A former Worldwide Church of God member writes about
how it was growing up Black in the church.
In honor of Black History Month
Jerald Walker grew up believing the world would end when he was twelve. His parents—both blind—had joined the Worldwide Church of God at its height in the 1960s. The Church would later prove to be a fraud, its leader collecting hefty dues from its parishioners and using them to fund a lavish celebrity lifestyle. But before Jerald Walker understood this, he came of age believing that The Great Tribulation would transform him, his family, and all believers into gods, and that his parents’ sight would be restored, and so for years, the stringent rules and deprivations within the Worldwide Church of God seemed worth it. When the Great Tribulation did not come, and the family’s faith began to unravel, Walker was left with a life that had no order. The World in Flames: A Black Boyhood in a White Supremacist Doomsday Cult is the story of Walker’s childhood journey through believing, ending in the realization that he will now have to erect an understanding of life from the ground up.The World in Flames is as hilarious as it is harrowing. Walker’s accounts align so faithfully with his childhood point of view that the reader can see how he managed to believe that a dog bite was a direct punishment from God for wanting to celebrate Christmas, or that “integration”—something the Church forbade—was as bad a sin as “fornication.” And oh, yes, the Church preached slavery as ordained by God, and supported racial separation. How does the black Walker family make sense of that? The dissonance between what young Jerald understands, and what we know he understands later in life, creates instant comic friction.--------
Rumpus: Your childhood religion was the Worldwide Church of God. Can you tell readers unfamiliar with the Worldwide Church of God what it was all about? Is it still around?
Walker: The Worldwide Church of God was founded by a man named Herbert W. Armstrong in 1933. At the height of its success in the 1970s, it had a membership of over a hundred thousand and annual revenues of eighty million dollars, more than Billy Graham and Oral Roberts combined. Composed of a hodgepodge of religious beliefs, including Levitical dietary restrictions, the observance of “Holy Days,” literal Sabbath-keeping, and the rejection of medical treatment, the underpinning tenet was British-Israelism: the view that Western and Northern Europeans, as direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, was God’s chosen race. The membership was ruled by fear, intimidation, and threats, such as the assertion that anyone who dared leave the church would endure hardship for the remainder of this life, and eternal suffering in the next. And the next life, according to Armstrong, would arrive in 1975, three years after the start of The Great Tribulation.
When Armstrong died in 1986, leadership of the church fell to Joseph Tkach Jr., who began to move the church away from Armstrong’s teachings to mainstream Christianity. The name of the church was changed to Grace Communion International, and ultimately Armstrong was declared a “heretic” and “false prophet.” Needless to say, many members rejected these changes, and a dozen or so splinter groups formed, some of which adhere to Armstrong’s original teachings.
Rumpus: One thing that differentiates your experience from the experience of a childhood in some other extreme religious communities is that the reader gets hints throughout the book that this religion is not just restrictive and fear-inspiring, but might also be an enormous monetary scam. You and others who grew up within the church and later left it had to come to grips with reevaluating pretty much everything that had previously ordered your life, including the possibility that you and your entire family had been taken advantage of. What role did writing play, if any, in your process of understanding the world after your youth? When did you realize you would be a writer, and when did you realize you would write about your childhood in the form of memoir?
Walker: Writing helps me to understand most everything; in a very real sense it’s how I process my world. My view prior to writing the memoir was that my parents’ decision to join a church run by a con man was inexcusable, and I harbored a bitterness toward them about it that lasted for decades. And so when I began writing the book, I knew there was a real possibility that this bitterness would taint, if not largely shape, the narrative. But I also knew that something else could happen, because for me the process of writing is the process of thinking and learning, of acquiring knowledge more than dispensing it. I wasn’t entirely surprised, then, that by the time I’d completed the book, my bitterness toward my parents had given way to sympathy, understanding, and a deepened respect.
