Monday, October 6, 2025

Samuel Kitchen: "Jesus Christ came in the flesh of Herbert W Armstrong"



New revelations by Samuel Kitchen:

1) Jesus came in the flesh of Herbert Armstrong:
 
Jesus Christ came in the flesh of Herbert W Armstrong. That is, through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, Christ worked in and through His servant and His apostle, Mr Herbert W Armstrong. 
 
To teach people, that Christ is not in Herbert W Armstrong, and that the Worldwide Church of God is NOT the spiritual body of Christ, is the spirit of Antichrist, and not the Holy Spirit. 

2) You cannot enter the Kingdom of God without following Herbert Armstrong's teachings:

"Everything we have received through the servant of the Lord, the apostle of Jesus Christ, Mr. Herbert W Armstrong, is FOR OUR PREPARATION. We cannot MARRY Jesus Christ, no can we enter the Kingdom of God without such PREPARATION!"

"So what we have received from Christ through Mr Armstrong, is necessary for our current TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, and PREPARATION as the Bride of Jesus Christ and to ENTER the Kingdom of God. If we neglect this preparation, we will NOT ENTER THE KINGDOM OF GOD!"
"A wrong attitude, and refusal to obey God, and refusal to apply the instruction given through the apostle, will leave you UNPREPARED for the Kingdom! And if you can’t enter the Kingdom, you wont go to a place of safety!
The promises and protection of God come to those INSIDE THE INNER COURT. They are going through their preparation!

So it BEHOOVES YOU TO PAY HEED! To repent, and BELIEVE! To be PREPARED! "


 

Sunday, October 5, 2025

Commercial Break/Feast Edition:

 

 The Chronological Order of the New Testament and why it matters. 


New Testament - Etsy

Compositional Order

https://conciliarpost.com/theology-spirituality/the-new-testament-in-order/

A final way to think about the ordering of the New Testament is in the order in which these documents were written.

=====================

Personal Note and Reminder: Why it matters is because it shows that the Pauline Jesus was first Cosmic and Hallucinatory in nature to Paul. The Gospels to follow after Paul put Paul's Christ into a historical setting. 

As we know, Paul never met Gospel Jesus nor quotes him. No sayings of Jesus. No miracles recounted and no tales of how he, as a Pharisee in Jerusalem, tormented Jesus with the others. 

This seems odd to scholars if Paul was indeed a Pharisee of the Pharisees in Jerusalem at the time of the stories of Jesus in the Gospels. The Gospel writers never heard of any Apostle Paul or Saul of Tarsus

This is because the story of Gospel Jesus had not yet been brought down to Earth in the stories of the Gospels in Paul's lifetime. Paul's Jesus, or Christ was revelatory. Jesus talked to Paul and Paul heard Jesus in his mind.

Galatians 1:11 I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. 12 I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.

Galatians 2:6 As for those who were held in high esteem—whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not show favoritism—they added nothing to my message.

 Paul never heard of the stories, teachings or drama of Jesus life and death in the Gospels)

=====================

At first, you might imagine that this would parallel the chronological ordering, but that’s not quite correct.

Most scholars believe that either 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, or James was the first New Testament document written, all of which speak to events chronologically later than the Gospels.

This is largely due to the fact that the Gospels are not media reports or live tweets about Jesus: they are literary biographies, composed by followers of Jesus to tell the story of Jesus as the first generation of Christians got older.

The order in which the writings of the New Testament were composed is a topic of much scholarly debate. On the one hand, many contemporary scholars push the writing of certain documents well into the second century and speak extensively about anonymous and pseudonymous authorship of certain writings.

On the other hand, there are plenty of scholars who advocate for much earlier (and more traditional) datings, with some scholars even suggesting that the contents of the New Testament were written before the destruction of the Second Jewish Temple by Rome in 70 CE.9

Consider Marcus Borg’s listing of the New Testament books in the order they were written in The Evolution of the Word (including his likely dates10):

  • 1 Thessalonians (50 CE)
  • Galatians (50 CE)
  • 1 Corinthians (50 CE)
  • Philemon (mid-50s CE)
  • Philippians (mid-50s CE)
  • 2 Corinthians (mid-50s)
  • Romans (58 CE)
  • Mark (70 CE)
  • James (70-80 CE)
  • Colossians (80s CE)
  • Matthew (80-90 CE)
  • Hebrews (80-90 CE)
  • John (90 CE)
  • Ephesians (90s CE)
  • Revelation (90s CE)
  • Jude (90s CE)
  • 1 John (100 CE)
  • 2 John (100 CE)
  • 3 John (100 CE)
  • Luke (100 CE)
  • Acts (100 CE)
  • 2 Thessalonians (100 CE)
  • 1 Peter (100 CE)
  • 1 Timothy (100-110 CE)
  • 2 Timothy (100-110 CE)
  • Titus (100-110 CE)
  • 2 Peter (120-150 CE)

==================

Bonus 

Scholars normally break down the 13 Pauline letters as follows:

              Undisputed letters of Paul: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon.

