UCG just wrapped up their fancy little member survey about programs and the oh-so-fulfilling congregational experience they provide. Shockingly, members are still finding those same old repetitive, tired, canned sermons they've been force-fed for decades to be boring and utterly lacking in depth. What a surprise. They had this golden opportunity to reinvent everything when they launched their shiny new-and-improved COG, but apparently, old habits die harder than a bad sermon illustration.
At the same time, several themes emerged where members see opportunities for improvement:
- Congregational care and belonging show mixed results. Many feel loved and supported, while others feel less engaged or unsure how to connect.
- Biblical resources are valued, but some members desire more support during difficult personal trials.
- Weekly messages are appreciated but sometimes described as repetitive or lacking depth; there is room to elevate the delivery style and effectiveness of messages.
- Service and involvement remain areas of both strength and challenge. Many serve regularly, yet others want to serve but don’t know how to begin.
- Being a light in the community is an aspiration for many, but members desire clearer pathways and encouragement to do so.
UCG is still dragging around the exact same problem WCG had: the same handful of people do everything repeatedly while everyone else gets ignored. Offer to help? Crickets. No wonder people eventually withdraw.
When people withdraw, surprise—they get ignored even more, leading to charming responses like this. Cliques still reign supreme. The minister's inner circle of chosen pets still rule the roost, leaving the rest of the members on the periphery.Some described congregations where the same small group carries most of the responsibilities. Others noted that service is often associated only with visible tasks—speaking, leading music, organizing activities—rather than the broader, relational service Scripture describes.
A recurring theme was the longing to feel invited. Several comments reflected this sentiment: “I don’t feel like the Church gives me an opportunity to serve; I step out on my own and offer myself to anyone who needs it” and “There are brethren with talents who want to serve, but they are never asked.”
At the same time, those who have been serving for many years expressed feeling stretched thin. This creates a cycle where some are overloaded while others stand back, unsure how to join in.
UCG members apparently still have this crazy desire for deep spiritual conversations that aren't being met. In Armstrongism, this is hardly breaking news. Deep, meaningful spiritual conversations were never exactly encouraged. Members weren't supposed to gather in homes for honest discussion without a minister playing babysitter. The second a minister walks in, the real talk dies, honest questions get stifled, and everyone snaps back to script. Imagine a group doing a Bible study together without a single minister or official literature in sight—pure chaos, right?A large majority of respondents feel cared for and treated with Christian love in their congregations. Many described their local church as “family,” a refuge, and a source of strength.
Yet the comments also reveal a quieter reality: some members feel overlooked, lonely, or unsure how to break into established social circles. A number of respondents used words like “cliques,” “inner circle,” or “outsider” to describe their experience.
One comment captured this poignantly: “I have been here almost two years and only a few people even know my name.”
...many respondents expressed a desire for:
- Practical guidance for Christian living in a rapidly changing world
- More opportunities for meaningful spiritual conversations
Armstrongism has never been big on putting faith into action in our multicultural world. The world was always seen as sinful and out to "get" COG members. The ministry and leadership apparently thought members were so feeble-minded they'd bolt at the first exposure. You rarely saw a COG member volunteering at a homeless shelter or food bank—too risky.Some noted that fellowship can feel superficial, with members unsure how to discuss biblical topics or navigate differences of opinion peacefully. This is an area where congregations can continue to grow— creating environments where spiritual conversations feel natural, safe and enriching.
Members expressed a strong desire to be more active in their communities and to shine God’s light beyond the walls of the church. Younger adults in particular expressed interest in service projects, outreach and opportunities to work together in meaningful ways.
Many respondents noted that while personal example is important, coordinated congregational efforts could help members feel more confident and connected in this aspect of the Church’s mission.
The survey ended with this:
Sadly, for most of the church's existence, members have been viewed as little more than tithing units. Brethren, we need a new jet. We need a new auditorium. We need a college campus. We need new recording studios. We need a new magazine. We need a new web server.This year’s survey paints a picture of a deeply valued Church, but one with opportunities to grow stronger, be more connected and more welcoming.
