Why is the COG filled with so many Jezebels? They are EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sometimes what COG members write on Facebook is so ludicrous it does not even deserve to be mocked. They do a wonderful job all by themselves. 

Repent from wicked man made pagan traditions like xmas, easter etc and follow Yeshua the one and only Son of God the capital P Prophet in Deut 18 in our Father Yahovah! Stop wearing a crosses of Tammuz jewelery they are graven images/idolatry and an abomination to God! Stop wearing makeup, jewellery and outward adornments that is lying and coveting a look you don't have to beguile/allure men. That is the spirit of Jezabel working in you and not of God and it is wicked. Go read about the punishment to Jezabels in revelation 2:20-23. Why would you want to cause a man of God to stumble and sin...When just looking at someone with lust is committing adultery... A sin that leads to death. CHRISTIAN WOMEN SHOULDN’T WEAR MAKEUP, FAKE NAILS, DYE HAIR, GET FILLSDS, PLASTIC SURGERY ETC NOR USURP THE AUTHORITY OF MEN, OR TEACH MEN! IF YOU DONT LIKE IT THEN YOU DONT LOVE GOD SO STOP PROCLAIMING YOU ARE A GODLY WOMAN OR EVEN A CHRISTIANYOU GOTTA OBEY YAH WHICH REQUIRES YOU TO ACTION WHAT HE SAYS THE LOVE OF GOD IS ..

Three Days and Three Nights - Proclamation Magazine

The following is reprinted by permission of Proclamation Magazine/Life Assurance Ministries, Colleen Tinker. Serving former Adventists. Inquiring Adventists, Sabbatarians and Concerned Christians.

Three Days and Three Nights

JULY 16, 2026 PROCLAMATION! 2003-5,6 PROCLAMATION!, DOCTRINE, FEATURE, VERLE STREIFLING

VERLE STREIFLING, PhD | Minister, Author, and Missionary | 

Editors note: We have received several letters in response to the timing of the resurrection. Some of these letters were of great length and went into great detail why we should believe that Christ was crucified on Thursday and raised on Saturday. For some of us this may not be an important issue in that we are more concerned that Christ died for our sins and He was raised from the dead and believe that this fact is the foundation of Christian faith, however, for others of our readers this issue holds major importance. They have been taught that THE SIGN that Christ is the Messiah of the O.T. is that he was in the heart of the earth THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS. They claim that this could not mean from Friday afternoon to Sunday morning. Dr. Verle Streifling has prepared a paper to answer this question. We hope our readers will find this study useful.

---

Today, everything historic Christianity has taught is being tested, and anything that can be shaken, is being shaken. One such historic Christian teaching is the historic view that Jesus died on Friday and rose Sunday. Some say that Jesus died on Wednesday and was raised on the Sabbath. We must evaluate this, for a number of seventh day sects endorse it such as some groups of the World Wide Church of God. Others, including the Churches of God Seventh Day and some Assemblies of God Seventh Day have also held this for a half-century. This teaching is used to strip the historic church of the reason for celebrating the Lord’s day, saying Jesus rose ‘late on the Sabbath’—not the first day! On this basis, they also hold Pentecost was on a Sabbath, so the church was birthed on a Sabbath as well. Some of this has also filtered into the Companion Study Bible and Dake’s Study Bible.

Those who’ve written studies on this don’t all agree that Jesus rose on Saturday. Only the seventh day sects hold this, while others as the Christian Jew Foundation hold He was raised on Sunday,1 thus they celebrate our Lord’s day. But the seventh day sects strain Matthew’s account to their advantage for Sabbath resurrection. One such article is well written by E. E. Franke, and it relies entirely on Jesus’ crucifixion being in 31 AD, while another written by Rev. Garver C. Gray, a historian and pastor, proves it was 30 AD, showing Jesus was born BC 4, the year Herod died. These studies differ in the events preceding the crucifixion, so some harmonize on Saturday resurrection, some on Wednesday crucifixion, but not all on any one point—except that Christians are wrong about the Friday crucifixion! Yet we must commend them for well-written articles that convince the reader so that he won’t even think he needs to do deeper study.

Twenty years ago, I believed and defended this view for almost six years, until I found S. E. Anderson’s book Armstrongism’s Thirty Errors Exposed. Knowing he’d say something on this, and not finding anyone to show its errors, I got the book, which changed my opinion about the historic view on this subject. Though Anderson didn’t say much, he really didn’t need to, for what he said was like a little bullet that stops a charging elephant in his tracks! He reopened my blinded eyes in this, forcing me to more study to find where these writers and study Bibles that adopted their views got derailed. How could they seem so right, yet be so wrong? Where had I and so many others been misled?

For brevity I’ll refer to E. E. Franke’s booklet (the most thorough), to share some Bible answers I found that would convince any who believe the whole Bible.2

Error repeated often enough will sound true, so its followers will believe and recite it until God confronts them with His Word. Misinterpreted Scripture is often girded by misquoting scholars, to appear authoritative. This occurs in Franke’s selectively citing scriptures, authorities, and Bible versions.

Resurrection: ‘on the Sabbath’ or ‘after the Sabbath’?

He begins at Matt 28:1 KJV, “In the end of the Sabbath as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week…” (the women found He had risen). He notes Jesus arose on a Sabbath as Matthew says it was ‘IN the end of the Sabbath’; and it was not yet the first day, for the text says “toward the first day…” Citing four versions with ‘In the Sabbath’, he quotes the Siniatic Palmiset “the oldest Greek text known”, saying “And on the evening of the Sabbath…” 

Jewish Holy days3 reckon the night as the first part of a Sabbath, and the day as the last. Yet here the translator did not mean this, for he continues “as the first day of the week dawned.” Thus the Palmiset means it was the evening after the Sabbath. But does the Greek have in or after? The Received Text has after, so Franke’s words, “No man can accept the inspiration of Matthew and not believe that Jesus was risen on the Sabbath” are unwarranted disjunction, placing inspiration in the KJV , but not in the Greek text!