Though I’d been writing stories since I was a child, I didn’t realize I’d be a writer until I took a creative writing course in college. Fiction was my genre of choice, but my stories were always thinly-veiled works of autobiography. My MFA degree is in fiction writing, and for more than a decade after completing the program I continued to write fiction. It wasn’t until about ten years ago that I tried my hand at writing nonfiction, and I fell in love with the form, particularly the essay because it requires the writer to think on the page, which, as I noted, is my wont. I had no intention to write about the cult because I didn’t want to think deeply about it, to reopen those wounds. But the honest truth is that I’m a writer, and my experience in the cult is rich material. Sometimes you have to put the work first, even at a high emotional cost.
---------------------
The title of Jerald Walker’s new memoir “The World in Flames: A Black Boyhood in a White Supremacist Doomsday Cult” (Beacon) sounds like it was ripped from the front page of a supermarket tabloid. Yet this was his life growing up in Chicago in the 1960s and 1970s.
Walker, a writing professor at Emerson College, is one of seven children. Both his parents lost their sight in childhood accidents and Herbert W. Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God gave them hope that their sight might be restored and that they had been chosen for a better afterlife. Struggling to make ends meet, his parents sent tithes to Armstrong even when they needed the money for heat and food.
After “60 Minutes” aired an exposé of Armstrong and his lavish lifestyle, Walker and some of his siblings left the church. His parents did, too — for a while.
Walker will speak about the book at 7 p.m. Friday at Harvard Book Store in Cambridge.
“World in Flames” is Beacon Press’s first title to be simultaneously released as an audiobook. Boston Globe
When The World in Flames begins, in 1970, Jerry Walker is six years old. His consciousness revolves around being a member of a church whose beliefs he finds not only confusing but terrifying. Composed of a hodgepodge of requirements and restrictions (including a prohibition against doctors and hospitals), the underpinning tenet of Herbert W. Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God was that its members were divinely chosen and all others would soon perish in rivers of flames.
The substantial membership was ruled by fear, intimidation, and threats. Anyone who dared leave the church would endure hardship for the remainder of this life and eternal suffering in the next. The next life, according to Armstrong, would arrive in 1975, three years after the start of the Great Tribulation. Jerry would be eleven years old.
Jerry’s parents were particularly vulnerable to the promise of relief from the world’s hardships. When they joined the church, in 1960, they were living in a two-room apartment in a dangerous Chicago housing project with the first four of their seven children, and, most significantly, they both were blind, having lost their sight to childhood accidents. They took comfort in the belief that they had been chosen for a special afterlife, even if it meant following a religion with a white supremacist ideology and dutifully sending tithes to Armstrong, whose church boasted more than 100,000 members and more than $80 million in annual revenues at its height.
When the prophecy of the 1972 Great Tribulation does not materialize, Jerry is considerably less disappointed than relieved. When the 1975 end-time prophecy also fails, he finally begins to question his faith and imagine the possibility of choosing a destiny of his own. A World In Flames
His blind parents have my sympathy. Members were, and still are deliberately fed spiritual milk in order to keep them dependent on the churches ruling class. Much like the politicians and their government handouts.
ReplyDeleteBlacks and Whites will never agree on anything. They need to live in separate countries.
ReplyDeleteSome people seem strangely absent. Perhaps they are out rioting and looting and burning things down along with the communists. I question how many were ever converted. Joining a church to flee a disaster is not conversion. And their juvenile attitudes and life choices suggest they never grew up let alone converted.
ReplyDelete"Blacks and Whites will never agree on anything. They need to live in separate countries."
ReplyDeleteThat is called slavery but you are to dumb to see that!
DBP
For the racist commenters who condemn a man's personal experience and those condemning individuals who are protesting and striving for equality shame on you. You and your Jim Crow attitudes will be left behind on the dung heap of American history. Your confederate statutes are even now being brought down and your ideologies will come next. The future generations have no need for your hate. May it perish with you.
ReplyDelete"That is called slavery but you are to dumb to see that!
ReplyDeleteDBP"
If you're going to call someone dumb please use proper English. The correct phrase would be 'too dumb to see that'.
12.54 AM
ReplyDelete",,,Individuals who are protesting and striving for equality."
The looting is another case of mass delusion, which unfortunately is common in human history. It was philosopher Francis Bacon who pointed out that "thoughts are often the theatrical curtains to conceal personal passions and reactions."
