Dietrich Bonhoeffer, (born February 4, 1906—died April 9, 1945, German Protestant theologian important for his support of ecumenism and his view of Christianity’s role in a secular world. His involvement in a plot to overthrow Adolf Hitler led to his imprisonment and execution. His Letters and Papers from Prison, published posthumously in 1951, is perhaps the most profound document of his convictions.
The Enemy Within
When we know something or someone is evil, we can take steps to fight it. With stupidity, it is much more difficult.Dietrich Bonhoeffer argues that stupidity is worse than evil because stupidity can be manipulated and used by evil.He also argues that stupidity tends to go hand-in-hand with acquiring power — that is, being in power means we surrender our individual critical faculties.In comic books and action movies, we know who the villain is. They wear dark clothes, kill on a whim, and cackle madly at their diabolical scheme. In life, too, we have obvious villains — the dictators who violate human rights or serial killers and violent criminals. As evil as these people are, they are not the biggest threat, since they are known. Once something is a known evil, the good of the world can rally to defend and fight against it. As Bonhoeffer puts it, “One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion.”Stupidity, though, is a different problem altogether. We cannot so easily fight stupidity for two reasons. First, we are collectively much more tolerant of it. Unlike evil, stupidity is not a vice most of us take seriously. We do not lambast others for ignorance. We do not scream down people for not knowing things. Second, the stupid person is a slippery opponent. They will not be beaten by debate or open to reason. What’s more, when the stupid person has their back against the wall — when they’re confronted with facts that cannot be refuted — they snap and lash out.
“Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed — in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical — and when facts are irrefutable, they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack.”
Stupidity, like evil, is no threat as long as it hasn’t got power. We laugh at things when they are harmless — such as my brother’s ignorance of reindeer. This won’t cause me any pain. Therefore it’s funny.
The problem with stupidity, though, is that it often goes hand-in-hand with power. Bonhoeffer writes,
This works in two ways. The first is that stupidity does not disbar you from holding office or authority. History and politics are swimming with examples of when the stupid have risen to the top (and where the smart are excluded or killed). Second, the nature of power requires that people surrender certain faculties necessary for intelligent thought — faculties like independence, critical thinking, and reflection.
Bonhoeffer’s argument is that the more someone becomes part of the establishment, the less an individual they become. A charismatic, exciting outsider, bursting with intelligence and sensible policies, becomes imbecilic the moment he takes office. It’s as if, “slogans, catchwords and the like… have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being.”
Power turns people into automatons. Intelligent, critical thinkers now have a script to read. They’ll engage their smiles rather than their brains. When people join a political party, it seems like most choose to follow suit rather than think things through. Power drains the intelligence from a person, leaving them akin to an animated mannequin.
Theory of stupidity
Bonhoeffer’s argument, then, is that stupidity should be viewed as worse than evil. Stupidity has far greater potential to damage our lives. More harm is done by one powerful idiot than a gang of Machiavellian schemers. We know when there’s evil, and we can deny it power. With the corrupt, oppressive, and sadistic, we know where we stand. You know how to take a stand.The lesson from Bonhoeffer is to laugh at those daft, silly moments when in close company. But, we should get angry and scared when stupidity takes reign.
15 comments:
This so true. I work in a University, and some of the faculty they hire is the epitome of stupid, from the Dean on down. It makes the peons like myself shake my head. They hire foreigners to teach our students, and the staff kows more than Faculty. That is scary. I am ready to retire because I don't suffer fools lightly.
To really understand the power of stupidity, read Eric Hoffer's The True Believer. He shows the fanatic is a truly stupid person.
I thought of this theory many times from 2,016 through 2,0000 as a macro, and from my time under the influence of WCG on a micro level. The two seemed very similar and interrelated on many levels. People appear to be awakening to one degree or another, but it is unclear how safe we are from the stupid. The residual problem is that the stupid have not gone away, and are present for a future manipulation. I count it as a win that the majority now seems to be attaching relatively less importance to their line of thinking, but who knows if and when one catalyst or another might cause them to rise to prominence once again? People who still have common sense have seen and been appalled by the ugliness their presence can inflict, but the fact is that the stalwarts of their ilk never go away, and I suppose, will always be a threat. This has been ongoing for some time now, and those who are core to the group are clever shapeshifters, capable of reinventing themselves in a manner so as to regain appeal and influence. I'm just thankful that we seem to be experiencing a breather, a time to gulp in that vital breath of fresh air as our heads pop above water for who knows how long.
