James 5
14 Is anyone among you sick? Let them call the elders of the church to pray over them and anoint them with oil in the name of the Lord. 15 And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the Lord will raise them up. If they have sinned, they will be forgiven. 16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.
Ok, let's get right to it. While this
teaching, so plainly stated and seemingly unambiguous is not directly that of
Jesus, it is by James and includes Jesus name as the talisman that brings
results. One can proof text themselves all over the Bible from
Genesis to Revelation to find what one thinks this REALLY means, or how it
REALLY is to be understood, or how one REALLY is to understand it, but I am
taking each questionable teaching in it's given context without all the
apologetics that get hunted down to explain why this teaching will work if
properly understood.
I think it goes without saying the misery and
heartache this simple teaching has caused sincere Bible reading Christians all
over the planet and in all ages since it was uttered is without parallel.
All humans get sick and sickness leads to death at times. We will all die
for lack of breath at some point and as we have seen in past postings, God
evidently knows and has planned the hour of our deaths anyway. So I
suppose I even question why we would ask for healing since if it is time, it is
time. If it is not time, then I will get better anyway
right?
Sometimes I think one author in the
Bible is oblivious to what other authors say and can't match their
teachings into one coherent teaching. I guess that's why we proof-text
until we find the answer we need for ourselves and can say, "the Bible tells me
so."
As well, I know how tempting it is to blast
WCG or any church that teaches divine healing, anointing and prayer as per James
5:14-16. I know the horror stories. But we need to back up a bit and
realize it is the BIBLE , the APOSTLES and the EARLY CHURCH that teaches
this. We are just reading it as the inspired word of God, so to speak, and
trying to figure out how to apply it and what it means. Does it mean get
anointed, trust God, avoid medical care because it is either or and cannot be
both, or what?
Does our standing with God depend on our
faith in such matters? What does this scripture expect Christians to
really do and not do? And since we KNOW in our heart of hearts that the
implication of this is IF you do A the B will happen. When it doesn't,
then we agonize over the reasons listed in an earlier posting as to why God did
not answer our prayer. No matter...it is OUR fault and never the fault of
the Deity. He wanted to help but we just didn't hold our mouths right when
we asked or something so the answer is no.
Also, I am pleased for those who can feel or
know that God healed them of this or that. A minister distracted me once
with a job offer that caused me to miss a flight from LA to Boise Idaho. The
plane I missed was hit by a fighter Jet and all died. Luck?
"Intervention?" I don't know, but it sure was a cruel joke to save me
to go through the rest of the WCG minister
experience.
Anyone who gets better after asking for
healing is not going to dare not to credit the prayer of faith and such with the
healing. We are happy for you. You can't prove to us you did not
luck out or get better anyway. After all, most don't die anyway each time
they get "sick." I was often asked to anoint for colds and such
which of course I did but didn't want to. I never got anointed for a
common cold. You know the cycle. I would only get anointed if I felt
my sickness could really get out of hand and after all, I was young and did want
to live! I'm still here.
The faithful tend to die in such times and
stinkers live forever...
I had a ministerial assistant once, who
announced to the Church during a sermonette that he would either anoint you for
sickness OR visit you in the hospital but not both. I made him take it
back and told him he'd be doing both if he was going to work with me. If not, we
could arrange for him to work elsewhere. I always did both and sent many a
person to his doc, ER or Hospital for help that was readily available. I
guess my Presbyterian background saved me from some of the more profoundly
stupid mistakes others made having grown up in a much smaller theological box as
they must have.
However, my point is and what I want
to point out is not "how could we be so stupid as to believe Armstrong
on this issue," etc...but recognize that it is a very bad teaching of the Bible
itself. It leaves little to interpretation really even though many
denominations teach it every way from being a nice idea and quaint to
absolute Bible truth that God will judge your faith over. But it is
in the Book. It is not a confusing statement. It seems to say
what it says and mean what it means. James does not tell us if that
is all we do or just a part of doing all else we can
do.
So, to me, and having seen the hurt, fear and
shock this teaching not being so as stated has caused, I vote this a bad
teaching. By its fruits I believe we can know
it...
Thankfully Jesus had no problem with unclean women or tax collectors, or the dispossessed, or the dregs of society.