Dennis noticing some Waggle in the Wiggle

This ain't Rocket Science Folks...Oops, This is Rocket Science Folks

 

 

 

David C Pack's Pre-August 31, 2013 Comments on the simplicity and non-complicated nature of the Haggai Prophecy about Himself and RCG

 

"God Reveals Secrets

Before continuing we must also grasp something repeated from before. I am neither a prophet nor have I any self-prescribed authority to bring any prophecies. What will be shown is entirely GOD’S prophecy—from HIS WORD—explained and conveyed through the only office He ever uses to bring biblical truth to His Church (Acts 2:42; Eph. 2:20). The Bible warns that “no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation” (II Pet. 1:20). But God does work through His chosen servants. In fact, He never reveals His Plan through anyone else. The many sermons I have given, including much of what you have read and will read, bring GOD’S interpretation of phrases, symbols and terms that He uses, not my private opinions. The reader will find that a crucial part of Zechariah holds powerful keys, but was written in code. But nothing within it is complicated. Each verse has a clear explanation if we just allow the Bible—meaning GOD!—to interpret the meaning through other scriptures. The “code” it is written in becomes easily unlocked."

 

 

David C Packs Post August 31, 2013 comments on the complicated and puzzling nature of a the same highly complicated Haggai Prophecy about himself and RCG

"Mr. Armstrong puzzled and puzzled and puzzled over certain much less complicated prophecies. He often said that things he learned came over time—not all right away, or even close in some cases. There are points we learned “late” in what is an enormously complex prophecy. We knew from early on in our pursuit of the truth that this prophecy did not carry with it the kind of time that Mr. Armstrong always had to properly sort through prophecies—ones that, however great in magnitude as we know some are, were simpler to understand."

James Malm's "Logic" Believes That Some Leather Bound Bibles Can Be Unclean

James Malm's Pharisaical bastardization of the law continues unabated.  For some reason, hair and unclean skin has literally gotten under Malm's skin.  He has been blabbering on about this as he attempts to force his few acolytes into no longer using using animal skin products. 

What this idiot fails to realize is that if he really believes his own malarkey then his acolytes will have to get rid of some of their leather bound bibles because some are covered in camel skin.  What is an Armstrongite to do if he can't have his leather bound Moffit or original King James Bible is covered in camel skin?

Animal hair  or wool air is not unclean; however the dead body (including the skin) of an unclean animal IS unclean; therefore furs which are still attached to the skin of a dead unclean animal are unclean.

Hair / wool sheared from the living unclean animal is clean; hence the camel hair cloak of John Baptist.  It is perfectly acceptable to wear a camel hair coat, or something made of alpaca wool.

The hair of the dead animal, IS unclean; through its touching the dead body (skin) of the dead unclean animal.  The dead body is unclean and anything touching it is unclean.

In the case of a clean animal that dies of itself; it is unclean, along with its attached skin and hair or wool.