How Armstrongism Misses the Mark:
Clinging to the Law Instead of Resting in Christ
(Hebrews 3–4 and Galatians)
The book of Hebrews was written to first-century Jewish believers who were tempted to slip back into the old covenant system of law-keeping for security and acceptance with God. Chapters 3 and 4 deliver a powerful warning and invitation: Jesus is superior to Moses, and the true “rest” is found by faith in Him alone—not by ongoing ritual observance of the law. The apostle Paul makes the same case even more forcefully in Galatians, confronting any “different gospel” that adds law-keeping as a requirement for salvation or Christian living. Herbert W. Armstrong’s teachings (Armstrongism), which insisted that Christians must keep the seventh-day Sabbath, holy days, clean/unclean meats, and other elements of the Mosaic law to “qualify” for the Kingdom, directly contradict this biblical message. By clinging to the law, Armstrongism turns the gospel of grace into another form of the very bondage the New Testament warns against.
Jesus Is Greater Than Moses—the Son Over the House (Hebrews 3:1-6)
Fix your thoughts on Jesus, whom we acknowledge as our apostle and high priest,” the writer urges. Moses was faithful as a servant in God’s house. But “Christ is faithful as the Son over God’s house—and we are his house, if indeed we hold firmly to our confidence and the hope in which we glory (Hebrews 3:6, NIV).
Moses represented the old covenant and the law given at Sinai. Jesus is the divine Son who built the house. Armstrongism elevated the law (especially the Sabbath command) as an unchanging requirement for true Christians, treating it almost as co-equal with Christ. Hebrews flips this: the servant (law/Moses) has been surpassed by the Son. Clinging to the old system after the Son has come dishonors Jesus and risks the very unbelief the chapter condemns.
The Warning from Israel’s Wilderness Failure (Hebrews 3:7-19)
Quoting Psalm 95, Hebrews recalls how the Israelites saw God’s miracles for forty years yet hardened their hearts in unbelief. They never entered God’s “rest” (the Promised Land) “because of their unbelief” (3:19). The application is urgent:
See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God… We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end (3:12, 14).
Armstrongism often flipped this warning to mean that breaking the weekly Sabbath was the ultimate rebellion, like Israel’s disobedience. But the text is clear: the sin was unbelief—refusing to trust God’s promise and instead relying on their own efforts or rituals. Insisting on law-keeping as a qualification for rest is the same heart-hardening unbelief.
The Superior Sabbath-Rest Available Now by Faith (Hebrews 4:1-13)
The promise of rest remains open. Joshua’s generation entered the land but never experienced the ultimate rest, so “God again set a certain day, calling it ‘Today’” (4:7). Then comes the key verse: “There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their own works, just as God did from his” (4:9-10).
This is not primarily a command to keep Saturday. It is the spiritual rest believers enter today by faith—ceasing from self-effort, law-keeping, and striving to earn God’s favor, just as God rested from creation. The weekly Sabbath was a shadow pointing to Christ (Colossians 2:16-17); the reality is the Son Himself.
Armstrong and his followers taught the exact opposite. They interpreted “a Sabbath-rest” (Greek sabbatismos) as proof that Christians must continue “a keeping of the Sabbath” literally each week as a type of the future Kingdom rest. Without it, they claimed, you could not qualify for salvation or enter God’s rest. This misses the entire point of Hebrews: the rest is entered now by believing the gospel, not by ritual observance. The chapter ends with an exhortation to “make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will perish by following their example of disobedience” (4:11)—disobedience defined as unbelief, not calendar-keeping.
Galatians: No Other Gospel—We Are Not Under the Law (Galatians 1–5)
Paul’s letter to the Galatians is even sharper. False teachers were pressuring Gentile believers to add circumcision and law-keeping to their faith. Paul calls this “a different gospel” and pronounces a curse on anyone preaching it (Galatians 1:6-9). He writes:
- We know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ… because by the works of the law no one will be justified (2:16).
- I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose (2:21).
