Monday, November 9, 2026

UCG: Fourth-Generation Faith, First-Generation Fractures: A Testimony of the System Working Exactly as Designed




UCG's Amber Duran, pastor's wife and editor for Beyond Today, has an article up titled "Broken Home: Unbroken Faith" (Compass Check, Fall 2026) on the United Church of God site. It is a personal testimony of a fourth-generation COG member (great-grandmother heard Herbert W. Armstrong on the radio) whose parents divorced when she was young. She describes the pain, the forced choices between parents, navigating Sabbath-keeping at her non-member father's house, finding "family" in the local congregation, learning to forgive, and later marrying equally yoked within the system. It repeatedly elevates God's original design for lifelong marriage, the church as spiritual family, and the liberating power of forgiveness (citing Colossians 3:13, etc.).

On its face, some of the personal reflections and the call to forgive are unobjectionable. The problem is the source and the selective memory.

The Worldwide Church of God (the mother body from which UCG split in 1995) and its Armstrongist offshoots systematically prioritized organizational loyalty and distinctive doctrines over natural family bonds for decades:
  • Early WCG doctrine on divorce and remarriage was so rigid that people in second marriages were frequently required to separate to be baptized or remain in good standing. This produced a class of "spiritual widows" (and widowers) supported by third-tithe funds. Herbert Armstrong later loosened the policy in 1974 partly because it was costing members and creating practical chaos. The article's nostalgia for "God's design" ignores that the organization itself manufactured broken homes under the banner of purity.
  • Herbert Armstrong's own writings on disfellowshipping were explicit. In pieces such as "When One Is Disfellowshipped - Which Family Comes First?" he argued that membership in the "God Family" (the church) took precedence, and that members were to "avoid" even close relatives who had been marked for causing division or offenses "contrary to the doctrine." He invoked Romans 16:17 and 2 Thessalonians 3 alongside Matthew 10:36-37. The natural family was secondary when it conflicted with church discipline.
  • Disfellowshipping (the Armstrongist version of shunning) was a real tool. It was applied for doctrinal dissent, "causing division," or lifestyle issues. While UCG's formal policy today is more measured than the Philadelphia Church of God's hardline version, the inherited culture still treats departure or questioning of core Armstrongist distinctives (Sabbath, holy days, tithing system, exclusive or near-exclusive "truth," etc.) as spiritually dangerous. That pressure has split households for generations.
The 1995 formation of UCG itself was a massive family-and-congregation fracture. When the post-Armstrong Worldwide Church of God under the Tkaches abandoned the distinctive Armstrongist package (British-Israelism, mandatory holy days, non-Trinitarian "God family" theology, etc.), large numbers of ministers and members left to preserve the old system. Critics at the time noted that many stayed until the doctrinal changes became irreversible-when the paycheck and institutional structure were clearly at risk. UCG was created so that ministers could continue being supported by the tithe system while keeping the legalistic framework. The "just so their ministers could still get paid" observation is not invented; it is how the largest offshoots were born.

UCG still counsels strongly against marrying outside the faith, treats unequally yoked situations as inherently strained, and maintains suspension/disfellowshipping procedures for division or habitual unrepentant sin. The article's own author grew up navigating the friction between church rules and a non-believing parent. That friction was not an accident; it is a design feature of the system.

The New Covenant has this to say.

The New Covenant is not a refined Mosaic administration with new management. It is the finished work of Christ that ends the old covenant system of works, days, foods, and priestly hierarchies as the means of standing before God (Galatians 3-5; Romans 7; Colossians 2; Hebrews 8-10).

What it requires of believers regarding family and relationships is straightforward:
  • Forgive as Christ forgave you (Colossians 3:13; Ephesians 4:32). Forgiveness is releasing the claim to vengeance; it does not require pretending sin is not sin or immediately restoring trust where repentance is absent.
  • Love one another and pursue peace (John 13:34-35; Romans 12:18). The law of Christ is love, not institutional loyalty tests.
  • Honor parents and care for one's own household (Ephesians 6:1-3; 1 Timothy 5:8). Jesus' hard saying in Matthew 10:34-37 is real-following him can cost family relationships-but it is about allegiance to him, not to a corporate church hierarchy, a Council of Elders, or a unique set of Armstrongist doctrines. It is not a license for ministers to manufacture division so the organization stays intact and funded.
  • Reconciliation where possible (2 Corinthians 5:18-20). The New Covenant ministry is one of reconciliation, not perpetual marking and avoiding over secondary matters.
Armstrongism inverted this. It made distinctive practices and loyalty to "the one true church" (or the current pure remnant) the measure of faithfulness. The result was exactly the family fractures the UCG article now laments and spiritualizes as refining fire. The church becomes the real family; the natural family is dispensable when it gets in the way of the system.

The personal pain in the article is real. Many children of divorce and many former members of these groups carry scars. But publishing a piece that treats the church organization as the healing family while the same tradition spent decades splitting households to protect its doctrines and its payroll is not prophetic. It is selective. The New Covenant does not demand that anyone keep funding or submitting to a hierarchy that treats natural family ties as secondary to institutional continuity. It demands that people follow Christ, extend grace, and stop elevating man-made walls (whether Sabbath enforcement against family, shunning, or exclusive claims) above the law of love.

Silent Pilgrim

---------------------


I’ll never forget the first Bible study I ever did on my own.

I was in fourth or fifth grade, and my parents had been divorced since I was 4 years old. During one of our weekly Wednesday night visits, my dad sat me down and began to say some not-so-nice things about my church.

“Your church is a cult,” he said, and proceeded to toss a book about cults into my elementary-school lap, which included a section about the Worldwide Church of God.
I timidly shrugged and replied, “I just believe what the Bible says.” I had no idea how to talk to my unbelieving father about what I believed, nor did I ever think I would have to defend my faith to my own dad. But there I was, doing just that.

I was sweating, my stomach churned and I was on the verge of tears. I went home, pulled out my Bible and found every reference I could on divorce. I remember reading Malachi 2:16 and connecting deeply with it: “For the Lord God of Israel says that He hates divorce, for it covers one’s garment with violence.” The truth of that scripture resounded in my heart—this was violence. What once was whole was now in pieces.

The painful separation of my family made me wonder:
How was I supposed to be happy? How could I ever be successful? Would I ever be able to rear a family of my own some day?
Life with an unbelieving parent

I’m what some call a fourth-generation Christian. God started weaving His truth into my family’s story all the way back in the days of my great-grandmother, when she began to listen to Herbert W. Armstrong on the radio.

My mother met my father in high school, and they were married just before her first son was born. She was called and baptized into God’s Church, while my father, who was raised Catholic, never really practiced any religion of his own. My mother raised my two brothers and I in the faith, but because my father never shared my mother’s faith, there was a natural disconnect between them.

