From a reader here:
Literal or Parable & Allegorical Understanding
A few years ago, after church services, a round table
discussion about various religions began. After several minutes the following
comment was made, “All religion is made man.” Immediately someone said, “Except
ours.” After several minutes of continued discussion, the comment was repeated
with emphasis, “Remember this, all religion is man made.” A few years ago
someone questioned another’s belief in God. The answer was, “Yes, absolutely,
but I prefer the word creator rather than God."
The word “God” was derived from the word “good.” This may
have been done to emphasize the goodness of the creator more so than the
greatness of the creation by the creator. Both are equally valid. There are
three Hebrew words translated as God; “elohim” Strong’s #430, which is the
plural form of “eloah” #433, which is
derived from “el” #410, which means might, strength, and power. Elohim does not
always refer to “God” as creator as the following will show; keeping in mind
that Strong’s Concordance reference for the Hebrew word “elohim” is #430.
Genesis 23:6 Hear us, my lord: thou [art] a mighty(430) prince among us: …..(Refers to Abraham as elohim, but not as God)
Genesis 30:8 …. With great(430) wrestlings have I wrestled with my sister, …(Refers to Rachel and Leah - as elohim / godly wrestlers?)
Exodus 9:28 …… that there be no mighty(430) thunderings and hail; ……. (as elohim / godly thunder and hail?)
Exodus 22:9 ….... come before the judges;(430) [and] whom the judges(430) shall condemn, . . .godly judges? - maybe, maybe not)
Jonah 3:3 …... Now Nineveh was an exceeding(430) great city of three days' journey.(Was Nineveh an elohim / godly city?)
Searching for and learning the meanings of words, rather
than the traditional teachings of 20+ years of Baptist and Methodist teaching
as well as 50+ years of awareness of and/or association with the Church of God has
helped in coming to a completely different understanding of the Bible.
Twelve years ago, an interest in trying to understand the
bible more clearly was begun, rather than relying on traditional teaching. Over
time, an understanding was realized that parables, allegories and “dark sayings
of old” were used in the Old and New Testament. “Dark sayings” in Psalms 78:2 and
Proverbs 1:6 are used in the sense of being difficult to understand or hidden. Galatians
4:22-26 states that the story of Abraham, Sarah, Hagar and their sons are allegory
(vs. 24). Did those “hidden” terms use anthropomorphism and personification to describe natural conditions
of the world we live in as well as all people, no matter who the person is or
where that person resides on this earth?
Once the
similarity of stories from the O.T. and N.T. were compared to nature, our solar
system, the universe and us as humans, the meanings began to become clearer.
Also, similar stories are a part of nearly every culture throughout time on
this earth. Compare the stories of Krishna
of India, Tammuz of Syria, Esus of the Celtic Druids, Mithra of Persia, and Quexalcoati
of Mexico, Dionysus of Greece and many
others. All were crucified gods and all have stories similar to the one we know
best. Why?
The following are
a few of examples to explain some allegorical possibilities:
- Important events, in the Bible,
happens at a high place. Mt Siani, Mt Zion, Mt Ararat, Mt Moriah, Mt
Carmel, Mt of Olives, Sermon on the Mount, large “upper room” and others. Could
all these be allegory for our own personal “mountain” which is on top of
our shoulders? Psalms 139:13-14 . . . [God] formed my
inward parts . . . I am fearfully
and wonderfully made.
- 1 Kings 6 describes the construction
of the temple, which could allegorically describe our skull and the parts
of the brain. The temple, which really counts, is made without hands. (Mark
14:58). If you point to your temple, would you point to the side of your
head? Is that just coincidence? “For we
are the temple of the living God” (2 Corinthians 6:16) “. . .the kingdom of God comes
not with observation: . . . the kingdom of God is within you. (Luke
17:20-21) A study of the word “within”
may reveal an understanding that very well may not mean “among” as we have
been told. The Greek word translated “within” (Strong’s #1787) appears
only two times. The other is in Matthew 23:26 and the word means “inside”.
- There
are twelve signs of the Zodiac. One of those is Gemini, a set of twins
(total 13). One of those signs is represented as a woman, Virgo. There
were twelve sons of Jacob and one daughter (total 13). There are twelve main
followers or disciples of Jesus plus a woman, Mary Magdalene (total 13).
- There
are 2 sets of 12 (total 24) cranial nerves that start originate in our
brain and extend into our body. There are 24 elders around the throne of
God. (Rev. 4:4) Could that throne be our skull, which contains the brain,
and be the “Great White Throne” where judgment occurs?
