A CGI Response to the
Bill Watson Article
By
Lonnie C. Hendrix
“I believe you misunderstand the reasons CGI is known for being ‘relatively moderate.’ The CGI differs from some (but not all) of the other groups in that it emphasizes servant leadership rather than some hierarchical form of polity, does not believe it is ‘above’ the other groups spiritually (it's members do not claim to be the ‘Philadelphia church’ or the ‘spearhead’ of the Work of God), does not have leaders claiming to be apostles or prophets, and doesn't use near-date-setting or claims about being in the ‘gun lap’ of the ‘final phase of God's Work’ to get people to send more money.” - See more here
So the CGI’s
claim to moderation rests on its emphasis of the servant leadership model? So
there is no one in the CGI telling everyone what to believe or controlling what
everyone says and does? Then how do you explain another quote from the same
response to my article?
“When someone from another organization is invited to speak in Tyler, if that person has views that differ in some way from the CGI's doctrinal positions or are considered controversial within CGI circles, he is asked not to bring them up. If he does bring them up, he will not be invited to come back to speak again. Further, the degree and nature of other CoG groups' differences with the CGI is an important factor in determining whether and how the CGI will participate in joint-activities with them. If you think CGI folks will "accept any belief that comes down the pike," just ask Lonnie about that. After he went public with his views on sexual issues, the CGI stopped using his material in its publications.” - See more here
Sure sounds
like more of the same to me: Unity
imposed from above – We MUST all speak the same thing! No room for different
views here. If you disagree, hit the road! And, if you don’t claim to be
superior to the other groups, why should anyone want to choose you over one of
them?
“But the CGI's theological positions are spelled out in no-uncertain terms in its Systematic Theology Project. Its official position on homosexual behavior is in agreement with the official position of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as well as a very large number of Evangelical churches and theologians: homosexual acts are acts of grave depravity and are intrinsically disordered.” - See more here
Funny, in
addition to being in agreement with the teachings of the Catholic, Orthodox and
most Evangelical churches, the CGI finds itself in complete agreement with
Herbert Armstrong’s God Speaks Out on the
New Morality. Since they claim to regard all of those other groups as
heretics, isn’t it funny that they would agree with them on this point? I guess
Satan hasn’t succeeded in deceiving those folks on this one?
By the way,
am I the only one who noticed that nothing was said in this response about the
doctrine of British Israelism? If a dubious claim to an attachment to servant
leadership is your only claim to independence from Armstrongism, then you may
wish to rethink your responses to the thesis of my article?