Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Grievous Sins of Philadelphia Church of God Cause Earthquake In Edmond Oklahoma



Thanks to those fun folk at the Herbert W. Armstrong cult compound, the Edmond area has been hit by two earthquakes.  Both were centered between a half mile and a mile and half from HWA "College".

PCG writes:

At 5:07 a.m. on November 11, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) registered a 3.3-magnitude earthquake with its epicenter located about 1.5 miles southeast from the campus of Herbert W. Armstrong College. This was the second earthquake to shake the campus in less than 12 hours. At 5:25 p.m. the previous night, as students were about to head to the John Amos Field House for dinner, a 3.4-magnitude struck only a half mile from campus.


Some of the PCG faithful comment:

Here in the northwest we have also noticed the attacks from the enemy increase as we talk to brethren who have had especially difficult weeks, our conclusion is that something big must be happening at HQ. Now with the earthquakes at HQ, we will just wait the good news, and keep praying for Mr. Flurry and the rest of you. Thank you for your diligent service.
 -----------------
Something big is going to happen or is happening right now.
I will pray for you Mr. Flurry. God made you a brazen wall, nothing can befall you nor God’s children who follow God’s government.
 -----------------
Satan is so angry, he wants to get as close as he can. That’s why we have to step up our prayers.


Is God getting tired of Six Pack's antics?

Is it wrong to claim God is pissed at the PCG?


They do the exact same thing when an earthquake happens elsewhere.  They accuse the people in the area of being sinners.  Obviously there must be great sin at the PCG cult HQ.

Dennis Tries to Muse...

Does God Have to Try?



The concept of a Deity that "tries'" to do things either in the Church or in the world and the affairs of men is a common thread in many Church of God and fundamentalist circles.   Dr. Bob Thiel and Roderick C Meredith, in their respective writings, often end with the concept that "God is trying to get the attention of mankind."   This "trying" is usually given it's best shots by using meteorological disasters, financial calamity, disease or the occasional fireball in the sky.  

God?  Is that you?

If  it snows too much, "God is trying to get our attention."  If it rains to much.  "God is "trying" to get our attention.  If there is too much heat, whatever too much means in a places that heat up naturally depending, ditto.  If an individual gets sick, even if they are old, and "unconverted", "God is trying to get your attention." I am quite sure that in local communities of believers, when the reprobate do not attend church and have some misfortune on a Sabbath or Sunday , someone is telling them or at least thinking it, "God is trying to get your attention."  

How one would distinguish between a Godly try and just circumstances, time, chance and luck of the draw, I have personally no clue.  At what point in the Saffir-Simpson Scale, used to label the intensity of hurricanes, does it change over from merely weather to God sent trying?   Are category 1-3 storms merely weather and 4-5 the absolute truth that now God is trying to get our attention?   I doubt it.  Low pressure systems come in small, medium and large.  It is just that simple, to me.  Nothing out of the ordinary for conditions at times on the planet.  Are dust storms, due to temperature differentials between mountains and dry dusty deserts a form of Godly trying?  I have never seen that tried in South Carolina.  Here in South Carolina, radio ministers assure us that it is through hurricanes on the coast and heat, with the occasional winter ice storm that God is trying to get our attention here.

I suspect that those in the Bible who thought that was God knocking just didn't understand natural phenomenon.  Is that so difficult to accept?

Which brings up another point.   Is God restricted to seasonal and geographical trying?  Does HE/SHE wait till Spring to try and get the attention of those living in the mid-West tornado alley?  Does God bowl there only in the Spring when the highs and lows, warm ups and leftover cold of winter can work it's heavenly  magic on the plains?  Once in a great while we get a random tornado watch or warning here in South Carolina.  Are those times when God is branching out and trying to get our attention using Midwestern tactics?   Why does it seem that God can only try to get at humans seasonally and with the attention getters common to an area anyway?  I assume people build tornado shelters not because they are afraid God might take another run at trying, but because they know the temperament of the area in which they live.  Ditto coastal regions and countries prone to the heat or cold.  

Could you not just talk with me instead of this?

