God Does Play a Role in Your Understanding!
Herbert Armstrong taught that God had revealed a number of biblical "truths" to him that had been lost down through the ages since Christ and his apostles walked the earth. He also taught that God wasn't "calling" everyone now, and that only those few whom God had "called" would be able to understand and accept the "truths" that had been revealed to him. Unfortunately, as with many of the other things that Herbert taught, these notions about understanding biblical truth were a perversion of what Scripture actually has to say on the subject.
First, Scripture clearly states that God loves the people of this world and gave his beloved Son so that they could be saved from sin and death. (John 3:16-17) Scripture also reveals that Jesus Christ is the way to God the Father, and that he came to this earth to reveal the Father to us. (Matthew 11:27, Luke 10:22, John 10:25-38 and 14:6-11) Moreover, Scripture reveals that God has spoken to all of us through his Son, and that he has provided the clearest and most perfect revelation of the Father that has ever been shared with humankind. (Hebrews 1:1-3) Now, this is the context for the passage which Armstrong employed to teach that only the few folks whom God had "called" would be able to understand Herbie's "rediscovered truths."
In the sixth chapter of the Gospel of John, we read: "For no man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them to me, and at the last day I will raise them up." (John 6:44, NLT) Without the aforementioned context, Herbert claimed that this passage demonstrated that only the folks whom God had specifically called to Christ would understand his little package of "truth." However, even without that wider scriptural context, the very context of this particular passage refutes its usefulness as a prooftext for Herbert's understanding!
Christ had just told his disciples that he was the true "bread of life" - the real manna which came down from heaven. (John 6:22-42) Now, this was NOT well received by many of the folks who heard it, and they did NOT understand how Christ could insist that folks would have to consume him to be saved. Then we read: "But Jesus replied, 'Stop complaining about what I said. For no one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them to me, and at the last day I will raise them up. As it is written in the Scriptures, ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from him comes to me. (Not that anyone has ever seen the Father; only I, who was sent from God, have seen him.) I tell you the truth, anyone who believes has eternal life. Yes, I am the bread of life! Your ancestors ate manna in the wilderness, but they all died. Anyone who eats the bread from heaven, however, will never die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Anyone who eats this bread will live forever; and this bread, which I will offer so the world may live, is my flesh.' Then the people began arguing with each other about what he meant. 'How can this man give us his flesh to eat?' they asked. So Jesus said again, 'I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have eternal life within you. But anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise that person at the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him. I live because of the living Father who sent me; in the same way, anyone who feeds on me will live because of me. I am the true bread that came down from heaven. Anyone who eats this bread will not die as your ancestors did (even though they ate the manna) but will live forever." (John 6:43-58, NLT)
Clearly, God wants EVERYONE to be saved, and he has "called" or invited EVERYONE to come to Christ in order to have access to him! Indeed, most Christians understand that Jesus was explaining to his followers that salvation is found through his broken body and spilled blood, and that he was speaking about the Eucharist which his followers would be required to participate in for the rest of their physical lifetime on this planet. In reality, NOTHING in this passage suggests or supports a claim of exclusivity of understanding!
Moreover, I believe that part of Herbert's blind spot where this teaching is concerned can be attributed to his rejection of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. "Why do you say that?" Because Scripture reveals that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit ALL have important roles to play in our ability to understand God and his plans for us! We've already seen the role of the Father and the Son. Next, we will look at the role assigned to the Holy Spirit.
Again, in the Gospel of John, we are informed that Judas asked Christ about how he would reveal himself to them, and not to the world as a whole. Christ replied: "All who love me will do what I say. My Father will love them, and we will come and make our home with each of them. Anyone who doesn’t love me will not obey me. And remember, my words are not my own. What I am telling you is from the Father who sent me. I am telling you these things now while I am still with you. But when the Father sends the Advocate as my representative—that is, the Holy Spirit—he will teach you everything and will remind you of everything I have told you." (John 14:23-26, NLT) A little later, in the same account, Jesus went on to say: "But I will send you the Advocate—the Spirit of truth. He will come to you from the Father and will testify all about me. And you must also testify about me because you have been with me from the beginning of my ministry." (John 15:26-27, NLT)
Paul wrote to the saints at Corinth that ordinary humans do not understand what God has in store for them. He continued: "But it was to us that God revealed these things by his Spirit. For his Spirit searches out everything and shows us God’s deep secrets. No one can know a person’s thoughts except that person’s own spirit, and no one can know God’s thoughts except God’s own Spirit. And we have received God’s Spirit (not the world’s spirit), so we can know the wonderful things God has freely given us." (I Corinthians 2:10-12, NLT) Thus, according to Scripture, we can see that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit ALL THREE have significant roles to play in the revelation of God's will and plans to our minds!
