2026, The Centennial Year of HWA Finding God's Word That Had Been Lost In Portland Oregon Library

Central Library

One hundred years ago, in 1926, our intrepid hero Herbert Armstrong bravely marched into the
Portland Public Library—yes, that cutting-edge theological powerhouse—to, in the most humble and selfless way possible, prove his wife wrong. What followed was the legendary six-month super-intensive Bible study (now lovingly preserved as one of the foundational myths of the entire movement).

There, in the hallowed, musty corners where old paper, glue, and ink slowly decompose into that unmistakable “vintage library” perfume permanently scorched into your nostrils, Herbert miraculously rediscovered God’s True Message—a message that had somehow been misplaced for a casual 1,900 years.

Apparently, the Almighty managed to smuggle His forgotten truth all the way from the Middle East, through Europe, over to Britain, across the stormy ocean, and then across the wild and treacherous American frontier… only to be carefully shelved in the dim, dusty stacks of a 1926 public library in Portland, Oregon. And then—pure divine serendipity—Herbert, in just six short months of casual browsing, managed to locate every single piece of it. What are the odds?

Mind you, this wasn’t one of those dusty, overfunded historical theological libraries in Europe, where actual scholars had been arguing theology for centuries with thousands of deeply researched volumes. No, no. This was a public library. You know, the place where ordinary people checked out novels, children’s books, and the occasional almanac. But sure, it was obviously brimming with the secret keys to the universe that God Himself had lost track of.

Because clearly, while the Creator was busy daydreaming Bob Thiel into existence, He accidentally misplaced His own Word so thoroughly that even He couldn’t find it for nearly two millennia… until Herbert W. Armstrong, unemployed and heroically ignoring his family from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. every single day (including weekends), finally cracked the code. Is it any surprise the Armstrong family turned out so wonderfully well-adjusted and emotionally healthy?

This is the COG version of the Mormons' "This is the Place" monument, a place that Herbert Armstrong’s six-month library odyssey supposedly unlocked 1,900 years of divine lost mail. The Philadelphia Church of God still leads pilgrimages to that very public library, where the faithful can tread the same carpet and breathe the same musty air, convinced they’re walking on holy ground rather than checking out the self-help cult recovery section. It’s a fitting monument to a movement built on the unshakable belief that God chose a struggling salesman in Portland, Oregon—rather than, say, a seminary or a cathedral—to rediscover His truth. One can’t help but marvel at the sheer audacity of it all: a six-month crash course in a municipal reading room that launched an entire American sect, fractured families, and, a century later, still inspires guided tours. If that isn’t peak religious irony, it’s hard to imagine what is.

A hundred years later, the movement still treats a random public library like it’s the burning bush, the empty tomb, and the Mount of Transfiguration rolled into one slightly dusty building with overdue fines.

If that isn’t the single most gloriously absurd origin story in modern American religion, then frankly, I don’t know what is. Bravo, Herbert. Bravo.

What a legacy. 🙄

Number 40 - The New COG Idolatry

 

It is another sunny day in COGland and the whackiness continues on unabated. Numerology has always been an important part of the church. Numbers matter. No COG is more guilty of this than the Philadelphia Church of God. Every imaginable thing turns into something sacred from the god they claim to follow.

HWA has been dead 40 years.

Gerald Flurry was fired by the Worldwide Church of God 40 years ago.

Jesus fasted for 40 days

40 is emphasized in the lives of Moses, David and the end-time Elijah—Herbert W. Armstrong.

 

It has been 40 years since Herbert W. Armstrong died. Also, there are 40 days between December 7, the date I was fired from the Worldwide Church of God in 1989, and January 16, the date Mr. Armstrong died in 1986. 

 

The number 40 occurs often in the Bible. Have you ever wondered why? It is significant in the lives of the biblical prophets, kings and judges. It occurs repeatedly in the lives of spiritual giants. The significance of this number helps us understand why the Israelites spent 40 years wandering in the wilderness; why Moses, Elijah and even Jesus Christ fasted for 40 days; and why this number is a sign for us today.

Study the number 40 in the Bible and you see that only God could have inspired the use of this number throughout the millenniums. This number is an important sign that brings God into events to show His presence. This should be very encouraging for us—especially when you consider that 40 is emphasized in the lives of Moses, David and the end-time Elijah—Herbert W. Armstrong.