I do Oncology Massage on a volunteer basis at the  Bon Secours Saint Francis Infusion Center here in town.  These are folks who site for four or five hours as they are infused with some of the most powerful drugs humans have come up with to fight cancer.  Is God trying to tell them something.  Of course one in such a state is going through much introspection about their lives, the reasons they might have cancer or what may or may not be the outcome.  I have massaged the feet of some who died shortly after.  (No...I did nt cause them die as you're no doubt thinking!) Many tell me they have what their mom had or that dad died of the same thing.  Is it genetic or is God using their genetics to "try to tell them something."  The trying is usually meant to get them to repent , get back in some one's church and be saved so they can go to heaven or be in the Wonderful World Tomorrow depending.  Would Bob Thiel think God was trying to get the attention of the Filipinos if they did get some theological message from their misery after a typhoon and returned to Catholicism?  I think not...  In that case, I suspect he'd feel the storm was of satanic origins to deceive them into going to the wrong church.  Now it is Satan we finding trying. I suspect that when Bob or others say publicly that they are "praying for them" in their misery, he also prays the three or four in the country who know about his minuscule church will get in touch and join since God was trying to get their attention to seek out Dr. Bob.  

That ought to convince them!

In the Old Testament, it seems that God was always trying to get the attention of the chosen people. I'd think that if plagues , exactly ten, occurred before my eyes in such miraculous ways, waters parted for me to walk through and pillars of cloud and fire literally lead the way, shoes and clothes did not rot in the waste howling wilderness and 2-3 million of us could roam the dessert, feed thousands of cattle, have plenty of water with bread and meat sent in such abundance from heaven we puked our guts out sick of it all,  I'd not be so skeptical and unbelieving.  Forty years is a long time for such things and yet , it came to not much.  Virtually none of those folk got to where they were promised to go.  I guess God did not try hard enough to convince them.  I do remember as a child in Sunday School wondering why God lured them with promises of deliverance into the desert and then said "you ain't going to make it."  Seemed a weird way to inspire anyone and more a case of never trusting what YHVH said again in their lives. Their kids returned to idol worship in the Promised Land and YHVH was forever trying to get their attention evidently unsuccessfully again.

He you peckerwood!  Knock it off!

If I built a boat and miraculously kept a remnant of every animal on earth at the time safe and not eating each other on board for a year while all of humanity and life drown beneath the keel, I'd be impressed enough by that.  I'd be very easily convinced as two or seven pairs, depending,  of every creature made their way to the Middle East.  Polar bears and penguins, kangaroo and platypus,  Mammoth and Giant Sloth.  Especially if I actually heard, and all around me heard God's literal voice giving out building plans and these creatures not stalking each other until I could get them into their stalls.  Just shoveling animal poop overboard successfully without being overwhelmed in a seal ship by ammonia,  for a year, would have been enough of a try to get my attention.  However, I get suspect when only the leader hears God's voice and everyone else just has to believe what the voice told them.  

Life is life and it is full of joy, sorrow, dis-ease , weather and circumstances that are going to occur no matter what.  Obviously my own view is that no real Deity has to "try" to do anything.  If a God wants to save people either literally or spiritually, all He or She has to do is show up and explain the program.  No middle men.  No "and yes brethren, I am an Apostle" or "God told me.." to interject doubt.  "Just have faith" and "Trust me" are probably two of them hideous concepts ever pushed on to humans by others who wish to manipulate and control.  Faith is something that , in my experience, fails when the facts present themselves somewhere down the road.  Facts trump faith eventually.  It is why I deeply believe in...

"wow...."

"Sit down before fact like a little child, and be prepared to give up every preconceived notion. Follow humbly wherever and to whatever abyss Nature leads, or you shall learn nothing."
  --  Thomas Henry Huxley


I think we would have to admit that if all the trying to get humans to repent, attend, give, show up, believe, stop believing, do, don't do, accept, reject, love each other, hate the enemy, get saved, born again, begotten, into heaven, into the resurrection (preferably the first one), avoid hell, stop thinking they can tread water in the lake of fire and every other think a Deity may or may not want humans to be or do, it is a miserable failure.   If what God has to tell us all is so absolutely important for all ETERNITY and for our good , awesome and amazing , but must absolutely be believed and practiced in the exact right ways or else, things aren't going so well.  If the is ONE TRUE CHURCH and it's Dave Pack  (there isn't and it isn't) are we not of all men most miserable?  Even Protestant types are smart enough to come up with the vagaries of the Community of Believers to answer that question.  Let God sort them out. 




