Friday, June 19, 2026

Why Returning to the Fold Hurts Less Than Freedom: Armstrongism's Grip on Minds and Families

 



Exit and Support Network recently shared this update about a former Philadelphia Church of God (PCG) minister:

June 19, 2026

I don’t know if you have heard anything about this, but Jim Cocomise is back attending the PCG and is with his wife and most of his family living in Florida. I guess he decided it wasn’t worth losing literally everything. –[name withheld]

For many who exit the more abusive Armstrongist groups, the decades of threats about losing salvation, combined with the shunning of family and friends, can simply become too much to bear. The heartache of isolation often outweighs the relief of leaving, leading some to return to that abusive environment just to restore relationships. This pattern reveals how deeply perverse Armstrongism is at its core—its masterful manipulation of members' minds.

We experienced this firsthand in the old Worldwide Church of God days. Ministers stood on the stage in Pasadena and told 1,200 people sitting in front of them that if they ever left the church, their marriages would fail, their children would despise them, they would lose their jobs and if they owned a business, it would fail, and ultimately they would NOT be part of the Kingdom of God. Maybe—just maybe—if they were a repentant Laodicean, they might be granted a second chance. And that their mistake was permanently recorded in the Book of Life under their name.

Just how sick can Armstrongism be?

Take a look at these quotes from the PCG section on The Exit and Support Network site. They illustrate how the PCG manipulates members. Note that this is not unique to PCG—it applies to almost every Church of God (COG) splinter, even those that perceive themselves as more enlightened, like UCG or COGWA.

Here is “that” false prophet himself, Gerald Flurry:

“And those people who leave the PCG and have been here, well, if you just want to look at it the way it really is, we’re in a war and they are deserters, and in the civil wars, war, deserters were shot! So its not a small little sin.” 
 
These are Flurry’s exact words and it was said about a local elder who left PCG.

Then there is this painful testimony from a former PCG member describing how deeply it hurts when friends and family turn their backs:

I’ve recently left PCG and it’s shocking how my so called “friends” won’t have anything to do with me as it will cause problems for them. Out of all things, that’s what cuts the deepest. Maybe others have heard the same statement: “I love you (or I care for you), but I can’t have anything to do with you anymore,” and, “You’re in my prayers,” or “I’ll pray for your repentance.” How would they feel or respond if God said that same statement to them?? It would be a different story then. I’m sure they’d be pleading.
PCG rambles on about having love for each other, but they choose to forget about the very scriptures that talk about brotherly love and “laying down our lives” for our friends and brothers. [See I John 3:16-18] This is what Christ did. Isn’t that the same example we are told to follow? How is what any of these members act in PCG godly? God doesn’t get rid of people out of His family and refuse to have anything to do with them again!! That’s not love! [Note by ESN: Read about GF’s No-Contact” Ruling.] So what gives PCG people the right to do that to people?

It is no wonder Armstrongism is rotten to the core when its leaders show such little respect for Jesus Himself. Gerald Flurry stated in a Key of David program:

I reviewed transcripts of the December 17th Key of David program entitled, “Christ Declared the Father,” and in it Gerald Flurry makes this statement: 
 
It’s the Father’s name that we honor. We honor His name above Christ’s, above everything because He’s the Head of the Family. Christ has a marvelous responsibility, as well, but He’s not the Head of the Family. 

This directly contradicts passages like John 5:23 (“That all men should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father”) and Philippians 2:9, where Christ is given a name above every name. If there appears to be no love in PCG, perhaps it is because there is so little genuine focus on Christ. 

That last observation strikes at the root of the problem in most of Armstrongism.

After years in the PCG, one former member observed:

After having been in the PCG for a number of years, it finally became increasingly clear that this “church” did not worship and praise God through Jesus Christ and perhaps this is the reason that the majority of their teaching and preaching stems from the Old Testament books. 
 
