Herbert Armstrong's Tangled Web of Corrupt Leaders

Sunday, September 20, 2026

Once for All: How Hebrews Ends the Day of Atonement



The Day of Atonement is here and various COG groups fast this day beleiving it is still required, but it is not a New Covenant command. The New Covenant does not demand fasting on this specific day or treat it as a binding annual ritual. Armstrongist groups continue the practice because it is central to their identity as keepers of "God's festivals," and in high-control settings it functions as one element of a larger legalistic system of required observances, financial demands, and loyalty tests.

Old Covenant ritual vs. New Covenant fulfillment

The Day of Atonement is detailed in Leviticus 16 and 23:26-32. It involved the high priest entering the Holy of Holies once a year with blood, two goats (one sacrificed, one sent away as the scapegoat), and the command to "afflict your souls," which later Jewish practice understood as a complete fast. It was the most solemn day of the Mosaic calendar. 

The New Testament treats this as a shadow fulfilled in Christ. Hebrews 9-10 is explicit: the annual ritual could never take away sins; Christ entered the true heavenly sanctuary once for all with His own blood and sat down, ending the need for repeated offerings. "Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin" (Hebrews 10:18). The tearing of the temple veil at Jesus' death further signals the end of restricted access that the Day of Atonement ritual represented. 

Colossians 2:16-17 groups festivals, new moons, and Sabbaths together as "a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ." The consistent mainstream Christian reading is that these calendar observances are no longer binding. Romans 14 and Galatians 4:8-11 likewise warn against making days a matter of obligation or judgment. 

Acts 27:9 mentions "the Fast" only as a seasonal time marker for dangerous sailing weather. Luke uses a well-known Jewish term for dating; it does not constitute a command that Gentile or Jewish Christians must keep the day. The early church fasted for specific purposes (commissioning workers, appointing elders), not as an annual atonement ritual.
 
Fasting under the New Covenant

Fasting appears in the New Testament as a voluntary discipline, not a mandated calendar event. Jesus assumes His followers will fast ("when you fast," Matthew 6:16-18) and predicts they will after He is taken away (Matthew 9:15), but He gives no required days, durations, or connection to the Day of Atonement. The only Torah-commanded fast was the Day of Atonement. Once that system is fulfilled, fasting is a matter of personal or congregational liberty for prayer and seeking God, not a requirement for atonement or covenant standing. 

Armstrongist groups (United Church of God, Living Church of God, Philadelphia Church of God, and others that retain Herbert W. Armstrong's teachings) disagree. They argue Leviticus 23 remains binding, the rituals of Leviticus 16 are fulfilled but the day itself is not, and Acts 27:9 proves the early church kept it. They treat the 24-hour complete fast as an enduring command that pictures both Christ's work and the future binding of Satan. 

How the practice functions in Armstrongism

Herbert W. Armstrong taught that true Christians must observe the seventh-day Sabbath and the annual holy days of Leviticus 23, including a full fast on Atonement as a precurser to the Feast of Tabernacles. These days were presented as pictures of God's plan of salvation and as tests of obedience. Failure to keep them marked someone as outside "God's church." This was paired with British Israelism, a hierarchical "government of God" through the ministry, rejection of the Trinity, and a multi-tithe system (first tithe to the church, second tithe for holy-day expenses and travel, third tithe every third year, plus extra offerings). The original Worldwide Church of God after Armstrong's 1986 death rejected these requirements and moved toward evangelical Protestantism (now Grace Communion International). Numerous splinter groups did not. In those groups the holy days, including Atonement, serve several practical functions:

They create a distinct identity separate from "apostate" mainstream Christianity.
They require time off work, travel to designated sites (especially the Feast of Tabernacles), and extra expense-reinforcing dependence on the organization.
The complete fast on Atonement is framed as humility and "afflicting the soul," which can be used to measure submission.

Combined with disfellowshipment threats, warnings about the unpardonable sin for questioning leadership, and the claim that only this remnant has the full truth, the observances become loyalty markers. 

Former members and critics have documented authoritarian structures, financial pressure, isolation from family who do not keep the days, and fear-based control. Not every congregation or individual minister operates the same way, and some members experience the days as meaningful worship. The pattern across many Armstrongist groups, however, is that required calendar observance plus exclusive claims plus top-down government produces high-demand religion rather than the liberty described in the New Testament. The New Covenant centers on Christ's finished work, the law written on the heart, and freedom from the ceremonial shadows. Treating an Old Covenant fast day as a continuing command for Christians reverses that order.