The lunacy keeps on going:

When John Amos and I were fired from the wcg on Dec. 7, 1989, it was just 40 days before the anniversary of Mr. Armstrong’s death on January 16. We found that significant, and I believe it showed God’s presence was with us because we were obeying God when we got fired. In fact, that is why we were fired! The wcg leaders were forsaking God and what Mr. Armstrong taught them. 

 

The number 40 is tied to God. These 40s are not the work of man but of God! It shows that God is involved here. What could be more important than that?

The proofs just keep piling up - or maybe the crap is, it's hard to tell when it involves PCG and Gerald Flurry.

We started our campus in Edmond, Oklahoma, with 40 acres—just like the Pasadena campus under Mr. Armstrong. Both campuses were associated with the number 40.

Then he ends with this heresy:

Just think about all those 40s, and think about God’s presence. He does sometimes curse or correct us if we get away from Him and forsake Him; He must do that! But God is re-creating Himself in man—that is His goal. We are going to be sons of God—not adopted sons but real sons of God! 

 

While the Bible doesn't mention "numerology" by name, it classifies such predictive or occult uses of numbers as a form of divination (fortune-telling or seeking supernatural knowledge through means other than God). The Scriptures repeatedly and severely prohibit divination and related occult practices.The clearest and most frequently cited passage is from the Old Testament law:

Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable (an abomination) to the Lord...This passage lists several forbidden practices, and modern predictive numerology typically falls under "divination," "interpreting omens," or related categories because it seeks to uncover hidden knowledge or future events through numerical patterns. 

Deuteronomy 18:10-12 (NIV) 

While PCG and the COG do not use numerology as divination, they have elevated the use of numbers to a sacred status, especially when they can use it to promote their own group as the only true and correct COG. 

 

LCG : In the world, but not of the world...

 

It is hard to believe that here we are in 2026 and COG groups are still having to justify why they use the Roman calendar and other peripheral issues around daily life. They still like to claim that while they are of this world, they are not part of this world. That is one of the biggest cons of the church (besides British Israelism). Some are so quick to point out that they only observe biblical days and seasons, and yet the very days and seasons they celebrate in the church are all days that were patterned after the so-called Canaanite days of the ancient tribes.

A New Year? In Winter? Why do we in the Living Church of God not engage in “New Year’s” parties or festivities—or even the greeting “Happy New Year”? Because the new-year celebrations our world just observed are from pagan sources, which you can read about in the commentary by the late Gary F. Ehman, “The Two Faces of New Year Celebrations,” posted on TomorrowsWorld.org this week. We live in this world, so it’s not wrong to use the Roman calendar as a part of functioning in it—but we are not to be of this world. As Jesus prayed to the Father, “I do not pray that You should take them out of the world, but that You should keep them from the evil one” (John 17:15). Let’s thank God for the fact that He has called us out of ancient superstitions and customs of this world and called us into His sanctifying truth (John 17:17)!
Have a peaceful Sabbath,
Rod McNair

They love to mock Christians, whom they claim have reinterpreted days associated with pagans, such as Christmas and Easter, and yet keep days appropriated from Canaanite pagans that ancient Israel came out of.

COG groups have no problem keeping the three major biblical pilgrimage festivals (Shalosh Regalim): Passover (Pesach), Shavuot (Weeks/Pentecost), and Sukkot (Booths/Tabernacles). These holidays have deep roots in ancient agricultural harvest cycles that were common across the ancient Near East, including among the Canaanites (the pre-Israelite inhabitants of the land). Over time, the biblical authors reinterpreted and "historicized" these observances, transforming them into uniquely Israelite/Jewish celebrations tied to key events in salvation history (like the Exodus and Sinai).