Fools, can I use that term?, maybe the foolish is better, such as a James Malm, (whoever he is) who stresses over every detail of proper worship and practice, in HIS view,  E.W King or a Dr. Bob Thiel, (Who they are makes no difference to me, I learned NOTHING from them-Paul/Galatians 2), who seem to have a need to correctly see into the future so they can say stuff like, "as I predicted", or "as I said in an article entitled...", or the Dave Pack, Ron Weinlands and Gerald Flurry types who simply need to be in charge, noticed and pin all sorts of Apostolic medals and titles upon their chests, are a dime a dozen in this world.  Are these God's best attempt at "trying to get our attention"?  If so, there aren't going to be many human being rushing to get into the Kingdom of God any time soon.

I thought it was a code...

No God in reality has to try to do anything.  In hind site after years of pastoring, proof texting and flipping through the Bible in sermons and studies unlocking the code or solving the puzzle as some like to view it, it would have been better and still would be that a real God would not rely so heavily on the concept of "inspiration of men."  It would be nice if there were no Holy Books with questionable backgrounds and origins to divide and not unite the vast majority of humans into us and them, me and you, chosen and unchosen, called and uncalled, true and false, special and not special, Apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, elders, deacons, helpers and single people who should always bring a watermelon to the church picnic. It doesn't work well.  


The Bible tells us that the Deity's ultimate goal is that all men be saved and come to the knowledge of the "truth", whatever that may be.  I am wary personally of men who claim t speak for the Deity and have "the truth" to deliver to you.  Paul's truth came from his visions and theophanies which , of course, others did not have .  He heard voices and saw things , so he said, that were beyond description because he had gone to the third heaven.  He, as a man, a very special man, heard and saw things no man should hear or see. Unfortunately, he said he couldn't say any more about it.  How convenient.  Was that God trying to inspire us or was that Paul trying to seem special to himself and them?  Was he lying?  That's not a good "try" and serves no real purpose in scripture save to make Paul seem special in my view.  Dave Pack is predicting literal voices coming to him and "his people" in the future to prove something or other.  I know he'll be lying about it all. He'll either be slipping over into schizophrenia or if that's another God Try, I won't be interested at all.  

I don't know the answer to how humans could absolutely be convinced that the real truth of a real God is forthcoming without hearing and seeing it from the horses mouth so to speak.  Middlemen in religion muddy the waters.  Ten thousand Christian denominations, sects, cults, splits, splinters, schisms and slivers are not the good fruits of a God trying to get all men to come to the knowledge of the "truth", make it into whatever eternity has to offer for our GOOD and not cooking briefly or forever in some fire pit.  Add to that all the other world religions that are NEVER going to see the light of other folks religions, and trying just doesn't work very well.
Every COG and one man show we witness in the comedy production produced by the Wild World of God CAN'T be the best "try" on the planet.  

I know some will say that we only see in part now, but which part?  Are these parts true or just fake parts and knock offs?  If one is not qualified, chosen or part of the Royal Priesthood, which all sounds very serious, when we see it fully , will it matter by then?  "You had your chance" as the Deity reminded Dives of Lazarus fame.  I never quite understood why "they would not believe though one returned from the dead," was not an option.  I would if I knew the person, knew how they died and how long  ago, and then they showed up to speak to me about where they had been.  Maybe it's just me. 

Finally, the reason I am suspect of Deitific Trying is because it opens the big door of humans launching their own endeavors in the name of the Trying God to get you to see things their way, which of course are God's ways, even if they are not really God's ways.  It is a formula for disaster and the fruit of it is all around us.  Truth should not produce so much falsehood, war, hate and division on the planet.  

I know we have all kinds of reasonings about why it just seems that God is trying and not to successfully.  Humans are vain, stubborn, rebellious, deceitful, desperately wicked, lost, blind, deaf, dumb and with hardened hearts.  God does try hard but the truth ends up on hard ground, weedy ground, infertile ground and in the rocks where it can't grow. Only the few really get it when God endeavors to try. The rest will get it in the Second Resurrection or they will really get it in the Third.  That's when we get to say "I didn't know..."  and God gets to say, "Well, now you do."

