Fitly Joined Together? Herbert Armstrong’s One True Church Meets the Reality of a Thousand Splinters
Samuel Kitchen recently posted a 1981 quote from Herbert W. Armstrong that paints a picture of beautiful, organic unity. Armstrong declared that the Church of God is “fitly joined together,” founded on the apostles and prophets with Jesus Christ as the chief cornerstone. He leaned on the vine-and-branches imagery of John 15: the branches are joined to the vine and to one another through that vine. Break one off, he warned, and you break it off from Christ. God has one Church. He never said He would create several different groups. “I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” And, Armstrong insisted, that Church was still here in 1981—organized, together, and speaking the same thing.
Illustration by Samuel Kitchen
Forty-five years later the landscape looks less like a single healthy vine and more like a vineyard after a hurricane.
The organization Armstrong led did not remain “fitly joined together.” Before his death, there were already hundreds of splinter groups and self-appointed group leaders. Then, HWA had to go and die, and all hell broke loose. The Worldwide Church of God became a cascade of competing claims: United, Living, Philadelphia, Restored, Continuing, Church of God Eternal, and hundreds more. Each new group insisted it was the true remnant, the Philadelphian era, the sole organization still joined to the vine. Leaders rose, declared themselves the rightful successor or the end-time Elijah or the final apostle, and promptly cut off anyone who questioned the new arrangement. Disfellowshipping became the preferred pruning method. Congregations split, re-split, and split again. Today the COG world operates as hundreds of independent fiefdoms, each demanding exclusive loyalty, each warning that leaving their particular group is the same as leaving Christ.
The irony is thick enough to cut with a knife. Armstrong’s own words are now used by men who lead separate, mutually exclusive organizations to prove that only their group is the one true Church. The very quotation that insisted God would never create several different groups is posted by leaders who have spent decades creating and maintaining those groups. The “one thing” they claim to speak is no longer a shared voice; it is a chorus of competing claims about calendars, governance, prophecies, titles, and who is allowed to sit at the table.
This is the natural fruit of the exclusivity model Armstrong taught. When the identity of the true Church is tied to a single hierarchical organization, every disagreement becomes a potential schism. Every strong personality becomes a potential new headquarters. Every failed prophecy or internal scandal becomes an opportunity for the next man to declare that the previous group has been rejected and that he now carries the true mantle. The result is not a fitly joined body. It is a landscape of rival claims, competing websites, parallel Feast sites, and endless accusations that the other groups have “broken off from Christ.”
New Covenant Christians are under no obligation to play this game. The New Testament never requires believers to locate the one correct corporate organization in order to remain joined to Christ. The Church is the body of those who are in Christ by faith. The vine is Christ Himself. Union with Him is by the Spirit through faith, not by membership cards, hierarchical approval, or the ability to recite the correct list of end-time titles. Believers are joined to one another through the vine, not through a single human headquarters that claims exclusive rights to the vine.
That means a Christian who fellowships with other believers outside the Armstrongist orbit is not automatically “broken off.” A believer who refuses to accept the latest self-appointed leader’s claims is not cut off from Christ. The gates of the grave have not prevailed against the Church Christ is building—because that Church is not identical with any one of the splinter groups that claim the Armstrong brand.
Armstrong’s 1981 words reveal the high ideal he held. The history since then reveals how quickly that ideal collapses when it is married to organizational exclusivity and hierarchical control. The fractured COG world is living proof that tying spiritual life to the claim of being the sole true Church produces endless division rather than the unity it promises.
New Covenant believers are free to leave any COG out there and the exclusivity contest behind. The vine is still there. The branches that abide in Him remain joined—both to Him and to one another—without needing permission from any of the competing headquarters that still insist they alone hold the keys.
4 comments:
Excellent post. Exclusivity certainly was the hallmark of the Armstrong empire, and that exclusivity was enforced. John 10 tells us who we belong too, and no one can steel us from Him. It is the believers in Him who are justified from what the law would never do. Fractured, splintered and slowly withering away to dust marks this movement in all its shattered fragments. We have nothing to fear from these men any longer and can have that life more abundantly that He came to give us, without the middle men. I feel sorry for those still caught up in the Armstrong embrace. It has truly become a forest of splinters, so much for the one true church theory they held too.
..........and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished. Dan 12:7
Felt sick seeing that self satisfied face staring back and dressed in fancy suit and tie
HWA's strength (advertising background) became a profound weakness in many ways. His exclusivity also applied to himself in that he created a personality cult which was so dependent upon himself and his personal attributes that he was irreplaceable. Any successor would be regarded as a place holder, and always less than, right up until the time of the resurrection.
Many of the mantle grabbers believe that if they continue to spread all of the bogus material which defined HWA, that that material will make them great leaders, great teachers. But, alas! Nobody can sell that crap as meaningfully as could HWA!!! He exemplified "If you build it, they will come." His successors? All quite lame and totally ineffective. (Thankfully).
BB
Post a Comment