Final Curtain on the One Man Show?
There is a wonderful awakening going on today in the
world of politics, at least in some places. The One Man Show is in
grave danger. Egyptian, Syrians, Yemenese, Russians and with some luck,
Americans are sending the clear message that many are on to them and
the time for change has come. Poor Vlad Putin, who probably thought he
was President for Life is learning this may not be so. His egocentric
antics of the past year may be blowing up in his face as the average
Russian wakes up and stands up to this charade. Of course, it could be
costly.
As a kid, I always wondered how one man could control millions. Fear I guess.
Before the age of television and radio, a charismatic minister, one
who by the power of his own personality, ego and even his mental
quirkiness or illnesses, tended to influence a relatively few people
overall. Since these inventions, times have changed of course. Now we
can be bombarded with the ideas, opinions, inspirations, knowings and
outright stupidity of the sincerely misguided. The problem is that they
reach millions and are supported by people who buy into their ideas, but
never meet the man, attend his church or know what might be going on
behind the scenes of the organization he has created. Such men build
Mega-Churches in their local communities and the sheer size of the
congregation seems to be proof enough that the pastor must be right,
must be really speaking for God and must be doing God's for sure, real,
end time (again and still) work on earth. Surely something this big and
with these many resources, which are mainly the tithes given to the man,
who then decides just how to spend it with littler over site, has to be
right and true.
For better or worse, the religious texts often give men more than
they need to create a powerful, but false, and misguided belief system
that then replicates itself and brings great ego pumping to the man who
weaves the tale his way. They look into the Bible, both Old and New
Testament, and what do they see? THEMSELVES! They see that, sure enough,
just what Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are alleged to have said, is
what I, am say as well. These misguided and often dangerous pastor
types, and the danger is to one's finances and freedom of thought, often
anoint themselves with various titles such as Evangelist, Apostle,
Prophet, Watchman (watch out for this one as it's not what they watch
that is so dangerous, but how they interpret what they watch to the
faithful), and worse sometimes. Elections might be fine in government,
but not for church. It does seem that the more bold a man or
organization is, the grander the titles and the more authoritarian with
YOU designated as a mere follower, it becomes... and the more dangerous
to your real spiritual self it is.
One of the more interesting facts in human mental health is that a
man or woman who may be plagued with Narcissism, which is a person who
thrives on the idea that life is all about them and has these traits...
"Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates accomplishments, talents, skills, contacts, and personality traits to the point of lying, demands to be recognised as superior without commensurate achievements);
Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion;
Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be understood by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or unique, or high-status people (or institutions);
Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation - or, failing that, wishes to be feared and to be notorious (Narcissistic Supply);
Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her unreasonable expectations for special and favorable priority treatment;
Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends;
Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with, acknowledge, or accept the feelings, needs, preferences, priorities, and choices of others;
Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his or her frustration. Suffers from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she believes that they feel the same about him or her and are likely to act similarly;
Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior, omnipotent, omniscient, invincible, immune, "above the law", and omnipresent (magical thinking). Rages when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by people he or she considers inferior to him or her and unworthy. " (Malignant Self Love)
Ministers and CEO's with these traits, can rise to very high
positions in the world of Religion, Government and Business, on the
backs and at the expense of those who would not be inclined to think
this way. They may be genetically predisposed to this way of being, but
the world has paid a big price for allowing such people to include us in
their exploits. Since they rarely if ever seek professional help and to
suggest they do can get you everything from fired, disfellowshipped or
killed, others don't insist, to their peril. My experience is a Pastor
with emotional or mental health issues often scoffs at and demonizes
those that would go to professional mental health care counselors, or
suggest it is a viable alternative to prayer, fasting and internal
church counseling, by the minister of course. I often wonder mental
health counselor types in Mega-Churches don't recognize the problems in
Mr. Charisma, but overide it because a quirky or dangerous mental
disorder can look so spiritual in a church context. The same actions of
Isaiah, Jeremiah or Ezekiel in your school teacher, mayor or boss would
not result in someone saying they are inspired by God.
