Romans 13:1 Those in positions of authority have been placed there by God
Is Romans 13 Good Teaching and Advice?
The readers of this blog are probably some of the most Biblically literate layman on the planet. One of the things I got from both my Calvinistic and WCG experience was knowing WHAT the Bible said. It is why I credit most ministers with at least being good Bible readers, which of course is not to be mistaken for Bible literacy. Rather than take the "splatter pattern" approach to why teachings of Jesus or Paul might be considered suspect and ill advised, I would rather take them one at a time and expand each of those that , to me, are susceptible to criticism and rejection.
First of all let me say that many of the teachings of both Jesus and Paul are excellent and make a real life more meaningful when applied. We also need to realize that these teachings are not unique to Jesus or Paul. The Sermon on the Mount is full of common sense teachings that anyone in just about any religion could and did already teach. They are not unique or especially amazing teachings. Many teachings of Jesus parallel Buddhism and those of Paul are just nice things to keep in mind.
Another thing to keep in mind when we come across those difficult things to do or give up scriptures are given in the context of the FIRM belief by Jesus and Paul and the early Church that time really was short. Really short. Turning the other cheek or giving up ones cloak was in the context of time is really short so don't worry about it. You will be avenged and clothed very soon. Practices such as sharing all things in common were based on the short plan that Jesus was about to return so let's stick together. It was NEVER meant to be a prolonged way of being. In time, when Jesus did not materialize, the system broke down and it was abandoned. Not exactly eternal truth.
Paul's advice about marriage was based on "time is short." It is not really a long term good thing for anyone's mental health to be alone , without someone to love and be loved by. Paul, having never met Jesus and never quoting him did not know that Jesus taught the opposite of himself. It is not better to be like Paul according to Jesus, or any psychologist.
Also and evidently, Jesus own mom and brothers, the ones who in Mark had never heard of his miraculous Matthew and Luke birth story, came to get Jesus when they heard what he was teaching to take him home, because he was "beside himself." This is code for "nuts" or "insane."
Mark 3:20-21
New International Version (NIV)20 Then Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that he and his disciples were not even able to eat. 21 When his family[a] heard about this, they went to take charge of him, for they said, “He is out of his mind.”
There is no Mary, "who pondered these things in her heart," in Mark's account of Jesus. There is no Mary that knows from his birth, that Jesus is the Son of God to become God himself eventually through the process of theological evolution.
Evidently the family, in Mark's view, did not find Jesus teachings all that amusing and if it kept up, they might get blamed for not reigning him in. So they tried.
Evidently the family, in Mark's view, did not find Jesus teachings all that amusing and if it kept up, they might get blamed for not reigning him in. So they tried.
At any rate, let's take a look at Paul's teaching on obedience to government, i.e. the Romans at this time in history.
We need to ask ourselves how, if this advice was obeyed through history, if we'd have had an American Revolution or been able to bring about real change in the governments of insane leaders gone nuts. In this chapter, Paul is telling the Church members to obey the Romans. My sense is that Paul knew you could rant, curse and rave against the Jews but it was really stupid to do so against the Romans. The Jews might get pissed off, but they are branches cut from God's tree. The Romans, on the other hand, can kill you/us.
Romans 13 New International Version (NIV)
Submission to Governing Authorities
1 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
Really? Caligula? Hitler? Stalin? Mao? Sadaam? Ghadaffi? Netanyahu? Clinton? Bush? Obama? Really? What of the millions who have died under their God given authority? Is this not the advice from Paul, the "all things to all men, " kiss up to the Romans, so that he might save his own hide at times?
Paul pulled his 'I am a Roman Citizen" card out from time to time to save himself. How does a Pharisee of the Pharisees , who hate the Romans become a Roman Citizen exactly? Is this good advice for the long haul? I don't think so? We'd all be in gulags and internment camps before long with this attitude. Would not any corrupt government LOVE to have this taught religiously to the masses? Was Paul being realistic here? Why would the Book of Revelation be relevant if this advice was followed? Obey the Beast and False Prophet and all will be well. After all, they have their authority from God.