Of course the ministry doesn’t out right deny Jesus. They will speak about Him, especially during the spring holy days, but to worship Christ, to sing praises to His name or to speak power to truth according to His name is unheard of. It’s almost like they are ashamed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. [Romans 1:16] This denial of Christ is very subtle; Gerald Flurry [in speaking about other Christians and churches] makes statements like: 
 
“They focus on His person.”
“If they keep looking at the personality, they don’t see what He actually said.”
“You hear about Jesus Christ all the time, but do you hear about His message?”

Sound familiar?  

Very recently, I spoke with a member friend, that feared going against “government” but this person made the statement the Jesus and God are not the same. Prior to leaving the PCG, I heard a sermon by Wayne Turgeon [Flurry’s son-in-law] entitled, “What Would the Father Do?” In the sermon he mentioned, “I would not be caught wearing a bracelet, more or less one with the initials “WWJD” on it” (What Would Jesus Do?). 
 
Now, what is so amazing about this is that if he would have read John 5:19 he would have known that Jesus would do the very same thing as the Father: 
 
“…The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.” 
 
Their belief seem to be this, “Jesus is okay but God the Father is better, and we at the PCG are better than the other Christian groups, because we don’t worship Jesus.” 
 
In John 10:30 Christ said “I and my Father are one.” But the PCG seeks to divide this one relationship, perhaps to make it fit better into their organizational chart [originally formulated by HWA]: God the Father first, Jesus second, Herbert Armstrong third, then under him, Gerald Flurry. 
 
On their TV program in a lesson entitled “Christ Declares the Father,” Gerald Flurry made the following statement: 
 
“Christ has a marvelous responsibility as well, but He’s not the Head of the Family.” 
 
This may sound enlightening to some, but to me, it sounded very carnal minded. Again, their thinking seems to be, “Jesus is lower than God the Father and therefore is not worthy of praise and honor.” 
 
In the same program Gerald Flurry makes another carnal minded statement: 
 
“It’s the Father’s name that we honor. We honor His name above Christ’s, above everything because He’s the Head of the Family.” 
 
Well, so much for John 5:22-23: 
 
“For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.” 
 
The reason Gerald Flurry may not be able to say “Jesus is Lord” is because, based on what he teaches, he doesn’t believe that He is Lord

The organizational chart remains clear: God the Father first, Jesus second, Herbert Armstrong third, then Gerald Flurry. Flurry has repeatedly emphasized that Christ “is not the Head of the Family” and that the Father’s name is honored “above Christ’s, above everything.” This stands in direct opposition to John 5:22-23, which states that all judgment is committed to the Son so that all should honor the Son even as they honor the Father. Plus, can you imagine anything so heretical as an org chart with God-Jesus-HWA-Flurry-etc.? The sheer stupidity is appalling. Through 2,000 years of church history and millions of real martyrs, old Herb and Six Pack Flurry gets the number three and four spots!

Why is it so hard for members to leave this controlling cult mentality?

Years—often decades—of indoctrination create a powerful psychological and emotional prison. Leaders weaponize fear of eternal damnation, painting leavers as “deserters” worthy of execution in a spiritual war. Families are held hostage through no-contact policies and shunning, turning loved ones into enforcers of compliance. Members are conditioned to view the outside world (and even other Christians) as deceived Laodiceans or worse. The social structure becomes their entire identity, support system, and perceived path to salvation. Leaving means risking not just family ties but the very foundation of their worldview.

For many, the terror of being “cut off from God” and losing everything familiar outweighs the promise of New Covenant freedom—life in the Spirit, resting in Christ’s finished work, and simple relationship with God apart from legalistic control. Some try “plain old freedom from religion” only to find the scars run deep. The mind games are expertly crafted: you’re either all in with “God’s government” or you’re rebelling against the Almighty. It’s no surprise some crawl back, choosing the known pain over the terrifying unknown.