New Covenant Christians do not need to observe the Day of Atonement as a required practice. 

The annual ritual, including its commanded fast, belonged to the Old Covenant system that pointed forward to Christ. Once the reality arrived, the shadow no longer binds the people of God.

1. The New Covenant replaces the old sacrificial system. Jeremiah 31:31-34 promised a new covenant in which God would write His law on hearts and remember sins no more. Hebrews 8 quotes that promise and declares the first covenant obsolete. The Day of Atonement was the high point of the old system: one day each year the high priest entered the Most Holy Place with animal blood to cover the nation's sins. That covering was temporary and repeated. The New Covenant is built on a better priesthood, a better sacrifice, and a better promise. Christians live under the new arrangement, not the old one. 

2. Christ's single sacrifice ended the need for annual atonement. Hebrews 9-10 is the clearest New Testament commentary on the Day of Atonement. The high priest entered the earthly sanctuary every year "not without blood." Christ entered the true heavenly sanctuary once for all with His own blood and obtained eternal redemption. "He has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." Because forgiveness has been secured, "there is no longer any offering for sin." Repeating an atonement ritual would imply that Christ's work was incomplete. New Covenant Christians rest in a finished work, not an annual reenactment. 

3. The holy days were shadows; Christ is the substance. Colossians 2:16-17 groups festivals, new moons, and Sabbaths together and calls them "a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ." The Day of Atonement pictured two things: the removal of guilt and the removal of the source of sin. Both are fulfilled in Jesus-the sacrifice and the scapegoat. Once the substance has come, insisting on the shadow as a requirement reverses the order of revelation. Believers are not to be judged regarding these days because the days themselves no longer function as covenant obligations. 

4. The New Testament never commands the church to keep the dayJesus observed the Mosaic calendar during His earthly ministry because He was born under the law. After His death and resurrection, the apostolic letters contain no instruction that Gentile or Jewish Christians must fast on the tenth day of the seventh month. Acts 27:9 mentions "the Fast" only as a calendar reference for the season. The early church fasted for specific ministry decisions, not as an annual atonement rite. The absence of any command is decisive: what God requires under the New Covenant He states plainly. He does not. 

5. Atonement is something Christ did, not something Christians repeat. Under the old covenant, the people "did" atonement by fasting, resting, and participating in the priestly ritual. Under the New Covenant, atonement is an accomplished fact. God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself. Believers receive that reconciliation by faith; they do not re-perform it each autumn. To treat the Day of Atonement as a continuing duty is to treat Christ's once-for-all offering as insufficient. The proper New Covenant response is gratitude, repentance as a way of life, and confidence of access to God at any time-not a 24-hour fast on a particular calendar date.

6. Fasting remains a liberty, not a law. Jesus assumed His disciples would fast, and the early church did so on occasion. That practice is voluntary and situational. It is never tied in the New Testament to the Day of Atonement or presented as a requirement for remaining in covenant standing. New Covenant Christians may choose to fast on any day, including the traditional date of Yom Kippur, as a personal act of devotion. They are not required to do so, and they are not more spiritual for doing so. Compelling the fast turns a gift of grace into a work of law.

7. The result is freedom, not neglect of holiness. Refusing to keep the Day of Atonement as a command is not antinomianism. It is fidelity to the New Covenant. Holiness now flows from the Spirit writing God's moral will on the heart, from ongoing confession of sin, and from looking to the finished work of the cross. Christians remember Christ's atonement every time they take the Lord's Supper, preach the gospel, or live in the good of forgiveness. They do not need an annual ritual to make that atonement effective again.

The old covenant Day of Atonement was a gracious provision for its time. The New Covenant has something better: a High Priest who sat down because the work was done. New Covenant Christians therefore do not need to "do atonement." They receive it.

Silent Pilgrim

23 comments:

  1. Livable. Sustainable. Happiness possible. You nailed it, SP. I don't believe God intended us to be ascetics. That is not the abundant life spoken of in the New Testament. On the other hand, neither did He intend for us to be Epicureans or hedonists. The narrow path is the small band of balance between the two.

    HWA did know a certain amount about human nature. If you are ever in desperate need of help, you are unlikely to get it from wealthy, "important" people. It is the downtrodden, the needy who understand desperation who will usually pitch in and help you. That is what he built his church from. People who, by their circumstances were already living an ascetic lifestyle. And, they were easily exploited. They readily accepted the concept of deferred reward.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is basic arithmetic "REQUIRED" knowledge for understanding Algebra, Trigonometry, or Calculus? Yet, how many of the rank and file Christian believers in the scattered Christian church of 45,000 denominations really know anything about the day of Atonement, or even the concept of "reconciliation" for that matter? Would you not have to have a simple elementary understanding of it to even grasp Paul's explanation in Hebrews 8-10? I would think so.