The Torah itself preserves clear evidence of the festivals' original agricultural character, even as it layers on historical/theological meanings:

• Passover / Feast of Unleavened Bread — Tied to the spring barley harvest (the first grain to ripen). It falls in the month of Abib (spring), when the new planting season begins after winter rains. The emphasis on unleavened bread (matzah) and the offering of the first sheaf (omer) of barley reflects this. Some scholars propose connections to Canaanite spring rituals involving unleavened bread and apotropaic (protective) rites.
• Shavuot — Called the "Feast of Harvest" or "Day of First Fruits" in the Torah. It marks the wheat harvest (about 7 weeks after Passover) and the bringing of first fruits (bikkurim) to the sanctuary. Later rabbinic tradition linked it to the giving of the Torah at Sinai.
• Sukkot — Originally the "Feast of Ingathering" (Hag ha-Asif), the major autumn harvest festival celebrating the gathering of grapes, olives, figs, and other late-summer fruits. It was the most prominent and joyous of the three in biblical times (often just called "the Festival"). The practice of dwelling in temporary booths (sukkot) likely derives from field shelters used by farmers during the final, intensive harvest period before the rains.

These three festivals align precisely with the natural agricultural rhythm of the Land of Israel: spring barley → early summer wheat → late summer/autumn fruits.

Archaeology, Ugaritic texts from ancient Canaan, and comparative studies, hold that the early Israelites — who emerged within Canaanite culture — adapted existing regional harvest festivals rather than inventing them from scratch. This was a common process in the ancient world: new cultural or religious groups often reframed inherited seasonal rites to fit their theology.

• Sukkot shows particularly strong parallels to Canaanite autumn new-year/harvest festivals, including seven-day celebrations, temporary booths/shelters, and rituals linked to rainfall and fertility (e.g., Ugaritic texts describe similar practices for deities like Baal). Some scholars trace the sukkah itself to Canaanite customs of building ritual booths on rooftops or terraces.
• The overall pattern — three major seasonal pilgrimages to a central sanctuary — fits broader Canaanite and Near Eastern patterns of harvest thanksgiving and petitions for fertility/rain.

The biblical texts themselves show this evolution: earlier layers refer to the festivals purely by agricultural names (e.g., "Feast of Ingathering"), while later passages add historical explanations (e.g., Sukkot recalling the desert booths of the Exodus, or Passover recalling liberation from Egypt).

It's more accurate to say the biblical authors took over and transformed pre-existing Canaanite/Levantine harvest festivals than to call them simple "substitutes." The process was one of historicization and monotheization — removing pagan elements (like fertility rites or polytheistic myths) and reorienting the celebrations toward the God of Israel, the Exodus covenant, and ethical/historical memory.

This pattern is typical in the development of Israelite religion: the prophets and Torah writers repeatedly criticize purely agricultural or "Canaanite-style" observances, insisting that festivals must remember God's acts in history, not just thank nature deities for crops.

The core ancient Jewish pilgrimage festivals originated as regional harvest celebrations with likely Canaanite roots, but Judaism intentionally reframed them to emphasize historical redemption, covenant, and dependence on the one God rather than seasonal cycles alone. This creative adaptation is one of the fascinating ways ancient Israelite religion distinguished itself while remaining deeply connected to the land and its rhythms.

Dave Pack Lies That All Is Right On Track For Christ's Return

 

LCG: When Jesus Returns, LCG Members Will Help Spread The Law Around The World

 

Given the horrible track record of how the church used the "law" to make members' lives miserable, isn't it comforting to know that these same people who have suffered at times will be spreading that version of the law around the world, subjugating millions more? Oh, the joy.

The Way to Peace: In our world today, especially at the end of December, we hear a lot about “Peace on earth and goodwill toward men,” yet the news is full of reports of violence and suffering. The desire for peace is universal, but that hope has remained elusive for most human beings. While world leaders talk of peace and religious leaders pray for peace—and the United Nations sends “peacekeepers” to trouble spots around the globe—the world simply does not know the way to peace (Isaiah 59:8). However, God’s word reveals that the way to peace is to learn to love and live by the laws of God (Psalm 119:165; Isaiah 32:17). The world will learn the way to peace when Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, returns to this earth and the laws of God are spread from Jerusalem by teachers who are in training now (Isaiah 9:6–7; 2:2–4; 30:20–21). Let’s prepare for that day!
Have a profitable Sabbath,
Douglas S. Winnail 

 

When Jesus returns, the kingdom will be fully realized under the New Covenant. Promises like universal knowledge of God ("no longer shall each one teach his neighbor... for they shall all know me," Jeremiah 31:34) point to consummation at Christ's return and that the church, believers from all nations, inherits the blessings as the fulfilled people of God (Galatians 3:28–29; Ephesians 2:11–22).