The tragic return of people like Jim Cocomise to the PCG highlights a painful truth: Armstrongism doesn’t just teach bad doctrine—it engineers dependency and fear so effectively that freedom feels more dangerous than bondage. By subtly (and sometimes not so subtly) diminishing Christ, elevating human “government,” and enforcing loyalty through family destruction and salvation threats, these groups maintain ironclad control.

Yet the New Covenant offers something far better: direct access to the Father through the Son, liberty from the law’s curse, and love that never shuns the repentant. True brotherly love lays down its life—it doesn’t cut people off for questioning a flawed human leader. Jesus is not a subordinate figure in some cosmic org chart; He is Lord, worthy of full honor, praise, and trust.

Kknow that leaving the fear behind is possible. Many have walked this road and discovered the joy of freedom in Christ—real relationships untainted by conditional “love,” and a faith rooted in grace rather than terror, or in no religion at all. The cost of staying may preserve earthly ties for a time, but it comes at the expense of truth and spiritual health. As painful as the exit can be, the alternative is a lifetime (and beyond) of manipulation by men who claim to speak for God while denying the very heart of the Gospel. Choose freedom. Be a follower of TheWay.

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

Investing in a church where friendships built over many years can be ripped away from you for questioning a church teaching is ridiculous. I'I I never make that mistake again.

dmoffett said...

Gerald Flurry calls those who wake up and leave the PCG “deserters” and says they should “be shot”.
Well what does the BIBLE say should be done to a false prophet, like Gerald Flurry?
"A false prophet shall be put to death..."
(Deuteronomy 18:20-22)

Anonymous said...

If I were resurrected, and as my eyes cleared up from the soul sleep, suddenly saw Gerald Flurry, Dave Pack, Rod Meredith, and Herbert W. Armstrong walking, talking and smiling with Jesus and the Apostles, I'd be asking for directions to the Lake of Fire so fast it would be absolutely jaw-dropping. It would mean that eternity wouldn't be worth a damn, best to have just enjoyed your life and gotten it over with.

On the other hand, if I woke up, looked around, and found myself at a Lynyrd Skynyrd concert with all the original members on the stage, I'd really be basking in the reward!

Anonymous said...

No New Testament text supports the kind of shunning practiced by Jehovah’s Witnesses or Armstrong‑derived groups. Their system of social and family cutting‑off is a man‑made invention, foreign to apostolic Christianity, and used as a mechanism of control rather than a form of biblical discipline. It is unbiblical and deeply harmful..

Anonymous said...

Apparently, they've found ways of maintaining the same intensity of perpetual angst within members today as they did during an earlier era! Since pain compliance requires continuously upping the dosage of pain to obtain the same results, I can only imagine what daily life in an ACOG must be like today!

Back in the early 1970's the WCG ministers were dealing out the same sort of rhetoric. We were in countdown mode while the clock ticked down to 1975, and we were about to experience the WCG equivalent of discovering that we'd been lied to about Santa Claus!. We'd been leveraged into all manner of life decisions geared on 1972-75, and suddenly the leverage and influences vaporized, opening up the floodgates, causing massive rethinking, additional study to make sense of it all, and the realization that we were now going to live a normal life-cycle, whatever that might mean for each of us personally.

Bad marriages one thought would only need to last through 1975 began to dissolve, Fellowship became partying, career opportunities opened up. This was prior to invention of the 3-5 year reset button which accompanied WCG backpedaling. Some did get themselves into trouble carelessly living out the excesses warned about by the ministry as being inevitable, but even most of them got it together and managed to live long lives.

It had always been extremely painful for children growing up in HWA's cult, and unfortunately the children of those children suffered traumas, such as broken homes. Even that is mostly on the church for creating a bogus end time event. I chose that word (bogus) carefully because after 50 years, what logically thinking person would consider 50 years a minor math error, hiccup, or delay? 50 years is longer life than many people have, and, plotted along that timeline, for most of the "warned" (victims of the false prophets) it never happened in their lifetimes!