    Yes, the new covenant is better. Yes, the holydays are shadows (form) and Christ is the substance. Yes, the holydays are about and point directly to Jesus Christ, which is why we read in 2 Timothy 3 that "all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is PROFITABLE FOR INSTRUCTION IN RIGHTEOUSNESS (when framed through) faith which is in Christ Jesus" (verses 15-17).

    No, I no longer fast on Atonement, but in consideration of the principle "meat in due season", I do take time out on the day to refresh myself as to what the day means and why God established it in the first place. Why? Because I'm under no delusion that I already know it all merely because I'm a new covenant convert.

    For believers, Scripture offers both milk for babes and strong meat for the mature. They are not the same thing, but both have their place, if we are willing to acknowledge it, recognize its worth, and use it accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some day the eisegetes will come to understand only the church should do the judging - 2Col 1:18; 2:16-17.

    The fast-Acts 27:9 was probably in the 10th month - Zech 8:19; Acts 27:12 since much traveling was done in the 7th month to/from feasts including over water.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The only result of fasting is that it makes us hungry. Fasting is supposed to help us focus exclusively on God. When I fasted in the WCG the only thing I could focus on was how much time it was until sunset so I could eat again! Lets be honest didn't we all look forward to eating again after hours of not eating? How many of us really benefited spiritually from fasting?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have mixed emotions on that, 11:25. I actually feel as if I eventually got past just the hunger aspects of it all. I found that keeping a journal while fasting helped me with that. I don't know that it is possible to focus entirely on God during a fast, but moreso the relationship, and our part of that relationship. The longest I ever went without food and water was 48 hours, and I knew some who went well beyond that. I did study the Bible directly, but in retrospect, ruined my fast by also heavily studying the Armstrong written materials and earlier sermon notes, much of which was Old Testament-based. That did not leave much room for personalized inspiration from God.

      This is an aspect of the Armstrongism of my past that I do not regret. I believe it became part of a gladiator's skillset or mentality and established a discipline which I could apply when things needed to be accomplished, and that the ability to forego taking the time to eat or drink helped to fulfill obligations in a compressed time frame. Even today, I will work until 9:30 or 10 PM at a customer location, not having eaten lunch or dinner, so it's actually an advantage even if it had been learned as part of a failed religious philosophy. In other words, I don't see every single aspect of the HWAcaca to have been a net waste or lasting disadvantage. Learning the extremely austere money management skills which were a by product of the distorted form of Old Testament tithing we practiced has also been a very beneficial life survival skill as well. But, the nuggets were right there mixed in with the load of crap which was also forced upon us. Was our experience net negative? My experience was that yes it was! But there were some nuggets in there too!

      BB

      Delete
  5. Here we are, right before God's sacred Holy Days and Satan is attacking with all his might! Will you stand fast against his snares?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what you mean by this anon 2:42:57……. Did you read the post?
      Or Acts 15 or Romans Galatians…….it is the believers who are justified from what the Law could never do. As we read of Abraham who was declared righteous because he believed God, and that before Sinai and while uncircumcised…….

      Delete
    2. It could be Jesus knocking on your door, 2:42! You don't want to be like the guy who drowned in a flood while praying, who, when resurrected asked God why He didn't save him. God smiled and told him "My son, I sent a police car, a boat and a helicopter for you and you ignored them and just kept praying!" 😇

      Delete
    3. Try being in their congregation 2:42.

      Delete
  6. So then does Satan dial down his attacks on non holy days and ramp them up on holy days?

    ReplyDelete
  7. On Holy Days Satan attacks from his favorite position -- the pulpit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If that is your opinion then why don't you leave ?

      Delete
  8. Silent Pilgrim writes:

    The New Covenant replaces the old sacrificial system. Jeremiah 31:31-34...

    No it doesn’t.

    Jer 30:3 For, lo, the days come, saith the LORD, that I WILL BRING AGAIN [SUB] THE CAPTIVITY [SEBUT] OF MY PEOPLE ISRAEL AND JUDAH, saith the LORD: and I will cause them to return [sub] to the land that I gave to their fathers, and they shall possess it.

