And this is true.....
It has been my observation that one of the reasons
there are so many kinds of one true churches is because there are so many kinds
of one true personalities. Let's face it. Most folk feel that how
they filter their world, believe what they believe, practice what they
practice and feel as they feel is just fine and probably pretty close to what
should be. No one ever joined the false church as far as I can tell and no
one has ever told me , "oh yes, I know I am deceived by Satan, but I enjoy it
and the people are nice." No one ever told me that they
knew everything they believed was BS but they didn't care.
The desire to know whatever "the truth" of life is
that draws people to any religion or belief system is born out of our need for
purpose and understanding of the world around us and of course, the fact
that we know we shall die. This one factor, our knowledge of our own
demise, not found in any other sentient being, is the engine that runs religious
seeking. It is the origin of all doctrine and the subject of lives lived
to achieve the desired outcome. Our fears drive us to our religions and
that is quite normal.
Denominations have personalities and they draw
those of like personality. Pentecostals are known for their emotional
services so draw those inclined to repressed emotions needing and outlet.
Speaking in Tongues perhaps appeals to the need to feel special or set apart in
an uncommon way in an otherwise dull and routine life. The very
liberal who feel no need for "all to believe the same thing," can be found in
Unitarian, Unity and Episcopal Churches. You don't get disfellowshipped
from these groups for holding contrary views of the Bible or your what's it all
about being not the same as someone else's.
Presbyterians tend towards intellect as well and
set nicely in the middle of wanting to be and do what is right and understanding
the Bible is not literally true in all it's presentation , science is good
and we're all here to learn. Besides we have other things to
do.
Catholics tend towards the comfort of pomp,
authority and tradition. A good catholic can apologize away any Bible
contradiction to their faith. They are masters at taking a
simple scripture, say on idolatry, and showing how it still lets them do
what they do and doesn't mean what it says. But then Moses made bronze
snakes so no biggy. You haven't lived until you listen to a Catholic
apologist explain Mary or the need to obey the Magisterium when in doubt as they
know.
Baptists pride themselves in taking everything in
the Bible as literally true. God said, I believe it, that does it for
me works for them even if they don't understand the background or the
difference between myth, midrash and hyperbole. This church
attracts men who like to yell and talk funny bouncing on their feet and members
who love the show and an occasional "amen."
On Banned, we are often a bit dumbfounded wondering
just "who are these people that follow the likes of Gerald Flurry and Dave
Pack?" What are they getting out of this and why? What is the
appeal? What are they thinking with all this obvious and ridiculous
behavior, strange and weird ideas about themselves?
First of all, all COG's are Jewish Christian
holdouts and for this I cannot fault them. Jewish Christians were the
first Christians. If you exclude Paul, you have a Jewish people who follow
who they perceived then as the promised Messiah. Once the promised Messiah
was killed, the game did change however as that was not in the cards for
Judaism.
The problem Jewish Christians have is what to
do with Paul? They think Paul was also a Jewish Christian going to
Gentiles with a somewhat modified Jewish Christian view but they are wrong
about this. Like the early Jewish Christian leaders Peter, James and John
did, Paul will have to be rejected as apostate and false. Paul indeed is
the founder of our modern Christianity and not any Gospel Jesus. Jesus
would not have recognized Paul's thinking or conclusions. Of course no one
knows how to do that so they end up trying to figure out if Paul is for
or against many things depending on the verses quoted. It's also
why they do not pick up on Paul's convoluted theology. The Jewish
Christian view of Jesus, End of Age, True Church, Protection,
Resurrection and Kingdom of God is just so simple and appealing. Paul's
twisted and often tortured explanations which were admitted to be "hard
to be understood" by even those who followed him are just too far out and
not all that important really in the COGs. If one can't see that Jewish
Christian leaders hated the gentile interloper Paul, and why, you will
never get the NT straight or be more realistic in your understanding of Church
drama, division and crack ups.
I never gave a sermon in my life on
justification, sanctification or the triune this or that one scratches
one's head over when you read Grace Community stuff by Ted Johnston over at "The
Surprising God" Blog. I read their views from time to time and
shake my head with my own classic response of , "and you know this?"
Double talk if ever I heard it. You see it does not appeal to my
personality. I could never be drawn to getting all swoozy over the
Holy Spirit or the Trinity doing amazing things that are equally hard to be
understood or even imagined. I grew up
Presbyterian. When the Tkaches reinvented my wheel being so amazed at what
they found, it was just a shoulder shrugger for me. It is neither inspiring nor
motivating. I find the whole thing boring and unprovable as if I even wanted it
to be so. CGI stuff would put me in a theological trance with my response
being "yeah, fine..whatever, who cares?" I grew up with it and the WCG
view was more appealing when young. Not so much anymore :)
So what is it that draws people to the Flurry's and
Pack's of COGdom? Why do they allow themselves to be browbeaten by such
messages as Dave's Clarion Call to do things with their resources that no sane
thinking person would ever do? It is very manipulative, to me, for a man
to warn a congregation to be aware of himself going off track and getting
strange so they could do something about it and then calm them back down with
"but I tell you, I am not going anywhere." Telling them "no, no, no,
no...you can believe me now, because I'll say it's a, b, c and xyz," is
manipulative group doping. . I just told how I would manipulate you and
deceive you and then I told you not to worry about it but got my own fears off
my chest. Simply nuts. Back into the coma I guess.
So what would be the personal beliefs someone would
have to have to tolerate all this theologically off base drama? Do these
folk really believe Dave is spoken of in Haggai and IS the real topic of the
book? Who would really send in a retirement , inheritance or home sale to
Dave? What church ever said to do that? Even in the NT they tried it
and it failed miserably if you know how to read between the lines. It
never became the norm. Besides you can only give all once so then what? Send in
your retirement again? Pull big triggers again? If these kinds of
things are what Dave says in public, what on earth does he say to them in
private? Why does Dave go ape shit crazy to get sermon tapes back that
were only for the chosen ones ears? Who are these people and why do the
put up with this? On top of this, what kind of man would want to
administer Dave's views by being a minister in RCG? What kind of a man
would actually submit to Dave's 35 sell me your soul demands for forgiveness and
restitution to his institution?
These inner needs of those who simply must follow
Joshua W.Packstrong may not be in the exactly correct order, but these must be
factors in why Dave can fill seats with his ridiculous views of himself and
error ridden theology. Remember, Dave is actually not well trained.
Being "trained" by HWA, a man who was equally not well trained in theology is no
feather in your cap. It's like being taught to sing by Tiny Tim, who is
famous for "Tip Toe Through the Tulips." (TT always looked like Dr. Hoeh
to me:)
So...To be drawn to Dave Pack and RCG these must be
my needs and views.
Our salvation depends on doing what we know. We are commanded to learn and grow in grace [repentance] and knowledge. If we reject growth in understanding and knowledge, if we refuse to do what God reveals to us; then we stop growing and because we reject knowledge from God he will reject us, Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee”, .
Knowledge of the calendar is not a salvational issue if we do not know about it; but once we do know we no longer have the excuse of ignorance for not keeping it, and refusing to keep the new moons and High Days becomes a willful sin and most definitely becomes a salvational issue of rebellion against what we know is of God and his word. James