The first Greek word in Matt 28:1 is Opse. Strong’s Dictionary defines it: “Late in the day; by extension after the close of the day”. Thayer’s Lexicon gives the correct use in Matthew, which Franke only partially quotes, omitting what’s most significant, “Opse, an adverb of time, after a long time, long after, late, with a genitive ‘Opse sabbaton’ the Sabbath having just passed, after the Sabbath, i.e. at the dawn of the first day of the week—an interpretation absolutely demanded by the added specification “the dawning of the first day of the week” Matt 28:1”4 

Thayer shows Franke’s error, and his next in saying “Thus in every case the Greek word opse means late on or in”. Thayer shows it with the adjective equivalent as meaning ‘late…evening, either from our 3 pm to 6 pm and with four examples, or from 6 pm to the beginning of night” with ten examples). Other scholars agree5 on opse as either early or late evening, and its meaning after the Sabbath in Matt 28:1. Most Bibles agree.6 Goodspeed says “The plain sense of the passage is, “After the Sabbath as the first day of the week was dawning.” 

‘Dawning’ or ‘drawing on’?

Next, Franke affirms the Greek epiphosko (dawning) must mean ‘drawing on’ in Matthew, as that’s its meaning in Luke 23:54. But Greek converts a word from infinitive to verb, noun, adjective or even participle with the use of prefixes or suffixes, or both, changing the meaning or use of the word.7 To say that the true use for a word in Matthew is found from its use in Luke errs, unless both have the same spelling, grammatical construct, and the same context. We compare them in Greek:

Luke 23:54 has epephosken using the prefix ‘epe’ and the suffix ‘en’; but Matt 28:1 epiphoskouse with prefix ‘epi’ and suffix ‘ouse’. Their prefixes and suffixes are different, so they cannot bear the same use and meaning. Reinecher shows the distinctions.8 In Luke it’s the figurative, inceptive imperfect verb, but Matthew uses a participle literally meaning dawning or breaking forth of dawn.

Rotherham has ‘when it was on the point of dawning’. Thayer also notes that in Matthew it’s followed by ‘eis’, explaining, “It denotes entrance into a period which is penetrated, as it were, i.e., duration through a time…dawning into the first day of the week”. (p. 183). Their distinctions appear in most Bibles.9 

Greek ‘eis’ as ‘toward’ or ‘into’?

One Monday morning a church janitor found the pastor’s notes on the pulpit and was amazed to read in the margin, “Point weak: Shout loudly!” It seems Franke was doing this when he wrote: “The word ‘Toward’ is the mighty obstacle in the way of the resurrection on Sunday…for as long as it was dawning or drawing on toward the first day of the week, it is certain that the first day had not arrived. Sure indeed is the fact that while you are going toward anything or object, you have not reached it… If this is not true, then the English language, and the Greek from which it is taken, have lost their meaning.” He stressed the English toward—not the Greek word it is from.

This word is ‘eis,’ which most often means ‘into’ but only rarely ‘toward’. As Thayer said “It denotes entrance into a period which is penetrated…duration through a time…‘dawning into the first day of the week’ Matt 28:1”. Berry’s Lexicon says “Preposition governing accusative “Into to (the interior)…motion into.” Goodrick’s prepositional chart10 has ‘eis’ with the accusative, as in Matt 28:1, meaning ‘into’. Young’s Analytical Concordance shows ‘eis’ as ‘into,’ over 500 times; but as ‘toward’ only 27. Strong’s Dictionary on ‘eis,’ “A primary preposition: to or into…the point reached and entered…” Rotherham, who Franke uses for the “correct reading” of Matthew, uses ‘into’.

From the above, scholarship and translators agree Matt 28:1 says, “After the Sabbath, as it was dawning into the first day of the week…” as compared to the KJV. Matthew does not say Jesus was raised on the Sabbath, as Franke etc., affirm, but rather as the TR shows, it was ‘after the Sabbath…dawning into the first day of the week’, which only means “Sunday, at daybreak”.

‘Move the comma’ trick at Mark 16:9

Franke now wrestles other texts to uphold his error. He begins with Mark 16:9 which says, ‘Now when Jesus was risen early on the first day of the week…’ As this contradicts him at Matt 28:1, he works punctuation magic in Mark, moving the comma11 from the word ‘week’ to the word ‘risen’, making it say “early on the first day of the week He appeared to Mary…” 

You can do this in English, but in Greek it doesn’t work, for the rules of syntax and declensions show which words apply to which others, and how they’re being used. We need to learn the emphasis and word order in the Greek sentence. Goodrick’s Everybody’s Guide tells us, “The most important part of the sentence is put first. The secondary emphatic position is last. What is not so important is buried in the middle of the sentence…usually the order is verb, subject, and direct object; or subject, verb and direct object.” (5:3) 

Mark follows the first precisely, as seen from the literal translation “(He) having risen early (the) first day of the week, (He) appeared first to Mary the Magdalene”. Of the use of modifiers Goodrick tells us, “Sometimes modifiers belonging to the word come between (it and its article). The adjective usually follows the word to which it belongs.” So in Mark the modifier ‘early on the first day of the week’ follows the verb to which it belongs, ‘He having risen’. We see the most important emphasis in Mark 16, (coming first in the sentence) is the fact of Jesus’ resurrection ‘on the first day of the week’. Mark is correctly punctuated in the KJV saying Jesus arose ‘early on the first day of the week’, and Mark 16:9 is in concord with Matt 28:1, correctly translated!

Luke 24:21 also gives Franke problems. The two disciples going to Emaeus say that first day of the week, “is the third day” (since He was crucified). Literally,l “It brings today, this third day, since all these things came to pass”. Diagrammed, the sentence looks like this:

‘It’ is subject; ‘brings’ is the verb; ‘today this third day’ is all direct object, for all four words are in accusative declension. We may literally translate the accusative as ‘This day (is) the Third day’ since one part of the direct object is a subjunctive to the other. The KJV rightly equated today with the third day. But Franke failed to discern between translation and paraphrase— taking Dr. Murdock’s paraphrase of the Peshitto Syriac “Three days have passed…” to be an accurate translation of Luke! Irrespective, Luke underscores that very day was the ‘third day’—just as Jesus had prophesied!

‘The third day’ biblically defined

So we must Biblically define ‘the third day’. The Jewish Encyclopedia says, “In Jewish communal life, part of a day is sometimes counted as a full day”. This is what is called “Inclusive Time Reckoning”, as seen in 2 Kg 18: 9-10 where ‘three years’ is given for what our Western culture would count as 2 years. In 13 places, as in Matt 16:21, we’re told He’d be crucified and ‘raised again the Third day’. The Jews to whom He spoke equated this with ‘After three days’. But we err to literalize the Greek idiom ‘Three days and three nights’, to be exactly 72 hours, instead of being equal to ‘the third day’ as the Jews knew He meant, having a guard placed at the tomb on the Sabbath, before the third day arrived. No idiom can be literally interpreted in any language. Franke implies that Orthodoxy makes Jesus a liar by not teaching He was entombed a full 72 hrs. But this is question begging, for the Bible defines ‘the third day’, as S.E. Anderson showed:

1 Sam 20:12: “O Lord God of Israel, when I have sounded my father about tomorrow any time or on the third day…” third day is the day after ‘tomorrow’.

