Armstrongism’s Twisted Take on 2 Peter 3 Exposed
Armstrongites love to throw around 2 Peter 3:3-4: “In the last days there will be mockers, following their own ungodly desires, scoffing and saying, ‘Where is this coming he promised?’” They point fingers at anyone who dares question their prophetic timelines—think HWA’s failed 1972 Tribulation prediction—or their legalistic rules, labeling critics as the “end-time mockers” foretold in scripture. But let’s flip the script. Armstrongism’s caricatures of Christianity, painting believers as pagan sun-worshippers or deceived fools, are the real mockery here. Blogs exposing their corruption and lies, aren’t mocking—they’re shining the prophetic light on darkness. Lets set the record straight by showing Armstrongism’s moral, biblical, and historical errors, complete with a top 10 list of their mocking tactics.
The Scripture: What 2 Peter 3 Really Says
The passage in 2 Peter 3:3-4 warns of scoffers in the last days who mock the promise of Christ’s return, living for their own desires and dismissing God’s timeline. Peter’s context is clear: these mockers deny the Second Coming, saying, “Things have always been this way,” ignoring God’s judgment (like the flood) and His patience for repentance (2 Peter 3:5-9). Historically, early Christians faced such scoffers—those who ridiculed their hope in Christ’s return amid persecution. Biblically, Peter calls believers to hold fast, knowing God’s timing isn’t ours (2 Peter 3:8).
Armstrongism, however, twists this scripture to silence critics. They claim anyone who questions their end-time prophecies—like HWA’s repeated failures—or rejects their legalistic law-keeping is a “mocker.” This misuse is biblically wrong, as Peter’s scoffers deny Christ’s return entirely, not HWA’s specific predictions. Morally, it’s a cheap tactic to shame dissenters, stifling legitimate critique of their corruption.
Armstrongism’s Mockery: Caricatures and Strawmen
Armstrongism doesn’t just misread scripture—they mock Christianity by building strawmen to tear down. They paint mainstream Christians as pagan idolaters, claiming practices like Easter stem from Babylonian sun-worship, despite historical evidence tying Easter to Passover (Pascha). They caricature the Trinity as a “three-headed monster,” ignoring its biblical roots in the early church’s understanding of Christ’s divinity. These distortions aren’t just wrong—they’re a form of mockery, ridiculing genuine faith to prop up Armstrongism’s superiority.
This mockery is morally problematic, as it sows division and fear among believers, portraying historical Christians as enemies rather than brothers. Historically, it clashes with the early church’s unity despite theological debates—think of the Council of Nicaea. Armstrongism’s strawmen mock the very faith they claim to defend, making them the true scoffers of 2 Peter 3.
AICOG’s Role: Prophetic Light, Not Mockery
Blogs like Banned by HWA, Mike’s Enlightenment Page, Painful Truth, and others aren’t mocking—they’re exposing darkness with prophetic clarity. By uncovering Armstrongism’s lies, like Herbert’s failed prophecies, financial exploitation, and legalistic burdens, these blogs hold a mirror to corruption. This isn’t scoffing at Christ’s return—it’s calling out false teachers, a biblical mandate (Titus 1:9). Historically, prophets like Jeremiah exposed religious corruption without being labeled mockers; they were voices of truth.
Armstrongism’s accusation that critics are “end-time mockers” is biblically baseless—many who remained/became Christian after leaving Armstrongism didn’t fulfill the biblically condemned “mocker” denying Christ’s return but rather affirms it while rejecting HWA’s timelines. Morally, exposing lies isn’t mockery; it’s justice, protecting the vulnerable from cult exploitation. Armstrongism’s attempt to flip the script only highlights their guilt.
Top 10 Ways Armstrongism Mocks Christianity
Here’s a list of Armstrongism’s top 10 mocking tactics, showing how they distort and ridicule Christianity while claiming to be God’s “true church.”
Armstrongites love to throw around 2 Peter 3:3-4: “In the last days there will be mockers, following their own ungodly desires, scoffing and saying, ‘Where is this coming he promised?’” They point fingers at anyone who dares question their prophetic timelines—think HWA’s failed 1972 Tribulation prediction—or their legalistic rules, labeling critics as the “end-time mockers” foretold in scripture. But let’s flip the script. Armstrongism’s caricatures of Christianity, painting believers as pagan sun-worshippers or deceived fools, are the real mockery here. Blogs exposing their corruption and lies, aren’t mocking—they’re shining the prophetic light on darkness. Lets set the record straight by showing Armstrongism’s moral, biblical, and historical errors, complete with a top 10 list of their mocking tactics.