We found equillibrium! We lived successful and mostly happy lives emancipated from the cult! 1975 was our Juneteenth! I wonder if that involves the differences between a non-addictive personality and an addictive one. What makes a recovering addict shoot up, or an alcoholic who hasn't had a drink in years have a drink? Reality is that no excuse is needed. And that's why I believe that some who are recovering from Armstrongism return to their old vomit or poison!. It's an addiction!

Anonymous said...

Usually in life what goes around comes around. And poetic justice (in real life) occurred when HWA's son GTA gets excommunicated, then he choses the wrong successor and then the empire falls. You can't get any greater justice than this! Whatever splinterdom does, it's miniature right now. Be grateful armstrongism didn't get as big as say like mormonism or something.

dmoffett said...

Gerald Flurry calls those who wake up and leave the PCG “deserters” and says they should “be shot”.
Well what does the BIBLE say should be done to a false prophet, like Gerald Flurry?
"A false prophet shall be put to death..."
(Deuteronomy 18:20-22)

Here is what “That Prophet” said, “And those people who leave the PCG and have been here, well, if you just want to look at it the way it really is, we’re in a war and they are deserters, and in the civil wars, war, deserters were shot!…”

It’s becoming more apparent and must be even to the brainwashed members still following “King” Gerry that the Philadelphia Church of God is circling the drain financially.
The membership numbers are going south as fast as the income numbers as the “royal” family and their enforcer demons struggle to maintain their lavish lifestyles.
We pray for those still held captive by the false prophet to wake up.
We are entertained watching the Flurry empire implode. Waiting for the next shoe to fall. My bet is they will have to JETtison the PJ .(private jet) soon

I hope more former members will write to let us know first hand what is happening inside the cult.

Anonymous said...

It is hard sometimes. However this is why we must have friendships among more than one group. Though, I cannot imagine going back to any of the cogs unless it is for family and still would recognize the false doctrine they preach..

Anonymous said...

The COGs are totally depressing. Your church isn't supposed to make you that way.

Anonymous said...

Gerald Flurry is a liar who deserted the truth a long time ago.

Anonymous said...

Well, if you pray for the captives, don't pray to the same god Gerald Flurry does. You don't want to pray to Satan.

Anonymous said...

Ask AI the following question:

"Does gerald flurry run a cult?"

They call it a split-off from the so-called Grace Communicable International. The apple does not fall far from the tree.

BillW said...

Indeed, can you imagine an eternity with the thought/dread of hearing Armstrong loudly proclaiming, never ending, 'Greetings friends around the Universe..''. as he invents yet another story to tell?

Anonymous said...

What a relief it crashed down as it deserved such fate given its lies and excesses and misuse of God;s name from the beginning. Armstrong had a long held pride and vanity at outperforming COG7 but that proved a temporary boast. It is a wonderful thing the man made con by the man made apostle didn't keep going.

Anonymous said...

Leaving UCG was very similar. I lost all my friends. Not a single one called to see how I was doing or even where I was. I didn't make a big production out of my exit, I just kind of faded away. Nobody cared enough to ever check on me.

Anonymous said...

That, to me has always been proof that the only love in which they believe is conditional. That is not the type of love which holds members. It is the type which makes us all expendable.

Can we actually picture Flurry (and others) as the good shepherd who foresakes his flock to go after the sheep which strayed? Certainly not when he's talking about shooting them! That is not a loving spiritual guide, it's a flaming a$$hole!

Anonymous said...

I’m finding that if you didn’t let people know you left, people just assume you are going to a different feast site and they just haven’t seen you in a while. When our friends have reached out, they’re surprised that we’ve left and curious about why. Not sure how long you’ve been out, but it’s quite possible no one really knows you left. I think when people leave, the leadership just pretends you are going to another cog…

dmoffett said...

Back in my world wide days. I was hospitalized for a few days. NO ONE from the "church" came to see me, or even called to check on me or my family. Such love and caring.

Anonymous said...