There will be no restoration of the Old Covenant or its sacrificial system, as it was temporary and shadowed Christ's work. The future kingdom is governed by grace, internal transformation, and direct access to God through Christ alone. Jesus' return brings the full realization of the New Covenant, not a return to the Old. The Old Covenant's purpose was fulfilled in Christ and set aside.

No one has ever kept the Old Covenant in its completeness, including every single COG group today, nor has any COG member ever fully kept the Old Covenant. It was deliberately set up to be impossible to keep.

_____________________________

And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,' for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Jeremiah 31:34

Under the New Covenant, we no longer need a mediator like a pastor general, chief overseer, apostles or even prophets. We will have direct personal access to God - Joel 2:28-29. There will be total amnesty for sins not just covered (as in our annual Day of Atonement) but forgotten. The slate is wiped clean and no longer remembered. That enables the relationship with God. There will also be absolutely no need for COG leaders, evangelists, super deacons, or great Bwanas. "From the least to the greatest" implies equality, fulfilled in a messianic age where barriers dissolve.

The Old Covenant exposed sin but couldn't empower obedience or provide permanent atonement. The New Covenant provides regeneration (new heart), indwelling Spirit, and total forgiveness—enabling what the Law demanded but couldn't produce (Romans 8:3–4).

There will be no reverting to temple sacrifices, Levitical priesthood, or Mosaic regulations because that would be regression, not progress (see also Hebrews 10:1–18; Galatians 4:9–10). This directly counters any theology that expects a restored Levitical system in the future as some in COGland believe.

Even the Sabbath and holy days (as we claim to know them) will no longer be in effect. People will have their "Sabbath rest" living in the presence of Jesus. The holy days, as we claim all point to Christ, will no longer be necessary since that "point" is dwelling among us, and then would serve no function.

We will have the confidence of access. We will approach God directly through Christ, without human mediators or rituals (Hebrews 4:16; 10:19–22).

We will have the assurance of forgiveness: Sins are not just covered but removed—"remembered no more."

We will have empowered obedience: The Spirit writes God's law on our hearts, producing genuine transformation, not external conformity.

Hebrews 8 warns about returning to legalism or ritualism that denies the sufficiency of Christ's work.

In essence, Christ’s return brings the complete realization of the New Covenant in grace, making any form of Old Covenant legalism, ritualism, or hierarchical church leadership unnecessary and contrary to Scripture, thus will not require any COG-trained member wandering around the world preaching Armstrongism.

Catty Gerald Weston Just Can't Help Getting Digs In Against New Years and Christmas

 

Gerald Weston penned his latest intro to his weekly member letter. As usual in COGland, the leader has to demonstrate how superior the COG is over other Christians, particularly when it comes to New Year's and Christmas. It is so comforting to know that COG members are so much more enlightened than the worldly Christians and those who celebrate New Year's and party too much (much like some LCG members do at the Feast, but you never hear Weston mention that).

While much of the world is sleeping in this morning after a night of frivolous partying to ring in a new Roman calendar year, we are busy in the office doing the Work to which we’ve been called. Mr. Wallace Smith and I recorded telecasts today, and others are taking care of end-of-year chores. While regular income has been rather anemic for several months, the year has ended with a very strong December and special donations of $20,000 or more have exceeded last year’s. Last week’s Family Weekends were a huge success, giving hundreds of members a welcome relief from the shallow music and worldly celebrations of this time of year.

Shallow music...ROTFLMAO! Take a look at a COG hymnal! War, death, destruction, and taking delight in smashing opponents underfoot.

Weston has also called a fast for January 31. Myanmar brethren are being persecuted while sickness, job loss, and financial difficulties are plaguing the church.

More than one member has asked about a Church-wide fast for our members in Myanmar or due to the general state of the world in which we live. I’m therefore calling for our members to join in a voluntary fast on January 31. We understand that some members, such as those involved in Tomorrow’s World Presentations, will need to choose a day or two before or after due to previously scheduled events, but for the majority of us that Sabbath should work just fine. In addition to the situation in Myanmar, many of our members are suffering from individual trials of sickness, job loss, and/or financial difficulty. Let us beseech our Creator to intervene for His sons and daughters.