These seven letters are normally thought to be written by Paul. That is why they are called “undisputed” letters.

  1. Disputed letters of Paul: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus.

There is no scholarly consensus on whether these six letters are actually penned by Paul. That is why they are called “disputed” letters. Others use the term Deutero-Pauline to describe them, a sort of “second” canon of letters that are questionably attributed to Paul.

In this short post, we cannot go into the reasons why each of these letters are rejected by some, questioned by others, and accepted as Paul by yet other scholars.

Such inquiries of authorship developed from the Enlightenment period when biblical writings started to be critically examined. This took place through the process of reasoning rather than letting religious dogma of previous generations decide the issue.

Great overview for those so inclined

https://www.bartehrman.com/pauline-epistles/

 

Saturday, October 4, 2025

Crackpot Prophet: Modern Day Zerubbabel And One Of The Two Witless Witnesses?



As Armstrongism spirals ever more comically down the drain, flushing away into irrelevance like yesterday's bad prophecy, it hasn't deterred our beloved cadre of resident loons from spewing absurd and outlandish statements that could make a carnival barker blush. The wilder and more unhinged they get, the more they puff up their chests, convinced they're the sole divine mouthpieces on this spinning rock—because, obviously, God couldn't possibly have better options.

Tragically—or hilariously, depending on your tolerance for farce—the church has been a magnet for a nonstop parade of raving lunatics over the decades, from the sign-waving protesters and picketers turning WCG headquarters into a sideshow, to those self-anointed messiahs (mostly men, with a sprinkling of women for diversity) who fancy themselves God's exclusive spokesmodels. That's precisely how the likes of Ron Weinland, Dave Pack, Gerald Flurry, and the inimitable Bob Thiel bootstrapped their pint-sized personality cults. The more batshit bonkers their proclamations, the more they lured in that tiny flock of lost souls wandering the wilderness of confusion. These poor folks had their identities yanked out from under them in the so-called Great Apostasy, desperately grasping for any crumb of "truth" to nibble on—and lo, these charismatic crackpots whispered (or shouted) exactly the right mix of delusion to hook 'em.

The more prophetic gibberish and doomsday drivel they barf out, the tighter it grips those identity-starved wanderers like a cheap thriller novel.

This obsession with end-times claptrap manufactures a faux urgency and purpose, perfect for reeling in the perpetually panicked about world events—because nothing says "spiritual enlightenment" like doom-scrolling the apocalypse. Weinland's apocalyptic rants about impending catastrophe followed by a shiny "better world" (any day now, folks!) paint his outfit as the ultimate survival raft in a sea of sinners. Flurry and his ilk shoehorn today's headlines into biblical fanfic through rags like The Trumpet magazine, turning every geopolitical hiccup into "proof" of prophecy. It's a masterclass in exploiting fears of Big Bad Persecution or societal meltdown, all while the leaders wield it like a remote control to dictate behavior and hoard power. On the psychological front, devotees often succumb to "abdication syndrome," gleefully outsourcing their life choices to the guru for that warm, fuzzy blanket of false security. And why question the flops? The cult playbook conveniently labels any dissent as satanic sabotage or holy persecution—genius, really, if you're into self-preserving scams.

And then there's Bob Thiel, the undisputed king of self-aggrandizing cosplay, who's appointed himself to more biblical roles than there are pages in the Good Book itself—yet somehow, the humility deficit never slows him down. Today, he's channeling the Two Witnesses, because why not add apocalyptic tag-team partners to his resume? Shocking precisely no one, we all know where this ego parade is headed: straight into another round of prophetic face-plants, with Thiel emerging unscathed in his own mind, ready to claim the next divine title on the clearance rack.

After whining incessantly about an article from Gerald Flurry about the identity of the Two Witnesses, and how, since Herbert Armstrong had died, he was not the end-time Zerubbabel or one of the two witnesses, celestial Bob has this to say:

Since Herbert Armstrong died, he obviously was not one of the two witnesses, and his reference to those two identified in Haggai and Zechariah is a reference to an end time Zerubbabel and Joshua. Thus, based upon his own writings, Herbert Armstrong was not Zerubbabel. But he pointed to someone from the 20th century who would be:

Hum, I wonder who THAT could be?????  The rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper:

Since Christ is the foundation, the chief cornerstone (Matthew 21:43; Ephesians 2:20) of the Christian temple (1 Corinthians 3:16), some have suggested that “Zerubbabel” may have been a type of Christ–especially since Jesus is specifically prophesied to return (Revelation 17:14) and destroy the kingdom of the Gentiles (Revelation 11:15; Haggai 2:21-23). 
 