- The law was added “because of transgressions” and served as a guardian “until Christ came” (3:19, 24). “Now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian” (3:25).
- You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace (5:4).
- If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law (5:18).
Galatians 4’s allegory of Hagar and Sarah drives it home: the law is the slave woman producing bondage; the promise is the free woman producing heirs. Armstrongism’s insistence on law-keeping as essential for Christians puts people back under Hagar—slavery—when Christ offers sonship and freedom.
The Heart of the Issue: Law vs. Grace, Shadow vs. Reality
Armstrongism’s core error was treating the old covenant law as still binding in its details while claiming to believe in grace. Hebrews 3–4 shows the law (through Moses) could never give true rest—only Jesus the Son can. Galatians proves that adding any part of the law as a requirement for justification or ongoing acceptance with God is “another gospel” that nullifies grace and makes Christ’s death meaningless.
The weekly Sabbath and other commands were good shadows, but the substance is Christ (Colossians 2:17). True rest is not earned by perfect calendar observance; it is received today by simple, ongoing faith in Jesus’ finished work.
The Invitation Still Stands Today
Hebrews 3–4 and Galatians do not merely critique a first-century problem or a 20th-century movement—they issue a timeless, Spirit-empowered call to every generation tempted to trade the simplicity of the gospel for the security of rules. The law was never meant to be the final word; it was a faithful servant that exposed our inability, drove us to our knees, and pointed ahead to the One who could do what the law could never accomplish (Romans 8:3-4). Armstrongism, with its heartfelt zeal for obedience and its deep respect for Scripture, tragically stopped short of the finish line. By insisting that Christians must still “keep” large portions of the old covenant to remain in God’s favor or “qualify” for the Kingdom, it recreated the very yoke Paul condemned and the very unbelief that kept Israel out of the Promised Land.
Yet the author of Hebrews refuses to leave us in despair. He repeatedly shouts the word “Today!”—the day of opportunity, the day of grace, the day when the promise of rest is still wide open. This rest is not a future reward earned by flawless Sabbath observance or dietary law-keeping. It is a present reality entered the moment a weary soul stops striving and simply believes that Jesus, the faithful Son over God’s house, has already done everything required. It is the soul-level sabbath where we cease from our own works the way God ceased from His at creation—fully satisfied, fully accepted, fully at peace.
For anyone who has carried the heavy tablets of Armstrongism—or any form of legalism—the message is liberating and urgent: You do not have to qualify. You only have to believe. The chains of “Sabbath & Works” shatter not by greater effort but by looking to the radiant Christ who stands with open arms. Galatians 5:1 rings like a victory shout:
It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
True obedience does not disappear in this rest—it is transformed. No longer motivated by fear of disqualification, it flows from love for the Savior who fulfilled the law on our behalf. The Spirit who lives in every believer now writes God’s character on our hearts (Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 36:26-27), producing fruit that the law could only demand but never create.
If you are reading this and sensing the Holy Spirit stirring your heart, hear the final invitation of Hebrews:
Let us then approach God’s throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need (Hebrews 4:16).
Step out of the wilderness of striving. Leave the shadows behind. Fix your eyes on Jesus—the better Moses, the better High Priest, the better Rest—and enter the superior, permanent Sabbath-rest that Armstrongism, by clinging so tightly to the law, sadly missed.
The old covenant has served its purpose. The new has come. Rest is here—today—in Christ alone. May you receive it, walk in it, and proclaim the glorious freedom of the gospel to everyone still bound by the very system the New Covenant came to release us from.
The old covenant has served its purpose. The new has come. Rest is here—today—in Christ alone. May you receive it, walk in it, and proclaim the glorious freedom of the gospel to everyone still bound by the very system the New Covenant came to release us from.
Silent Pilgrim
26 comments:
More crap from the UCG ministers here. Always trying to lead people away from God's church. I bet you never preached this today at church did you?