Luke 13:32 “And He said to them, ‘Go tell that fox (Herod) “Behold I cast out demons and I do cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be finished.” ‘ “ Here Jesus uses ‘the third day’ as the day after ‘tomorrow.’

Acts 27:18-19: “And we, being exceedingly tossed with a tempest, the next day they lightened the ship; and the third day we cast out with our own hands the tackle of the ship.” Acts confirms Luke’s same use of ‘the third day’.

Alford Edersheim says, “It was the first day of the week, according to Jewish reckoning, ‘the third day’ from His death”, (his footnote said ‘Friday, Saturday, Sunday’ Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, p.630-631).

A. T. Robertson at Mk 16:2: “The body of Jesus was buried late on Friday before the Sabbath (our Saturday) which began at sunset…The women rested on the Sabbath (Luke 23:56). This visit of the women was in the early morning of our Sunday, the first day of the week…Some people are greatly disturbed over the fact that Jesus did not remain in the grave the full 72 hours. But he repeatedly said that He would rise on ‘the third day’, and that is precisely what happened. If he had really remained in the tomb full three days and then risen after that, it would have been the fourth day, not the third. The occasional phrase ‘after three days’ is merely a vernacular idiom common in all languages and not meant to be exact and precise like ‘on the third day’. (Word Pictures in the NT, vol I, p.399+400).

Robertson’s point is confirmed by a parallel idiom ‘after eight days’ as the same as ‘the eighth day’ which we read of in the Apostolic fathers. Barnabas, 75 AD, says “We keep the eighth day with rejoicing, in the which Jesus rose from the dead”. Then in Constitutions of the Holy Apostles is this instruction: “Break your fast the first day of the week, which is the Lord’s day…after eight days let there be another feast observed with honor, the eighth day itself.” As ‘after eight days’ equals ‘the eighth day’, so too ‘after three days’ equals ‘the third day.’

Matthew: ‘in the sepulcher’ or ‘in the heart of the earth’?

 These teachers get so boxed into their ‘72 hours of entombment’, they overlook that Matthew doesn’t mention the grave at all, rather he writes of how long Jesus would be ‘in the heart of the earth’.

 The Greek kardia (heart) is figurative for ‘hades’, but not ‘sepulcher’12 as the literal place for which it speaks, as hell in the center of the earth.13

 So Matthew spoke of how long Jesus was to be in hell—not His body in the tomb! And this time began the ninth hour (3 p.m.) when ‘He dismissed His spirit’, the earth shook, and the temple veil was rent in two on Friday afternoon!

The crucial factor: the year Jesus died!

 This teaching hangs on the year of Jesus’ death. He died Nisan 14, which is on a different day of the week from year to year, but always the day of the full moon after the Spring Equinox. It’s easily shown astronomically when Nisan 14 began in any given year. Franke got a U.S. Naval Observatory chart showing the week day for Nisan 14, and the hour of full moon from the years 24 to 38 AD. We show their findings for the years 27 to 34 AD.

The chart above shows 31 AD as the only year near when Christ died, that Nisan 14 began on Tuesday, so he’d be impaled at Passover on Wednesday. Franke needs to show this is the year He died, to validate his theory. It seems easily shown from Luke 3:1, for His baptism was in the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar, whose reign began AD 12, so counting 15 years from 12 AD, adding three and a half years (Jesus ministry), makes 31 AD, the year He was crucified. Yet there are serious problems with this calculation:

1. Very few Scholars will agree with Franke that Jesus was born not before 3 BC,14 (an essential for His death in 31 AD). Born in 4 BC, the year Herod died, Jesus wouldn’t have been crucified in 31 AD, as E. E. Franke holds, but rather He was crucified in 30 AD (as marked (+) on the US Naval’s chart). This agrees with the Scriptures, for Passover began Thursday evening, and He was crucified on Friday as the historic church always held.
2. The chart has Nisan 14 in 30 AD beginning April 6, so the crucifixion on April 7 is of special note in view of a quote from Hales that Franke supplied, recording the darkening of the sun at “about April 8”. 15
3. Also Hales records 784 UC as when the above event occurred. It was then 34 years after Herod died (in 750 UC, our 4 BC). This places 784 UC as the year 30 AD—the year Christ died, so Hales and the chart both historically agree with the Biblical evidence.
4. Added evidence of the year He died is correctly calculating Luke 3:1, and Jesus’ baptism in the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar.16 We must apply the Bible’s Jewish Inclusive Reckoning to compute the year of Jesus’ baptism in the 15th year of Tiberius. To do this we may not add 15 years to 12 AD, but rather we must add 14 actual years to the year of His accession, so 26 AD17 was when Jesus was baptized, to which we may now add the three and a half years of Jesus’ ministry, making it 30 AD when He died.
5. More evidence for 30 AD as the year Christ died is in John 2:18-22,18 where the Jews disputed Jesus’ authority. This was the first Passover of His ministry, and the 46th year since temple building began, in Herod’s 18th year, which was 20/19 BC. Forty-six years after 20 BC brings us to 27 AD, since there was no ‘0’ year from 1 BC to 1 AD. And this was the Passover week, exactly three years before Jesus death, which would then be 30 AD.
6. Evidence Jesus died in 30 AD comes from Daniel 9:25-27, the prophecy of the Messiah. No one has a problem using the ‘year-day principle’ interpreting this prophecy of 70 weeks. The command it speaks of is from Ezra 7:11-28, which is in the seventh year of King Artaxerxes (458-457 BC), and being written on the first day of the first month, makes it 458 BC.19

The 69 weeks until the anointing the Most Holy are 483 days, each for a year. Counting 383 years from 458 BC, we arrive at 25 AD, but we must add 1 more for there was no ‘0’ year, making it 26 AD, the year when Christ, the ‘Most Holy One’ was anointed for His ministry.20 From 26 AD as fulfilling Daniel 9:25-27, we add His three and a half years of ministry to find His death in 30 AD.