I have very little memory of the years my parents were together. Because they split when I was so young, the separation and divorce feel like my first memory of them both—I don’t really remember any part of my childhood when both my parents were in the home together.

Unfortunately, my parents’ divorce was not very amicable and that put my brothers and me in uncomfortable positions far too often. Many times, we were forced to choose which parent we wanted to spend time with, and how often. I can remember the intense inner turmoil and the extreme guilt I felt if I wanted to go with my dad, because then that meant I was leaving my mom alone. The hurt she felt was always plain on her face and in her tears. There was no right choice, but a choice had to be made nonetheless.

Sometimes my dad would take us over a weekend. When this happened, we would have to make personal choices about the Sabbath and how to keep it holy, even when we were encouraged to play video games or go to the mall or a waterpark. As respectfully and quietly as possible, we navigated those waters.

I don’t believe that my parents put me in these positions maliciously. I never believed their divorce was my fault, but that didn’t make life any easier, and I had to grow up quickly. Even if my parents had chosen to remain together, there would always have been some degree of strain or separation between them, because they didn’t agree about God’s truth.
God’s family design

These are issues God never wanted children (or adults) to face, and I share my story with the goal of offering hope and encouragement to you if you’re going through a similar situation. Instead, the Eternal designed marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a husband and wife, and He established the family unit to depict the spiritual family He is in the process of building! Although Scripture recognizes limited circumstances in which separation or divorce may become necessary or permissible, those exceptions do not change God’s original design for marriage

From the beginning, God created us in His image and said, “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:27-28).He engineered marriage to stand as a sacred covenant, where two become one (Genesis 2:24). The marital relationship between a husband and his wife is intended to represent the loving relationship between Jesus Christ and His Church (Ephesians 5:31-32). Children from this union—when viewed how God views them—are considered a blessing, a “heritage from the Lord. . . a reward” (Psalm 127:3)!

Matthew 19:6 says,

“What God has joined together, let not man separate,” and in verse 8, Jesus makes clear that He had only permitted divorce as a concession for “the hardness of [their] hearts.”

Although God’s intended family design wasn’t what I experienced growing up, that didn’t mean He was going to abandon me, and, similarly, He won’t desert you. In Hebrews 13:5 we are reminded that the Almighty will not leave or forsake us; He will not abandon those He is calling. He can provide care, guidance and meaningful spiritual family relationships through His Church. It’s as if He extends His hand to us as a loving Father does, and says, I’ll show you the way. Follow me, child. For me, this way led directly to His Church.

I lived with my mother and had once-a-week visits at my dad’s house after school. I saw my school and Church friends more than I saw my own father, which is odd to think about.

When I would read my Bible or hear sermons at services about God being a Father and wanting to build a family, I paid attention. I needed a family. My brothers needed a family. And we not only found that in God, but in the Church that He gave us.

We found fathers and mothers in our local congregation—men and women with families of their own who took the time to build relationships with us and fulfilled aspects of family for us that we never had. Fathers would take my brothers out hunting or teach them new skills. Mothers would check in to see how I was doing and would take me under their wing. It is truly a treasured gift that God gives to us through the assembly that He calls. To this day, the Church is my family. When members of the Church seek opportunities to practice Galatians 6:10, doing “good to all, especially to those who are of the household of faith,” beautiful things happen for a child like me, who found a healthy family life at Church.

When things felt especially hard through the years, Scripture reminded me that difficult times aren’t without purpose. In fact, trials and challenges produce wonderful things!


“That the genuineness of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it is tested by fire, may be found to praise, honor, and glory at the revelation of Jesus Christ” (1 Peter 1:7).

For me and many others, too, that refinement process began at a young age. And even though it’s a painful thing to recollect or reflect on, that pain produced something greater in me: “. . . tribulation produces perseverance; and perseverance, character; and character, hope” (Romans 5:3-4).

Everything I needed for a good life was found in God’s Word and His guidance. I owe my life and success all to God.
A higher calling

Mankind’s track record shows us that earthly families will have problems. Every person makes mistakes (Romans 3:23), and some are worse than others. However, when we learn to forgive at a young age, it can provide us with an incredibly liberating and peace-giving experience. Even when someone has not asked for forgiveness, we can choose to release bitterness, refuse to seek revenge and maintain a heart that is ready to forgive. Reconciliation and the restoration of trust, however, require genuine repentance and demonstrated change. In Colossians 3:13, Paul speaks plainly to the Church of God, reminding them that Christ’s disciples are responsible for “bearing with one another, and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even as Christ forgave you, so you also must do.”

In my Christian walk, I’ve come to learn that I love God’s law. Many will claim that it’s a burden that keeps us from doing fun things like going out with friends on the Sabbath or playing sports or participating in tournaments during the Sabbath. But, trust me when I say, those things do not matter as much as you might think they do—they’re so fleeting! And they’re nothing in comparison to the peace and the joy that obeying God brings to you.

Once you’ve chosen to release bitterness and maintain a forgiving heart—not just saying the words because it’s what you’re supposed to do, but deeply and inwardly letting go of the hurt—there’s no greater relief! A very real weight is lifted from your shoulders. You can begin to heal even when reconciliation or restored trust is not yet possible.

I deeply love both my father and mother. I love my stepmother. And my children love them, too. They are my family. I’ve grown up in God’s way and chose to commit my life fully to that way in 2011 when I was baptized. I’ve been married to my wonderful husband for almost 16 years, and we share the same faith. As is discussed in Amos 3:3 and 2 Corinthians 6:14-17, I am enjoying the wonderful fruits of being “equally yoked” with my husband. We are blessed to have two beautiful children learning this way, too. I learned how a family should operate through God’s Word, and I follow His lead.

Every family is different; every divorce is different. For my parents, the divorce wasn’t amicable, though for some it may be. Some families endure much greater turmoil than I. However, one thing is constant, unchanging, timeless—it’s God’s love, faithfulness and commitment toward us (Joshua 1:9; Hebrews 13:8). We can rely on Him, depend on Him, trust in Him.

So, regardless of your circumstances or the challenges in your family situation, remember to lean on the One who is our Creator, who formed us in the womb, knows us completely and loves us deeply (Psalm 139:13-16). Whether you live under one roof or two, you are always at home with God.

Amber Duran lives in Loveland, OH, with her two boys and husband, Andy, who pastors the Cincinnati East and North congregations. She also works as an associate editor for Beyond Today magazine.

Sunday, November 8, 2026

UPDATED: PCG: Flurry Clan Burns More Tithe Money On Trip To Ireland




A Gulfstream G-IV (G4) flying from Edmond, Oklahoma, to Shannon, Ireland, and returning would likely cost approximately $150,000–$220,000 for the complete round trip, depending on fuel prices, flight routing, crew expenses, and whether the aircraft has to remain in Ireland.

