The Cult’s Favorite Tactic: Blame the Exiles
In an August 1980 Good News Article, the Ol’ Herb was on a mission to demonize anyone who dared leave his flock. In a piece that reeks of desperation, he claimed ex-members—those “embittered” dissidents—spend their days obsessing over what’s “wrong” with the WCG, conjuring up “monstrous, impossible, filthy lies” about the church and its leaders. Their minds, he said, are consumed with negativity, twisting facts into falsehoods, spreading rumors, and fueling their “vengeful bitterness.” Meanwhile, loyal members focus on the “wonderful truths” of God’s work—see the difference? If you don’t, you’re in danger of becoming one of those satanic exiles. It’s the WCG’s favorite gaslighting trick: don’t question us, or you’ll end up like them—cursed, miserable, and doomed.
We show how Armstrong and his demonic decedents shamed ex-members and current ones alike to silence dissent, all while ignoring the real reasons people left—like the WCG’s corruption, failed prophecies, and predatory leaders. In an unsurprising reveal: those “dissidents” weren’t the problem—the entire religious system of Armstrongism was.
Painting the Villain: Ex-Members as Satanic Liars
The article kicks off with a vicious attack on ex-members, claiming their “principal purpose in life” is to “expose the evils” of the WCG. The founder paints them as bitter haters whose every thought and conversation revolves around what’s “wrong” with the church. They’re not just critical—they’re liars, twisting facts into “filthy” rumors about the WCG and its leaders. He quotes Jude 8-19 to seal their fate, calling them “filthy dreamers” who “defile the flesh,” “speak evil of dignities,” and are destined for “the blackness of darkness forever.” They’re “raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame,” driven by “ungodly lusts,” and lacking the Holy Spirit. In short, they’re not just wrong—they’re satanic, and their fruit is chaos, leading splinter groups that fight each other and drag others away from Christ entirely. If you’ve been in any of the WCG’s offshoots for any length of time, you have probably seen similar letters and sentiments expressed in a similar fashion.
This is gaslighting at its ugliest. The WCG didn’t just excommunicate members—they vilified them, turning them into cartoonish villains to scare the flock into loyalty. But ex-members weren’t making up “filthy lies”—they were exposing real ones, like the cult’s failed prophecies (1972 Tribulation, anyone?), the triple tithes that bankrupted families while the Armstrongs lived like kings, and scandals like Garner Turd Armstrong’s college harem at Ambassador College, which we covered in “Suspicious Lies.” The WCG couldn’t handle the truth, so they smeared the whistleblowers, gaslighting members into thinking criticism was satanic. It’s a classic cult move: don’t fix your problems—just blame the ones who call them out.
The Warning Shot: Don’t Join the Damned
The dear leader doesn’t stop at ex-members—he turns the spotlight on you, the reader. He warns that their bitterness could infect your heart, urging you to “think no evil” and set your mind on “things above” (Colossians 3:1-3, Proverbs 23:7). The WCG, he says, is the “Body of Christ,” preparing to be Christ’s spotless Bride at His soon return, so forget the past—your sins are covered if you repent. But ex-members? They’re not blessed like the WCG, which is “back on track,” growing, and knit together with Christ. He tells you to pray for them, that they might repent and return, but also to pray for each other to endure to the end, now “near.”
Here’s the gaslighting twist: if you even think about sympathizing with ex-members, you’re at risk of becoming one of them—bitter, cursed, and lost. The WCG framed itself as the pure, blessed church, while ex-members were miserable failures leading doomed splinter groups. But the reality? The WCG was bleeding members because of its own failures—financial exploitation, authoritarian control like the Visiting Program we exposed in “Gestapo in God’s Name,” and leadership scandals. Ex-members weren’t “unblessed” for leaving; they were free, while the WCG was the one fighting to survive, hemorrhaging followers to those “eight or 10 little splinter groups” that wouldn’t have existed without the cult’s own dysfunction. The founder gaslit members into thinking the problem was the dissidents, not the cult that drove them away.