The chart Franke received from the US Naval Observatory shows Nisan 14 began on Thursday in 30 AD, so He was crucified on Friday and raised on Sunday as the Bible says. Only 30 AD, from 24 to 36 AD, Nisan 14 begins on Thursday, showing this the only option, when He could be crucified on Friday and raised on Sunday.21 

Defining ‘preparation day’ and ‘high day’

The Bible’s meaning of ‘High day’ isn’t found in Ex 12 nor Lev 23, but in a holy week, as in the feasts of Unleavened Bread or Tabernacles, the first and last days of these feast-weeks were holy Sabbaths, above the other days of their feast week, and ‘holy convocations’ when ‘you shall do no servile work’. It was usual to call these days ‘high days’ or ‘great days’ (Greek. megaleh) which John used to denote this distinction. This word only appears twice in the NT re. Jewish feasts. Vine’s Expository Dictionary says, “Here the meaning is virtually equivalent to ‘Holy’; and Thayer’s Lexicon says of megaleh in this use “Solemn, sacred, or feast days, John 7:37; 19:31”.22

Franke redefines ‘Preparation Day’, to be only a one-day-per-year event when the Jews prepared their Passover to be eaten. But the Greek word for Preparation day is ‘paraskueh’. Strong defines it as “Preparation for the weekly Sabbath” Other scholars concur.23 This word is used five times referring to the weekly Sabbath, while it’s used once of the Passover. From this we know Jn 19:14 can’t mean preparing the passover, especially as the Gk ‘etoimadzo’ is used for preparing the passover 3 times in the Gospels. Josephus (p344) shows Friday was preparation day for each Sabbath, citing Caesar Augustus’ edict that Jews ‘be not obliged to go before any judge on the Sabbath day, nor the day of Preparation to it, after the ninth hour’. What historic proof!

Preparation day defined in Mark

God gave the first preparation day in Ex 16; and Mark 15:42 gives this definition “It was the preparation, that is, the day before the Sabbath”. From this, scholars agree that the expression ‘the preparation of the passover’ literally means ‘the preparation day of the passover (week),’ for the word passover can also mean ‘passover week’. In this, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, is correct, as seen in Acts 12:3-4.24 Herod arrested Peter during the days of Unleavened Bread “intending to bring him before the people after the passover”. As the Passover feast is before the days of unleavened bread, it’s obvious Luke didn’t intend its technical use here. Rather, ‘passover’ is used for the Passover week, including the Passover and Unleavened Bread, together. 

Two sabbaths in Passover week?

Sabbath-resurrection teachers do leave another puzzle. Comparing Lk 23: 54-56 with Mk 16:1-2 they contend there were two Sabbaths in Holy week: the first, that of Unleavened bread (a Thursday); the second was the weekly Sabbath. They note Matt 28:1 says “After the Sabbaths” (plural), and shows two separate Sabbaths. But the Greek idiom uses plural spelling for singular feast days. In Ex 20:8 God says “Remember the Sabbaths day (singular)…” LXX, as in Col 2:16 taking sabbatwv (plural) from Ex 20:8.

The grammatical construction of Luke 23:56 solves the difficulty as the NKJV has, “Then they returned and prepared spices and fragrant oils. And they rested on the Sabbath, according to the commandment”. In Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, Archer shows that in a grammatical construction where ‘de’ appears, followed by ‘kai to men’, we are to understand the second part of the sentence as happening first, and the first part of the sentence as following the second. So the sequence of events would be: 1. they observed where His body was laid; 2. They rested on the Sabbath; 3. Then they prepared spices to anoint Him.

The reason number three is placed before number two in the text is to continue the thought concerning Jesus’ body and burial. Using ‘de…kai to men’ the ‘de’ means ‘but (though the latter),’ and the ‘kai to men’ means ‘and indeed’. Thus it would read that they observed the tomb where He was laid, (then later on) prepared spices and fragrant oils, (but indeed) they rested on the Sabbath”. Correctly understanding the sequence of Luke 23:56, there’s no discord with Mk 16:1-2 telling the same events, but in direct chronological order. After the Sabbath (after sunset, Saturday) they bought these spices that they might anoint His body. They both bought and prepared spices after the one and same Sabbath ended.

Thus, as the historic Church has always taught, Christ was crucified on Friday, and raised on Sunday27 the ‘third day’ according to the Scriptures. If you, beloved, were taught differently, as I had been, why not leave these errors which we’ve exposed in this article, and ask God the Holy Spirit to be your teacher, according to John 14:26 and 1 John 2:20-27? 

How we thank God today, that thousands are leaving many of the errors Armstrong taught, and are moving into more historic evangelical churches. The fact of Jesus’ Sunday resurrection was the basis on which the early church began celebrating that day with rejoicing, being so enjoined by the Scriptures, as taught by Jesus Himself in Luke 24, which we show in Bible Answers for Sabbath Questions, chapter 19. †