That is an estimated aircraft operating and trip cost, not necessarily the amount an organization actually paid.

Estimated flight breakdown

The distance from Edmond to Shannon is approximately 3,697 nautical miles one way, or 7,393 nautical miles round trip.

Flight time, both directions
15–17 hours

Fuel
$50,000–$65,000

Crew and flight operations
$20,000–$30,000

Maintenance and engine reserves
$25,000–$35,000

Airport, landing and handling fees
$5,000–$12,000

Overnight crew expenses and miscellaneous
$3,000–$8,000

These are planning estimates, not an actual invoice. Some categories overlap with published hourly operating-cost calculations, so they should not simply be added together.

If the church owns and operates the aircraft
$130,000–$160,000


Published figures support these estimates:

CRAFT's Gulfstream GIV cost analysis lists charter rates of $14,500–$16,500 per hour and fuel consumption around 447 gallons per hour.

GlobalAir's GIV operating-cost report lists an estimated total operating cost of $8,148 per flight hour.

Guardian Jet's GIV specifications lists a nominal range of 3,800 nautical miles.

One important consideration: The westbound return flight from Ireland to Oklahoma could be more challenging because of prevailing headwinds. The G-IV's published range is approximately 3,800 nautical miles, making this route close to its nominal range. A fuel stop could therefore be necessary, depending on the aircraft configuration, payload, weather and routing.

Bottom line

If we're examining the expense of a Philadelphia Church of God trip to Ireland using this aircraft,  $150,000 is a reasonable working estimate for the round-trip operating expense, while recognizing that the actual amount could be higher.

That's a substantial amount of money to consider when evaluating how church contributions are being spent.  AI sources on estimates


Armstrongism: Still Standing at Mount Sinai While Christ Has Moved On

 


Armstrongism: Still Standing at Mount Sinai While Christ Has Moved On

By a Concerned Believer 

Armstrongism's deepest contradiction may be its insistence that Christians return to the Old Covenant while claiming a clearer grasp of the New Covenant than other Christians. After nearly two thousand years, you might expect Jesus Christ's message to have settled the issue. It has not. Armstrongism continues trying to keep Moses' religious system in operation, despite the New Testament's clear claim that Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and established something greater.

At Mount Sinai, God made the Old Covenant with Israel. Its commandments shaped the nation's life, while priests, sacrifices, ceremonial rules, and temple worship governed how the people approached God. The arrangement had a defined purpose: it showed God's holiness, revealed human sin, preserved Israel as the people from whom the Messiah would come, and directed attention toward Christ. It was not meant to last forever or give humanity a way to earn righteousness and salvation. Paul called the Law a schoolmaster that led people to Christ (Galatians 3:24). It exposed sin, and the sacrifices made clear that repeated animal offerings could never meet humanity's deeper need.

That something was Jesus Christ.

At the Last Supper, Jesus said the cup signified the New Covenant sealed by His blood (Luke 22:20). He was the perfect sacrifice and eternal High Priest who mediates a better covenant, one founded on better promises (Hebrews 8:6). With Him, the reality anticipated by the earthly priesthood, sacrifices, and temple had arrived; those arrangements had completed their purpose. The shadow yielded to the substance.

Yet Armstrongism apparently missed the memo.

Armstrongism does not let Christ's fulfillment of the Old Covenant shape Christian life. Instead, it turns back to Sinai and treats practices such as Sabbath and holy day observance, dietary rules, and tithing as requirements for faithful Christians. Members are told that following these rules separates the truly obedient from Christians deemed deceived because they have misunderstood God's instructions.

Apparently, Christ's finished work needs a little help from the church calendar.

The New Testament does not present the New Covenant as a revised form of Moses' religious system. Hebrews 8:13 says plainly that, by establishing a New Covenant, God made the first one obsolete. Paul draws the contrast even more sharply in 2 Corinthians 3: the Old Covenant was written on stone tablets, whereas the New Covenant brings the ministry of the Spirit. God's work no longer revolves around external regulations; it changes the human heart through the Holy Spirit.

Christians are not therefore free to live for themselves or discard moral responsibility. Grace does not excuse sinful behavior. Titus 2:11-12 says that grace teaches believers to turn from ungodliness and live rightly. Obedience follows salvation; it does not purchase it. Christians obey because they belong to Christ, rather than trying to earn acceptance by completing an elaborate set of covenant obligations.

Unfortunately, Armstrongism keeps treating the two as though they were the same. Obedience should grow out of a changed heart; instead, it becomes a religious yardstick. Following the right day and calendar, observing dietary rules, and accepting organizational teachings are presented as proof of spiritual superiority. The New Testament, by contrast, gives far greater weight to love, mercy, forgiveness, humility, and the fruit of the Spirit.

It's easy to spend hours working out holy days and scrutinizing food rules, then miss the far harder work of loving your neighbor.

Paul faced the same mindset in Galatians. Some believers were being urged to add Old Covenant requirements to their Christian faith, as though faith in Christ were insufficient by itself. Paul did not praise them for reviving neglected commandments; he warned that this return placed them back under bondage. Anyone seeking justification through the Law, he argued, was denying the sufficiency of Christ (Galatians 5:1-4). That warning still speaks to movements claiming that Christians must follow Mosaic regulations to prove their faithfulness.

Armstrongism also misses a major change introduced by the New Covenant: through Jesus Christ, believers can approach God directly. The Old Covenant tied sanctuary access to an earthly priesthood and sacrifices. Christ, however, is the eternal High Priest, and His sacrifice allows believers to come before God with confidence (Hebrews 10:19-22).

Armstrongist groups often rebuild the religious hierarchy that Christ's ministry rendered unnecessary. Ministers and church leaders receive unusual authority, while self-appointed prophets claim a special grasp of truth, unique commissions, or sole responsibility for restoring doctrines they say everyone else lost. Members are then directed to these men for spiritual guidance and prophetic interpretation, despite Christ having already provided the way believers approach the Father.

Apparently, the New Covenant needs an institutional middleman after all.

This legalistic mindset brings familiar results. People start judging their standing with God by visible religious behavior and loyalty to an organization. Some grow convinced that they are spiritually superior; others worry endlessly that they have not done enough. Legalism breeds pride and fear alike, and neither reflects the freedom Paul describes in Christ.

The irony is hard to miss: Armstrongism often charges mainstream Christianity with abandoning God's commandments, yet it misunderstands the relationship between the Old Covenant and life under the New. Though it claims to defend biblical truth, it keeps directing believers back to the covenant that Hebrews calls obsolete. Christ is celebrated, but Moses remains the practical center of its religious identity.

