Herbert Armstrong's Tangled Web of Corrupt Leaders

Sunday, December 31, 2023

This Blog Ends The Year With A Love Letter From A Reader

via GIPHY



Poor unfortunate is the one who publishes this Blog.
It is a stanic blog, full of ridicule and resentment.

How can they be so blind to see us beyond the tip of their nose?

The day will come when all your mockery will be silenced and the King of Kings will act and erase dark characters like you, owner of this site, a malicious and mocking blog, from the face of the earth. All these foolish words will remain there and your followers will be watered with horror, at that moment it will be crying and gnashing of teeth.

For now, continue doing your work of iniquity promoted by your mentor Satan, we are confident that not even with you working will the true work of God be silenced.




21 comments:

  1. A "stanic" blog? A blog obsessively devoted to its object of attention, its goal? What a nice compliment! That's obviously what the reader meant, since as a follower of HWA he must adhere to the famous "Ambassador quality" in all he does, and as a result would never publish a stupid typo or silly mistake.

    Thank you, NOHWA, for continuing to "stan" the Armstrong churches!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This gadfly has been around for years, and maintained a much higher profile at one time on Armstrong recovery sites. His, her, or it's comments have always been on the kooky side, and are by no means intellectual in any way.

    We used to say that most of the people who comment in support of Armstrongism appear to be dumb as a rock. Their comments often contain horrible grammar, they misspell even the most basic of words, and they don't know how to construct sentences or paragraphs. They reflect little logic, zero conceptualization skills, and apparently the classes in their particular public schools which covered deductive and inductive reasoning must have taken place during the Feast of Tabernacles. In fact, this terminal dumbness is one way a discerning reader can determine whether a comment was composed by an actual Armstrongite, or a troll faking being an Armstrongite for the sole purpose of pissing people off. The piss-off troll generally forgets that he must conceal his intelligence when preparing his fake defense of Armstrongism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The day will come when all your mockery will be silenced and the King of Kings will act and erase dark characters like you, owner of this site, a malicious and mocking blog, from the face of the earth. All these foolish words will remain there and your followers will be watered with horror, at that moment it will be crying and gnashing of teeth."

    MY COMMENT:
    As a regular contributor to this site, I respond-
    1) I am not a "follower" of this blog's operators , or anyone else that is breathing on this planet.
    2) I love the King of Kings- The Lord Jesus Christ.
    3) I believe in the Sabbath, and the tenets of the Church of God Seventh Day, and also observe the Holy Days.
    4) Are you aware of the scripture about "Judge not and you shall not be judged"?. Certainly there is discernment in this life, but you are making damning condemnations of Eternal Judgement , that only God himself holds as a prerogative to himself. In the meantime, we are to pray for people, love them, and strive for the best for all people. I sense that you "cant wait" and would rejoice, seeing people have crying and gnashing of teeth.

    I stand against false prophets, sociopaths, abusers of the brethren, and those that would make filthy lucre from the financial exploitation of sincere people under the guise of religion and "Godly office".

    ReplyDelete
  4. 5:54 looks like you are describing the person you see when you look in the mirror. Nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only hypocrites are these blog writers.

      Delete
  5. May the King of Kings soon come to silence every scoffer.

    Including Stan. (Whomever he is.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. There will be "weeping and gnashing of teeth" when the ACOGs attendees realize on judgment day that they messed up by blindly believing the food salad of truth and error dished out by HWA's collaborators. God will point out to them that it was their personal responsibility to "prove all things" rather than subcontracting this responsibility to "gawds ministers."

    ReplyDelete
  7. 10:31, Please tell us why you feel that Tonto is a hypocrite. It sounds as if he is a discerning individual who has followed his conscience. How is this hypocritical?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "The only hypocrites are these blog writers."

    The only hypocrites on here are people like you filled with so much racist animosity that makes you say the comments as you do. It is always amazing to me to see people who think they are God's gift to the church and think themselves to be highly converted who then say the filth that you do. You whine that I censor comments, well, damn right I do when you say the crap you do. I know it gets you delicate lace panties all in a twist, but put on your big boy underwear and act like a man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. False accusations galore. You must be getting desperate.

      I have never written, spoken or even thought a racist remark in my life. I'm no hypocrite unlike yourself who hides behind a contrived false name thinking your a great writer. Who are you fooling ? Not me and how many more? You've been rumbled for a long time and many "views" are in fact ones who know who you really are.
      The fact you make sexual perverted remarks also speaks volumes.
      You've been found out and don't ever forget it.

      Delete
  9. To the disruptive kid in class: If you believe all of us writers here are hypocrites, why come here to imbibe of the hypocrisy? I mean you're like the guy who smells rotten eggs (probably you're the one who caused the odor!) and calls every one over to smell it! And with your atrocious grammar and spelling, to boot! You make your catcalls, but never reveal how or why people are hypocrites. What a pest! I think your Mommy's calling.

    Today's a big day for you! We actually reacted to you, so now your life has been totally validated and has meaning!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big day ? I've been exposing the hypocrisy of this blog for years and years. You have no idea.

      Delete
  10. Calling all writers on this blog hypocrites is a smear. It a ploy used often in politics. Rather than logically disprove an opponents policy, the opponent is smeared, which has the effect of discrediting their policies in the eyes of the uninformed. HWA and his ministers often did this by labeling their critics in the church as unconverted, and/or lacking the holy Spirit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is the blog owners and writers who decide the athiest and snearing mocking posts.

      Delete
  11. “ I've been exposing the hypocrisy of this blog for years and years. You have no idea.”

    ROTFLMAO! You've done nothing of the sort here. Over 11 million hits later and you are a pathetic failure. Give it a rest buttercup! No one cares what you think.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There has been some discussion about sexually perverted activities here, 11:21, no doubt about it. But, you see, we can't actually have an honest, non-hypocritical discussion about HWA or GTA without discussing their activities.

    By the way, I like your response at 11:14. You responded to the comment addressed to the disruptive kid in class. So, you acknowledged that you know what you are. Did you ever make it past sixth grade?

    I recommend that you use spell check. It will prompt you to spell simple words like "atheist" and "sneer" correctly. On second thought, nah, that's not going to improve the quality of your comments. They'll still be puerile.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @ Anon 11:16,

    Connie became Tonto a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Based on style similarities and heat taken, I believe there were several characters prior to Connie, including a certain cowboy. But many of the comments reflect certain knowledge and a common sense approach that rarely goes overboard.

      Delete
  14. Sounds like it came from Charlotte? LCG heads, maybe?

    LCG were the ones who disfellowshipped me for disagreeing with a prophecy.

    Can you legally disfellowship someone for that?

    (Nothing about that from Paul in 1 Cor 14)

    ReplyDelete