---

Endnotes

1. Charles Haff of the Christian Jew foundation, holds the Sunday resurrection, but stresses Thursday crucifixion to evade the pagan Good Friday.
2. Often cults will use only selectively cited proof-texts as a grid to filter out what the other Scriptures say. In this they may also use poetic writings to refute didactic, or OT texts to overturn the NT, or sometimes both in the same rash act. They may also use a historic event which creates a non-sequitir to overturn direct Biblical teaching.
3. Some teach all Jewish days were calculated “from even to even”, but this is based on fallacious interpretation of creation days, as TWBOT shows under ‘ereb’, while Lev 23: 32 limits this to Sabbaths. John 20:19 proves this point, for the same day as Jesus rose, still the first day of the week, but at least 2 hours after sunset, when He revealed himself to the two at Emaeus, Jesus appeared to His disciples. See added detail re. Jewish days and creation days in Bible Answers for Sabbath Questions.
4. The Greek phrase is translated for the reader’s benefit.
5. Vines Expository Dictionary gives “Opse: Adverb. Long after, late, late in the day, at evening…in Matt 28:1 it is rendered ‘late on’ RV or AV ‘in the end of’. Here, however, the meaning seems to be ‘After’, a sense in which it is used by late Greek writers”. Again on Opsia Vine says :Late…the word really signifies the late evening, the latter of the two evenings as reckoned by the Jews… after sunset”. Berry’s Short Lexicon of NT Words concurs, and Reinecher’s Linguistic Key to the NT, vol 1, p.86 says “Opse, with genitive, After the Sabbath”, citing Bauer’s Greek English Lexicon of the NT. Moulton’s Grammar of the Greek NT says “After the Sabbath…”
6. As RSV, NIV, Amplified, NKJV, Good News, Moffatt, Byington’s Living English, JB Phillips, EG Goodspeed, Emphatic Diglott, The Interlinear Bible, etc.
7. As a noun the word can have 8 cases, 3 genders, 2 numbers; as a verb, 3 persons, 2 numbers, 3 voices, 2 aspects, 8 tenses, and at least 4 moods. A participle that may combine a noun and verb together, the possibilities are phenomenal.
8. At Lk 23:54 “Epephosken—imperfect tense of epiphosko (to dawn) to give light. In a figurative way ‘to approach’ (F.W.Arndt, Bible Commentary, “inceptive imperfect”, ‘began to approach’)”. At Matt 28:1 “epiphoskouse—present participle of epiphosko, ‘to shine forth’, ‘to dawn’.” (Linguistic Key to the NT)
9. As KJV, Amplified, RSV, NIV, NASV, NKJV, Alford’s NIV Interlinear, Berry’s Interlinear, Good News, Byingtons NT, Living NT, Moffat, JB Phillips, NEB, NWT, Emphatic Diglott, New American Bible, Jerusalem Bible, and Young’s Literal Trans.
10. The Kingdom Interlinear’s prepositional chart concurs. 
11. SDA, WWCOG and some others moved the comma to change Lk 23:43 to read “Verily I say unto you today, you shall be with me in Paradise”. As few could call them on this, they’ve promoted this, without challenge, for years.
12. Greek, ‘mnameon’. Matt 27:57 shows Jesus’ burial wasn’t finished until the sun was setting, using opsias (usually the late evening), with the aorist tense ‘had come’. This construction is used 10 times with this meaning, sometimes with the addition “when the sun did set” (as Mk 1:32).
13. Jesus had told the thief “today you shall be with me in Paradise”, which in Lk 16 was also called ‘Abraham’s bosom’ and is the place for the departed spirits of the just. Peter says when Jesus died, He went down into hell and ‘preached to the spirits in prison’, and Eph 4:8-11 concurs ‘He descended into the lower parts of the Earth’ before He ascended to the Father. This subject is thoroughly exegeted by Dr Robert Morey, in his Death and the Afterlife, Bethany house pub.
14. In 526 AD, when the monk Dionysius Exiguus calculated our present calendar, he made an error of 4 years, placing Jesus’ birth in the ‘year of Rome’ (UC) 754. It was later proved Herod died in UC 750, four years earlier—ie in 4 BC. Jesus was born before Herod died, so this couldn’t be later than 4 BC.
15. Here Franke added in brackets “25th of March” to prevent the reader identifying by the chart the year 30 AD when Jesus died ‘about April 8’. Only 30 AD comes close, with Passover Friday being April 7, while 31 AD is 11 days out. (The day difference from Apr 7 and 8 is easily accounted as calendar differences, as the Jew’s sacred calendar is one day different from the Babylonian, adding greater disparage between their Sabbath, and the Babylonian Shappatu—a full moon feast, held twice a year.)
16. Franke added 15 yrs to 12 AD, arriving at 27 AD as the year of Jesus’ baptism, but he failed to allow for the Jew’s inclusive time reckoning. Jewish historians didn’t use ‘accession year’ reckoning as we do today, but ‘ante-dating’ or ‘non-accession year’ method where year 1 was the year he became king, and the first complete year of his reign, beginning on New Year’s day after he ascended was called ‘year 2’.
17. Luke says Jesus began to be 30 years of age when baptised. Counting back from 26 AD, with no ‘0’ year, this places Jesus’ birth at 4 to 5BC, if age be counted from birth or conception. From Rome’s census records, (Luke 2) Christians recorded and honored both Jesus’ birthday, and Annunciation day, when He was conceived.
18. Here the Jews disputed Jesus’ authority. When He gave the sign “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”, they chose to take this as Herod’s temple (instead of His body which they knew He meant). “Forty six years this temple was being built, and you will raise it up in 3 days?”
19. But not 457 as SDA use for their ‘2300 day prophecy’, ending in 1844. From 458 BC, with no 0 yr, 2300 yrs end in 1843 as Miller taught and Ellen White endorsed.
20. In baptism with water by John and with the Holy Spirit, as we read in Lk 4:18, and fulfilling Isa 61:1-2.
21. This chart also shows that many, as SDA who date this event in 33 AD err, for in that year the moon fulled at 5 PM Friday, so Passover was Friday night, and Jesus’ death on Nisan 14 would be Sabbath, against Roman Law, and his resurrection on Monday, and Pentecost would have been Monday.
22. The fist of these is on the last day, the 8th day and “great day” of the feast of Tabernacles, when Jesus stood up and offered to all the Living Water, speaking of the Holy Spirit who would be poured out on a Sunday, the 8th day. The other ‘high day’ is John 19:31, which was the first day of the week of Unleavened Bread, and so considered an holy day, compared to the other days in which work could be done—except the last day which also was a ‘sabbath’. Thus Nisan 14 was not the only high day, but one of 4 high days that occurred in the Jew’s yearly feast cycle.
23. Berry’s Lexicon says of ‘paraskueh’ “a preparation, ie, the day immediately before the Sabbath or other festival”.  Thayer agrees saying “the day of preparation, ie the day on which the Jews made necessary preparation to celebrate a Sabbath or a feast”. Reinecher’s Linguistic Key to the NT says “Here used technically of the day of preparation for a Sabbath or Passover (Taylor) used with prosabbaton the day before the Sabbath: that is, Friday” (p.133)
24. Here Herod arrested Peter during the days of unleavened bread “intending to bring him before the people after the Passover”. Since the Passover feast itself occurred before the days of unleavened bread, it’s obvious Luke wouldn’t intend the technical use here. Rather passover is here being used for the whole Passover week, including the Passover and Unleavened Bread, together.
25. This being re-established, so also the wave sheaf offering was on Resurrection Sunday, pointing to Jesus as the First fruits, and subsequently Pentecost was also on a Sunday, as the Birth day of the Church.

Reeducation in the World Tomorrow?

Herbert Armstrong had a very low opinion of this world's education system, and the scholarly elite which it produced. In his book, Tomorrow - What It Will Be Like (Chapter 5: Education and Religion Tomorrow), he wrote: We covered a section on this world's paganized, agnostic, decadent education earlier in this book. The academic system was founded by the pagan philosopher Plato. It has always remained pagan. Injected into it, in more recent times, has been German rationalism and the atheistic theory of evolution. He continued: Modern education has been based on a false, erroneous, untrue foundation. The supposedly educated of this world, even the great minds, have absorbed false knowledge. They have been trained in a false approach to knowledge. Almost always, error is based on a false assumed premise or hypothesis, taken for granted, never questioned-and, of course, unproved. The "educated" minds have been filled with such false hypotheses. They have allowed a false sense of values to flood their minds. Armstrong reasoned that the whole concept of education had been perverted and twisted, and he concluded that a whole new system would have to be instituted when God's Kingdom was established on this earth!