If Christ completed the Law, offered the final sacrifice, established a superior covenant, and gave believers direct access to the Father, why does Armstrongism keep acting as though Christians must go back to Sinai and complete what remains?

Legalistic religion feels safer when faith can be reduced to rules, boundaries, and visible performance. Grace resists that kind of control: it directs attention to Christ instead of institutional authority. Organizations can count attendance, observance, tithes, and compliance. Genuine love, humility, mercy, and spiritual maturity are far harder to measure.

And therein lies the problem.

Christ Is Not an Amendment to Moses

The Old Covenant was no error. God used it for His purpose, and it directed people toward the Messiah who was to come. Still, a shadow cannot replace what it represents; preparation was meant to lead somewhere. Jesus did not give His blood to create another system of rules for people to uphold. He came to reconcile humanity with God and establish a New Covenant based on better promises.

Armstrongism faces an awkward biblical problem: it cannot keep proclaiming Christ's superiority while treating Moses' religious requirements as the measure of Christian faithfulness. Nor can it praise grace and still burden believers with obligations the apostles refused to impose on Gentile Christians.

The New Covenant does not restore Mount Sinai. Nor does it depend on Herbert Armstrong, Bob Thiel, or any other self-appointed religious authority to repair it or add commandments claimed to have been forgotten. Christ is sufficient; His sacrifice is complete, and His covenant is better.

Perhaps Armstrongism should stop fixating on stone tablets and turn its attention to the One who fulfilled what they never could.

The shadow has done its work; the reality is here. His name is Jesus Christ. Keeping the Sabbath, observing holy days, or twisting Armstrongist theology cannot make Moses the mediator of the New Covenant again.


The Value of “Wisdom” According to LCG (Or: How to Quote Solomon While Quietly Ignoring the One Greater Than Solomon)




Douglas S. Winnail has once again reminded the Living Church of God faithful that wisdom is really valuable. Greater than rubies. Greater than gold. The key, he says, is a proper fear of God and obedience to God’s instructions. Then he dutifully wheels out the usual proof texts: Proverbs, a quick nod to the child Jesus increasing in wisdom, James 1:5, and 2 Timothy 3:14-17. The punchline? Follow these instructions so you can become more useful instruments in God’s hands.

How convenient.

Let’s set the Old Covenant scroll aside for a moment and ask the obvious question the note carefully avoids: what does the New Covenant actually say wisdom is?

Paul does not say Christ is a really helpful example of someone who kept the instructions so you should go do likewise. He says Christ is the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24, 30). Not a pointer toward more law-keeping. The thing itself. The wisdom of God is a person, not a checklist of holy days, clean meats, and second-tithe accounting rules that LCG still treats as the gold standard of spiritual maturity.

Solomon wrote Proverbs under the Old Covenant. He was the wisest man of his era, and it still wasn’t enough to keep him from accumulating a thousand wives and turning his heart after other gods. Jesus explicitly claimed to be greater than Solomon (Matthew 12:42). The one “greater than Solomon” did not arrive to hand out a slightly improved version of the Mosaic instructions. He arrived to fulfill them and then write something better on the hearts of those who believe (Hebrews 8:10; 10:16). That is the New Covenant. Winnail’s note treats the New Covenant as if it is merely the Old one with better lighting.

“Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” is true. It is also true that perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18). The New Covenant does not leave people perpetually trembling under a system of external obedience so they can stay “useful.” It gives the Spirit so that the law is no longer something you strive to perform from the outside; it becomes the natural fruit of a new heart. LCG’s version of wisdom has a curious habit of translating into more fear of missing a feast, more fear of the second tithe audit, and more fear of the minister who might decide you are no longer useful enough.

James 1:5 is about asking for wisdom in the middle of trials, not about asking for clearer instructions on which meats are still unclean or how much of your income must be routed through the church’s bank account. And 2 Timothy 3:15 does not say the Scriptures make you wise so you can become a more reliable instrument for organizational ends. It says they make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. Salvation. Through faith. Not through demonstrated obedience to a filtered set of Old Covenant regulations that the Living Church of God has decided are still binding while the rest of the book of Hebrews is quietly de-emphasized.

The child Jesus increased in wisdom, stature, and favor. Adult Jesus then went to the cross, rose, and poured out the Spirit. The “instructions” that mattered after that were not a call to re-enact Solomon’s court or Moses’ camp. They were a call to believe, to receive the Spirit, and to walk in the freedom of the New Covenant rather than the yoke that neither the fathers nor the apostles were able to bear (Acts 15:10).

Winnail closes by urging the faithful to follow “these instructions” so they can be useful instruments. Useful to whom, exactly? The God who already declared the work finished, or the organization that still needs a steady stream of obedient members who never quite grow out of the fear-based system that keeps the lights on?

Solomon’s wisdom was real. It was also incomplete. The New Covenant does not invite you to go back and polish the incomplete version. It offers the wisdom of God Himself—Christ—apart from the works of the law. That is not a minor adjustment to Winnail’s note. It is the reason the note, for all its polished Proverbs citations, still manages to miss the point.

Silent Pilgrim

Living Church of God Celebrates Historic Mind Numbing Victory: Six People Showed Up




In a stunning display of prophetic momentum that can only be described as "encouraging" if you squint hard enough and ignore basic arithmetic, the Living Church of God recently reported the results of its latest Tomorrow's World Presentations. In Amherst, Nova Scotia, six guests materialized out of 263 invited subscribers. The follow-up in Fredericton, New Brunswick, managed three visitors. Headquarters promptly informed the flock that this was an encouraging turnout and asked everyone to keep praying and supporting the effort.

Let's pause for a moment of quiet awe. Six people. From two hundred and sixty-three invitations. That is roughly a 2.3 percent response rate. In the world of direct-mail marketing, that might be considered respectable for selling driveway sealant. For a group that claims to be restoring original Christianity, preaching the pure Gospel, and serving as a witness to the nations while the British-descended peoples face decline (the actual topic of at least one of these Canadian events), it is something closer to a rounding error. Yet LCG treats it like the early church in Jerusalem, only with fewer people and more hotel conference rooms.

This is the same pattern that has defined Tomorrow's World Presentations for nearly two decades. Over the years the organization has conducted well over a thousand of these events across hundreds of cities. Cumulative guest totals have climbed into the tens of thousands. The conversion rate into actual, sustained membership, however, has remained microscopic. Many of the "guests" who do appear are already Church of God members from other groups shopping for a slightly different flavor of Sabbath-keeping, Holy Day observance, and tithing. The rest tend to drift away once they discover that "restoring original Christianity" means treating the New Covenant as little more than a slightly updated version of the Old one, complete with the same dietary rules, calendar, and financial requirements.