The Real Lies: The WCG’s House of Cards
The article’s biggest lie is its refusal to admit why ex-members left. Herbie claims they’re just bitter and satanic, but let’s look at the facts. By 1980, the WCG was a mess—GTA had been disfellowshipped in 1978 for his Ambassador College harem, a scandal that confirmed members’ worst suspicions about the leadership’s hypocrisy. The cult’s prophecies kept failing (no Tribulation in 1936, 1951, or 1972, no Petra escape), yet they still preached the end was “near,” keeping members in fear, The triple tithes left families broke while the Armstrongs lived in luxury, pulling in $200 million a year by the 1980s (over $600 million today).
Ex-members weren’t “conjuring up lies”—they were telling the truth, and the leadership couldn’t handle it. The splinter groups the founder mocks? They formed because people saw through the cult’s facade and wanted out, even if they didn’t fully escape Armstrongism’s grip. The real “fruit” of the WCG wasn’t growth or peace—it was broken lives, financial ruin, and a pipeline to atheism for those who, as the article admits, “departed entirely from Christ” after leaving. The WCG gaslit members into thinking ex-members were the problem, but the cult’s own corruption was the root of it all.
Stop Falling for the Shame Game
The WCG’s gaslighting in “How Ex-member Dissidents Fill Their Minds” was a desperate endgame: smear ex-members as satanic liars, shame current members into silence, and pretend the cult is God’s pure church—all while ignoring the scandals, failed prophecies, and control tactics that drove people away. The founder wanted you to believe dissidents were the problem, but they were just the ones brave enough to speak the truth about the WCG’s rot. Stop falling for the shame game. Your doubts, like those of the ex-members, aren’t satanic—they’re a sign you’re waking up. Ditch the cult’s lies, and walk out of the trap for good.
Hotel Armstrong © 2025 by AiCOG is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0
Subscribe to ::Armstrongism investigated::
By Ai-COG · Launched 4 months ago
::Armstrongism investigated:: takes a Deep Dive into the cultic murky world of the Worldwide Church of God and its offshoots. If you love investigating cults stick around and prepare to dive deep!
17 comments:
This is why I named my ACOG splinter Church of one person, Lake of Fire Church of God. As Pastor General, I minister to myself due to my being condemned to the Lake of Fire according to HWA.
Richard
In the unlikely chance that Armstrongism somehow ends up being right, I still believe the best course is to willfully live a good life now with the better Christian ethics taught by Jesus and mainstream Christianity, and then to be annihilated in the Lake of Fire so that your eternity will not be ruined and miserable as the Armstrong despots rule over you with their rods of iron.
Not likely, though. I do not believe that their god is THE God! There simply has to be something better waiting for us than that!
BB
HWA taught that the holy days were a commanded convocation, so members are morally bound to attend services. That's no quite right. Independent
stay-at-home Christians can fulfill the convocation requirement by fellowshipping with Christ and God the Father at home.
When it comes to the practical application of God's laws, "choose life" is always the criteria, rather than some inflexible, self-serving church rules.
BB so true. All denominations have made God in their own image. They teach an emasculated Christ. Forget about the Christ who overturned the money changes tables and criticized the Pharisees to their face. If Christ secretly came as a church member, they'd throw Him out for His outspokenness.
Why is it that the ministers demand attendance by members, yet Deuteronomy 12:21 says: "If the place that the Lord your God will choose to put his name there is too far from you, then you may kill any of your herd or your flock, which the Lord has given you, as I have commanded you, and you may eat within your towns whenever you desire." -- the principle here is for people to not have to attend a Feast site if it is too far, which could also mean too expensive, or a person is not well enough.
The Bible commands attendance by males, not by females. ACOGs that command women to attend (instead of letting them come or not, voluntarily) are engaging in cult control, not sound Biblical practice.
Byker Bob, I agree with you 1000%.
Anonymous 1:21:00 AM, Your comment reminds me of a paperback book which I literally donated to Goodwill last week after sitting on my bookshelf for almost 50 years. The book? The Real Jesus by Garner Ted Armstrong. Oddly, there are six images of GTA preaching on the book cover, perhaps sending a sublime message to the casual peruser.
