Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Crackpot Prophet: I Am A Veteran, So Do Not Call Me A Chicken Hawk!

 


This has been sitting in drafts for a while:

It's another sunny day in California, and our resident crackpot is on another of his self-righteous piss-fests. This time, it is about Veterans Day. It just frosts his delicate self-righteous little butt that some in COGland are not the kind of pacifists he thinks they should be. But first, the world's GREATEST prophet and true church leader to ever exist in human history wants you to know that he served in the military for 4 years before he was "converted." That's so funny!

November 11th is called Veteran’s Day in the USA. It is a day to remember those who served in the military. 
 
For what it’s worth, I happen to be a veteran myself, as I served four years in the US military. 
 
The historical position of the true Church of God is that Christians do not become part of the military, and if they are in for some reason, that they “do violence to no man” (Luke 3:14, KJV). 
 
In my own case, perhaps I should mention that I was NOT raised in a Church of God (COG) family, and entered the military before being baptized by a Worldwide Church of God (WCG) minister. 
 
Since the break-up of the old WCG decades ago some relatively few, affiliated with the COGs, publicly changed and have improperly taught that it is acceptable for true Christians to be part of the military and kill others. 

He then has to add the following, proving once again what a delicate little man he is and how he gets so easily upset. He easily gets his wholistic knickers in a really big knot when COG folk do not adhere to the pacifist stance that the elite chicken hawks in the church do.

Furthermore, some of these few have seemed to wish to poke fun at those of us who hold to the original Christian teachings on this matter.

He then proceeds to try and eviscerate Wes White, from the Ronald Dart Evangelistic Association for his stance on military service from a story that was published in the Journal in 2017. Bitter Bob sure can hold grudges a LONG time! Bitter Bob has been to ashamed to post the link to this story, so her eit is

By Wes White

BIG SANDY, Texas--I was jogging past the home of my friend Moore Wright Thnu yesterday when I heard loud screaming coming from his living room. I immediately ran to the door and rang the bell.

When Moore opened the door he was red-faced with rage. Our conversation went like this:

Wes: Moore, what in the world is the matter in there? Is everything all right?

Moore: Did you hear what he called me?

Wes: Who?

Moore: Him! Look at the TV.

I looked at the image being transmitted by the Fox News Network.

Wes: That looks like the former governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura.

Moore: That's right. The unpatriotic rat.

Wes: Unpatriotic? Wasn't Ventura a decorated war hero during the Vietnam War?

Moore: Well, yes, but that's not the point.

Wes: Didn't he get a lot of medals like the Silver Star, Navy Cross and Purple Heart while serving in the U.S. Navy Seals?

Moore: Forget that part. I'm turning this off. I can't stand it anymore.

Wes: What is it you can't stand?

Moore: He called me a chicken hawk.

Wes: A chicken hawk? Why would he call you a chicken hawk?

Moore: A chicken hawk is a guy who had a chance to join the military and serve in combat but didn't. And, now that the guy is too old to serve, he's in favor of war and sending young men off to fight.

Wes: And you think he's calling you a chicken hawk?

Moore: Of course he is. He says I was chicken when I could have helped out during the Vietnam War, but now I'm a hawk when it comes to the war in Iraq.

Wes: Oh, I get it now. This is interesting. I know you have been vocal in promoting the war in Iraq, but I don't know anything about your personal history in the late '60s and early '70s. Did you serve in the military during those years?

Moore began stammering.

Moore: I was in the church at that time. We weren't allowed to join the army.

Wes: Really? I thought it was okay for you to enlist as a conscientious objector--a CO--and serve as a medic or in some other noncombat capacity. Did you consider that option back then?

Moore: I don't know if I want to discuss this. If you must know, Mr. Nosy, I was in the employ of the church back then.

Wes: I didn't know that. So did you agree with the church's teaching on military service back then?

Moore: Not really. But I went along with it so I could keep my job in the church.

Wes: Are you saying that, when you filed papers with Selective Service saying you didn't believe in carnal warfare, you didn't mean it?

Moore: Now see here, Wes. I didn't want to get disfellowshipped. Besides, Ann Coulter wasn't writing and speaking back then. I didn't have access to her profound insights back in those days.

Wes: Well, please help me understand all this. Would you serve in the military today if you weren't past the maximum age of enlistment?

Moore: Absolutely!

Wes: Would you say that young men today should sign up to help the war effort?

Moore: That's correct!

Wes: But you have three sons of ideal military age. Have you encouraged them to enlist?

Moore started stammering again.

Moore: What? Of course not! Why would I encourage my boys to join? You know that many Sabbath-keeping Churches of God teach against military service.