What do you think?  Does God have to try to get our attention?  Does that sound very omniscient, omnipotent , omnipresent and om the mark?  Aside from blowing off the fruits of middlemen speaking for God and that it will all work out when "we see God face to face," at some nebulous time in the future, is this any Deity's best effort to know the truth that is supposed to make us free I assume in this life which seems the only real one we have?

I sometimes get asked or rebuked over, "Why are you trying to destroy people's faith?"  It's an odd reaction to me because I suppose I think everyone loves to seek.  I forget that in the Churches of God and fundamentalism, they have all "found it" and to not see it or believe what they found is true makes some folk react with glittering generalities about the mind, thoughts and motives of others.  Being challenged in beliefs is risky business because our beliefs are what keeps us explaining our own questions in life to ourselves successfully. The ultimate reason we are religious to begin with is our incredible fear and knowledge that we will die.  You know, "After Death-Then What?" Challenge a belief and you get an arguement and defensiveness along with childish responses. Beliefs, however are merely moments of partial truth along the way to be discarded when better perspectives come along.  Even the Bible calls it The Present Truth, which is a far better concept than The Plain Truth.  Beliefs are not final truths of anything.  So should you need to know my inner perspective on the journey all of are on in life, here it is.  This truly how I see my world and the perspective in which I 'try' to right the inaccuracies of my own youth when I thought I knew the truth of all things and nothing but the truth.  
...otherwise all bets are off  :)





Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Eric King Claims The United Nations Was Frightened By His Asteroid Prophecy




Eric King is such a powerful prophet that even the United Nations trembles at his feet and takes all of his words seriously.

As if the United Nations even knows or cares who this COG moron is!

United Nations takes Mr. E.W.King’s asteroids warnings seriously in Nov.2013

Posted on
  1. UN Meets with Space Experts for Contingency Plan on Asteroid Strikes

    http://www.hngn.com/…/u-n-meets-with-space-experts-for-contingency-plan-o…
    Oct 28, 2013 - Representatives of the United Nations (U.N) met with the world’s best space experts in New York to develop a contingency plan on the asteroid 

E. W King: An Earthquake Is Coming! Oh Noooos!





The King had another brain fart the other day.  It is one more in a long line of prophecies that King has uttered and then it came to pass......at least in his eyes.

This one involves an earthquake.  Given that we have numerous earthquakes every single day here in California, I guess we are to assume that this is going to be a great big shaker.

In case this blog disappears in the next three months you will know that California slipped off into the ocean and Eric King is the ONE and TRUE Church of God prophet.

The following is from a recorded message given to Mr. E.W.King on 11-12-13:

“I saw that America would receive a sizable quake within the next three months. If and when this occurs it will point towards a soon to be released prophecy marker which I have been waiting for.” ~ Eric W. King

Let us all watch and wait!

Monday, November 11, 2013

Dennis Muses on Intelligent Theology



dop·pel·gäng·er

 noun \ˈdä-pəl-ˌgaŋ-ər, -ˌgeŋ-, ˌdä-pəl-ˈ\
                          : someone who looks like someone else
                           :  a ghostly counterpart of a living person
                                :  a double
 or alter ego
           

Recently I met with a highly educated Episcopal Priest just to talk.  I had the opportunity and was feeling the need to see and hear what a man in his position would have to say about Biblical topics that I have come to understand in a far different way than my meager WCG training in all things Bible.  WCG trained itself to be good Bible readers, as you have heard me say over the years.  COG ministers are mere Bible readers with no desire to dig deeper into the texts, background, history or intent of what they quote to frame their beliefs. If they had the desire they would have to keep it to themselves.  Only in a secure religious setting can one speak freely of  Biblical realities. Beliefs are framed by proof texting and COGs compete with each other by proof texting better than the competition.  It's a ridiculous approach and why under trained men like Dave Pack and Ron Weinland make fools of themselves with hubris and ego centric ministry.  

To the point.

