James Malm's Pharisaical bastardization of the law continues unabated. For some reason, hair and unclean skin has literally gotten under Malm's skin. He has been blabbering on about this as he attempts to force his few acolytes into no longer using using animal skin products.
What this idiot fails to realize is that if he really believes his own malarkey then his acolytes will have to get rid of some of their leather bound bibles because some are covered in camel skin. What is an Armstrongite to do if he can't have his leather bound Moffit or original King James Bible is covered in camel skin?
Animal hair or wool air is not unclean; however the dead body (including the skin) of an unclean animal IS unclean; therefore furs which are still attached to the skin of a dead unclean animal are unclean.
Hair / wool sheared from the living unclean animal is clean; hence the camel hair cloak of John Baptist. It is perfectly acceptable to wear a camel hair coat, or something made of alpaca wool.
The hair of the dead animal, IS unclean; through its touching the dead body (skin) of the dead unclean animal. The dead body is unclean and anything touching it is unclean.
In the case of a clean animal that dies of itself; it is unclean, along with its attached skin and hair or wool.
nt)
nt)
nt)