God as Man: Armstrongism Missed the Mark on the Incarnation

 

Joseph, Jesus, Mary

God as Man

Armstrongism Missed the Mark on the Incarnation

By Scout

When he was born as Jesus Christ, he was flesh and blood, materialistic and could be seen, touched and felt.

― Herbert W. Armstrong, Mystery of the Ages, p.41, First Edition, 1985

We are in the Advent season and for many Christians the mind turns to the Incarnation.  I do not like the term incarnation.  It’s fine after you come to understand what it really means.  But at first cut it sounds like a narrow reference to the physical flesh.  Like the Advent is all about fleshliness.  But the incarnation isn’t about metabolism, cellular structure and endocrine secretions.  I would rather see the term “humanization” be used.  Humanization encompasses a larger span of meaning.  But who am I to meddle with church terminology?

An abstract of this essay, if you don’t want to read the rest, is that the Christian doctrine of Incarnation means that Jesus was fully God and fully man when he was on this earth.  And now he is still fully God and fully man.  The Armstrongist doctrine is that Jesus was fully God as the Logos but was transformed fully into the flesh as Jesus.  Then Jesus was resurrected and glorified as God. Jesus was never, ever fully God and fully man.  He was always one or the other.  And the Armstrongist model of the incarnation is in error.  And the erroneous view is not supported by exegesis. That is my theme in brief.  

Disclaimer: Before I start, I have to say that I am not really sure what Armstrongism declares concerning the incarnation.  I searched an archive of Armstrongist literature and only found the term “incarnation” in connection with pagan belief or purported pagan belief.  One would have to conclude that Armstrongism does not really have a strong doctrine of the incarnation.  There are just some scattered statements.  Denominationally, Armstrongism takes great pride in its rejection of Christmas and its meaning based on the illogic of pagan connections and calendar calculations but theologically and exegetically the denominations seem to be absent from class. 

The Conjectural Armstrongist “Model” of Incarnation

Armstrongism does not have a well-defined, comprehensive model for the Incarnation.  I am surprised by this hole in their theology.  The Incarnation may seem peripheral but it is directly related to the Antichrist.  In 2 John 1:7 we have: “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.”  Since Armstrongists are interested in all things prophetic, it seems like they would have a finely parsed doctrine of the Incarnation. Lacking a clear, coherent statement of the doctrine, the most I can do is develop a “strawman” that I believe represents the Armstrongist view.  The strawman is built on the pre-1995 writings of the Worldwide Church of God (WCG).  My strawman may not reflect what current Armstrongism intends.  If there are counterpoints, I would welcome the debate.  I just do not know who credibly speaks for Armstrongism at this time.  This underscores the fact that Armstrongism is no longer a monolithic doctrine but a decentralized collection of somewhat divergent beliefs.

My guess is that it is safe to start by saying that Armstrongism rejects the orthodox Christian view of the Incarnation.  The orthodox view is that Jesus was fully God and fully human and remains so to this day – in a nutshell. The Armstrongist belief is that Jesus was fully God in the pre-existence.  Then he was made flesh, that is, he became human. And this means that his ontology changed.  He no longer had a divine ontology but rather a human ontology.  His essence was now different.  In authority, he was yet God.  But he no longer had the divine capabilities of God because he had emptied himself of the divine ontology.  If he did anything miraculous during the period his was flesh, it was done through angels or the Holy Spirit.  Then when Jesus died, he was resurrected and glorified and regained his divine ontology.  So, Jesus was fully God, then became fully man instead and then back to fully God. 

It would be naïve of me to believe that all the denominations of Armstrongism now on the land would agree with this characterization.  It is likely that there will never be among Armstrongists a single view of the Incarnation.  Page 41 in the First Edition MOA is as close as we can ever get to a doctrine-like statement.  

Fully God and Fully Man: Where Armstrongism Misses the Mark

In brief, the orthodox view of the Incarnation is that Jesus was fully God as the Logos, then when he came to live with us he limited himself and became fully human but without losing his full divine ontology and when he was resurrected he became a single Person with two natures, one divine and one human.  This dual nature in one being is referred to as the hypostatic union.  We can make up a term to refer to the state and operation of these two conjoined natures but nobody knows how it happens.  To our eyes, it is a miracle. 

