Sunday, June 28, 2026

Prediction Addiction: The Addictive Art of Moving Goalposts in Jesus’ Name




If there is one addiction Armstrongism has never managed to kick, despite decades of spectacular public failures and personal wreckage, it is prediction addiction. The symptoms are easy to spot: compulsive headline-scanning for “signs of the times,” breathless “prophecy updates” that imply the end is weeks or months away, quiet date-setting followed by loud goalpost-moving when nothing happens, and a steady stream of new literature and appeals to keep the faithful alarmed, loyal, and tithing. It is the same spiritual opioid that has hooked large segments of Evangelical fundamentalism, and it is the polluted well from which Crackpot Bob Thiel draws much of his daily “prophecy junk.”

Herbert W. Armstrong’s 1950s–70s output, especially the booklet 1975 in Prophecy!, painted lurid pictures of drought, disease, atomic war, a United States of Europe smashing the Anglo-Saxon nations, and Christ’s return with the church safely tucked away in a “place of safety” (often speculated to be Petra). When 1975 arrived and departed with no Great Tribulation and no miraculous flight, the cognitive dissonance was managed the usual way: reinterpretation, blame-shifting onto the members’ lack of faith or zeal, and a quiet burial of the most embarrassing literature. The human cost was real—shattered expectations, financial strain from years of “emergency” giving, and a lingering trauma that many ex-members still describe decades later. The habit, however, survived intact.

The post-1986 splinters simply updated the dosage. David C. Pack’s Restored Church of God in Wadsworth, Ohio, has compiled a remarkable record of more than 140 failed or abandoned prophetic timelines and date implications for Christ’s return or key Danielic events. Each failure is followed by fresh “greatest story ever” installments and renewed calls for support. Ronald Weinland had his own prophetic miscalculations and the added spectacle of federal tax troubles. And then there is Thiel, who turned his self-appointment into a near-daily content operation. On cogwriter.com and the Bible News Prophecy program, he analyzes every geopolitical twitch, European defense initiative, Middle East flare-up, or technological development as potential fulfillment. Much of the raw material and interpretive framework comes from the same sensationalist stream that fuels large parts of Evangelical prophecy media—blood-moon tetrads, Shemitah-year financial warnings, Gog-and-Magog speculations tied to current conflicts, and the general “everything is a sign” hermeneutic. Thiel simply runs it through an Armstrongist filter of British Israelism and his own “watchman” authority, producing a slightly different flavor of the same addictive product.

Evangelical fundamentalism suffers from its own advanced case of the disease. Harold Camping’s multiple rapture predictions (including the widely publicized 2011 fiasco) are only the most cartoonish examples. Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth generation was told the end would come within their lifetimes; when it didn’t, the genre simply mutated into new bestsellers and conferences. Modern variations include tying every U.S. election, pandemic, or Middle East war to the final countdown, complete with fundraising appeals and “urgent” teaching series. The pattern is identical to Armstrongism: when the prediction fails, the leaders rarely repent or shut down the machine. They declare that God was mercifully giving more time, that the signs were “near” rather than exact, or that the faithful simply need to study harder and give more. The prediction industrial complex—books, newsletters, YouTube channels, radio programs, and special offerings—remains remarkably resilient because fear is a reliable product.

This has been an abject, repeated failure in Armstrongism for a simple reason: it produces the opposite of genuine Christian maturity. Instead of the peace that passes understanding, it manufactures low-grade apocalyptic anxiety. Instead of unity in Christ, it creates endless division over whose prophetic timeline is correct. Instead of freedom, it reinforces authoritarian control—only the “true church” or the “true apostle/prophet” has the inside track, so stay loyal, keep quiet, and keep paying. The 1975 disappointment did not discredit the system; it merely taught the addicts how to manage disappointment more efficiently. Every subsequent splinter has repeated the cycle because the claim to exclusive truth requires an urgent, exclusive message about the end. Failed predictions are not treated as evidence against the system; they are treated as evidence that the leaders were spiritually ahead of schedule or that the members were not zealous enough.