2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves
Really? God is the author and originator of these worldly regimes? I thought Satan was the God of this World? Another great piece of advice to benefit any corrupt regime that needed to be ousted. I wonder if ministers preached this in the pulpits of England and America in the 1760's?? If God is really behind human governments, is this some kind of cosmic joke on the faithful? Seems terrible advice to me. .
3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong.
Har har!! Oh Really!!! May I suggest there be no drinking the next time someone thinks to give this kind of advice or evaluate the fruits of human government! There are lots of dead Palestinian Children in and around Gaza who might disagree with this erudite observation on the motives of rulers. One may as well say, "For rulers hold no terror for those who do not get in their way or oppose their plans...but those who do...watch out." I think it means "For rulers hold no terror to those who do what they are told..." The rightness or wrongness is not really up for discussion.
Am I on Candid Camera? Sounds like advice right out of the WCG Handbook on How to Intimidate the Brethren! The Flurry's, Pack's, Weinland's and Meredith's of this Wild World Church of God experience would love that one! Most politicians would kill to see this be your attitude. And don't expect to get commended for anything. No one is going to give you a medal in this life for doing "the right thing."
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
Yikes, If you make it to the top, you are automatically there because God voted for you and you won. And government as humans have experienced it is here for nothing but our own good. Who writes this stuff...the Government? So anything the Government does to wield the sword, mace, tazers, microwavers, crowd control, tear gas, outright shooting and gassing is really God giving it to us all good, via his trusted servants and agents? Goodbye American Revolution. Our bad!!!
5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.
Right, if I disobey an illegal, immoral or tyrannical government, it will hurt my conscience. I don't think so.
6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing.
"...he said as he took his 20th vacation at the seaside and played 200 rounds of whatever game was popular in their time. I pay taxes to finance war and killing. I pay taxes so others can pay off their friends on Wall Street and cover their asses for stealing my other taxes, homes and properties. In my world, these jerks are not God's servants but rather work for the other guy in the Bible who is more the roaring lion type. Shoot...if Satan is a leader of his own gang, God must have put him there for their good! Obey him boys!!
"...who give their full time to governing...." Uh huh, sure , right , fine...
7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.
Notice we are not talking to the receivers here, but rather the givers. I always wanted to scream when HWA chanted, "God's way of life is the way of giiiiiivvve." Uh huh, so we gave and they took. The receivers of our giving only think they are givers but it is easy to give away someone else's money. HWA built "God's College," "God's House," "God's work," with our money not his. That was easy and painless for the receivers. My parents and thousands of others bought Steuben Crystal for world leaders and rented auditoriums for the snakes in government to fill with the unwilling citizens to make these meetings look successful. My parents and others paid for "The Church" to preach to world leaders...God's chosen leaders evidently who were mostly jerks and bastards.
How about we turn this one around and say, "Give to everyone what you took from them. You who have taken, how about you give it back? I digress.
So, Is Romans 13 here good advice for realistic living on this planet at anytime in human history. Or is this the idea of one man who bragged about being "all things to all men," not that he might save them, but in fact, did not get his head taken off quite yet by them because they had the power anyway and we need not stir them up.
Why would Paul give this advice about gentile leaders in government and yet scorn Peter, James and John's leadership in the Jewish Church. If anything was of God it was that? Why did Paul curse those who didn't agree with him or his Gospel? He was not much of a team player himself it seems when it comes to following the lead of others that God seems to have put in high places. Paul totally disregarded the commands of James in Acts 15, in reality, but I guess he was special and that was different.
Personally, I think the author of Romans was writing for the Roman Government to see he and his teachings were harmless and no threat to them. To do otherwise would have been suicide and, while you can make fun of the weak who cannot harm you, you had better be on good terms with those that can kill you.
Dennis C. Diehl