The Scripture: What 2 Peter 3 Really Says
The passage in 2 Peter 3:3-4 warns of scoffers in the last days who mock the promise of Christ’s return, living for their own desires and dismissing God’s timeline. Peter’s context is clear: these mockers deny the Second Coming, saying, “Things have always been this way,” ignoring God’s judgment (like the flood) and His patience for repentance (2 Peter 3:5-9). Historically, early Christians faced such scoffers—those who ridiculed their hope in Christ’s return amid persecution. Biblically, Peter calls believers to hold fast, knowing God’s timing isn’t ours (2 Peter 3:8).
Armstrongism, however, twists this scripture to silence critics. They claim anyone who questions their end-time prophecies—like HWA’s repeated failures—or rejects their legalistic law-keeping is a “mocker.” This misuse is biblically wrong, as Peter’s scoffers deny Christ’s return entirely, not HWA’s specific predictions. Morally, it’s a cheap tactic to shame dissenters, stifling legitimate critique of their corruption.
Armstrongism’s Mockery: Caricatures and Strawmen
Armstrongism doesn’t just misread scripture—they mock Christianity by building strawmen to tear down. They paint mainstream Christians as pagan idolaters, claiming practices like Easter stem from Babylonian sun-worship, despite historical evidence tying Easter to Passover (Pascha). They caricature the Trinity as a “three-headed monster,” ignoring its biblical roots in the early church’s understanding of Christ’s divinity. These distortions aren’t just wrong—they’re a form of mockery, ridiculing genuine faith to prop up Armstrongism’s superiority.
This mockery is morally problematic, as it sows division and fear among believers, portraying historical Christians as enemies rather than brothers. Historically, it clashes with the early church’s unity despite theological debates—think of the Council of Nicaea. Armstrongism’s strawmen mock the very faith they claim to defend, making them the true scoffers of 2 Peter 3.
AICOG’s Role: Prophetic Light, Not Mockery
Blogs like Banned by HWA, Mike’s Enlightenment Page, Painful Truth, and others aren’t mocking—they’re exposing darkness with prophetic clarity. By uncovering Armstrongism’s lies, like Herbert’s failed prophecies, financial exploitation, and legalistic burdens, these blogs hold a mirror to corruption. This isn’t scoffing at Christ’s return—it’s calling out false teachers, a biblical mandate (Titus 1:9). Historically, prophets like Jeremiah exposed religious corruption without being labeled mockers; they were voices of truth.
Armstrongism’s accusation that critics are “end-time mockers” is biblically baseless—many who remained/became Christian after leaving Armstrongism didn’t fulfill the biblically condemned “mocker” denying Christ’s return but rather affirms it while rejecting HWA’s timelines. Morally, exposing lies isn’t mockery; it’s justice, protecting the vulnerable from cult exploitation. Armstrongism’s attempt to flip the script only highlights their guilt.
Top 10 Ways Armstrongism Mocks Christianity
Here’s a list of Armstrongism’s top 10 mocking tactics, showing how they distort and ridicule Christianity while claiming to be God’s “true church.”
Easter as Pagan WorshipThey label Easter a Babylonian sun-cult ritual, ignoring its roots in Passover and the resurrection, mocking a core Christian celebration.Trinity as a “Three-Headed Monster”Armstrongism caricatures the Trinity as a pagan invention, dismissing the early church’s biblical understanding of Christ’s divinity.Sunday Worship as “Mark of the Beast”They claim Sunday worshippers bear the “mark of the beast,” a baseless scare tactic that mocks believers’ freedom in worship.Mainstream Christians as “Deceived”They paint all non-Armstrongist Christians as spiritually blind, mocking the faith of millions who trust in Christ.Christmas as “Satan’s Birthday”Armstrongism calls Christmas a satanic holiday, ignoring its historical celebration of Christ’s birth, ridiculing a joyful tradition.Prophetic Failures as “God’s Delay”When HWA’s 1972 Tribulation prediction failed, they mocked critics by claiming God delayed it, twisting scripture to save face.Legalism as “True Obedience”They mock grace by insisting rules like Saturday Sabbath-keeping are salvational, as Brisby does, contradicting the gospel.Church History as “Apostate”Armstrongism dismisses 2000 years of church history as apostate, mocking the legacy of martyrs and saints who preserved the faith.Tithing as “God’s Financial Law”They mock biblical generosity by enforcing triple tithes, exploiting followers while leaders lived in luxury, a moral failure.Critics as “End-Time Mockers”By labeling Anti-Armstrongism blogs as scoffers, they mock legitimate critique, using 2 Peter 3 to silence truth-tellers exposing their lies.