The numbers are consistent with the larger picture. LCG's worldwide Feast of Tabernacles attendance in recent years has hovered in the 9,000-11,000 range (including some online and shut-in participation). Membership, including children, remains in the low tens of thousands at most, spread across hundreds of mostly small congregations. For a movement that once filled Ambassador Auditorium and claimed it was doing a work that would reach the whole world before the end, these figures represent stagnation dressed up as faithfulness. The "little flock" verse from Luke 12:32 is endlessly useful for this purpose: any failure can be reframed as divine preference for quality over quantity.

What the numbers actually reveal is a message that has lost whatever cultural traction it once had. People in 2026 are not lining up to hear that they must keep the seventh-day Sabbath, observe the Old Testament festivals, and send a portion of their income to Charlotte in order to be part of the true church. The New Covenant announcement-that Christ has fulfilled the law, that justification is by faith, and that the Spirit writes the law on the heart rather than on stone-has far more explanatory power and far less administrative overhead. Armstrongism's version of "the Gospel of the Kingdom" still requires an elaborate infrastructure of ministers, literature, and prophetic timelines that keep failing to deliver on their own terms. When only a handful of the already-interested show up, the honest response would be reflection. The institutional response is to call six people an encouraging start and schedule the next round in Kitchener/Guelph and Springfield, Illinois.

Armstrongism as a broader phenomenon is aging out. The original Worldwide Church of God generation is largely gone. The various splinter groups continue to divide, rebrand, and insist that this time the real work is finally beginning. Meanwhile, the actual New Covenant message continues to draw people without requiring them to adopt a 20th-century American reconstruction of ancient Israelite religion. LCG can keep mailing invitations and celebrating single-digit turnouts. Reality, however, keeps delivering the same quiet verdict: the appeal is gone, the numbers are pathetic, and no amount of internal cheerleading changes the arithmetic.

Friday, November 6, 2026

True Church Government In Action: Believe in Jesus, Obey Armstrong, Pay Samuel!




Every so often, Armstrongism produces something so spectacularly disconnected from the New Covenant that you have to read it twice to make sure it isn't satire. Samuel Kitchen has now managed to accomplish something remarkable. He has taken several passages of Scripture, inserted Herbert W. Armstrong into the middle of them, declared virtually every other Church of God organization outside the Body of Christ, and emerged with the extraordinary announcement that Jesus Christ has personally authorized him to collect God's tithes and offerings. Apparently, the finished work of Christ needed one final addition: Samuel Kitchen's mailing address.

The foundation of Samuel's argument rests on Matthew 10:14-15, Matthew 10:40, Luke 10:16, and Ephesians 2:19-22. The first passages concern individuals whom Jesus personally commissioned to preach during His earthly ministry. They do not establish a perpetual apostolic franchise through which someone centuries later can announce that Jesus has appointed him as His exclusive representative. Yet Samuel conveniently inserts Herbert Armstrong into that original apostolic commission and declares that Armstrong was sent by Christ to complete the foundation of the Church.

There is just one problem. Paul says the Church is built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Jesus Christ Himself as the chief cornerstone. He does not say that Herbert Armstrong would eventually arrive in the twentieth century to become an additional foundation stone. The apostolic foundation has already been laid. Christ does not need a succession of self-appointed restoration figures to finish what He began.

But Samuel insists that Armstrong's writings and teachings are now integral to that foundation. In other words, the teachings of a twentieth-century religious leader have been elevated to a position of authority that effectively places them alongside the apostolic witness. Disagreement with Armstrong becomes disagreement with Jesus Christ Himself. What a convenient arrangement! Once a religious leader's teachings are treated as the voice of Christ, questioning that leader becomes a spiritual offense rather than an opportunity for honest biblical examination.

Samuel then invokes John 6:44, arguing that because the Father draws people to Christ, and because some people first encountered the gospel through Herbert Armstrong, Armstrong must therefore have been personally sent as an apostle. This is theological gymnastics worthy of an Olympic medal. God can use a preacher, a book, a conversation, or any number of circumstances to bring someone to Christ. That does not confer apostolic authority upon the instrument He uses. If someone discovers Christ through a book by C.S. Lewis, does Lewis become an apostle? Of course not. God receives the glory for drawing people to Christ, not the human instrument who happened to deliver the message.

The real problem becomes even more obvious when Samuel declares that any Church of God organization not in 100 percent agreement with Herbert Armstrong is not the Body of Christ. Apparently, the biblical qualifications for belonging to Christ have been replaced with an Armstrong loyalty examination. You can believe in Christ, trust in His sacrifice, and seek to follow Him, but if you disagree with Herbert Armstrong on a doctrinal point, Samuel has apparently decided that you belong to a synagogue of Satan.

Paul would have had something to say about that. In 1 Corinthians 1:12-13, he rebuked believers for dividing themselves into competing camps based on allegiance to particular religious teachers. He reminded them that Christ is not divided and that Paul himself had not been crucified for them. Yet Armstrongism has managed to recreate precisely the kind of personality-centered allegiance Paul condemned, only with Herbert Armstrong's name substituted for the first-century personalities.

Then comes the financial centerpiece of Samuel's message: Malachi 3 and his demand that God's people return their tithes and offerings to the Worldwide Church of God, under his administration.

Here the theological problems become particularly serious. Malachi was addressing covenant unfaithfulness in ancient Israel, including the withholding of agricultural tithes intended to support the Levitical priesthood and temple system. Samuel simply transfers that Old Covenant arrangement into his modern organization and declares himself the authorized recipient.

Apparently, the Levitical priesthood has been replaced, the temple system has been redefined, and the treasury department has relocated to a post office box in Fairfield, Iowa.

The New Testament, however, presents a very different picture. Hebrews 7:12 explains that a change in priesthood necessarily involves a change in the law. Christ is our great High Priest. Christians are not instructed to recreate the Old Covenant temple economy under a modern religious administrator.

The New Testament absolutely teaches generosity and financial support for those who faithfully minister the gospel. But 2 Corinthians 9:7 makes the principle unmistakable: giving is to be according to what a person has determined in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion. Paul does not establish a compulsory ten-percent payment to a particular organization, nor does he identify a modern religious leader as the exclusive recipient of God's money.

There is an enormous difference between encouraging Christians to give generously and declaring that Jesus Christ personally commands them to send their money to you. Samuel appears to have overlooked that distinction.

His use of Zechariah 2 is equally revealing. He takes prophetic passages concerning Jerusalem, Zion, and God's future purposes for His people and applies them to his own modern organization. He even connects his recent visit to Rome with prophetic warnings about the destruction of that great city. Once again, Scripture is made to validate Samuel's preexisting conclusions about his organization and its supposedly unique commission.