So what are the problems with a one man, Mr. Prophet, Apostle,
Watcher or potential half of the Two Witnesses of Revelation church or
organization?
1. The minister, used to being believed in every area he cares and chooses to comment on is an impediment to good science. When a minister says.."We really have dinosaurs today, without any question. You just need the right weather conditions, as I see it, to get huge creatures. And in the ocean, of course, we have huge creatures.... this is where the plesiosauruses seem to be today, and perhaps also this fire breathing dragon is still down there -- very rare, but occasionally there."
-- Rev. Walter Lang, quoted from American Atheists, "From the Mouths of Creationists", we gotta a problem with scientific truth here. Kids of course grow up with this lie well planted and have to unlearn it when they hit the real world of science, or they go into hibernation as an adult and believe lies.I wonder if anyone with a genuine education in the congregation gets to question a man who thinks like this and wields influence in the name of God? People do, far too often have to check their brains at the door of their church when it comes to scientific truth.2. The minister or Christian Zealot that goes unchallenged because he IS the Minister or Zealot, is a threat to a good education. They often bolster their own pronouncements by making fun of a formal education. They mock Plato, Socrates and others who are symbols to them of "human reasoning" as if there is reasoning is more than human. I realize they give the impression that God pours his mind on a regular basis into this minister, but this is an illusion."When you take into account what the so-called "educated" people don't know that's essential to know, and compare it with the vain "education" they do have, it becomes clear that they are quite dumb."
-- Robert T. Lee, Anti education Christian Leader.
These types tend to use the words "so-called" and put parenthesis around the words "education" a lot. They will soak their congregants in the biblical verses that mock human wisdom and ultimately, when cornered, come back with "well, the wisdom of man is foolishiness with God," and "God's thoughts, (which usually mean his thoughts at the moment you are questioning,) are higher than yours!" End of discussion.3. Many charismatic and one man churches are a threat to your good health. They often stress that ill health is a function of the devil in your life or mind, when it really might be the fact that one believes that sugar, caffeine, alcohol and nicotine are the four food groups and spends a lot of money proving it. Anointing an obese person for bad knees is like painting a car with flat tires. It still won't move.These spokesman for God emphacise that having hands laid on you is more important than a good check up or good treatment of maladies contracted in the course of living on the earth as a human or old age. Some teach that it's either God OR Doctors, but can't be both. Some mix it up but give false reasons in sermons for human illness and often cause a person to postpone getting genuine help and finding a solution to the problem. When these ministers contract an illness themselves, they tend to re-read the scriptures and hear the voice of God telling them that it's now ok to seek professional help and a good Doctor for themselves, and thus have to reveal this a new truth to the congregation who'd catch on if he didn't. When they need it, they tend to change over to "God has given us medical knowledge as a gift and we should recognize it...now and for me at least."4. Charismatic and One Man Shows aren't accountable for their use of your generous tithes and offerings. As such, they are a grave threat to your finances. Such members often tell themselves after they send the money, "I just obey God and tithe, and what he does it it is none of my business. I trust God and his Church." That gives Mr. Charisma a free hand which is why we see Tel-Evangelists and Religious CEO's sporting hot cars, expensive watches and amazingly expensive homes in exclusive neighborhoods. Even the original scripture, "blessed are the poor, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven," was changed to "blessed are the poor, IN SPIRIT, ...." to give some very wealthy and materialistic ministers and churches some wiggle room throughout history. Somehow these men embarrass and anger us, but nothing is ever said or done that changes them and the giving goes on, along with the lifestyle abuses and offenses to common sense. Sheeple love Shenanigans I guess.5. The One Man Show can define the world to the members as it serves him. He can spew out why the world is this or that way and just what exactly God is doing and thinking. He can motivate the masses with the imminent (again) return of Jesus. Everything is watched with baited breath and is just around the corner. The world can't go on for more than 3 or 5 or 10 or 15 more years, so give, give, give, give. Of course the numbers of years "just ahead" never change and often match the number of years the