Monday, October 11, 2010

Child Rearing Dilemma: Whether to Stone or Spank Rebellious Kiddies


Armstrongites always love to boast that they take the Bible literally.  The fact is they don't.  They lie when they say they do.  They pick and choose what they want to do when they want to do it.  One year it may mean one thing and the next it is ignored or fluffed off as not relevant.





GTA taught that beating kids was a good thing. Flurry and Meredith also want their members to spank their kids.  Meredith in particular, gets off on the spanking bit.  When he brags at a feast site several years a go about spanking his current wife, you know something is not quit right in that mind of his.



Today Six Pack Flurry has a post on his Philadelphia Trumpet web site about child discipline. After doing the typical Armstrongite proof-texting of using old testament angry go scenarios he makes the following comment:

"Follow God’s example. Be clear about the rules. Speak only once, and expect your children to obey. Pay attention—and when they deviate off course, don’t make excuses for them. Be consistent about applying the necessary discipline." (Armstrongism translation:  "Beat your child when it disobeys") Speak Only Once

Six Pack has also had this to say:

". . . We have always understood in the Church of God, in respect of correcting child behavior, that this means a light instrument which stings when applied but does no physical damage. Mrs. Armstrong used the table-tennis paddle as an example of an implement which will do no harm to a child when applied with care and in love. But even that should never be used till the infant is around two or three years of age. Light, stinging taps first with fingers on the backside of an infant, then, as the child grows, carefully, with the hand, should suffice till then."
"Lesson number one is, teach the child GOVERNMENT! That's where it starts. Who's boss around here? Up to the second or third month, the infant gets what he wants usually when he's good and ready to get it, by simply demanding it! But, comes the time he demands, doesn't get, and reacts angrily! Generally, parents should be able to determine an angry baby's cry. It's time for baby to learn that angry demands are not acceptable."
Royal Vision May/June 2000

ESN had this comment about Sx Packs child rearing techniques:

One former PCG member (12-20-03) described to the police authorities how some congregations in PCG have engaged in so called "screaming sessions" at children. This involves taking a child (who has misbehaved or presumably done something wrong), along with gathering a number of members together, and then sitting the child on a chair in the middle of the room and screaming and yelling at the child for a long period of time. Sometimes these sessions go on for so long that some of the adults have to take a break and then go back to continue it. This is a technique that abusive, totalistic groups have used and is very damaging to any child!



If old Six Pack had his way, his churchs' teachings for methods of child discipline would fall under the arms of the Reconstructionists/Dominionists.

Reconstructionists/Dominionist sincerely preach that stoning of children, gays, adulterers, fornicators, etc is the way to go.

BIBLE REQUIRES DEATH BY STONING FOR 'REBELLIOUS' TEENAGERS, SAYS PA. PREACHER

Mercersburg Activist Insists Bible Mandates Execution


The Bible mandates death by stoning for rebellious teenagers, according to a Pennsylvania preacher and Religious Right activist.


The Rev. William O. Einwechter's article, "Stoning Disobedient Children," appeared in the January issue of Chalcedon Report, a monthly journal published by the Chalcedon Foundation in Vallecito, Calif.


In the article, Einwechter cites Deuteronomy 21:18-21, which advises parents to take "a stubborn and rebellious son" before city elders to be stoned to death if he will not change his ways.


Einwechter's viewpoint drew criticism from church-state separationists.
"Rev. Einwechter reminds us all of why we need a clear separation between religion and government," said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group. "I doubt if most Americans think we should turn America into a fundamentalist Christian version of Iran."
Einwechter says the death penalty should be applied to "a grown son (and by extension to a daughter as well) who, for whatever reason, has rebelled against the authority of his parents and will not profit from any of their discipline nor obey their voice in any thing."
Writes Einwechter, "[T]he execution of the rebel in view is just, merciful, and preventive. Just, in that the transgressor deserves to die; merciful, in that his quick death prevents the destruction of the family, society, and others; preventive, in that it strikes fear in the heart of other would-be rebels and restrains them from taking a similar ruinous course."
The Chalcedon Report is the leading publication of the "Christian Reconstructionist" movement, the most extreme contingent of the Religious Right. Reconstructionists reject democracy and believe Christians should take "dominion" over American society. Under their version of "biblical law," the death penalty would be required for over a dozen offenses, including adultery, homosexuality, witchcraft and spreading "false" religions.
Although the movement's numbers are relatively small, its ideas have often filtered into other Religious Right groups.
Einwechter, a Mercersburg, Pa., resident, is vice-moderator of the Association of Free Reformed Churches. He also serves as vice president of the National Reform Association, a Pittsburgh-based group that advocates Christianity in government.

For decades we had some numbnuts in Pasadena who actually believed this type of 'child rearing'.  They looked forward to the day when the 'kingdom' would get here and they could do this.  It was going to be their job and the job of the church (OCG) to root out evil in the people.  The best way to root out evil was to kill the person.  God did it so why shouldn't they!

Meredithism and Six-Pack Flurryism get rather giddy when it comes to spanking.  They both seem to get off on corporal punishment.  Of course they get off on it because their little god they find in the Old Testament gets off on killing rebellious people. That's they god they identify with.


Here is The Brick Testament's version of the story:



1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"This involves taking a child (who has misbehaved or presumably done something wrong), along with gathering a number of members together, and then sitting the child on a chair in the middle of the room and screaming and yelling at the child for a long period of time."

WHAT? The bleeding F$#K? Time was, the congregations were worried if the kids were heard screaming, as we got our bottoms paddled! How...what...in what universe...where...I can't even, that's just....I'm speechless, I really am. If they're "holding fast to the truth once delivered", where in the ever-loving HELL did they get these "screaming" sessions from?? That sounds like something more out of a therapy cult, not from the Church archives!!!

Not far off, when they call them Branch Davidians, IMO.