The underlying message never changes: Samuel's organization is God's organization, Herbert Armstrong was God's apostle, competing organizations are spiritually corrupt, and those who refuse to return to his organization are resisting God Himself.

What makes this particularly troubling is the enormous spiritual burden placed upon followers. Their relationship with Christ is effectively made dependent upon loyalty to a particular religious leader, institutional identity, and financial arrangement. Yet the New Testament points believers directly to Christ. First Timothy 2:5 identifies Jesus as the one mediator between God and humanity. Hebrews repeatedly emphasizes the sufficiency of His sacrifice and His continuing priestly ministry. There is no missing Armstrongite intermediary, and certainly no requirement that Samuel Kitchen stand between Christians and their Savior.

If Herbert Armstrong truly pointed people to Christ, why does Armstrongism continually insist that people must also submit to Armstrong's teachings as an indispensable foundation of their faith? Why must every competing organization be condemned? Why must Christian unity be measured by agreement with a twentieth-century preacher rather than by allegiance to Jesus Christ?

The New Covenant is not an Armstrongite restoration project. Christ does not need another apostle to complete His work, another organization to monopolize His Church, or another religious personality to collect His money.

Samuel repeatedly insists that this is not his work, that he did not volunteer, and that Jesus Christ appointed him to the job. Unfortunately, the only evidence offered for this extraordinary appointment is Samuel's own declaration, accompanied by an assortment of Scripture passages that never actually identify him, authorize him, or instruct Christians to send him their money.

What a remarkable coincidence that God's supposedly restored work happens to require financial support payable to the very man announcing that he has been appointed to administer it!

Perhaps Samuel should consider that there is a considerable difference between being convinced that God has given you a mission and convincing everyone else that God has given you authority over their spiritual lives and their wallets.

Jesus Christ did not establish the Church so that Herbert Armstrong could become its indispensable foundation stone and Samuel Kitchen could become its authorized collection agent. The foundation is Christ and the apostolic witness to Him. The gospel is sufficient. His sacrifice is sufficient. His priesthood is sufficient.

If Samuel wants to preach Christ, by all means, preach Christ. If he wants to encourage generosity, teach the New Testament principles of giving. But when he starts declaring that refusal to finance his organization is disobedience to Jesus Christ, he has crossed a very serious theological line.

The New Covenant has no provision for an Armstrongite apostolic franchise, no requirement for 100 percent agreement with Herbert Armstrong, and no provision for Samuel Kitchen's personal collection agency.

Christ said, "Come unto me." He did not say, "Come unto me through Herbert Armstrong, surrender your judgment to Samuel Kitchen, and make your checks payable to Fairfield, Iowa."

Perhaps it is time for Armstrongism to stop looking for another man to follow and start paying attention to the One it claims to worship.

----------------------------------------------------------

"whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
"Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city."(Matthew 10:14-15)
"He that receiveth you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me."(Matthew 10:40)

This is talking about the APOSTLES OF JESUS CHRIST. The men "sent forth" by Jesus Christ to preach the gospel of the Kingdom of God, 

"He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me."(Luke 10:16)
"Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
"And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
"In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
"In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit."(Ephesians 2:19-22 
 
If we are built together for an habitation of God through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, we have ALREADY received the apostles of Jesus Christ, and are readily HEARING THEM and RECEIVING THEM.

Today, we have the preserved epistles, and teachings of Herbert W Armstrong, which are already produced as integral to our foundation with Jesus Christ. 

Jesus Christ sent forth Herbert W Armstrong, in order to build us for an habitation of God, through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The people prior to this Philadelphia ERA, looked to dead apostles too. 

Some people want to say we follow dead men. Do you realize all the men of the Bible are DEAD, even Jesus had to die...but he was resurrected first? The others are awaiting a resurrection too. And what God did through them, in preaching and teaching, we who are of God receive and heareth them! Knowing this that they were sent of God. 

We have no excuse. Not only do we have the Word of God in print, but we also was given an apostle in the 20th century, to prepare the way for Christ's return, and for our preparation as the Bride of Jesus Christ! He is part of OUR FOUNDATION, and we are built in Christ with Mr. Herbert W Armstrong as an apostle! The rest of the Church prior DID NOT HAVE THIS! Why? Because we have a work to do. Every member of the body, does not do the same job. A toe cannot see, or smell, or taste. We all must work together, but we do different things. 

So if we believe the one sent forth by Jesus Christ, we observe everything he teaches us in the name of Jesus Christ, as if Christ Himself was teaching us! We can evaluate the lifetime of Herbert W Armstrong. He does not lead you away from Jesus Christ! He points you and leads you to Jesus Christ! 

And so we have EVIDENCE, that Herbert W Armstrong was doing the WORK OF GOD! Not the work of Herbert W Armstrong! THE WORK OF GOD! Because in John 6:44, Jesus says NO MAN CAN COME UNTO HIM UNLESS THE FATHER FIRST DRAWS HIM! The WORK OF GOD done by Herbert W Armstrong, was used to DRAW YOU TO JESUS CHRIST!

YOU WERE CALLED, through the hearing of the gospel message, and then you were added to the Body of Christ, when you repented of sin and BELIEVED THE GOSPEL. THE WORK OF GOD was performed by Herbert W Armstrong. And when YOU BELIEVED the one sent by Jesus Christ and received and heard His apostle, YOU became part of the WORK OF GOD.

As you live God's way, according to what Christ gave through His apostle, you become one with the Father, and Jesus Christ, and WITH ALL OF GOD'S PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD! Because when the WORK OF GOD went all around the world, so did the people of God stand up to perform that work!

This is why we are the Worldwide Church of God. We are the Church of God raised up in 100% agreement with the apostle of Jesus Christ Herbert W Armstrong, to DO THE WORK OF GOD a/k/a the GREAT COMMISSION. As we live, we become witnesses of that way of life. 

Some "Church of God" groups, are not in 100% agreement, and do not receive 100% of what the apostle has taught, and do not 100% observe the things we were taught to observe through Herbert W Armstrong. 

These are not the Body of Christ...So if you are part of the Body of Christ, why attend with belial? Why give to the synagogues of Satan the tithes and offerings of God? 

What does the Temple of God have to do with works of darkness, and of wickedness? This is why you are WARNED and have been warned for the last 16+ years!

These WORKS are NOT the WORK OF GOD! Their existence provides the evidence they are NOT doing the WORK OF GOD. 

They left the Worldwide Church of God. 

They developed new churches, and new works, according to their various departures from Jesus Christ. They wanted to "do better".

But BELIEVING GOD and THE ONE HE SENDS, does not require us to create hundreds of other churches and hundreds of other organizations. It requires us to stand still and let God perform His Mighty Work and Deeds!

The Worldwide Church of God is a spiritual organism. 