Unfortunately, like many Fundamentalists and Literalists before him, Armstrong viewed the findings of science as an attack on God and religion. This caused him to reject any evidence which he felt contradicted the Bible or his belief system. In his mind, they simply had to be wrong! Armstrong reasoned that - if they were right, then he and God would be wrong - and that could NEVER be. If this reasoning is beginning to sound circular to you, then you may be on to something! For Herbert Armstrong and his followers, the Genesis account of creation explained the mechanics of how life in all of its varied forms came to exist on this planet. Instead of seeing those chapters as an emphatic statement about God's role as Creator, they see it as the ONLY valid scientific explanation of how the earth and universe began! In other words, they turn spiritual/supernatural revelation into a scientific text. In reality, the Theory of Evolution provides a well-documented explanation for the diversity of life that we see all around us. It is evidence-based, and it has absolutely NOTHING to say on the subject of God and/or "his" role in creation!

At any rate, all of his angst about the educated of this world served as the basis for Armstrong's speculation about education in "The World Tomorrow." Armstrong wrote: In God's millennial civilization, the basis of all knowledge dissemination will be revelation. Light will replace darkness-truth will replace error. Understanding will replace crass materialism. True knowledge will replace intellectual ignorance. (Tomorrow - What It Will Be Like) Likewise, Herbert reasoned that this world's educated elite would be the toughest nut to crack when Christ returns. He wrote: Yes, indeed, the educating and reeducating of the world will be one of the most important tasks the Kingdom of God will face, after Christ returns to rule. Today people follow the false and deceptive values. Their entire thinking will require a reorientation-a change of direction. Now, while Mr. Armstrong's reasoning appears reasonable and progressive at first glance, we can clearly discern that it is extra-biblical when we take a second look. Armstrong identified a problem (education and the educated of this world) and then reasoned that it will have to be resolved in "The World Tomorrow," without referencing any scriptures to back up his reasoning! Moreover, Armstrong then proceeded to offer what he felt would be a reasonable solution to the problem: Christ would use his (Armstrong's) folks to reeducate the world!

In support of this conclusion, Armstrong turned to one of his favorite passages about the future Kingdom. However, before we address his interpretation of the passage, I'd like to quote it for our readers without prejudice. In the fourth chapter of the prophet Micah, we read: It shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and it shall be lifted up above the hills; and peoples shall flow to it, and many nations shall come, and say: “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob, that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths.” For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. He shall judge between many peoples, and shall decide disputes for strong nations far away; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore... (Micah 4:1-3, ESV) Now, in response to this passage, Armstrong wrote: This knowledge-this teaching-and even knowledge of God's Law-shall go forth from the Church-and from Jerusalem, the new world capital. The problem, of course, is that this passage does NOT mention the Church anywhere - Armstrong injected this into the passage! Notice also that it is the nations themselves who will be seeking God's help - "that HE may teach us his ways." Notice too that there would not be any opportunities for them to learn about war anymore. In other words, Micah has absolutely NOTHING to say about ACOG folks reeducating the rest of the world!

Talk about a leap in logic. Herbert Armstrong went on to write: This Headquarters Church, at Christ's own world capital of Jerusalem, then, undoubtedly, will be given the administration of the world's new system of education. Did you notice that word "undoubtedly"? In other words, this is the only reasonable conclusion for us to reach! Is that, however, true? Even so, the speculation didn't stop there. Armstrong went on to conclude: Also, the indication is that the teaching of spiritual truth-of the true gospel, the spiritual conversion of the world-will be directed, worldwide, from this Headquarters Church, under Elijah and the overall direct supervision of Jesus Christ. Now, laying aside the fact that all of this is unsupported by scripture and is based entirely on Armstrong's reasoning out the "problem," how likely do you think that it would be for God to use a group of educators to retrain the world whose own teachings have been so thoroughly discredited by reputable sources? Indeed, Mr. Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God doesn't even exist today - some forty years after the death of its founder!

At this point, I think that it would be appropriate to actually examine some of the appropriate prophetic scriptures dealing with the dissemination of spiritual knowledge in God's Kingdom. In the book of Jeremiah, we read: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” (Jeremiah 31:31-34, ESV) Notice that God intends to put his law within them and write it on their hearts. Moreover, we are informed that it will no longer be necessary to instruct people to "Know the Lord, for they shall ALL know me." Finally, this passage seems to imply that spiritual knowledge is inextricably linked to forgiveness of sins! In other words, no teachers appear to be necessary in this passage!

Finally, there is that other Armstrong favorite passage from the book of Isaiah. Anyone with any background whatsoever in one of the ACOGs will remember the often-quoted passage from the eleventh chapter of Isaiah. After talking about the shoot which emerges from the stump of Jesse (Jesus Christ) and the nature of his person and reign (Isaiah 11:1-5), we are treated to a vision of his Kingdom. We read: The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall graze; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The nursing child shall play over the hole of the cobra, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder's den. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea. In that day the root of Jesse, who shall stand as a signal for the peoples—of him shall the nations inquire, and his resting place shall be glorious. (Isaiah 11:6-10, ESV) Once again, we notice that the nations will seek him. Also, we are told that "They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be FULL of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea." Universal knowledge of God and "his" ways, but no mention of ACOG teachers reeducating people!

Bottom line - the world will be reeducated in a sense, but it won't be as Herbert Armstrong imagined it. Scripture indicates that it will be accomplished by a Divine miracle, and the willingness of the people of all nations to learn about God and his will for us. Moreover, as with our own experience, it appears that this will be accomplished by believing in Jesus Christ and accepting what he has done for us. In other words, no crash course in Torah will be necessary! What do you think?


by Miller Jones/Lonnie C Hendrix

How to Get Into the Kingdom: Step 1 – Submit to Headquarters. Step 2 – There Is No Step 2

No one back in 1986, the moment Herbert W. Armstrong finally checked out, could have possibly predicted that the Church of God would one day turn into this flaming dumpster fire of theological insanity. Everyone was dead certain we’d already be in the Millennium by now, happily beating the survivors with iron rods while the elite taught classes at the Ambassador Colleges of the World Tomorrow. Herbert would’ve had the corner office right next to Jesus.