There you go again, 1:34, blowing around your allegations without substantiating them by naming these UCG ministers. You realize everyone here considers you to be a joke, or a troll, right? Names, Bubba! That's the only way you are going to get the attention you crave! It's the American way. That organization has the right to confront its accusers!
That's the challenge! Arriving at the truth that encompasses all of scripture, not just Hebrews and Galatians. When do the brethren (who is that?) meet? Faith without works is dead. Where's John's comments about the Commandments? Don't let SP judge you, only the body of Christ. The laws associated with the Levitical Priesthood are removed!, of necessity cuz the LP no longer exists. Etc.
Thank you SP. We are indeed called with a holy calling, not according to works, but by His purpose and grace in Jesus Christ before time began. What liberty we have in Him. What freedom. Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him as righteousness. Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, scripture tells us. The Law was but a tutor to bring us to Christ, and now that Christ has come we have no need for the Law. We are saved by grace and that through faith. Clear and to the point. He saves us not works. Oh yes I do observe the Sabbath and holy days, but it is He who saves. Cheers.
Where's John's comments about the Commandments? Don't let SP judge you, only the body of Christ
such are carefully twisted scriptures by Armstrong among the others that he uses to enforce alleged law keeping and sabbath as a requirement for Christian living and as the way to salvation.
John never uses “commandments” to refer to: the Ten Commandments as a unit; the Sinai covenant; Sabbath-keeping; food laws; holy days; Torah obligations. Instead, John defines the commandments explicitly for those who read the few chapters with a inquisitive mind not clouded by a veil.
Armstrongism and his devotees are ones who read John through Moses not liking to read Moses through Christ. John is not veiled. Armstrong’s system is.
"Strive" is in the KJV more than 20 times. Doing it is both encouraged and discouraged, depending on the context.
Another person 1:44. There now seems a group of people who have sussed you out.
Yet Sunday Christianity is dying in numbers too. Huge empty chuches are struggling with holding onto the next generations. Churches are shutting their doors and having to merge congregations in both Catholicisim and various Protestant Christianity.
This blog isn’t about other Christians, Mormons, SDA, Islam, or anyone else. It’s about Armstrongism. Grow up!
Reactionary theology has its place but often it can hide as much as it exposes.
In 1 Timothy 1:8, Paul gives what is probably his most important statement in all the NT concerning the "law". With this one text we have a tool for evaluating everything he says on the subject. The law is GOOD when used lawfully and not good when used unlawfully.
The law is holy, just, good and spiritual= GOOD.
By the law is the knowledge of sin= GOOD.
Observing the feasts in sincerity and truth= GOOD.
The law of Moses written for our sakes= GOOD.
Faith establishes the law = GOOD.
Delighting and serving the law after the inward man= GOOD.
The law is not burdensome if used lawfully. On the other hand,
Legalism= unlawful.
Justification by works of law= unlawful.
Self righteousness by law= unlawful.
Law versus Grace= unlawful.
Using false typology for illicit gain= unlawful.
The law in its proper and lawful role is good and not burdensome. The law when abused can be both dangerous and damaging. A knife can cut both an apple and a throat. A gun has several positive uses, but in the hands of a child or criminal it can be a disaster.
Whether it be the law or the covenants, place fault and blame where both belong. Reactionary theology can be good when used correctly and honestly.
SP alleges that "the law is the slave woman producing bondage". Not true!
The son of the slave woman Hagar was the product and result of Abraham and Sarah not trusting God, but taking it upon themselves to work out God's plan through their own effort and scheme (Genesis 16). Hence, the son of Hagar was born after the flesh (carnal effort and planning) while Isaac was by God's promise and blessing (Galatians 4:23). The 2 covenants follow the same pattern. The old covenant was based on Israel's promise to obey (which they couldn't) while the new covenant is based on PROMISE, what God does, which is guaranteed to work. We are HIS WORKMANSHIP!
The law is not problematic nor does it produce bondage (unless it is misused). But who's fault is that?
Paul in 1 Corinthians wrote “Let us therefore keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”
But Paul seems to be making a spiritual point - live a sincere, holy life because Christ is our Passover.