The Confederate statues are being brought down, but those doing so agree with the policy of using 70% of the federal government budget to transfer wealth. And they want this figure to be higher. This policy has a name. Hint, Abraham Lincoln defined slavery as "you work, I eat."
Anonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete"Blacks and Whites will never agree on anything. They need to live in separate countries."
That is called slavery but you are to dumb to see that!
DBP
June 4, 2020 at 11:51 PM
That's pretty much what Lincoln said, and why he was planning on returning them to Africa.
I found the Navaho nation country to be a rather arid area. I could use a drink there, but I didnt see many restaurants until arriving at the Grand Canyon. Spent a bit too much time at "The valley of the Gods", but hey, I am a contrarian.
ReplyDeleteIs Lincoln being misquoted here?
I know some good meaning christia folk started liberia for that reason.
2 nations in one country is not slavery, thats called apartheid. Tge official system in the "golden age".
I saw southern ladies in "the beguiled" sing an Elvis song. I need to look up if that was sn anachronysm or a fact or both.
Nck
Lincoln expressed support for two plans for repopulation in his lifetime, one involving Liberia and one in the Caribbean. He discussed it freely in several letters.
DeleteHowever, at a later date he stopped making mention of it. By the time he toured Richmond after the war, he said "As for you, colored people, you are now free - and if any tell you you are not, take the sword and teach them that you are."
Thx RSK
DeleteMe thinks its hard for intelectuals running for public office, catering to the populace, intellectual integrity and political trickery to get things done in an environment if opposing views.
Liberia, caribean....... Sierra leone for the british.
Practicality and legal consistency.
Its nice to be here and learn more about the political leanings of davy crockett and lincoln at a time the rest of the world considered america as kinda upcoming bric type of developing nation, while dividing the spoils of the rest of the world and traumatizing China by breaking its back.
I love it.... Policy debate on the conduct of the Territories at a time when Zorro still terrorized the haves in California and Roy Bean proclaimed the law West of Pecos.
Regarding Founding Fathers, my personal interests center around the influence of the New York delegates, whose influence on the true definition of liberty is not so much known, since their influence drew from "silent" legal precedents rather than oratory skills.
I'm an advocate for the silent minority. (perhaps 1 constituent only, I know)
Nck
Nck
ReplyDeleteFrom Abraham Lincoln, The Lincoln-Douglas debate:
"It is the same spirit that says,"You toil and work and earn bread, and I'II eat it."
Happy now? BTW, there is a 1971 and a 1917 version of the beguiled movie.
Thank you very much 9:30
ReplyDeleteI will study the context and draw conclusions privately, regarding this astute lawyer.
I saw the "flimsy" but picturesque 2017.
Nck
Nck
ReplyDeleteThe article in Wikipedia makes a good read on the African Americans who moved to Liberia after the civil war. They practised segregation with the local Africans, and are accused of enslaving some indigenous tribes.
11:32
ReplyDeleteI know. I saw a special on the origins of hate. Both Bonobo and Chimpansee dna are 99 percent like humans. Bonobo are generally friendly cooperative and chimpansee can be very agressive towards all.
Bonobo evolved south of congo river with plenty of food available. Chimpansee evolved north of congo river, competing with other groups and species for ever.
Nck
I’m reminded of the Rat Pack where I would hear Frank Sinatra wouldn’t even perform at a place where they were mistreating Sammy Davis Jr. or if they didn’t allow him to stay in a place. There are some sports teams, that didn’t didn’t stay in a hotel if their black players couldn’t stay there. Others just didn’t fight it.
ReplyDeleteBecause the Feast were mainly held in the South, the racist and prejudice wouldn’t change. And when segregation ended, those ideals still were left in the minds and hearts of people like crumbs. See Armstrong also come out of Oregon, that state that wanted to be white only, as this influenced his ideology within religion. It wasn’t stamped out. You have the boomer generation that still have held on to it, I know because as a black man I have had to deal with them in one of those splinter groups.