minister wants the show to go on for him, but no one notices or cares. Granted, it's a dangerous and discouraging world, but frankly it is the Christian, Jewish and Islamic religions that want their form of peace on earth to come that are pushing us towards the edge. As I have said before, they might nothing but a sanitation problem for their false efforts and beliefs about what God might be thinking.6. The One Man Show can leave you high and dry when they DIE! Uh oh...now what? These men often act as if they simply can't die "before all be fulfilled," and rarely make provision for a change in leadership, if that is what the group wants. Why would you have to make provision for new leadership when you are the End Time Apostle or both of the Two Witnesses of Revelation? I once asked a group that was just smitten with the talent and "knowledge so called" (sorry couldn't resist) of their pastor in his Mega-Church. I asked if they had a plan B. I asked what they would do if he failed to live up to his own press or died and they simply insisted that would never happen. Uh huh...It's the people who work for such jerk that end up paying the price in having given their lives to a false vision and were lied to about the outcome. Of course, life is choices and we make our choices don't we? If your grand poopa minister does not have a way to be replaced, you need to make a way, for your own good and spiritual safety. If he refuses to entertain the idea, he's an idiot and you need to vote with your feet. (See Narcissism above.)7. A One Man Show presupposes that you must see life, religion, God, the Bible, the world, your family, your thoughts, your finances and every other aspect of your personal freedom to be who you are, through his eyes. You really don't have a life. You have HIS life. You aren't a player in your own life. You are a player in HIS life. You can't see the world and receive knowledge as see fit. You have to receive knowledge and receive it from HIM and as HE sees it. In short, you have given up your mind and all you now are is an agreerer. You just agree with your ministers views, opinions and perspectives on who and what God is and when Jesus simply must come back for all of the big US, not them. If he says dinosaurs are less than 6000 years old and fossils are deceptions as is any book outside of the Bible, you just say, "yes sir." If you are really hooked by the one many show, you become a virus for him and spread it to others. If he says one man is God's political leader, but the other is Satan's, you just say "well ok," and vote as the minister says you should, for GOD. It's all bullshit, but many love bullshit and smear it on themselves every week in church as a Holy Excrement, I mean Sacrament.
(Hey, that was pretty good!)8. And finally, the one man show is dangerous because men are men and women are women and when they fall from grace, they tend to take everyone with them in one way or another. People are people and get into all sorts of wants, needs, desires, lusts and experiences. Religion and the need to be good, godly, perfect, righteous and sinless, well at least not "big" ones, forces people wear masks.
No man is above being normal, but the demands of religious
obedience is abnormal in a real world. The congregation can "sin" until
the cows come home and often, but they expect the pastor to be their
sacrifice for sin by his living an unreasonable life full of
unreasonable expectations and unresolved personal needs. The reason so
many ministers "fall from grace," is because few can meet the
expectations of religion and the few that think they can, can't but
won't admit it. Many are pushed from grace by ego. When the one man show
is caught in sexual, financial or philosophical "sin", it gets very
messy. Better to be one of many equals than the
grand-better-never-be-human Poopa. The congregation will tear you to
pieces for failing to do well what they don't wish to do at all.
Don't be overly impressed by the religious who know everything and
demand you pay, obey, pray and stay just because they say so. Question
religious authority and those that demand your righteousness at the
expense of your sanity. The person demanding your devotion or obedience
is just a human being as well with all the foibles that go along with
that. If you belong to a church with a one man show, ask the powers that
be what "Plan B" is for the church should the leader fall on his face.
Often they don't have one because they don't believe he can. Believe
it...we all can and do.
Dennis C. Diehl
DenniscDiehl@aol.com
DenniscDiehl@aol.com
2 comments:
Dennis, the thing which impressed me immediately from your posting was that out of 5 billion to the current 7 billion people, there were only no more than 8 million people at one time (and that is probably an inflated figure) who even read The Plain Truth, with an official membership (in the 1970s) of a mere top total (counting every warm body possible) of 140,000 attendees of Armstrongism in its Hay (or is it Hey or even Hoeh?) Day. Suffice it to say that is a very small percentage of people.