Don't know if you pay any attention to elections, 2:15, but, there's a little thing called "Christian Nationalism" which is very hot just now. Its gained a lot of traction. Seemingly, it marginalizes Catholicism to non-WASPs. A new sense of authoritarianism is pushing it.
Be careful what you ask for!
Check your shorts, 1:34. Sumpin' don't smell too good.
I fully agree with your last sentence. We were part of a church in which misuse was institutionalized, there were no work arounds permitted, and it could not be escaped. It was truly our fault for remaining as long as we did! Welcome to the Armstrong movement, where "the law" is weaponized against the brethren.
Yea 7:15, but you have to continue onto the next verse. I too think it's an important verse and verses.
1 Timothy 1:8-9 But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
If a person is weak (spiritually a child) in these things, the law is necessary. However the Holy Spirit should help one's inner desires and thoughts to not even go there. But we have an advocate from the Father, that being Jesus Christ, because we slip and and come up short from time to time.
Very observant 746. I would say your point is definitely part of the meaning. These are "Feasts of and about the Lord Jesus Christ", not feasts of Herbert W. Armstrong!
Imagine two people. One tries very hard to follow every instruction perfectly, but still fails in some areas. The other also tries, but is honest about falling short and relies on forgiveness rather than achievement.
How does God relate differently to those two people, if at all?
The only time I changed was repeating a new behavior over and over and over. Just like learning a new sport, or learning how to play a musical instrument, etc. I did the work, not God's spirit. And while I attended services, I did not witness God's laws written in members hearts. Am I supposed to look away from reality, and blindly believe the author's nice sounding words instead?
Not just that 6:30, but I saw ministers having some of the worst character traits. I saw a whole lot of what not to do's. It'll make one not even think about being a minister when I saw the worst.
Amen to this post by SP. We stand whole and clean before Almighty God because of what Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, did for us. Our obedience to the Two Great Commandments of love is the fruit/evidence of the presence of the Holy Spirit in us. The fruit of our faith in Christ, NOT the thing that procures salvation or God's favor! Once Again, Jesus FULFILLED ALL of the commandments of Torah - ALL OF THEM! Hence, the only thing left for us to do is BELIEVE IN HIM and the efficacy of his life, death, and work.
“The law doesn’t produce bondage — misuse does.” There seems some more need be understood of Paul. Paul says the Sinai covenant inevitably produces bondage because it demands obedience, but it does not give the power to obey. In this sense the law condemns, and enslaves.
Is this why Paul says “The law was our guardian until Christ came.” (Gal 3:24)
That is, the law is not the problem, but it seems under the old covenant, even when the law is used correctly, it still condemns sinners because it cannot change the heart?
Not asking for anything 9:57. Evangelican Christianity is popular amongst the young. That is a growing movement.
357
The old covenant demanded obedience because GOD DEMANDS obedience. The only question is, how is that obedience satisfied and accepted by God?
The children of Israel never learned, understood, or wanted to understand (Matthew 13:15) the things of God, which was the point of the old covenant experiment. When God opens their eyes they will then understand (Matthew 13:9-16, Acts 26:18) and profit from the experience. Thankfully, by belief in the Gospel, we can see and understand now!
Brethren/members as a whole are more naturally Christian than the leadership. Religious leaders tend to be very flawed and carry the latest on trend sins, of the world.
COG world tends to be an upside down world at times.
The law as contained in Leviticus gave Israel the rules for how to draw near God. But it was not how anyone would be made holy. It was meant to show separation from God and how work of the physical law, would never remove sin, nor allow anyone to truly rest or be in closeness with a holy and righteous God. No one would ever come before God through the law. No one. Not even the high priest.
The new and better way that God made a way for through the flesh of Jesus Christ is not like the way through the curtain into the holy of holies that only happened once a year. We stand in the presence of God in the garments of Christ and under the blood of the lamb everyday. Thanks be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ that we have His presence and the Holy Spirit who is in us always.
Post a Comment