I believe that the author of the article has embraced a false dichotomy. All evil people are delusional. They reject reality and try to make the unreal real. The Nazi ideology is one example of this. Rejecting reality and embracing delusions is the definition of stupidity. Further, the author's definition of an evil person only appears in comic books, such as Batman's villains. They are evil yet grounded in many ways.
The authors short life and presumably limited life experiences would explain his simplistic view.
Control is based on need. The masses are too needy, or dependent, and thus submit to whatever nonsense that those who cater to his need provide.
The most dangerous of all, in my opinion, is dumb AND in power. The cog leaders are the epitome of this. Truly horrifying when you see the human wreckage left in their wake. Broke, spiritually bewildered, confused and hurt.
Worst of all, oftentimes God gets the blame for what these evil, stupid men have done. God had nothing to do with it, or them.
"Evil is easy to identify and fight against"????
I would agree only IF one is guided by the holy spirit and believes what Scripture says about it! But in my opinion most follow the path found in Isaiah 5:20, who call " evil good and good evil". That's no surprise since, even in the COG, most refuse to believe what God plainly says about this world system and its leaders.
I'm sure our atheist friends disagree!
To quote that great American Forrest Gump: “Stupid is as stupid does” :)
One of life's paradoxes is that the stupid ones don't always recognize their own stupidity. There are stupid people whose other attributes lead them to be extroverts, and to dominate. Though stupid, they assume control, and frustrate and mind-boggle the intelligent ones. It is usually only the passive ones who tend to acknowledge their deficiencies and to take a back seat, and to allow others to lead them.
In many cases, it is nearly impossible to define stupidity. There are some pretty brilliant people who are dyslexic. There are those who fall on the autistic scale who are brilliant and functional, sometimes in very lucrative areas. Such individuals were considered to be stupid at a different time in history. Bonhoeffer himself lived and died during a somewhat primitive era when homosexuality, though not an indicator of intelligence, was considered to be a mental illness.
There are those who would like to reverse many of the advances of recent decades. These advances are just too much for them to assimilate. We watched the Ayatollahs reverse some fairly advanced civilizations. There are pictures of Iranian women in their bikinis, at the beach during the 1960s and '70s. Now, they are all in hijabs. There are extreme conservatives in the USA who want to go back so far as the FDR era in their efforts to reverse American ways. They are just like the Ayatollahs. I call people who want to reverse the cumulative effect of intelligence "stupid", but this is not the way they see themselves. They embrace the conservative label and refer to themselves as patriots.
Here is your Theory of Stupidity:
"We know when there's evil, we can deny it's power. With the corrupt, oppressive, and sadistic, we know where we stand".
I think the Bible knocks this idea in the head!
Rev 13:3- And the WHOLE WORLD wondered after the beast
Rev 13:4- And they worshipped the dragon (and the beast). . .
Rev 12:9- Satan, who decides the WHOLE WORLD
Good denial boys!! Good stand!!
Didn't Einstein conclude the definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over and expecting different results? 🤷
A German commander categorized his officers this way:
The lazy and bright officers became his commanders. They will figure out a way to get a job done, though not be able to do the planning to accomplish the task.
The ambitious and bright officers became staff officers. The staff officers had to be smart and hard working.
The lazy and stupid officers could always be found a slot to fill. They can't do much good, being stupid, nor can they do much harm, being lazy.
But the ambitious and stupid could be very dangerous and had to be removed from the system.
How would you categorize some of the evangelists in the WCG?
No, thats urban legend.
The ambitious and stupid went on to be splinter leaders in the COGS.
Hitler left school at 15, like HWA.
Post a Comment