Wait a minute. Did you keep on checking in with your old UCG friends? Did you call them to see how they were doing? If you did, they would have known that you'd left UCG. But if you cut them off, it's kind of hypocritical for you to complain that they respected your decision to ghost them.

Byker Bob said...

Here's the deeper problem. Somehow, with all that we were taught about love for God being centered on keeping the law, the second of the two great commandments of the Lord, love for fellow man, was neglected rather than being allowed to express itself in a manner complimenting the first. The innate natural love that most parents have for their children was made conditional, based on children's strict obedience. Based on our own "being on program" we often judged others of the brethren who did not come up to our (we said God's or the church's) standards. Since we shunned people who left the fold, we took Pharisaic extra precautions and also distanced ourselves from people whose level of compliance indicated a Laodicean attitude. That is partially responsible for the apparent cliques. The "good guys" hung out together and basked in the sunlight of the local minister, elders, and deacons.

Further, we were taught that illness was the result of sin, either ours, or the cumulative sins of mankind. If people were being punished by becoming ill, it wasn't seen as just a Siloam thing. Must be a reason. We were taught not to mourn death. The day of someone's death was supposed to be happier than the day of their birth! We were taught that you could not have the same types of relationships or concern with outsiders that you ought to with the brethren. Non church members were going to be tortured and killed by the Germans and in the plagues anyway, so don't be concerned. Why, they don't even keep the sabbath! This modified and killed some of the innate elements of human nature, and human feelings, which are good. These are feelings that you either have, or you don't have. They are not things you can mechanically turn on or off as you deem appropriate. Once killed, they are gone! The result is anything but the Christian conversion which is a state of existence in which the fruits of the Spirit freely flows. Rather, it created bad, impersonal robots who were narcissists about their keeping of the law! The reason Armstrongism was so totally FUBAR is that in the really critical areas, the ways by which Jesus said His followers could be recognized, it produced the exact opposite of Christ-like behavior.

In their twisted and obtusely literal interpretation of scripture, "they" taught us to mute the parables of the prodigal son and the good Samaritan, the example Jesus set through his treatment of children, and even the loving collections Paul took up to aid the Jerusalem brethren in their survival. I have believed for many years now that the R/WCG was largely an extension of the true pesonality (not the preached one!) of Herbert W. Armstrong, and we can REALLY see that the splinter groups are extensions of the personalities of their leaders! The various permutations of Armstrongism are faulty products, in that usage in accordance with their manufacturers recommendations results in great harm to the user, and in some cases, death! It does not in any way perform as advertised!

BB

Anonymous said...

Keep in my mind that if you leave quietly and don't tell anyone, most, I believe, would simply assume that it was your choice and that they aren't going to argue with you about it. What do you expect them to say? Are you willing to give them your reasons? If not, can you expect sympathy? Before I left WCG, I told my closest friend that I was leaving and told him why, which was hard and awkward for me because I had mentored him. Keep in mind that there is a possibility for offence from either side. If you explain your reasons and find fault with the church, the other side might disagree with you. So you want them to call you?? I told the brother mentioned above that I was leaving because of doctrine while he said to me that he couldn't leave his original church. So, what can I expect? What CAN you expect? DO YOU WANT ME TO FLATTER YOU? DO YOU WANT ME TO CORRECT YOU? These disputes over the Word cut people sharply so no one wants to talk to anyone about why this? or why that? Yet you look for sympathy. Today, in the church, everyone, young or old, men or women, elder or deacon, get offended at everything, even Scripture, let alone leaving the fold. So, consider THEIR position, how precarious the conditions are today in the world and in the church.