Yet, since “Zerubbabel” saw the original temple and is not recorded as laying its foundation (and really, he could not have as he had not been born then), then it appears that perhaps “Zerubbabel” would seem to be some individual who is prophesied to rise up in the last days–and that is what Herbert Armstrong believed scripture required. If so, he would have likely been someone who saw the old Ambassador Auditorium and WCG work, and perhaps helped lay the foundation for the final phase of the Philadelphia work.  Zerubbabel would not be a ‘newcomer’ as some suggested that both of the two witnesses might be.

And, deeper downit goes:

As far as names go, Zerubbabel means descendant of, or born of, Babylon (OT:2216; Zerubbabel. Biblesoft’s New Exhaustive Strong’s Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary) or “stranger at Babylon.” Thus, it could be that the prophesied Zerubbabel may have been born into a family that was part of the religion that will support the final Mystery Babylon of Revelation 17:5 (like one based out of the city of seven hills–Revelation 17:18). Because of the meaning of the name ‘Zerubbabel,’ it would seem that it is not a direct reference to Jesus, as some have suggested, since He was not born of Babylon and His human parents were not Babylonians. 

Notice the problem with that other personage of the two witnesses...he was too stupid to support the Continuing Church of God in the past, and that God had to "push him" to acknowledge the way and the truth that only exists in the CCOG.

Joshua, Yehowshu`a, seems to mean “Jehovah saves” (Ibid, OT: 3091). This Joshua’s father’s name was Josedech (Haggai 1:12), meaning “Jehovah-righted” (OT:3087 ). Perhaps his father was called out of religious Babylon to be a true Church of God Christian? Anyway, since Zechariah 3:3-5 shows that for a time Joshua wears “filthy garments,” it may be that he affiliated too long with Laodiceans, who need to put on “white garments” (Revelation 3:14-18)–hence maybe that means it took him time before he completely would support the Continuing Church of God and that God (Jehovah/Yahweh) had to push him to the right way. 
 
Perhaps the names Zerubbabel and Joshua indicate that one of the witnesses was born into a Roman Catholic family (and later was called and converted to be part of the Church of God) while the other was born into a Church of God family and remained part of the Church of God. Since Joshua was a high priest, he would have had to be born in a family keeping the biblical faith.

Zerubbabel ends with this:

So who are the two witnesses? 
 
1. The two witnesses are humans that God will give special power to. 
 
2. They are true prophets of God. 
 
3. They provide testimony of the truth about God and the return of Jesus Christ to the earth. 
 
4. Just like John the Baptist was really not Elijah, but came in the Spirit and Power of Elijah, so the two witnesses may come in the Spirit and Power of Moses and Elijah. 
 
5. They may be a type of Zerubbabel and Joshua, and these men may have been born into Roman Catholic and Church of God families respectively. 
 
6. They will have been in the true, and apparently most faithful, continuations of the Church of God. 
 
7. They will hold Church of God doctrines like the Sabbath, the Godhead, the return of Jesus and the millennium, the history of the true church, etc.
 
8. Contrary to the claims of some, God has not yet clearly revealed their identities to the general public. 
 
9. Those who support the semi-Catholic beast power (he will claim to be ‘Catholic,’ but will ultimately betray the Church of Rome) will apparently think that the two witnesses are false prophets, with one of them considered to be the false prophet of the Book of Revelation. 
 
10. The two witnesses will apparently wear some black (clothing or something else) and/or sackcloth. According to certain Greco-Roman Catholic prophecies, one who is “black” (opposed to their church) and looks like a Jew (apparently meaning having original Church of God practices) will be one of the two that cause that church problems at the end. 
 
11. The two witnesses are two who will accomplish the mission that God gives them. 
 
12. The two witnesses will keep and teach the Ten Commandments, whereas false prophets and the coming Beast of the sea will actually violate them all. 
 
Jesus warned that false prophets will arise and do miracles. Those who are waiting for Enoch and Elijah to literally come from Paradise to the earth, before they will accept God’s true witnesses, are deceiving themselves. The vast majority of human beings will be deceived (Matthew 24:24; 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12). But you do not have to be. 
 
The two witnesses will be killed and there are non-biblical prophecies that others may rely on to support killing them. 
 
The two witnesses are most likely alive now, and God will raise them up probably in the relatively near future. The two witnesses will more successfully proclaim the gospel of the kingdom of God. 
 
Those who do not wish to be deceived need to repent and believe the gospel now, as later it may be too late.

I can state, beyond a shadow of doubt, that Bob Thiel is NOT a modern-day Zerubbabel or that he will be one of the two witnesses, or that he is even a true Church of God leader.

We all know where this is ultimately headed:

...straight into another round of prophetic face-plants, with Thiel emerging unscathed in his own mind, ready to claim the next divine title on the clearance rack.