I still hold the same views as I expressed at 8:36. The feasts are not the core issue as to why I hold those views.
However, in the interest of intellectual honesty, and although this verse still relates the feasts and their practices and economic issues to an agrarian society, and does not modify the definition of a temporary dwelling,, does Deut. 12:21 acquit HWA on the matter of establishing feast sites other than Jerusalem?
BB
On Biblical realities, the Book also demonizes those who fall away and are "enemies of Christ". Paul goes out of his way to curse those who do not abide by "the gospel we preach", which meant "the Gospel which I preach".
Jude notes; "3 Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people. 4 For certain individuals whose condemnation was written about[b] long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.' and even more to the point, "11 Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain; they have rushed for profit into Balaam’s error; they have been destroyed in Korah’s rebellion.
12 These people are blemishes at your love feasts, eating with you without the slightest qualm—shepherds who feed only themselves. They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted—twice dead. 13 They are wild waves of the sea, foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever."
So the concept of gaslighting those not like the true believer is not an invention of Armstrong. They just look up the pre-existing verses and apply them to their own problems with dissention and disagreement.
Nothing new under that sun. The Book can be the problem and easily used tool for all who need a good one against their foes.
By all means Dennis, the book is the problem. Let's blame the book, the only book ever written that knows man, and what is in man, and speaks of the One who searches the reins and heart and declares them lacking.
"Man" doesn't like that! He rebels against it because men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil.
Yes, it has to be the book, not men abusing the book!
These long-assed songs like Hotel California resemble Armstrongism in many subtle ways. I never liked Henley's vocals. I fast-forward to get to Walsh and .Felder's dueling guitar solo. Did the same with Stairway to Heaven. I always tried to fast forward Armstrongism to the sweet spots, too. Problem was, there was a big brown cloud over Armstrongism and very sparse sweet spots that were only, say, a 4 on a scale of 1-10. They would have rated fairly low on Billboard's "Hot 100" using music as an analogy. I prefer #1 with a bullet, and Armstrongism never really delivered!
BB
For what it is worth, I do not believe that Hell exists or the Lake of fire. The idea that God created us imperfect so he punishes us for being imperfect makes no sense to me at all.
I remember the book and photograph, some CGI members at the time ripped the front cover off as they thought Ted's ego had gone too far. But they wanted to read the book about Jesus !
It could be a metaphor for some sort of purification process, 10:26. Fire has been used figuratively in that manner throughout history. Eternal hellfire in which one were always in pain and never burned up would be sadistic to say the least. I don't believe that Father God's character is compatible with eternal sadism. On the other hand, there is actually eternal peace provided by eternal death. The dead know nothing. I'm not attempting to organize a die-in, you understand, just making a play in logic. As in physical life, it is the survivors who would suffer the grief which comes with loss of a loved one.
There is just so much we do not, and cannot know.
BB
10:03 I first joined the UCG back in 2010. While my time with them I befriended a family who was invited to a NTBMO by a mutual UCG member. After I left the UCG because of doctrinal differences I fellowshipped with the small family at their home once a month or couple of months and during the holy days. The couple had been disfellowshipped from the WCG back in the 1970s or ‘80s and so they have kept services at home ever since. It’s only since the pandemic and the matriarch of the family dying and now the sole daughter having to care for her invalid father that our get togethers on Sabbaths have had to come to a sad end. So this means I just keep God’s holy days at home by myself like I’m sure so many others who are hesitant to join any Christian group.
Yeah Avoura that was one reason why I left the UCG. I believed they were compelling members to take a holiday when like Paul’s own example showed we can keep the holy days wherever we are. So it was my belief they should keep the FOT for instance exactly like the FOUB and Pentecost—both of which were pilgrim feasts in the Bible like FOT too—that is local and just let people decide when they wanted to take a break according to their own finances and circumstances if they wanted to at all and then they can check out other congregations in the same country or another country. Basically like mainstream Xians do when it’s their Easter or Xmas ie people choose freely for themselves if they want to go abroad or stay local.
Very clever takeoff on original LP cover artwork!
Post a Comment