Moreover, the passages which we have explored together make plain that the goal of the Godhead is spiritual understanding for ALL. However, even for Christians, this is NOT a "one and done" kind of phenomenon! It is NOT accomplished over the course of a few months in a public library or by reading a series of booklets. The PLAIN TRUTH is that even Christians are expected to grow in grace and knowledge. (Ephesians 4:11-13 and II Peter 3:18) Currently, we (Christians) see through a glass darkly. (I Corinthians 13:9-12) In short, we must NOT forget that the earth being filled with the knowledge of the Lord is a PROPHECY about the future (Habakkuk 2:14), it is NOT the present reality for ANYONE (including Christians). THIS is the truth about "the truth."
by Miller Jones/Lonnie C Hendrix

24 comments:
If thats's how you really feel then why don't you pack up your troubles in your old kit bag, and walk off down the road like Chaplin & Paulette Goddard in the end of Modern Times film? Yet you don't.
Armstrongites also tend not to understand how the inspiration of the Holy Spirit works. The Spirit does NOT coerce or demand. Those of us who have it also have the ability and inclination to resist its leadership at times. Notice What my Bing Copilot had to say about this:
"Biblical Context: In Acts 7:51, Stephen rebukes the religious leaders, saying, "You stiff-necked people! Your hearts and ears are still uncircumcised. You are just like your ancestors: You always resist the Holy Spirit!" This highlights a historical pattern of rejecting God's voice and guidance.
Consequences of Resistance: The Bible warns that resisting the Holy Spirit can lead to severe consequences, including spiritual blindness and a hardened heart. In Ephesians 4:30, believers are cautioned not to grieve the Holy Spirit, indicating that persistent sin can lead to a distancing from God's presence.
Forms of Resistance: Common forms of resisting the Holy Spirit include:
Unbelief: Rejecting the gospel message and the Spirit's conviction of sin (John 16:8-11).
Hardness of Heart: Choosing to ignore God's guidance, as seen in the Israelites' rebellion in Isaiah 63:10.
Quenching the Spirit: Suppressing the Spirit's prompting to act in faith or righteousness (1 Thessalonians 5:19).
How to Avoid Resisting the Holy Spirit
To cultivate a responsive heart towards the Holy Spirit, consider the following practices:
Stay Open to Conviction: Be willing to acknowledge and repent of sin when the Spirit convicts you.
Engage with Scripture: Regularly read and meditate on the Bible to understand God's will and the Spirit's guidance.
Practice Obedience: Act on the promptings of the Holy Spirit, even in small matters, to develop a habit of responsiveness.
In summary, resisting the Holy Spirit is a serious spiritual issue that can lead to significant consequences. Understanding its implications and actively seeking to align with the Spirit's guidance is crucial for a healthy spiritual life."
In the column of how to avoid this behavior, I would add humility to the mix. We must always entertain the possibility that we could be wrong about something - to be willing to admit that are understanding is imperfect (even with the guidance of the Holy Spirit). Once again, God is perfect - we are NOT!
OUR understanding
1John 2:3...2:4...3:22...3:24...5:2...5:3...2John 1:6
Today is 40 years since the deatj of Herbert Armstrong. PCG is anxiously awaiting a sign and wont get one, so I'm sure they'll eventually reposition some random thing from the news to suit their purposes.
Please elucidate more about the commandments to be followed.
The 10. The 3 - Ex 23:14-16: Nisan 14-20, Pentecost, Tishri 15-21......[ICor 5:8; Acts 20:16; Zech 14:16]
How do you get around that covenant being the son of the slave woman? Galatians 4
By the way, kudos on the artwork. I love that two lane road with the expansive sky. It is reminiscent of one of my favorite TV programs of all times, "Saving Grace", starring Academy Award winning actress Holly Hunter.
There was such a road in the opening credits, and a beautiful song by Everlast.
BB
205 asks, "how do you get around that covenant being the son of the slave woman"?
The son of the slave woman (Hagar) was the result of Abraham and Sarah not believing God but taking it upon themselves to work out God's plan through human effort (Genesis 16:1-5). Hence the son of Hagar was " born after the flesh" (human planning), where as Isaac was born by God's promise and action (Galatians 4:23).
This comparison is an allegory for the 2 covenants (Galatians 4:24) in that the old covenant was not of faith, but based on the Israelites attempt to keep their part of the agreement by human effort and performance (works), see Exodus 19:5-8, Romans 9:30-10:4. This human element of "works" renders both the Hagar event and the old covenant experiment as failures to work out the righteousness of God. Like Issac, we are now the children of promise, for the new covenant is based on our faith in God's promise to write His LAWS upon our hearts and mind by His spirit (Hebrews 8:8-10, 2 Corinthians 3:3).
2.05 How do you get around that covenant being the son of the slave woman? Galatians 4
Armstrongists get around it by ignoring Paul , and have a teaching they going way back to early days that they actually do keep the ten commandments. This is what they say makes them the one true church.
An example is Revelation chapter 22 verse 14 which reads:,
“Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city”.
Herbert Armstrong chose to re-write this verse and actually inserted the word the “ten commandments”.
Wherever they see the word commandments in NT letters and instructions they do the same, reverting to Exodus.