In critiquing the Armstrongist view, the first question that comes to mind is whether it is even existentially feasible.  Can someone undergo a change in ontology and still be identified as the same being?  If the Logos somehow were re-made as the human Jesus, would that not be like destroying the original and making a scaled down replica?  And could the human Jesus really be remade as God – the finite becoming infinite?  This idea would fit well with the Armstrongist concept of humans becoming God-as-God-is-God, but I have my doubts that ontology can be flipped back and forth.

We have no laboratory where we can conduct experiments concerning changes in ontology.  Such change is not known in the Nature that we are familiar with.  What we do have are the non-experimental and pre-emptive declarations of God himself.  In Malachi 3:6, we have the statement, “For I am the LORD (Yahweh), I change not.”  The way this is couched verbally, one receives the distinct impression that one of the attributes of Yahweh is that he does not change.  This presents a problem to the Armstrongist view which posits that God did change in his very essence.  The Logos changed from God to a human being and then back again.  The Christian view is that God does not change and is immutable.  And when the Logos became incarnate, he did not change his Deity but limited it and acquired an additional nature – that of a human being. But human ontology is created and Jesus was the Creator.  So, it is not like subsuming the human ontology is really a change in the divine ontology.

There are other inconsistencies.  Jesus came to earth as a King.  He was the King of the Kingdom of God.  He stated in John 18:36, “My Kingdom is not of the world.”  But if Jesus were only a flesh and blood human as Armstrongism asserts, he could not be the King of the Kingdom of God.  Paul states in 1 Corinthians 15:50, “Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.”  If Jesus were only human then he was totally corruptible.  So, one is inevitably led to the conclusion that he was much more than just a human being and Armstrongism was wide of the mark. 

HWA said many times that the reason that Jesus could pay for the sins of the entirety of humanity is because he is God our Creator and is worth more than all of us.  I agree with this.  It only makes sense.  But if Jesus were nothing more than a corruptible human being at his death, if he had lost his ontology as God, he was worth only one person and HWA’s arithmetic fails.

In the last analysis, the scripture states that Jesus was still God when he was on this earth.  Not just by designation but by ontology, by his existential essence.  Paul states in Colossians 2:9, “For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead (Greek, theotes, the state of being God) bodily.”  Even while in a human body, Jesus was carrying with him inherently all the fulness of the Deity.  And if all this still seems equivocal, there is the explicit statement of Doubting Thomas in John 20:28.  Thomas explicitly refers to Jesus as “ho theos.”  This is a Greek locution that uses the phrase “the God” to refer to the one and only great God.  It does not refer just to someone who may be heroic or god-like. If Jesus were just a human, he might have rebuked Thomas for this faux pas.  But Jesus accepted the language in reference to himself.  And you can be sure that Jesus knew his own ontology. 

Summation

There are many more arguments that could be made that support the Christian view of the Incarnation and they are found in most systematic theologies.  I like the ones I have presented above because they tend to be on the minority side – not often cited, if ever.  But if you happen to have been an Armstrongist at one time, these ideas stand out.  The unavoidable conclusion is that Christianity is right about the Incarnation.  Jesus was fully God and fully man when on this earth.  And Armstrongism needs to go back to the drawing board.  It’s not like Armstrongism actually made a mistake about the Incarnation.  They never really enunciated the doctrine it seems to me.  So, I find the quote of John Stuart Mill apropos to this case, “"They have never thrown themselves into the mental position of those who think differently from them... and consequently they do not, in any proper sense of the word, know the doctrine which they themselves profess."

 

 

 

 

Another Warning Is Sent To Aaron Dean. Time Is Short! Get Your Act Together!

 

Samuel Kitchen writes:

My job, as it had been made clearer to me recently by Christ, is to make warn and to remind the people of the Kingdom and the government of God and the need to restore that government.

As it was restored through Mr Armstrong, the Worldwide Church of God is the only place the government of God has been restored to.

Imagine a one-man army restoring some fictional form of government back into the church. When the church was toiling under that government, it was abusive and destructive to its members. Why would anyone want to restore that?