Think of that members. You're not going to get perfect agreement with everyone, whether it's from family or friends. Yet you might say, that doesn't matter. Well, it does matter to others. Why should I call you if you left without telling anyone? And IF I do call you, are you going to give me a weak excuse for leaving or the runaround? Then what? It leads to a dead end and useless conversation and the breach is noted in heaven's books. If you can't agree on fundamental doctrines of the truth, there is no friendship, no unity, no rapport, no camaradarie. We're not here to make friends or get sympathy or shoot the breeze or talk about carnal things all the time. The life you live is for Christ who died for you. As Paul said, no one lives or dies unto himself (Rom 14:7). You can live your life in self-indulgence for a while but everything that goes around will come back around to Christ's throne eventually for accountability.

So, again, I say, splits leave everyone uncomfortable. If I should call you to encourage you, and I find you drifting, waffling and double-minded you will be wasting your time and mine. Get right with the Lord and we will then have plenty of time to do wonders and miracles together, and grow toward perfection. Two can't walk together unless they be agreed.

The Lord came to bring a sword and fire to the world and peace to the church. If you don't want to make peace with your brethren in the truth, it will be fire and sword for you.

I haven't even touched on any of the wickedness, hypocrisy, deceit, unrighteousness and corruption in the church that is driving us further apart and leaving us in the lurch.

Anonymous said...

Maybe they didn't know. Maybe they thought you had blood relatives visiting.
In those type of situations it's best to cut some slack towards others, for everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about.

Anonymous said...

Great post BB, your quote “we can REALLY see that the splinter groups are extensions of the personalities of their leaders!”
________________________________________________________

It reminded me of a recent magazine article of a splinter group on prophecy. They had an image of two red doors beside each other. One door read that of prophecy with protection, and the other red door represented no protection (if you didn’t accept prophecy). They re-enacted something like the old testament passover. They actually are treating their version of prophecy as a law. I can’t remember which group, but it’s still that fear gospel.

Anonymous said...

Grace Communion International abandoned Armstrong’s authoritarian system decades ago.

Gerald Flurry’s PCG is not a continuation of GCI - it’s a continuation of the old Armstrong model that GCI rejected. Sociologists classify PCG as a high‑control, high‑demand sect because of its exclusivism, shunning, prophetic absolutism, and heavy control of members. So the “apple” didn’t fall from GCI - it stayed with Flurry.

Ed said...

Sometimes it is just easier to live a lie. Leaving a regimented life style can be very scary for some. It is also very hard for some to leave behind friends they have had for years or decades. Even though they know they are in a cultic organization some still attend simply because it is so hard for them to leave. I also know several who ended up going back who I thought would never go back simply because they felt like a fish out of water or whatever reason. When I left in 1995 it was easy to burn my bridges. I have no desire to ever go back. I am not a social person maybe that is what made it easy for me to leave and never go back.

dmoffett said...

I understand that Ed. I was one of them. I saw things. Things I knew were not right. I even talked to people about what I saw I was told, "it's God's church, He will work it out". So I stayed. It took being hit over the head with a 2x4 to get me out I was put out by the demon cultpecker. Lies were told, about me and he put me out. After 35 years. OUT, not a chance to tell the truth, no counseling. I was told, OVER THE PHONE that I was no longer a member of the church and not to contact them again. WOW. I learned from several other people that they were ALSO put out over the phone. The demon didn't have the courage to tell people to their face. Now I see that is was a blessing. NOW I see the truth. I'm sad that I have 2 children still in the cult. I pray for their deliverance every day. https://called-chosen.blogspot.com/2025/12/tell-my-children-i-love-them.html

Anonymous said...

I see a red door & I (Mick) wants to paint it black.

Eponymous said...

Shows how inept & inhuman the "wise" a.i. can be about psyche things. But a.i. is excellent on mechanical things & repair & tech specs.

Anonymous said...

Ms. Bareiro likely knows a thing or 2 of the fella.

Anonymous said...

Your assuming it's a foregone conclusion that the official leader of a church has the heart of the members. Without winning people's hearts you cannot influence them.

Not all COG leaders have won, or even at times even cared they had the members hearts. Even Herbert the more rich, old and powerful he became the more remote and less influencial he became on the members.