We talked about the Gospels and the Priest comment to me was that the Gospels are full of contradictions. Neither birth stories no resurrection accounts are eyewitness accounts and are muddled, but they still have good meaning for us.  He noted that if he did not have the desire for Jesus in the picture, he'd be a great Buddhist.  Sigh...

We talked about Genesis and evolution and the Priest agreed that the Adam and Eve story is mythological and not really the origin of human beings.  It was a comment that came with the idea that anyone should be able to understand that.  I got the feeling he'd not understand anyone taking it as literally true. The creation story is not really about science of course but it has some good lessons for us.  We didn't talk about what those might be.  It didn't matter if Genesis wasn't literally true, which it isn't and wasn't in his view as well and held my tongue when thinking of just how much the story being literally true did mean in the New Testament and later in the Church with the concept of Original Sin.  One can't be held as guilty because of the Fall of humans in the Garden if there was no garden and no man or woman actually "fell."  Sigh...

The Priest fully understood the rancour between Peter, James, John and Paul in the New Testament and that none of them agreed with each other much .  But again, there was good in it all.  Sigh...

When it came to Revelation, he noted  the Book of Revelation was never written for us.  It was written for them and the "soon" and "things that must shortly come to pass" was for THEM, not US.  Revelation is a strange book and not for us to get too concerned about today.  We both noted how many "preachers" make fools of themselves with false predictions.  Little did he know how hot a topic that was for me but he understood the actual place Revelation should have in the modern Church.  None.   Sigh...

He recommended a book or two that might help and as I looked through the one he took from his shelf , which he thought was just awesome and true, it was obvious the author was well versed in Buddhism and Buddhist thought as relating to the Gospels.  Sigh....

It was obvious he knew what most who take the time and have the theological inclination can come to see and understand about the Bible.  He made it very clear he understood it was a man originated book as there can be no other kind, and that it was certainly not written by any God literally.  Yet there were many good lessons in it if you skip the crazy parts which he noted as easily found.   Sigh...

All I can say  is that the experience was interesting with a touch of regret.  Of course the Episcopal Church is sacrament oriented. It has no interest in the strange and weird ideas of those like a Dave Pack.  It is not interested in Prophecy Coming Alive! It doesn't beg for money and expects to be around a very long time. I found a grave in the Church Yard going back to 1700's and it was filled with both Revolutionary and Civil War..oops, War of Northern Aggression soldiers.  It's just there for people of faith and provides a setting that serves that need.  I don't find the congregants particularly Bible literate.  They leave that to the Church. The members have lives apart from Church and yet the Church provides much in ways of social opportunities and excellent works in places like Haiti and the community, God forbid.  Having attended, it is orderly with not much room for straying from the Liturgy or Homily.  The Homily is short and to the point.  No Dave Pack or Ron Weinland, Bob Thiel or James Malm would get an inch in the Episcopal setting.  And this crowd would not be inclined to the personal views of a Dave Pack on everything from himself to what they should or should not eat.  With forty or fifty lawyers in the audience Dave would have to be a different kind of human being. 

I did have my doubts that all congregants would see or think of the Bible in the same way as the Priests do and he admitted to that being the case as well.  I once heard that the average well trained theologian is 50 years ahead of the congregation in what they understand about all things Bible and this is true. Very true. I'd say maybe 2000

I had met my Doppelganger...my ghost.  Maybe I was the ghost and he was the real thing.  I left with several emotions tugging at me.  I was a bit frustrated that we had such similar views but such different lives, though I always imagined myself in ministry from way back.  I went to Ambassador College really believing it was a Seminary if you can imagine that.  I was a kid and no one told me otherwise.  When I was at AC I would study at times at Fuller Theological Seminary and had an inkling that that might be a better place.  But with the world ending and Jesus coming soon, I stayed put.  Besides they ate pork and didn't keep the sabbath. I was a kid. It was not difficult to compare his relatively easy life of being kind and loving, generous and helpful to a very unique group of people with my own at this time.  I left having a chat with myself about it all just being a story.  He had his and I had mine.  But I had met myself in that office and it was an interesting experience and I left realizing what is uncommon knowing for the average congregant is common understanding when a man or woman is well trained in Biblical studies and can admit to the reality of it all. 

Just thought I'd share it...