I have been online warning, and pointing people back to the ONE MAN God is using, His apostle Herbert W Armstrong and what was taught through him for 16 years now.

This began on January 21, 2010 online. The 6th of Shevat. The same day Mr Armstrong died on the Hebrew Calendar on January 16,1986.

I’m not an ordained minister. The ministry is the BOWL of the candlestick depicted in Zechariah 4.

I was also studying about the Advisory Council of Elders and how they are actually attached to the spiritual body of Christ, in organization with the unincorporated spiritual organism.

Jesus does NOT have an advisory council of elders. He never has and ever will  

Mr Armstrong as apostle formed A.C.E, by the authority of Jesus Christ and in the name of Jesus Christ.

That so-called "Jesus authorized" council was nothing but a straw man. It was a group of men who were "yes men" who never held the so-called apostle accountable for the abuses occurring in the church or the heretical doctrines the church held. None of those men had the balls to stand up and take a stand. They all knew the moment they did so, they would be sitting on the curb outside on Green Street. 

So it is HOLY since it was established in righteousness, and by Jesus Christ! Mr Armstrong bound on earth what was first bound already in Heaven, and by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, added the appropriate men.

The advisory council of elders was not and is NOT holy. The men chosen for it by HWA were never holy, and the Holy Spirit was never part of the deal when Herbert hand-picked the yes-men he knew would back him in every decision. 

You are the last remaining member, because the Advisory Council of Elders does continue to exist in the spiritual Body of Christ.

The spiritual body of Christ does not need a council of elders. The focus is upon one person only and should not be upon anyone else. There are no middlemen between Christians and Jesus, especially when it is a bunch of COG elders in the equation.

It hasn’t been “loosened”. When Tkach went off the rails, he left Jesus Christ! And he may continued with something that looked like what God had previously established, but it was a demonic doppelgänger!

In the hands of a destroyer, is it any surprise those things ended up as nothing?

But I’m talking about the everlasting Word of God that hasn’t been broken. A.C.E was established in the Lord for the Church! Not the organization.

The advisory council of elders was not established for the church. It does not need it. It was established by men to control members.

The ministry after the death of Mr Armstrong, organized themselves outside of the Worldwide Church of God. They tried to form candlesticks, and operate in what they thought was BETTER than the Worldwide Church of God.

You’ve been attempting to talk about Mr Armstrong to them and their congregations! Tying them back to the government of God, to the one man God has been using.

Some people protest in certain ways, and you end up explaining the mistakes and obstacles Christ’s servant had to overcome and face.

The Body of Christ, is connected together through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, and our fellowship with God the Father and Jesus Christ and in truth.

By bringing the people back to the apostle, you are providing the means for the golden oil to flow freely to them. Satan wants to stop that flow.

Herbert W Armstrong is the golden calf of the church. Not one single person needs to be "brought back" to HWA. No one needs to return to the swill of the past. A Christians focus is always upward and forward, not backwards 

You are attempting to do it with a separate candlestick, but I’m here to provide the extra dimension of you needing to be away from the separated and divided portion that was formed by those vacating the Church.

If you have to deny what the apostle instructed to create a new structure as Victor Kubik and Joe Tkach Jr did inside the WCG in 1993, and then they split apart 2 years later forming their power blocs, to form new churches?

Thats not established in righteousness. Thats not based on my own interpretation, if you go to God’s Word, it is made clear by many examples, that sin is sin. Disobedience is sin.

And while men have had good intentions, WE have the right to the tree of life, and we should not take unto ourselves to decide what is right and wrong. But submit to God wholly and choose life.

If you are a real follower of Jesus, you no longer need to worry about doing it the right way or the wrong way. That has been settled, once and for all. The slate has been wipted clean.

Be zealous. Get excited. Get passionate. Lukewarm doesn’t suit you Mr Dean. And you can only do so much with lukewarm people.

Revelation 11 says to exclude those who are in the outer court. We can’t bring them to Christ! The tribulation will be used by Christ to wake them up!

But you are like a branch plucked from the fire. Sticks have been bundled up in groups to be burned. You have been pulled by the hand of God, and INCLUDED through my labor, when all others were happy you were just a minister of UCG.