Last I checked the whole old covenant said “thus saith the Lord” so which laws are written in your heart then?
The place of the old covenant law is set out in New Testament letters and books.
There are excellent resources showing helpful details. In Galatians we read how :
Law Works curse of death
Condemnation by Works
Servants in Bondage (Defeat)
Old Covenant
(Symbolized by Hagar)
The new message is
Grace Faith blessing of life
Justification by Faith
Sons in Freedom (Victory)
New Covenant
(Symbolized by Sarah)l
One good resource is PRECEPT AUSTIN and I’ve found it helpful.
4.49 Last I checked the whole old covenant said “thus saith the Lord” so which laws are written in your heart then?
Last I checked - yes it is indeed the old covenant.
If you took the to read and ponder any number of good resources that are now available you will find the answer to your question. People need to look outside the HW Armstrong library though for reasons well known by now.
As am example start with:
https://thegospelcentral.org/2025/11/20/what-laws-are-written-on-our-hearts-in-the-new-covenant/
https://biblequestions.com/answers/what-laws-are-written-on-a-believers-heart/
Armstrong doubles down and reinforces the old covenant . His agenda was to restate the ten commandments because of the 4th which he played for all it was worth - to stake his claim to be the one true church by reason of allegedly keeping commandments.
It misses the mark a long way sadly. The author makes in Hebrews that these laws are “not like” the Old Covenant law (Hebrews 8:9). Therefore, it’s a mistake to assume God has written the Ten Commandments, or any of the 613 Old Testament regulations, on your heart.
It is highly presumptuous to think that one's own religion is the correct one. There are a zillion religions.
648 writes, "it is a mistake to assume God has written the 10 C or any of the 613 OT regulations on your heart"?
I disagree, and so does one of the best external sources on the subject, the Bible Hub.
The Bible Hub: Meaning of God's laws in our Hearts?
Heb 10:16---I will put MY LAWS in their hearts! (Which laws)?
BH: God is announcing a new kind of relationship, moving HIS LAW from stone tablets (which law is that?) to human hearts.
BH: From stone to spirit, obedience empowered by the indwelling spirit. (Obedience to what)?
BH: Internalized desire, we no longer just know the rules, we want to live them (Psalms 40:8, Rom.7:22).
BH: Spirit enabled obedience---I will cause you to walk in my STATUTES, Ezekiel 36:27. (Which statues? The OT of course! See also Ezekiel 11:19-20).
BH: A Closing Snapshot
God's law written on our hearts means He has moved in, rewritten OUR desires, and supplied His spirit so that obedience flows from the inside out. What was once EXTERNAL COMMAND has become internal compass, guiding us into joyful, spirit empowered holiness every day.
NO, Christians are not under the OC agreement God made with Israel. That agreement was based purely on human performance and effort (Exodus 19:5-8), which we are told in Scripture doesn't work (see Deut. 5:29, Romans 8:7). The covenant Christians are under is based on what GOD DOES. He is the active agent, the Author and Finisher of our faith. He writes HIS LAWS (the only laws Jeremiah knew of) upon our hearts (Jere.31, Hebrews 8,10).
Our response? We now serve the LAW of God after the inward man, in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter (Romans 7:25, 22, 6, First Corinthians 9:8-11, 5:7-8, Romans 8:4, 13:8-10).
Both Scripture and the Bible Hub reflect that this change in the covenants is that which concerns US, our nature. God's law is not the problem, for it is spiritual, holy, just, and good (Romans 7:12-14). But the law is only good if used lawfully and not misused for unlawful purposes (1 Tim 1:5-8). It was not given for justification, to give or earn salvation, or to establish one's own righteousness. Scriptures making this clear are Romans 9:30-10:4, Acts 15:1, and Galatians 5:4. Go read them!!!
You are right 955, there are a zillion religions and each think they are the correct one. Why would you not? If you are going to adopt a religion, it would be silly to adopt the wrong one wouldn't it?
Every man doeth what is right in his own heart.
What I wonder, is what about the passionate, emotional guy who cusses his way through life at unfolding circumstances, but always tries to do what he knows is right even when it's to his detriment? Seems to me that that's more like real life. If that's the case, you sure can't be self-righteous about it! Maybe that's what St. Paul was contemplating!
If you didn't think your religion was the "correct" one, then it probably wouldn't be your religion!
Apparently this is true, in accordance with the Western mode of logic, 8:17. If you live in a third world country, however, and are looking to a group with financial strength to help alleviate the effects of poverty, a doctrinal error here or there may seem excusable.
Herb was a liar. But his bad theology made more sense than the usual stuff that people come up with. I have to give him credit for that.
No poop. What's your point?
People do not examine the zillion other religions logically, if at all. They absorb what they see around them. Pretty arrogant to assume it happens to be the correct one.
Well, things are tough all over. Who'd a ever thunk that Jack Bauer would end getting tripped up by an Uber driver?
Post a Comment