The most consistent message across all comments is simple: people want to feel included. They want to serve. They want to belong. They want to grow. They want to feel wanted. And they want to help others grow.
These are not tasks assigned to a few—they are responsibilities shared by all of us. Each of us has the ability to notice someone standing alone, to invite someone into a conversation, to ask someone to help, or to offer help themselves. Service is not a checklist; it is a way of being with one another.
Members soon found out that no matter how much they gave, it was never enough. They thought they were serving. They thought that by serving, they belonged to something bigger than themselves. They wanted to feel wanted for more than their money. Sadly, the church has never looked at them as being needed. Most COG groups count their "members" as tithing units. Those are the real members; the rest are just stragglers mooching off the community.
Imagine, if you can, what today’s Churches of God would be like if they actually practiced 1st Century Christianity as they all claim to do. What a different world we would be living in.

They are also too impacted by the politics of America. It can be a poison.
ReplyDeleteIf sermon time is reduced to two minutes, it will be less repetitive. Or just stay home.
ReplyDeletePeople are a mess.
ReplyDeleteMember surveys. Genuine or simply window dressing. And giving the impression that something is being done why actually doing nothing. The old two steps forward and three steps backward lol. While the weightier matters are neglected, like the theology underlying the Armstrong movement, i:e BI etc etc. This survey will surely provide no change. For that may lead to a greater call for theological freedom from the Armstrong underpinnings. And endanger the already limited income for the ministry. Nothing to see here unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteThey need to hire Pack to keep them on the edge of their seats with constant date setting.
ReplyDeletePervbert would be proud of them if could see them now.
ReplyDeleteWere he here he would be screaming out shaking his head and raising his voice and shaking his jowels and fists to warn the end is near and so is Petra, and that he has personal contacts in Jordan to ensure it all goes ahead.
DeleteI don't believe they can do anything to resolve this. When I read the works of Josephus years ago, one of the characteristics of his biographical summaries of historical figures was that it was almost high praise for him to state, "He made no innovations." In other words, per Josephus, goodness was defined by being static, as opposed to dynamic.
ReplyDeleteWhen you think of Armstrongites, what is their ideal world view-defining example? There are two basic main ones: 1) The time of Moses, and 2) The first century of Christianity. Armstrongites do not believe in the continued evolution of humans. They believe, instead, in degeneration with time. Unless some authority figure guides people compulsively and carefully, the human condition will worsen with time. That is a root paradigm for them. So one hears cliches such as "Recapture true values." "Tell the old, old story". "The faith once delivered." The effect is automatic. An organism which ceases to grow is in the process of dying. Hence, no innovation= no growth. Of course the sermons and practices will remain exactly as Herbert set in motion, and anything new which comes along is not new, it is automatically suspicious, and most likely the result of degeneracy. The approved pattern is to do the same things over and over again each and every day of your life. Don't look for new truth, look for greater depth to the old ones. Just don't get too original with that, because your vanity expressing itself in that way will get you into deep trouble!
This stagnant, "dead pool" approach to spirituality is not unique to the followers of Herbert W. Armstrong. To an extent, any group which believes they have arrived at "truth", and are the sole arbiters therof, will eventually lapse into this same pattern. It all becomes stale, and people whose questions accumulate will leave in search of answers.
As for this survey, what might the ministers really conclude? You can almost hear them whispering in unison, "Why, look at this! The liberals are trying to take over God's Church! This survey proves it!"
BB
In my ten year stay in the WWCG, I spent dozens of hours driving church members around in my car. When I had a car accident and needed a lift to services, members were offended that I so much as asked for a lift. The point in the article that only a few carry the church is very true. The constant serving talk in these groups is very misleading since most members are getters rather than givers. Plus, a minister can at whim throw a member out of the church, robbing that person of friendships developed over a decade or more. Based on a risk - benefit accounting, attending church isn't worth it.
ReplyDeleteAnd not forgetting, during my stay, it became obvious that some only attended services because it gave them access to members that they could exploit.