I was contacted by an editor at Forbes London who is writing about WCG's teaching on "The Place of Safety" and my personal experiences with the concept as a former Pastor. Interesting in that Forbes is mainly an economics publication
(I hated the speculation and never intended to tell anyone to go anywhere taking Gerald Waterhouse's marathon sermons with a grain of salt from my youth. You all recall, I am sure, his response when I asked him what he would do when HWA died. I eventually told him personally how I felt about his visits and that he caused more problems for me than he solved. He just said "Is that right?" and I got kicked under the table). I would have opted for online "final training" The whole concept was a badly cobbled opinion and teaching taking many unrelated and vague OT and NT scriptures and weaving them into making the texts mean what they never meant nor could mean to this day ). After the Jonestown debacle, the fear of it all in the minds of many was set. However, I found that "going along to get along" was more common than speaking up.
Before this interview, Wednesday, I would like a bit of fresh input on how you may have felt personally about it when the concept was presented. No rants, just how you really felt. Fears, expectations, questions, etc. Back in the day, did you agree? Did you look forward to it?
Thanks for your input.
An aerial view of Petra reveals that while it may have deterred the Romans, it is not exactly safe from above in our day.