    Jer 33:26 then I also will reject the seed of Jacob, and My servant David, not to take of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. FOR I WILL BRING BACK [SUB] THEIR CAPTIVITY [SEBUT], and have pity on them. (IHGEB).

    Jeremiah 31 is in what is often called the ‘longer’ “Book of Comfort,” comprising chapters 30-33, based on the above inclusio. So that when discussing the “new covenant” prophecy in Jeremiah, chapter 33 complements chapter 31 and also provides context.

    Jer 31:31 BEHOLD, THE DAYS COME, SAITH THE LORD, “when I will cut [karat] a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah,

    Jer 31:35 THUS SAITH THE LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
    Jer 31:36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.

    Jer 33:14 BEHOLD, THE DAYS COME, SAITH THE LORD, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised unto the house of Israel and to the house of Judah.

    Jer 33:17 FOR THUS SAITH THE LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel;
    Jer 33:18 AND THE LEVITICAL PRIESTS SHALL NOT HAVE A MAN CUT OFF [KARAT]] FROM BEFORE ME WHO IS TO OFFER BURNT OFFERINGS, TO OFFER UP GRAIN OFFERINGS IN SMOKE, AND TO PERFORM SACRIFICES CONTINUALLY.’”

    Jer 33:20 THUS SAITH THE LORD; if ye can break my covenant of the day, and my covenant of the night, and that there should not be day and night in their season;
    Jer 33:21 Then may also my covenant be broken with David my servant, that he should not have a son to reign upon his throne; and with the Levites the priests, my ministers.

    One will notice that the Hebrew of Jeremiah 31:31a and 33:14a and the citation formulas of 31:35aa1 and 33:20a are exactly the same.

    A citation formula “functions exactly like modern quotation marks, signaling to the audience that the words following it are a DIRECT QUOTE FROM GOD rather than the speaker's own words. (AI).

    In Jeremiah 33:18 God promises that in days to come, the Messianic Age of the New Covenant with Israel and Judah, the Levitical priests will be offering “sacrifices continually”.

    Following the citation formula of 33:20 the LORD guarantees the reliability and permanence of His promises to David and the Levitical priests. Only if day and night did not function at the proper time would the covenant with David and the Levitcal priests fail. In the same way that if day and night did not function at the proper time then Israel will fail to be a nation before God (Jer 31: 35-36).

    Silent Pilgrim quotes "there is no longer any offering for sin."


    Eze 46:20 Then said he unto me, This is the place where the priests shall boil the trespass offering and the sin offering,

    I would suggest that the author of Hebrews would be horrified that someone is claiming that there is no more animal sacrifices required for sin based on Hebrews 10:18 - that is no more sacrifices for the cleansing of the flesh.

    He could respond with “Why are you contradicting the LORD’s OT promises? Don’t you believe what the LORD promises and guarantees? Don’t you understand the nuance in Hebraic argument? Have you not read Jeremiah 33:14-26 and the Ezekielian Torah of 44-46? :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Silent Pilgrim writes:

    “Christ's single sacrifice ended the need for annual atonement.”

    No it didn’t.

    Eze 45:17 It will be the duty of the prince to provide the burnt offerings, grain offerings and drink offerings at the festivals, the New Moons and the Sabbaths—at all the appointed feasts of the house of Israel. He will provide the SIN OFFERINGS, grain offerings, burnt offerings and FELLOWSHIP OFFERINGS to MAKE ATONEMENT for the house of Israel.

    "It is evident from these lists that in Ezekiel's new order sin [and ritual impurity] will continue to be a problem for the nation. As he had done through Moses, however, through this prophet Yahweh reveals his magnanimous provision for FORGIVENESS and FELLOWSHIP with him" (Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel Chapters 25-48, p.659-60).

    Ps 110:4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

    In my previous post I quoted God’s promise to Jeremiah that David would not want for a man to sit on the throne of Israel. The king of Israel is both king, and a priest after the order of Melchizedek. The “prince,” that is the Davidic king, of Eze 45:17 will fulfill his role priestly role.

    Eze 45:18 Thus says the Lord YHWH: ‘in the FIRST MONTH, on the first of the month, you shall take a bull, a son of the herd, unblemished, and you shall cleanse from sin the sanctuary.
    Eze 45:19 And the priest is to take some of the blood from the sin offering and put it on the DOORPOSTS of the temple, on the FOUR CORNERS OF THE LEDGE of the altar, and on the GATEPOSTS of the inner court.
    Eze 45:20 And so you shall do on the seventh of the month, for each man who errs and is ignorant, and you will MAKE ATONEMENT for the temple.