Wes: But this is not your belief. And your sons don't even attend church or keep the Sabbath. Why wouldn't you want them to enlist?

Moore: I just don't. Wait a minute. You're trying to trick me. You're trying to get me to admit that I don't mind Americans dying in war but I just don't want it to be me or my sons doing the dying.

Wes: Is this true?

Moore: Quit calling me a hypocrite. You're as bad as that Jesse Ventura. You're accusing me of being a chicken hawk. You need to just leave my house right now.

As I walked down the front-porch steps, the door slammed behind me. Halfway down the block I could hear Moore's TV was back on and he was screaming at Jesse Ventura.

Chicken-hawking has been a way of life for many in COG leadership positions. They want the military to be strong and defend them, but they themselves are too lazy and self-righteous to ever take a stand. They wax glorious on the military intervening in world events ever since 9-11, and yet they are too weak to ever step up to the plate and defend their country. These are the types of people who would have turned their neighbors as people did in WWII, ratting out the Jews.

 

Monday, November 25, 2024

Herbert W Armstrong: World Leaders, Free Masonry and the Great Work

 

Herbert Armstrong Meets With World Leaders - Part 1


Herbert Armstrong Meets With World Leaders - Part 2 - Coincidences and Strange Bedfellows


Hebert Armstrong Meets With World Leaders - Part 3 - Freemasonry and The Great Work



Sunday, November 24, 2024

RCG News Flash! Dave Pack Confirms The Exact Date Christ Returns!!!!!!!

 


RCG News Flash – November 24, 2024

David C. Pack Declares
Jesus Christ Will Return
on December 16, 2024

The book of Daniel was unsealed again during “The Greatest Untold Story! (Part 545)” on November 16, 2024. The Pastor General of The Restored Church of God gave the brethren “wonderful news” for the 90th time since March 2022. He knows “inarguably” when Jesus Christ will return: December 16 at 9:37 AM ET. This is the moment of sunset in Jerusalem, Israel, beginning Kislev 16.

The countdown timer is running on exrcg.org.



It turns out that those with a background in the Worldwide Church of God who foolishly believed what Herbert W. Armstrong taught are a bunch of prophecy nincompoops for not accurately understanding the 1290 and 1335. Those days are consecutive, not concurrent, stupid.

Listening to his sermon after a two-month hiatus reinforced my suspicion that David C. Pack was still boring. Part 545 was painfully repetitive of everything else he has ever said. You can stop listening to him for months and jump back in without missing a beat. Nothing he said during Parts 534 through 544 is of any consequence because he perpetually reinvents the wheel, drumming up new excuses for his previous failures.

Rinse and repeat since 2012.

Even after David C. Pack fails again on December 16, the next teaching he rushes to call out will be just as “absolute, unassailable, inspiring, impossible to disbelieve and you can’t doubt it, impossible that it’s wrong, impossible to argue, and sure” with even more “powerful proofs.”

Marc Cebrian
exrcg.org

"Creating the Christ" and "Caesar's Messiah": Were the Gospels Written by the Flavians to Pacify Militant Messianic Judaism and Christians with a Pacified Messiah Jesus?



Undeniably the Gospels and the New Testament are very pro-Roman. 

How did that come to be and Why?



The tale of Bar-Abbas or "Son of the Father", the religious Jesus being let go, while "Jesus, King of the Jews" died, was not a story of two men but of two titles for the one Jesus. It was a loyalty test on the crowd who rightly answered the question, "Do I kill your religious leader or your King of the Jews"?  The crowd passed the test assuring Pilate "We have no King but Caesar!" 

Good answer....

Who was Jesus? Who wrote the Gospels? Why are they written in Greek? Why do they have a Pro-Roman perspective?

After the final destruction of the Temple in 70 AD and the end to the major Jewish war against Rome, the militant Judaism and Messiah is fading and the pacified Messiah as Jesus is rising as the new religion. In time, it will become the religion of the Empire. Militant Messianic Judaism is dead along with its twin, Zealot and Anti-Rome Christianity. 

The New and Pacified Messiah, Jesus, encourages the payment of taxes to Rome and turning the other cheek instead of violence. One would hardly know, in the Gospels, that Judea was under Roman rule. 

It is a Roman that Jesus credits with greater faith than any Jew and a Roman soldier that declares "Truly this was the Son of God".  Roman leaders are almost convinced to become Christians and Paul, as a Herodian, has an abundance of friends in the House of Caesar that Paul sends his greetings to.  

And of course, Paul teaches that it is God who puts Roman leaders in their positions of power, and they are there with God's approval and are to be obeyed.  

These are not the tales and admonitions of the militant and Zealot Messianic Jews or Christians.


Could Christianity have been created for an entirely different purpose than we have been led to believe?