It lends credence to the idea that the Armstrongist belief system is rather niche to say the least. It would not be outside the realm of possibility that such a One Man Show religion appealed to only a certain kind of person on the fringes of society. In fact, attendance puts the average "member" somewhere beyond 5 standard deviations beyond the mean of society. This, in turn, suggests that for the religion to have appeal to a person, the person himself or herself had some deeply flawed need to join up with the weirdness of the one man show idolatry sideshow. This is also exclusive of those who were not actively involved in the pursuit of the nuttiness, such as children grown up into it or others who came only because of relatives, friends or close associates whose relationship was important and dependent upon toleration of the crazy venue.
It has been my concern for some years now as to how people can recover from this ill-fated monstrosity, populated by worse than worthless narcissists, sociopaths, psychopaths and nut jobs. Part of the solution, as you have intimated is that the rotten leader / founder die. Unfortunately, the "shoot, what do we do now?" reaction (also accompanied by a proved false major prophecy, such as 1975 in Prophecy) last only fragments of a moment as the vacuum of the vacuous leadership is summarily replaced by someone of even less worth than the original (since nature abhors a vacuum, and so do humans, it seems).
These deadly parasites have convinced their sacrificing hosts that they are not just benign (about as benign as an aggressive cancer or Ebola in reality), but beneficial in some major way. The con is on.
Just what is it that convinced the herds to become livestock? Why did the prisoners volunteer to pay for the Ambassador College Prison Experiment of slavery and humiliation?
Dennis, you are right on the points (though I think the statement Even the original scripture, "blessed are the poor, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven," was changed to "blessed are the poor, IN SPIRIT, ...." to give some very wealthy and materialistic ministers and churches some wiggle room throughout history stands out as needing clarification.
The real question is, though, how do we proceed as we enter 2012, to decimate (as in leaving no more than 10%) the membership of the Armstrongist venue? We managed that in 2005 through great effort (and some would add, great Intervention) in the war against Wade Cox (in which, yet another battle was won in the last two months behind the scenes). What will it take for the rest of the scoundrels to fall?
Certainly, in my mind, at least, part of it is the continued intense focus in blogs and websites to expose the worthless crap leaders for all it's worth. Another part will be won if Roderick Meredith dies, Ronald Weinland is convicted of the criminal Income Tax Evasion and Gerald Flurry / David Pack go bankrupt in overextending themselves for their foolish mismanagement of funds and properties.
All in all, it does look like 2012 will be a good year for us, but a terrible year for the Armstrongist Leadership.
It is my hope for the New Year that there will be additional opportunities which crop up to ensure the more rapid demise of the destructive abusive cults of which we find so repugnant.
Good morning Douglas, I agree with you. In my own case it would be youthful zeal misplaced maybe as I left a rather ideal situation to pursue what my young mind perceived as more true. I admit to being a somewhat God Haunted kid and I do know why but I spare you.
The "Blessed are the poor," vs. "Blessed are the poor in spirit," reflects the edit from what I have read . The original was "Blessed are the poor, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven."
Once more wealthy types came along, an edit was needed to reflect a wider reality and not condemn them.
Many times one can question whether an edit or insertion has been made later on when the edit updates the reality of the times. That is how some feel some books aren't Paul's in reality as they reflect issues that would not have been issues so early in Paul's experience or a much more organized church that developed much later.
The birth narratives reflect this as the charges about jesus birth circumstances grew. "We weren't born of fornication...' etc. If you snip them out of Matthew and Luke, the Gospels read just fine without them.
Just like I think the missing end of Mark (Mark 16:9 and following was added later to give it one) is actually John 21. Long story. But Mark has no good ending and John has two. Church politics at work.
Post a Comment