- There
are four main parts of the brain; cerebrum, cerebellum, limbic system, and
brain stem. The cerebrum is further divided into four parts; frontal lobe,
parietal lobe, occipital lobe and temporal lobe. Could either of these
four parts be the four beasts of Rev 4:7-8?
- According
to some cultures, there are seven points of energy associated with the
human body. Six of those points of energy are within the body from the
base of the spine to the head. Work takes place within those six energy
points. The seventh is just above the head where no work is involved
within the body. Could our seven day week be an allegory for the six
points of energy in our body with the seventh just over our head where a
crown would be? Could these be the seals of Rev 5:1 which are written
“within” and on the “backside” be along the spine of our body? Could the
seventh be the crown we are promised?
- Jesus
was killed on Golgotha or Calvary. Both mean skull. Golgatha is transliterated
from Hebrew. Calvary is transliterated from Latin. (How did a Latin
word find its way into a book written in Greek?) Could the death of Jesus
be allegorical for the death of our own ego and carnal desires? Those
attitudes originate in our brain. BTW, transliteration is not
translation. Transliteration offers no definition, only an approximate
sound and spelling of a word.
There are many, many more possibilities which, if fully
understood, could free us from the control of the Nicolaitans. (Revelation 2:6
& 15) Nico is Greek for victory
(control) and laitanes (laity) is Greek for the common people; OR victory over or
control of the common people. That is not to say that the ministers, in
general, are purposely trying to deceive the people, but traditional orthodoxy
came about over many, many years of control. Ministers / clergy teach what they
are taught to teach. Generally, the lay people are expected to accept what is
taught without question. During the “Dark Ages” the vast majority of people
were not able to have a copy of the bible even if they could read. The thoughts
and actions of people were controlled to the point of death if commands were
not obeyed. During the Dark Ages, approximately 600 CE to 1600 CE, millions of
people were tortured and/or killed by the church. As a point for an interesting
study, the word “church” is not a valid translation in the bible. King James
was instrumental in having the word “church” used instead of the correct
translation, assembly and/or congregation for the Greek word ἐκκλησίᾳ, transliterated as ekklesia.
Following are two examples of the control of the Nicolaitans.
- William
Tyndale wrote a more correct English translation of the bible in the early
1500’s CE. The church had banned
the unauthorized translation of the Bible into English in 1408. Tyndale was
killed by strangulation while tied to the stake and his body was burned at
that stake because of a treatise he wrote critical of Henry VIII’s
divorce. At that time Henry VIII had broken with Rome and became
the ruling authority of the Church of England. Tyndale also claimed that
the Bible did not support the view that the “church” was the body of
Christ.
- Galileo
Galilee was charged, by the “church”, with teaching and defending the
Copernican doctrine that holds that the sun is at the center of the
universe and that the earth moves. This doctrine had been deemed heretical
in 1616, and Copernicus' book had been placed on the index of prohibited
books. In June 1633 Galileo was taken to the “church” and ordered to kneel
while his sentence was read. It was declared that he was “vehemently
suspect of heresy”. Galileo was forced to recite and sign a formal withdrawal
of his statements.
These are only two examples of the “church” and its control
of the people. There are many, many millions of others who were either killed
or severely punished because they challenged the church hierarchy and their dogma
and dictates. It still happens today in a figurative sense.
If
the bible is read with a literal interpretation for proper understanding, then
one must deal with the numerous illogical and contradictory statements within
that book. Did Jonah really stay in a whale’s (big fish) belly for three days
and three nights? Will Jesus literally ride a white horse out of heaven? Who caused David to number Israel? (Compare 2Samuel 24:1 and 1Chronicles
21:1) Will there literally be a “New Jerusalem” that comes down from
“heaven”?
As a
general rule Jesus spoke only in parables.
Mark 4:33 . .
. with many such parables he spoke the word to them, even as they were able to
hear.
Mark 4:34 But He did not speak to them without
a parable. . . . .
Is it
possible for the Bible to have been written with allegory, metaphor and
parables in the same manner as Jesus spoke? Could this explain the illogical
and contradictory statements within that book? If God is in heaven, could
heaven be our highest and controlling organ, i.e., our brain?
If
the Bible truly is the “Word of God” there must be a reason it is written with
those illogical and contradictory situations. If parable, allegory, metaphor
and dark sayings are considered as a possibility then maybe there are other questionable
situations or events from the bible which could be better understood. We have
been admonished not to accept the letter of the law.
