Friday, July 18, 2025

Russell Gmirkin: Former AC Student and Highly Respected Biblical Scholar Passes Away

 


Russell Gmirkin is an independent researcher specializing in the composition of the Torah (or Pentateuch, the first five books of the bible: GenesisExodusLeviticusNumbers, and Deuteronomy) as well as the Dead Sea Scrolls. He is most well known for his defense of the view that the Pentateuch was written in its entirety by a team of Jewish scholars working in the Library of Alexandria in 273-272 BCE, who also published the Septuagint Greek translation of the Torah around the same time.[1]

His father was Vasia Gmirkin, a CIA agent who recruited Soviet defectors and was responsible for the US acquiring night vision technology.[2][3] While a teenager, Gmirkin attended a small, now-defunct Christian liberal arts college named Ambassador College in Pasadena, California. During his time at Ambassador College, he began to increasingly question the religious doctrine of the university, ultimately leading him to leave before graduating. Gmirkin currently lives in Portland, Oregon.[2]






3 comments:

Byker Bob said...

Somehow, the name Gmirkin is familiar to me. I seem to remember someone, possibly an AC student, from way back when, but with a different first name.

Anyway, deep condolences to Russell's family.

Anyone who has ever read any Bart Ehrman, or is familiar with the process known as textual criticism, knows that the Old Testament has been revised at more than one point in time throughout its history. This is evident from specific language contained in the text which has been handed down to us today. There are theories regarding those points in time. One compelling theory centers around the time of the Babylonian captivity, a time period when there was great introspection amongst the captured. Scribes anticipated freedom, and were preparing for its eventuality. Some say that the compilations and revisions anticipated the time of the secomd temple, a time during which we now know thatJesus walked the face of the Earth, and often quoted from the Septuagint. There are also theories regarding the intertestamental period.

Now that I'm aware of them, I'll probably study Russell's materials, trying to keep an open mind. It can't hurt. We'll see how compelling they might be. Or not.

BB

Anonymous said...

Gmirkin was a real Bible scholar who left a lasting impression on so many people who speak fondly of him. Compare Gmirkin to Bob Thiel, well, actually you can't; one was a real Bible scholar, and Bob Thiel is a diploma mill/Armstrongite proof-texter who does not use sound exegesis.

Lee Walker said...

A little historical assessment to take as you wish:

The historical Jesus was an Essene. Essenes believe that the OT was edited in Babylon in the 500s to omit Moses’ supposedly actual first trip up Mount Sinai and a rather hippie-ish original covenant proposal. Much of Jesus’ teaching is simply a warmed-over version of it (with Matthew playing the lawyer and trying to make it sound like it fits with the Hebrew Scriptures). The practice of holding everything in common is a giveaway as to the Christian movement’s origin. Thus, despite preserved statements upholding the Torah as such, he actually held a different theology. Those statements were like a politician, saying, “I support the Second Amendment!” when he is a member of the Brady group, upholds David Hogg, and talks among his supporters about gun control plans.

Since the NT is predicated on the OT being Scripture (John 5:45-47; 1 Tim 6; and others), if Jesus was right, then… Jesus was wrong! And, of course, if Jesus was wrong, then Jesus was wrong.

Conclusion: Believe the OT or don’t believe it, but either way, Jesus was wrong.