Those leaders in the church had a wonderful opportunity to love their brother and be different from the world and practice what Paul spoke about in Galatians 3:28, but they couldn't . They could have said, “Okay well we are not staying at this feast site or this hotel.” We will go to some place else. They still don’t fully understand this principle. As they complain in sermons about Confederate statutes coming down. Again, I thought a statute with its twisted ideology is idolatry. As long as they keep the physical Israel doctrine, they will continue in the prejudice. Even though God has no respect of persons. And He searches the hearts and minds, He does not search the skin colors.
It just occurred to me that February can be an opportunity to have so much fun with the people who haven't shed their racism! Time to post a
ReplyDeleteshit ton of educational materials that gets the racists just 🔥seething, and then frustrate the hell out of them by blocking their filthy 🤮comments!!!
Could be the best opportunity this year to have some bodacious fun without sinning!
"Can your family afford to go to the Feast?" (We never missed one)
ReplyDelete"Are you bringing chicken to the potluck?" (WTH)
"Did you use to eat pig feet?" (No, I was born into the cult just like you.)
"You Gentiles..." (Boy I wish I could show them my DNA results now)
"Do you want my old..." (No, I have my own, thank you)
And of course the "do you do drugs".
However, once you hit teenagedom, suddenly the ministers' daughters took a great interest in you...
Personally, as a quasi-musician myself, I feel huge sense of gratitude to Charlie Christian, who was one of the first guitarists in a big band (Benny Goodman) to go electric, and to bring our favorite instrument from the rhythm section to the front of the band. He pioneered lead, note by note, guitar! Larry Graham of Sly and the Family Stone was also an innovator, having invented "slap bass". There's so much more history with musicians such Robert Johnson, and Elmore James. The Blues, and blues-based rock n roll has been the sound track for my life!
Delete"Suddenly, the minister's daughters took a great interest in you"
DeleteHopefully, they were a little rebellious and adventuresome.
Lets just say it was an, ahem, handle-with-extreme-caution situation.
DeleteSee Emmet Till.
DeleteShit! That was the scariest thing that I ever saw in media through my entire childhood! I don't remember what news magazine had the horrifying picture of Emmet Till's body on the cover, maybe it was Newsweek. Sometime back in 1955 or '56, my father had brought it home and was reading it, and set it down on the table. I would have been in second or third grade at the time. I asked him what happened to the man, and he explained to me what had been done to him, and why. He told me in no uncertain terms that people had done that to him solely because he was Black. We lived in the North, and I had no idea of some of the things that were happening in other parts of the country, lynchings and such. Elvis and Little Richard were just coming out and kind of overshadowed the Big Band music, and the pop on the radio, like Patty Page and Les Paul and Mary Ford, so it wasn't until much later that I learned of the Billie Holiday song "Strange Fruit". She had done that song in 1939, which was before my time.
ReplyDeleteIt became somewhat seared into the national consciousness because Tills mother insisted on an open casket funeral. Had she not done that, itd probably have been swept under the rug like so much else. He is only a very small part of the story.
DeleteLol, Elvis! He became a flashpoint in recent years when someone (Chuck D I think) wrote him off publicly as appropriating what was at the time "black music".
DeleteWhile I know where the speaker was coming from, I dont totally agree. Sure, maybe to a degree, but Elvis sounds to me like he "got it", at least in his early records. He didnt water it down for mass consumption. Pat Boone... ugh. He definitely did not get it. Oddly, I think the Stones and the Sex Pistols did a good job with it too... and theres nothing black about those boys!
All musicians have their influences. The problem is, at what point does influence segue into blatant cultural misappropriation? The problem with Boone was that he did whitened versions of Little Richard's songs, Fats Domino's songs, and others, and often ended up outselling the originals. Ripoff, big time. Richard said in interviews that he deliberately tried to do things with his voice that he knew Pat could never copy. I liked Bo Diddley, because he did such unique things with his highly modified and home made guitars, and used a lot more African rhythms in his music. Thank God I got to see Bo, Richard, and Chuck at some of the Richard Nader oldies shows in the early '70s. They still had it going on!
ReplyDeleteWell, especially in segregation days, it was particularly strange to have someone cross the aisle like that, I'm sure. What, we cant eat at the diner up the street but you're going to cash in on our entertainment?
Delete