Instead, we got 2026 — and a parade of spectacularly unhinged men who make the old Worldwide Church of God look like a model of sanity.

There’s Bob Thiel, the human equivalent of beige wallpaper, who got shown the door by basically everyone and responded by declaring himself a prophet and starting his own little church in Africa like some kind of spiritual colonizer cosplay. Then there’s Dave Pack, who has spent years screaming that “Christ” is personally returning to Wadsworth, Ohio to walk the holy sidewalks for His third coming. Because of course He is.

And then, sitting at the very top of this pyramid of delusion, we have Gerald Flurry — self-appointed King of COGland, professional Irish dance enthusiast, and the man who has somehow convinced his followers that he and his headquarters now hold the actual keys to salvation.

Yes. You read that correctly. (posted as written)

What is the key of David? IT IS THE ROYAL GOSPEL VIEWED THROUGH THE EYES OF THE FATHER, AND THE HUSBAND, AND THE HEADQUARTERS BRIDE---the highest level of God's government through all eternity.that's right---the headquarters Bride. That Bride consists of those who will go no more out from God's Headquarters temple---those who will be ruling with Christ there in Jerusalem foreverv(verse 12). That is the highest calling for a body of God's people ever! That is the resplendent reward awaiting those who teach the key of David! They will be sitting on the Headquarters throne of David forever! So this is the gospel viewed through their eyes too.

Those during this Laodicean era who reject the key David will not have that reward. Fifty percent of them will repent and be in God's Family, but they will not be at Headquarters, because they reject rejected the key of David , the greatest vision of the Bible. Revelation 3 makes it clear that anyone who goes into the Tribulation will not be stationed at God's Headquarters. 

The very ELECT comprehend God's family government far better than most of God's people. 

 

The big question is this: Will you understand and submit to this government in the age of man's rule of man and act while there is time?

Consider this carefully: THE ROYAL KEY OF DAVID GOSOEL IS UNDERSTOOD NOW ONLY BY THE HEADQUARTERS KINGS AND PRIEST IN EMBRYO! If you fully understand and submit to this teaching now, you are going to reside in Jerusalem forever.

Only 5vpercent of God's own people in the Laodicean era have remained faithful to God---and only that 5 percent will qualify for that level of royalty in this end time. We can't drift into such an exalted position. We must work hard and fervently support God's Work toady.

In past ages, God has only prepared a small number of His people to rule from the Jerusalem Headquarters. 

It is hard to fathom the level of royalty God's Philadelphians truly are. God has given them knowledge He never gave to the other eras of His Church because He is specifically training His Headquarters personnel who will teach the key of David vision to the world. That is why God gives us that vision from the perspective of Headquarters in Jerusalem forever! He is revealing this vision with greater clarity all the time. Christ personally gives it to the Philadelphia era and to the Philadelphians in the Laodicean era. But only a small percentage of both eras qualify for Headquarters rule in Jerusalem. 

Armed with this key of David knowledge, we will be better able to support the prophets, apostles and leaders that God prepared in part ages."

According to the current PCG gospel, Jesus is apparently far too occupied trying to get back to Wadsworth and working with Bob Thiel preparing to flee to Petra, to bother with minor details like saving people. So Gerald and his loyal Headquarters staff have graciously stepped in to handle the whole “eternal life” thing themselves. If you don’t submit to their “royal government,” you’re apparently not getting in. The pearly gates now require a Headquarters stamp of approval.

This isn’t just weird. This isn’t just “different doctrine.”

This is straight-up, grade-A, gold-plated blasphemy.

This is the theological equivalent of saying the only way to get into the wedding feast is to have the right stamp from the right committee. It turns the gospel into a corporate loyalty program with eternal consequences. It takes the beautiful promise of Revelation 3:12 — “Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God… and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God… and I will write upon him my new name” — and turns it into an exclusive club for those who stayed loyal to one particular splinter group’s leadership.

Herbert Armstrong had plenty of issues, but even he would have taken one look at this nonsense and thrown these people out so fast their heads would spin. He did not raise up a church so that some guy could later declare himself the new toll booth operator between humanity and God.

This is what happens when unchecked ego, narcissism, end-time obsession, mental illness, and a total lack of accountability are allowed to fester for decades. You don’t get stronger Christians. You get people who genuinely believe their salvation is tied to whether they recognize Gerald Flurry as the Royal Kingly Headquarters Representative of Jesus Christ.

The Facebook post quoted above is not some fringe comment from a confused member. It is the logical endpoint of everything that has gone wrong. It is the distilled essence of the very “quagmire of heretical stupidity” that represents Armstrongism today. Who could have imagined that the highest reward in eternity is not found in Christ Himself, but in proximity to “Headquarters.” We are told that the “Key of David” is not ultimately about Jesus, but about recognizing a physical organization and its leader as the pinnacle of God’s government. We are told that only a tiny elite — the self-described “Headquarters kings and priests in embryo” — will sit on the real thrones in Jerusalem, while everyone else who fails to submit to this system gets a lesser seat in the Kingdom.

This is not biblical Christianity. This is not even a creative misreading of Scripture. This is a man-centered, headquarters-centered religion that has quietly replaced Jesus Christ with an institution and one elderly man as the practical gatekeeper of salvation and glory.

Yet here we are in 2026. The same movement that once preached Christ as the Head of the Church now has influential voices teaching that only those who accept “Headquarters” as the highest expression of God’s government will receive the highest reward. The irony is almost too perfect: the very people who claim to be the most faithful to Herbert Armstrong’s legacy have created a system he would have found utterly intolerable.

This is what happens when the focus shifts from Jesus Christ to an organization, from the Head to the “headquarters,” and from grace to government. It doesn’t produce humility. It produces spiritual arrogance dressed in royal language. It doesn’t produce people who are desperate for Christ. It produces people who are desperate to be recognized by Headquarters.

How unimaginable this future would have seemed in 1986. The conclusion is even more sobering: not only did no one see this coming, but the very people who claim to be preserving the truth have managed to create something far more dangerous than simple error. They have created a system in which loyalty to men and institutions is presented as the highest form of faithfulness to God.

That is not the Church Jesus Christ is building.

That is something else entirely.

And the longer it continues, the clearer it becomes that the real tragedy is not just that these men exist — it is that so many sincere people have been convinced that submitting to them is the same thing as submitting to God.

