Exposing the underbelly of Armstrongism in all of its wacky glory! Nothing you read here is made up. What you read here is the up to date face of Herbert W Armstrong's legacy. It's the gritty and dirty behind the scenes look at Armstrongism as you have never seen it before!
With all the new crazy self-appointed Chief Overseers, Apostles, Prophets, Pharisees, legalists, and outright liars leading various Churches of God today, it is important to hold these agents of deception accountable.
Herbert Armstrong's Tangled Web of Corrupt Leaders
▼
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Dancing With Herbert W
Here's a new site with alots of information about Armstrongism.
While it's nice to have the ad hominum arguments about why Herbert Armstrong was wrong, it's far more important to have absolute irrefutible scientific and logical proof which cannot be disputed.
We have that. Armstrongism is dead. It is scientifically proved to be a fraud.
The Armstrongists can't deal with it and have to just ignore it.
They can handle and survive questionable speculation about such things as Mythra and the relationship of the Apostle Paul with the other Apostles of the New Testament, but there's no more absolute proof than any other long winded speculations which can either be accepted or rejected as fact because they are opinion.
DNA is not opinion. It is fact.
We have the proof.
The Armstrongists not only have nothing, they are deep in the black hole -- a deficit of understanding and they are completely bankrupt.
Fortunately, Armstrongists aren't scientific and they are bad at math, so they can excuse themselves to continue to believe what they believe (and yes, the moon made of green cheese is over the top, but it gets the message across).
It isn't clear that the Ads in "The Journal" will be accepted and published, but if they are, it should be interesting.
Yes, Douglas, I hope the ads will be accepted by the Journal! Here's why: Due to ministerial edicts, Armstrongites might be hesitant to do general research on the internet. Providing a specific address for them gets them where they need to be immediately,before there is any opportunity for guilt to sink in. Hopefully they will read, be edified, and enlightened, and begin to process!
I agree with you, ad hominem is simply seen as gossip, "blaspheming" their "apostle".
It would be really hypocritical of the Journal if they reject Douglas's ad, considering the various moonbats that have every kind of imaginable ad on there. UFO's anyone?
While it's nice to have the ad hominum arguments about why Herbert Armstrong was wrong, it's far more important to have absolute irrefutible scientific and logical proof which cannot be disputed.
ReplyDeleteWe have that. Armstrongism is dead. It is scientifically proved to be a fraud.
The Armstrongists can't deal with it and have to just ignore it.
They can handle and survive questionable speculation about such things as Mythra and the relationship of the Apostle Paul with the other Apostles of the New Testament, but there's no more absolute proof than any other long winded speculations which can either be accepted or rejected as fact because they are opinion.
DNA is not opinion. It is fact.
We have the proof.
The Armstrongists not only have nothing, they are deep in the black hole -- a deficit of understanding and they are completely bankrupt.
Fortunately, Armstrongists aren't scientific and they are bad at math, so they can excuse themselves to continue to believe what they believe (and yes, the moon made of green cheese is over the top, but it gets the message across).
It isn't clear that the Ads in "The Journal" will be accepted and published, but if they are, it should be interesting.
Yes, Douglas, I hope the ads will be accepted by the Journal! Here's why: Due to ministerial edicts, Armstrongites might be hesitant to do general research on the internet. Providing a specific address for them gets them where they need to be immediately,before there is any opportunity for guilt to sink in. Hopefully they will read, be edified, and enlightened, and begin to process!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, ad hominem is simply seen as gossip, "blaspheming" their "apostle".
BB
It would be really hypocritical of the Journal if they reject Douglas's ad, considering the various moonbats that have every kind of imaginable ad on there. UFO's anyone?
ReplyDelete