It is a SPIRITUAL HABITATION of God through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, a SPIRITUAL TEMPLE. 

Today, we are called by God to RETURN UNTO HIM. And to resume THE WORK OF GOD.
For the last 40 years, those who have held fast have observed what God gave through Mr. Armstrong all those years! Now, we are talking with each other as it says in Malachi 3:16-18, contemplating and thinking on the name and authority of God and Jesus Christ! Jesus Christ commends us for NOT FORSAKING HIS NAME in Revelation 3:8.

The WORK OF GOD was not the work of Herbert W Armstrong. Herbert W Armstrong was doing His part in the Work of God....so must we! That is what it means to be the Worldwide Church of God! TO WORK THE WORK OF GOD. To bring the tithes and offerings back, and give it to His AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

I didn't volunteer for the job. I was drafted. But I have the authority of Jesus Christ to receive the tithes and offerings of God and to DO THE WORK OF GOD. 

Earlier this year I went to Rome and Italy. 

What was present in my mind was what was said in Zechariah 2.

"I lifted up mine eyes again, and looked, and behold a man with a measuring line in his hand.
"'Then said I, Whither goest thou? And he said unto me, To measure Jerusalem, to see what is the breadth thereof, and what is the length thereof.
"And, behold, the angel that talked with me went forth, and another angel went out to meet him,
"And said unto him, Run, speak to this young man, saying, Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein:
"For I, saith the Lord, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her.
"Ho, ho, come forth, and flee from the land of the north, saith the Lord: for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of the heaven, saith the Lord.
"Deliver thyself, O Zion, that dwellest with the daughter of Babylon.
"For thus saith the Lord of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.
"For, behold, I will shake mine hand upon them, and they shall be a spoil to their servants: and ye shall know that the Lord of hosts hath sent me.
"Sing and rejoice, O daughter of Zion: for, lo, I come, and I will dwell in the midst of thee, saith the Lord.
"And many nations shall be joined to the Lord in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that the Lord of hosts hath sent me unto thee.
"And the Lord shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again.
"Be silent, O all flesh, before the Lord: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation."

WE ARE THAT HOLY HABITATION! We are BEING BUILT UP NOW, through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit! Not by might, nor by power, but BY MY SPIRIT SAITH THE LORD!

WE ARE HERE TO DO THE WORK OF GOD! Verse 11 describes a WORLDWIDE CHURCH OF GOD. And when this Church is restored, then you shall know I have been sent of the Lord. 

Verses 8-9 is what I was doing in ROME! Guess their end! They shall become a spoil to their servants, and that great city shall be destroyed!

Malachi 3 shows we are to DO A WORK, that is why the tithes and offerings are to be returned by THOSE DOING THE WORK OF GOD! We should NOT fund these other churches, who are keeping our membership from returning! They are teaching that the Worldwide Church of God went apostate and is no longer HEADED by Jesus Christ! THAT IS A LIE! They commit fraud so you can keep sending them God's money! 

SO why feed the wolves? They are NOT doing the Work of God! They are there to keep you funding THEIR WORK, and they do try to mimic the work being done by The Worldwide Church of God! BUT THEY ARE NOT THE WORLDWIDE CHURCH OF GOD, or they would CONTINUE AS US, but they went out of us and ARE MAKING IT KNOWN THEY ARE NOT ALL OF US! Why aren't they returning? YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RETURN! 

God says in Malachi, that the ministry departed from the way, and have cause many to stumble at the law. They are humbled and made base, meaning they are no longer His ministers!Why? Because they have rebelled against God and refuse to return!!!!! IT HAS BEEN 40 YEARS!
I'm visiting with brethren, and trying to rally the brethren together and God is doing that, so that we may be the Worldwide Church of God doing the WORK OF GOD. It is not the Work of Samuel Kitchen! But i am being used to do the Work of God, and to show the world we exist, and we still are working the work of God!

Now, what are YOU going to do about it? You are supposed to be doing the Work of God! But why then oppose me and work separately from me? We aren't a bunch of independent Christians working separately! WE OUGHT TO BE ONE IN HARMONY AND IN UNITY AND COOPERATION! ONE BODY. ONE SPIRIT. 

People want to say God put them in charge. No. They are critical of the man who was placed in charge. That man didn't choose or appoint himself. God chose him. 

My mailing address in P.O Box 126 Fairfield Iowa 52556 and my name is Samuel W Kitchen. This WORK OF GOD needs the people of God to support it. It does not need lukewarm guessers and doubters. It needs those CONQUERED TO THIS WORD and THIS 
FOUNDATION! Surrendered wholly to Jesus Christ! We do not live outside of this work! Take it to God and ask Him how you can become more involved. But to start God does declare what you can do with His tithes and offerings. They go to HIS WORK. SO OBSERVE this teaching, and OBEY GOD brethren. 

In Jesus Christ's name,
Samuel W Kitchen

Thursday, November 5, 2026

Armstrongism’s Pharisaic Gatekeepers: When the Law Becomes the God


Armstrongism’s Pharisaic Gatekeepers: When the Law Becomes the God

As Bereans Did has another excellent article up about the law and the church. One notable quote is this:

The Pharisees had an easy method for testing Him, and that was that the real Messiah to come surely would validate them as the guardians of the law; that the real Messiah would not allow Himself to be put to death by them or the Roman occupation. So all they had to do to prove or disprove Him was to charge Him with sin, condemn Him according to the law, and see what happens. If He dies, they were right. If He didn’t, they could always claim they were following the law to the letter. He broke the law; He sinned, and they acted accordingly, as they were commanded in the law.

Consider this carefully. It was their interpretation of the law that was the final arbiter of their decision process; not God who performed miraculous healing through the Holy Spirit that only could be attributed to God. They attributed those things to the devil anyway, even raising the dead.

The law was their de facto god… their graven images of stone that they never questioned as actually being treated by them as another god they obeyed in the hope of being blessed as a result. Appease the law and receive blessings. Ignore the law and the law would curse them.

The Pharisees didn’t merely keep the law—they positioned themselves as its exclusive guardians and final interpreters. Sounds familiar? That's Armstrongism today in the Churches of God landscape. They are the gatekeepers of the law and its modern day arbitors. Salvation is not assured unless you follow the strict law keeping of the church. Break the Sabbath - lake of fire. Eat pork or shellfish - lake of fire. Smoke cigarets - lake of fire. Leave the church - the deepest pits of the lake of fire that there is. Salvation does not exist outside of the strict lawkeeping of the church.

The Pharisees thought the real Messiah, they assumed, would validate them. He would submit to their authority, honor their rulings, and never allow Himself to be condemned under the very system they administered. So they tested Him the only way that mattered to them: charge Him with law-breaking, condemn Him according to their reading of Scripture, and watch what happens. If He dies, they were right. If He doesn’t, they could still claim they were simply being faithful stewards of the law.