Why Preach a Dead Christ Still On the Cross When You Can Restore 1,900 Years of Missed Truths Instead?

A Church of God member wrote recently:

The WWCG became the Laodicean Church. With out putting HWA on a pedestal, when you look at the Bible, God used HWA to restore many truths that went against the grain of mainstream Christianity. He was criticized because he didn’t initially preach Christ. However none can come to Christ lest God the Father calls. But the true Gospel begins with the Gospel of coming the Kingdom of God. Just the way John the Baptist, Jesus, and the apostles proclaimed it. Depending on how each person responds, God the Father calls those with a broken contrite heart to Christ to have their sins cleansed. But that is not where the Gospel ends. That is where mainstream Christianity ends-with a dead Christ hanging on a cross. The sacrifice of Christ is not enough. Christ said if a house is cleaned and swept and remains empty we come to a worse spiritual state. We are cleansed by Christ’s blood but we are saved by His life-Romans 5:10. The resurrected Christ imparts His Spirit to our cleansed spirit and begins transforming us-Romans 8:9. Christ fulfilling the Wave Sheaf Offering presents us to God the Father and then we also receive the Holy Spirit of God the Father joined to our cleansed spirit-Matthew 20:10. Fulfilling John 17:21. That is the full, complete Gospel.

Ah, the Armstrongite classic: "We didn't preach Christ at first because reasons... but look, we restored ALL the truths mainstream Christianity missed for 1,900 years!" This comment is textbook legalism dressed up as "deeper truth," and it perfectly illustrates why starting with anything but Christ as the blazing center leads to the fractured, authoritarian, prophecy-obsessed mess Armstrongism became.1. "HWA didn't initially preach Christ... but none can come to Christ lest the Father calls"Brilliant strategy! Don't lead with the actual Person the entire Bible revolves around. Instead, start with British-Israelism, end-times flow charts, "God's Law" (your selective version of it), and radio broadcasts hammering Saturday Sabbath and holy days. Christ can be an afterthought once the Father does the heavy lifting.  

How exactly are people supposed to respond to the Father's call if no one is proclaiming the One they're supposed to come to? Romans 10:14-15 has some awkward questions for this approach: "How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard?... As it is written, 'How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!'"  

Apparently, those beautiful feet were too busy restoring "truths that went against the grain" to mention the Grain of Wheat, who actually died and rose. That's why Armstrongism is such a mess today — dozens of splinter groups all claiming to be the "true" continuation, still arguing over who keeps the law purest, still waiting for the same failed prophetic timelines. When your foundation isn't Christ the Rock (1 Corinthians 3:11), but a man's "restored package," it predictably crumbles into legalistic factions.2. "The true Gospel begins with the Gospel of the Kingdom of God... mainstream Christianity ends with a dead Christ hanging on a cross"Yes, because nothing screams "we have the full gospel" like accusing billions of Christians of worshipping a dead guy on a stake (God forbid if you call it a cross) while you have unlocked the real message: a future government you qualify for by keeping the right holy days. Newsflash from the actual New Testament: The gospel is about Christ. Mark 1:1 calls it "the gospel of Jesus Christ." Paul defines it as the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ for our sins (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). 

The Kingdom of God is real and glorious — but it's His Kingdom, brought by the crucified and risen King. Jesus didn't say "Preach the Kingdom... and oh yeah, me too if there's time." He is the Kingdom in person. 

The apostles didn't tiptoe around the cross to get to the future government; they led with "Christ crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2).  

Calling mainstream Christianity "ending with a dead Christ" is peak projection. We celebrate the empty tomb every single day! The living Lord is at the right hand of the Father right now. The comment's version reduces Christ to a ticket-taker for the coming Kingdom while you work on your law-keeping résumé.3. "The sacrifice of Christ is not enough... We are cleansed by Christ’s blood, but we are saved by His life... Wave Sheaf Offering... full complete Gospel"Here it is — the heart of the error. The cross is just the beginning of your spiritual house-cleaning. Now you have to keep it occupied with... what? Your obedience to Old Covenant shadows?  Hebrews 10:10-14 laughs at this: "And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all... For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." One offering. Done. Perfected forever. Not "start with the blood, then add Sabbath-keeping and holy day observance to finish the job."  Romans 5:10 ("saved by his life") doesn't mean "the cross got you in the door, now keep the law to stay saved." It means the living, risen Christ continues the work He began — interceding, giving His Spirit, keeping you. The New Covenant doesn't pit the death against the resurrection; both are His finished work applied to us.  The Wave Sheaf Offering typology is cute. Christ fulfilled it perfectly as the firstfruits. We don't need to reenact the shadow to "present ourselves." That's the whole point of the New Covenant replacing the Old (Hebrews 8–10). The comment turns fulfillment into "now you do your part by keeping the feasts."4. It always boils down to enforcing the law over grace, justification, and sanctificationThis is the core rot. The comment admits the cross cleanses but insists it's "not enough." We still need the "resurrected Christ" plus (implied) law-keeping to complete the deal.  New Covenant reality check:

• Justification is by faith in Christ apart from works of the law (Romans 3:28; Galatians 2:16). 
• Sanctification is the Spirit writing God's law on our hearts (Jeremiah 31:33; Hebrews 8:10) and producing fruit — not external observance of shadows (Colossians 2:16-17). 
• Adding Sabbath, holy days, or tithing as requirements for ongoing favor puts you back under the tutor that was meant to lead to Christ (Galatians 3:24-25). Paul is brutal in Galatians 5: "You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace."

The "house swept clean but empty" warning (Matthew 12:43-45) is about the danger of not being filled with the Spirit — not a call to fill it with Old Covenant rituals. The New Covenant promise is precisely that the Spirit does come and transform us from the inside.

The comment tries to sound profound by saying "mainstream ends with the cross, but we have the full picture." In reality, it diminishes the cross, subordinates Christ to a coming government + law checklist, and justifies starting a "restoration" ministry without leading with the Restorer Himself.  That's why it produces spiritual pride ("we have the truth others missed"), division (endless splinters), and a focus on external observances rather than the indwelling Christ who is our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption (1 Corinthians 1:30).  The New Covenant doesn't say "Christ's blood gets you started — now keep the law to finish." It says Christ finished it. Preach Him — crucified, risen, reigning, and coming again. Everything else flows from there. Anything else is just rearranging Old Covenant furniture in a house Christ already tore down and rebuilt in Himself.  

Silent Pilgrim