Splinterland, Shine the Light
Armstrongism’s misuse of 2 Peter 3 to label critics as “end-time mockers” is a sham. Their caricatures of Christianity—calling Easter pagan, the Trinity monstrous, and critics scoffers—are the real mockery, morally divisive, biblically baseless, and historically absurd. Blogs and ex-members exposing their corruption, aren’t mocking; they’re shining a prophetic light on darkness, just as scripture calls us to do. Splinterland, reject the strawmen, ditch the legalistic lies, and embrace the true hope of Christ’s return—no cult filter needed.
Are We the Prophesied End-Time Mockers? © 2025 by Ai-COG is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0
Support ::Armstrongism investigated::
By Ai-COG · Launched 3 months ago
::Armstrongism investigated:: takes a Deep Dive into the cultic murky world of the Worldwide Church of God and its offshoots. If you love investigating cults stick around and prepare to dive deep!
9 comments:
NEWSFLASH/WARNING: LCG is now putting cross-domain cookies on the computers of people who visit their Members page at LCG.org. They'll probably claim it's a convenience for easier access to shared LCG resources, but cross-domain cookies can also give them the ability to see if LCG members are visiting other ACOG websites, ACOG critic sites, or political/news sites they disapprove of. If they can identify and crush mockers, they'll do so. Of course, if you're an LCG member who uses the site and you haven't accepted their cookies, they may be suspicious of that, too, so you're kind of screwed either way.
What is the difference between a traditional Christian and an Armstrongite?
If a traditional Christian observed an Armstrongite in dire circumstances, the Christian would help the Armstrongite. If an Armstrongite saw a Christian in dire circumstances, the Armstrongite would turn and walk away. "God is punishing that person for not keeping the sabbath." he would think.
Helping another is one of the most powerful forms of personal evangelism! It's the sort of thing that makes one ask oneself, "Who is this person, and why does he do what he does? I really wish I could be like him!"
On the other hand, watching a well dressed clean cut individual turn his nose up and sneer, and refuse to help makes one think, "Wow! What a flaming a$$hole! Just totally into himself! One day, he's going to need help!"
5.04 pm, that's why people use a VPN app:
"VPN stands for virtual private network — a service that protects your internet connection and privacy online. VPNs create an encrypted tunnel for your data, protect your online identity by hiding your IP address, and allow you to use public Wi-Fi hotspots safely"
Continued: "A standard VPN primarily masks your IP address, but it doesn't inherently protect you against cookies. While some VPNs offer features like ad-blocking or NetShield that can help, they don't prevent cookies that have already been stored on your browser. To effectively control cookies, you'll need to use browser settings to manage them or consider privacy-focused browsers with built-in cookie blocking capabilities."
Herbie, in the picture, looks as if he's tripping! Is that a real portrait, or some AI?. Never saw the man with a smile like that, although I understand he was quite personable when he invited numerous AC upper classmen to dine at his home.
The WWCG was notorious for devaluing others. The "The mystery of the ages" book being a good example. There's an excellent online review of the original edition that pointed out its many put downs. For instance, the book mocked engineering students for already seeing themselves as engineers. No matter that this is normal. The narcissistic cycle with its devaluation phase is still prominent in Armstrongism.
This blog gang does exactly the same and more, and has done for years. The desire for power and control over others has never subsided in fact with modern technology I'd say it's gone worse.
Well that's a fair few Ministry/ leaders and their wives sneering and shunning attitude for you 5:54. What's God to do with them ?
It’s a group of disgruntled UCG seeking to lead UCG members away from the church. We caught on years ago and it’s not working. You are the ones that need to leave the church! Immoral hypocrites.
Post a Comment