    Lev 23:27 Also on the tenth day of this SEVENTH MONTH there shall be a day of atonement:
    Lev 16:33 And he shall make atonement upon the SANCTUARY OF HOLINESS and the TENT OF MEETING; and he shall make atonement upon the ALTAR [of burnt offering]; and he shall make atonement upon the priests and upon all the people of the assembly.

    “Ezekiel's program is a revision - and up-dating and a rectification - of selected topics of existent priestly legislation and practice very similar to, if not identical with, that of the Pentateuch..." (Moshe Greenberg, "The Design and Themes of Ezekiel's Program of Restoration," p.235).

    The annual day of atonement under the OC was on one day in the seventh month. In the coming NC, with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, annual atonement will occur over two days in the first month. There is also a change in the three locations where the blood is applied.

    "... vv 18-20, announces an annual ritual of decontaminating the inner sanctuary area... it is a counterpart of P's great day of Atonement ceremony in Lev 16, but here the rite takes place in the spring, at the start of the year. As there, the blood of the sin offering [better “purification offering” has the function of bringing about the regular decontamination of the sanctuary from the accumulation of past sins that had a polluting effect upon it (cf. Lev 16:19 "... sanctify it from the impurities of the people of Israel")..." (Leslie C. Allen, Ezekiel 20-48, WBC, p.266).

    The temple and the altar are contaminated when certain sins are committed and severe ritual purity contracted; that is, in these cases, sin and ritual impurity generate impurities that automatically attach to sancta.

    Eze 43:4a And the glory of the LORD came into the house
    Eze 43:7a And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever,

    The LORD in the “principal” perspective is Yahweh God but in the “agency” perspective it is Yahweh Jesus.

    To maintain Jesus’ ‘dwelling presence’ in the NC Temple it, the temple will need to be cleansed annually. If not, impurities generated by certain sins and severe ritual impurity will so accumulate that they will force Him out.

    No Purification Offering - No Jesus - No Covenant

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 7:43:02 ……’To maintain Jesus’ ‘dwelling presence’ in the NC Temple it, the temple will need to be cleansed annually. If not, the impurities generated by certain sins and severe ritual impurity will so accumulate that they will force Him out……well no it doesn’t, but did you actually read the post by Silent Pilgrim? You negate the sacrifice of Jesus Christ who shed His blood ONCE for us all, for all time and brought in a better covenant with better promises…

      Delete
    2. "“Christ's single sacrifice ended the need for annual atonement.”

      No it didn’t."

      SP is correct. There will NOT be another sacrifice. There is only one crucifixion and resurrection. There will be no more atonements. It has already happened. What we do however, is celebrate the memorial of Christs redemptive work, not recreate a new sacrifice in some kingdom to come.

      Delete
  10. Silent Pilgrim and Dennis Diehl are a like a wrestling team. Their stage name is The Crown Stealers.
    No holy day keeping = no salvation.
    Those are the rules.
    A simple prayer request by the sincere will settle the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Fine post here SP. Yes He by His sacrifice once and for all time, atoned for our sins as Hebrews so plainly tells us. I have family in Israel in Ashdod and Jerusalem. Yom Kippur is a day of rituals, traditions, what to wear what not to wear, even the colour of one’s clothes, what one wears on one’s feet, the times of day and the services during said day. For them it is as above and of course in the synagogues globally, besides fasting. Jesus simplified it for one and all, for all time, did what the Law could never do, and I yearn for the time when family and all Israel are free from the burdens laid on them by these traditions which have blinded them to where our atonement truely lays. As SP points out the new covenant is rather clear.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The holy days, including the weekly Sabbath, keeps Christians anchored to sound principles and pointed in the right direction. The pre flood generation didn't do this, and look how that worked out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neither did the post flood generation. Look how that worked out. Thus, the need for a new and better covenant. What is so difficult to understand about that? Do you really think that by keeping your little rituals you’ll gain salvation?

      Delete
    2. 9.03 AM, Did the post flood generation really keep the holy days? God rejected Israel's religious festivals in Amos 5:21 because the people practiced empty external rituals while ignoring basic morality, justice, and the poor. A similar sentiment is expressed in Isaiah 1:14–15, where God says the New Moons and appointed feasts are a burden and weary Him because their hands are full of bloodshed.
      And yes, I really think that by keeping my little rituals, I'II gain salvation. Thank you for asking.

      Delete
  13. One day you will understand what the New Covenant is.

    ReplyDelete