2Corinthians 3:6 . . . . not
of the letter, (literal understanding?)
but of the spirit: for the letter kills,
(hides understanding?) but the spirit
makes alive. (gives better understanding?)
Our
traditions are so very deeply rooted and difficult to overcome without the following
example:
Acts 17:11 . . . . [Bereans] received the word with all
readiness of mind, and searched(350) the scriptures daily, whether those things
were so. (Strong’s #350, examined,
studied)
These
two questions are asked,
1. “Do
we really know and understand the meanings of the words in the Bible?”
2. “Do
we really want to know and understand the meanings of the words
in the Bible?”
All
previous comments and suggestions in this article are not limited to
understanding the Bible by it being the sole source of what has been written
here. These comments and suggestions have been known and written for thousands
of years throughout the generations and cultures of mankind.
George and Ira Gershwin, a couple of New York Jewish
song writers wrote “It Ain’t Necessarily So” for the play “Porgy and Bess” in 1935.
It seems that the Gershwin brothers may have had a better understanding than
most folks. They did not write “ain’t so”; but wrote “ain’t necessarily
so.”
Could they have understood the parables, allegories and dark
sayings of old?
**************************
It ain't necessarily so
It ain't necessarily so
The things dat yo' li'ble, to read in de Bible,
It ain't necessarily so.
Li'l David was small, but oh my!
Li'l David was small, but oh my!
He fought ‘ol Goliath, who lay down an' dieth!
Li'l David was small, but oh my!
Oh Jonah, he lived in de whale,
Oh Jonah, he lived in de whale,
Fo' he made his home in, dat fish's ab-do-men.
Oh Jonah, he lived in de whale.
Li'l Moses was found in a stream.
Li'l Moses was found in a stream.
He floated on water, till Ol' Pharaoh's daughter,
She fished him, she said, from dat stream.
Well, it ain't necessarily so
Well, it ain't necessarily so
Dey tells all you chillun, de debble's a villun,
But it ain't necessarily so!
To get into Heaven, Don' snap for a seven!
Live clean ! Don' have no fault!
Oh, I takes dat gospel, when’er it's pos'ble,
But wid a grain of salt.
Methus'lah lived nine hundred years,
Methus'lah lived nine hundred years,
But who calls dat livin' when no gal will give in
To no man what's nine hundred years?
I'm preachin' dis sermon to show,
It ain't neces, ain't neces, ain't neces, ain't neces
Ain't necessarily ... so!
**************************
4 comments:
Prefer science. It's based on observation.
Not interested in abstract philosophy which seems to totally ignore reality these days.
There must be an allegory in that somewhere, but I'm not interested.
After suffering through any number of people who went through psychotic breaks and were in a mental institution for awhile, the whole idea of dealing with unreality not connected to anything substantive seems neither profitable nor comfortable.
Too many crazies....
When I was a kid in Sunday School the Bible was "An earthly story with a heavenly meaning". This reverses it to "A heavenly story with an earthly meaning".
I'm going to opt for an earthly story with an earthly meaning written by earthlings
Church of God's, Messengers in Lexington,Tennessee needs to read this article.
Making iron-clad judgments and claims as to what is literal, metaphor, allegory, personification, midrash, etc. along with picking and insisting upon one amongst several often equally strong doctrinal approaches is what forms the backbone of fundamentalist Christianity. And, if "knowing" and being headstrong about prophecy is also factored in as one of the proofs of a church, even though the fulfillments of the prophecies somehow always end up getting postponed, it can become very confusing unless you have the proper prescription of blinders.
Armstrongism had its own individual set of such Gnosticism, including an assortment of unprovable, unbelievable theories. Special knowledge, proper doctrines, and having the keys to unlock prophecy is what was supposed to have made the church special enough that the leaders were the gatekeepers to the place of safety, and to the kingdom. Over forty years wandering busily but aimlessly in the wilderness since 1975 is not a gushing recommendation of Armstrongism as "God's True Church". And, the fruits made manifest by the horribly misnamed "God's government from the top down" are self evident. But then, what might one expect from leaders who believe they are guided by an impersonal force, rather than a sentient and interactive member of the God family? Does electricity provide guidance?
I hope I didn't offend any of our LCG friends by these statements. They were intended to show that there is much more, much deeper thinking to be done than what was spoon fed as the guided conclusions to our Bible "study" in the Armstrong churches. Hopefully, by now, everyone realizes that there are no such things as apostles or prophets during our current era, and most of what is being passed off as newly revealed truth is absolutely puerile, and easily disproven and dismissed. Shouting it out louder and using draconian enforcement does not prove it, either.
BB
Post a Comment