I’m gonna share this online. People need to be excited for what Christ is doing.

There is not one single thing that is evident here that Jesus is doing.  It is just delusions of one man who may be sincere, but is sincerely wrong.

Remember what Mr Armstrong taught and adhere to it. Don’t let others in lukewarmness overrun you and lead you to where you are unable to perform your ministerial duties inside the Worldwide Church of God. You can’t ride the fence any more.

At the close of these FORTY YEARS, will we be found believing the true report, or assembling with those that stay in the wilderness?

What was established by God? What was bound on earth as it was bound in heaven?

Those who are wicked , who’ve been hiding their real face, might come out of the woodwork in the next few weeks. As per Revelation 22, says, about a time when God says ENOUGH! If you are filthy and wicked, you’re locked in! If you are Holy and righteous, then you are locked in.

As January 16 rapidly approaches, watch for all kinds of craziness to erupt in the various COG groups. It will be 40 years since HWA died, and the numerologists will be having a field day. 

I wonder if it is the blessing of 1335 days. Those who received the promise and blessings of God went into the promise land at the end of FORTY YEARS.

Could the two witnesses in Jerusalem receive POWER on Pentecost? If you look at all the parables of Christ, it talks about the end times and the two witnesses two. When Christ said I will give power and authority to my servants, WHEN DID THAT OCCUR? Who would be there? Those who were of ONE ACCORD, with the apostles.

One thing we can rest assured of, if there are two witnesses needed, they certainly will NOT be from Armstrongism! 

Will we be there?

In Christ’s name,

Samuel W Kitchen

Dave Pack: I Am God's Private Detective-His Private Investigator

One thing that's glaringly obvious in the glittering paradise of COGland is that the assorted "gods" the pompous Church of God overlords have custom-ordered for themselves are hands-down the most laughably incompetent deities ever slapped together by mortal daydreams. I mean, honestly—why do these divine superstars always turn out to be such spineless, bumbling, utterly powerless disasters?

Let's start with Herbert's god, shall we? The one "miraculously rediscovered" in the thrilling aisles of an Oregon public library after a whopping 1,900-year nap. Picture this: an allegedly all-powerful creator of the universe so catastrophically useless that he couldn't even manage to safeguard his own sacred word from getting misplaced like a forgotten grocery list. And when HWA finally heroically rescued him from obscurity, he was so mortified by the sheer mediocrity of the fellow that he dared not utter his real name—instead settling for the oh-so-epic "a strong hand from someplace." Truly the stuff of legendary reverence.

Then we have Gerald Flurry's god, that exquisite Frankenstein monster stitched together from HWA's wildest hallucinations and Flurry's own deluxe delusions. This pathetic specimen is such a monumental underachiever that it couldn't get by on the Bible alone—oh no, it desperately required two shiny supplemental books (Mystery of the Ages and Malachi's Message) just to patch up the glaring holes. And brace yourself: this supposedly omnipotent ruler of everything is apparently too feeble to head straight to Jerusalem for the grand New Jerusalem reveal. Instead, it must first touch down in glamorous Edmond, Oklahoma, for a tacky coronation ceremony on a creaky garage-sale throne, clutching a filthy lump of rock excavated from... Oregon. Forget the breathtaking splendor of Westminster Abbey and the authentic Stone of Scone—this cosmic loser has to make do with a glaring spotlight on the Armstrong Auditorium stage as Gerald's grandchildren dance an Irish jig. How utterly divine.

But wait, the real MVP of divine incompetence has to be Dave Pack's god—a hopeless, flip-flopping clown who can't even commit to a return date in Wadsworth, Ohio. Week after endless week, year after embarrassing year, this alleged almighty fails spectacularly to float down in thunderous glory, strut across Dave's "sacred" manicured lawns, or mount Dave's prized pale horse. Poor, bewildered Dave, forever scratching his head over the eternal no-shows, has gallantly promoted himself to God's personal detective to crack the case. Yet all that "genius" sleuthing has accomplished zilch, leaving Dave perpetually clueless and looking like the ultimate fool as one "absolutely set in stone" deadline after another fizzles into oblivion. Just imagine the tragedy—all those blockbuster sales this god has tragically missed at the Giant Eagle right across the street! Heartbreaking, really.