Their interpretation was the final arbiter. The miracles—healings, raisings of the dead, works that could only come from God—were irrelevant. Those could be reassigned to the devil. What could not be questioned was the law as they understood it. The law had become their de facto god: a set of stone tablets they never examined for the possibility that they had turned it into another idol. Appease it and you receive blessing. Ignore it and it curses you. Transactional, mechanical, and utterly self-justifying.

Armstrongism runs the identical playbook, only with different letterhead.

Herbert Armstrong, Crackpot Bob, David Pack, Gerald Flurry, and the various lesser prophets who still orbit the system all function as self-appointed guardians of “the law.” Not the law as fulfilled in Christ, but the law as they have reconstructed it—Sabbath, holy days, tithing, clean and unclean, physical circumcision of the heart via calendar observance, and the rest of the package. The true church, they insist, will validate them. The real end-time work will recognize their authority, their interpretations, their organizational structure, and their financial requirements. Anyone who rejects those things is not merely mistaken; they are law-breakers, and therefore outside the covenant of blessing.

Watch how the test works in practice. Bring evidence of the finished work of Christ, the indwelling Spirit, the New Covenant reality that the law was a tutor until faith came (Galatians 3:24–25), or the plain statement that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4). The response is not engagement with the text. It is the Pharisaic move: charge the person with sin according to their reading of the law, declare them disqualified, and wait. If the person continues to reject their system, they were right—the individual is simply not “called.” If the person dies without submitting, the system is vindicated. The interpretation of the law remains the final arbiter.

Miracles, changed lives, the actual fruit of the Spirit, and the historical record of failed prophecies are all secondary. Those can be reassigned. The 1975 collapse can be redefined. Pack’s successive failed dates can be spiritualized. Thiel’s shifting timelines and African scandals can be minimized or blamed on others. What cannot be questioned is the law as the gatekeepers define it. Keep the Sabbath correctly (as they define “correctly”), send the tithe to the right address, avoid the right meats, and you remain eligible for blessing. Fail any of those and the curse of the law is still hanging over your head—New Covenant or no New Covenant.

This is exactly the idolatry the quote describes. The law has become the graven image. It is not examined as something that was always meant to point beyond itself to the One who fulfilled it. It is treated as the active agent of blessing and cursing. Appease the system and God is obligated to bless. Ignore the system and God is obligated to curse. The finished work of Christ is reduced to an entry ticket that still requires ongoing law-performance to remain valid. The Spirit’s work is subordinated to the calendar and the offering envelope.

The New Covenant answer is not complicated, even if it is offensive to the gatekeepers.

The law was never the final arbiter. Christ was. He did not come to validate the Pharisees’ guardianship; He came to fulfill the law and the prophets so that righteousness could be given apart from law-keeping (Romans 3:21–22). He was put to death under their condemnation and rose anyway—precisely the outcome their test said could not happen if He were genuine. The resurrection did not confirm their authority. It exposed it.

Under the New Covenant the believer is not under law but under grace (Romans 6:14). The law still reveals sin; it does not produce righteousness. The righteousness that counts is the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ. The curses of the law were exhausted on the cross (Galatians 3:13). There is no remaining transactional relationship in which Sabbath-keeping, tithing percentages, or clean-meat observance function as the mechanism of blessing. Those things may be observed by someone who is free; they are not the means by which anyone is kept free.

Armstrongism cannot accept this because it would collapse the gatekeeper role. If the law is no longer the active agent of blessing and cursing for the believer, then the people who claim exclusive interpretive authority over that law lose their power. So they keep the Pharisees’ method alive: charge the New Covenant teaching with antinomianism, condemn it according to their reading of selected Old Testament texts, and declare that anyone who dies outside their system has simply proven the system correct. The miracles of grace, the fruit of the Spirit, and the plain reading of the apostolic letters are reassigned to “another spirit” or “lawlessness.”

The law was their god. It remains the functional god of every Armstrongist system that still treats law-performance as the condition of ongoing acceptance. The quote you sent is not merely historical commentary. It is a diagnosis of a living problem. The stone tablets are still being polished, still being appealed to as the final standard, and still being used to determine who is in and who is out—while the One who fulfilled them is reduced to a supporting character in someone else’s legal system.

Paul does not stop at calling the law a temporary guardian. He goes further and names the condition of everyone still under its jurisdiction:

For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.” (Galatians 3:10)

The tutor was never a gentle schoolmaster handing out participation trophies. He was the enforcer of a standard no one could meet. Fail in one point and the whole arrangement collapses into curse (James 2:10, which Paul has already quoted in spirit). The law does not grade on a curve. It does not accept “mostly faithful.” It demands perfect, continuous obedience or it pronounces the sentence. That is why Paul says the law was never given to impart life; it was given to shut every mouth and place the entire world under the judgment of God (Romans 3:19; Galatians 3:21–22).

Armstrongism’s gatekeepers still collect the tuition as if the curse has not been paid.

They warn members that missing a Sabbath, sending the tithe to the wrong address, eating the wrong meat, or failing to observe a holy day correctly places them back under the very curse Paul says was exhausted at the cross. They treat the finished work of Christ as an entry fee that still requires ongoing law-performance to remain in good standing. In practice this means the curse is still active, still hanging over the believer’s head, still administered by the same self-appointed guardians who claim exclusive authority to interpret the statutes. The cross is acknowledged. The curse is simply relocated to anyone who refuses their reading of the law.

Paul’s next sentence removes the entire mechanism:

Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.” (Galatians 3:13)

The curse did not evaporate because people started trying harder. It was transferred. Christ became the cursed one so that those who trust Him would never again stand under that sentence. The law’s demand for perfect obedience was met in Him. Its penalty was executed on Him. The tutor’s authority to threaten the heir with the curse ended the moment the heir was declared free.

Yet the systems that still function as gatekeepers of the law continue to issue the threat. Keep the calendar correctly or the blessing is withdrawn. Send the money to the approved address or the curse returns. Submit to the leadership’s interpretation or you have placed yourself back under the very condemnation from which Christ redeemed you. This is not fidelity to Paul. It is the reimposition of the curse the apostle said had already been removed.

Any organization that still treats law-performance as the condition of ongoing acceptance is not merely misunderstanding the tutor’s temporary role. It is actively reintroducing the curse Paul declared finished. The guardians are still collecting payment on a debt that was canceled at the cross. They are still threatening the heirs with the very sentence the Heir already bore. The law has not merely outlived its usefulness as a guardian. In their hands it has been restored as an active instrument of condemnation long after the one who became a curse for us removed its power to condemn.

Silent Pilgrim