New Covenant followers of Christ have no business participating in this nonsense. Jesus was blunt: “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Matthew 24:36). He commanded His disciples to watch and be ready, not to turn every newspaper into a prophetic codebook or to live in perpetual fear of missing the correct escape hatch. The New Covenant is not an improved version of old-covenant date-keeping or works-based anxiety; it is the announcement that the decisive event has already occurred in the life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus. Our security is not in correctly interpreting the latest European army proposal or blood-moon tetrad. Our security is in union with Christ, sealed by the Spirit, and lived out in ordinary faithfulness—loving God, loving neighbor, making disciples, and resting in the finished work.

This prediction addiction is, at root, a distraction from the gospel and a return to the very bondage Christ came to end. It keeps people scanning the horizon for the next crisis instead of living as citizens of the kingdom that is already breaking in. It fuels leaders who need an endless supply of urgency to justify their authority and extraction of resources. It turns Christianity into a form of spiritual hypochondria where every headline is a symptom and the only cure is more “truth” from the same source that has been wrong for decades. When the predictions inevitably fail, the damage is not merely intellectual; it is pastoral—broken trust, disillusioned faith, families strained by fear and financial pressure, and a cynicism that makes genuine good news harder to hear.

The addiction continues because it is profitable on multiple levels. Fear sells books, fills seats, and loosens wallets far more effectively than the scandalous message of unearned grace. Bwana Bob and his Evangelical counterparts keep the content pipeline full because there is still an audience hooked on the rush of “this time it’s different.” But for those who have tasted New Covenant freedom, the game is over. We no longer need to feed the beast with clicks, tithes, or emotional energy. The end of the age will arrive on God’s timetable, not on the schedule of any self-appointed watchman or dispensationalist author. When it comes, the people most shocked will likely be those who spent their lives addicted to predicting it rather than living ready in the present reality of Christ.

So the next time another “urgent prophecy update” lands in your inbox or feed—whether from Crackpot Bob's daily machine or from the latest Evangelical doomsayer—feel free to do what recovering addicts eventually learn to do: recognize the old trigger, chuckle at the familiar sales pitch, and walk away. Go plant something in the garden. Play with your grandchildren. Serve someone in quiet faithfulness. Worship in spirit and truth without the overlay of apocalyptic dread. 

The real story was never about our ability to decode the times. It was always about the One who holds the times in His hands and has already secured our future in Himself. Prediction addiction is just one more old-covenant habit that New Covenant people are finally free to quit.

Shepherds of Tiny Pens: The Armstrongist ‘Little Flock’ Delusion and Why It Should Be a Giant Red Flag




How Bob Thiel, Gerald Flurry, David C. Pack, and the rest of the Armstrongist remnant industry turn one verse of comfort into a divine right to look down on every other Christian alive - including those in other COG groups.

Luke 12:32 contains one of the kindest things Jesus ever said: “Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

He was calming a small, frightened group of disciples. “You’re vulnerable, but the Father delights to give you the Kingdom anyway. Stop worrying.”

That’s it. No prophecy about 21st-century church corporations. No license for spiritual superiority. Just reassurance from the Good Shepherd.

But in the hands of Armstrongist leaders, this verse becomes something very different: proof that their tiny group is the special, chosen remnant while almost everyone else who claims the name of Christ is deceived, compromised, or simply irrelevant to what God is really doing.

And the scam isn’t limited to one man.

Bob Thiel of the Continuing Church of God loves this verse. He repeatedly uses “Fear not, little flock” to comfort his followers while positioning CCOG as the current “Philadelphia remnant” — the most faithful continuation of the true Church. According to Thiel, his group alone traces the unbroken line back to Acts, restores “all things,” and represents the humble little flock that God is truly pleased to give the Kingdom.

Never mind that his group is still tiny on a global scale. Never mind the endless splintering. Never mind that he left the Living Church of God claiming they had lost the “mantle.” The message is clear: recognize CCOG as the faithful remnant or risk being outside the circle of God’s special favor.

The sheer arrogance is breathtaking. While pretending humility, Thiel and his followers look down on billions of sincere Christians — and even other Church of God groups — as less faithful, less Philadelphian, or simply not “the work” God is using today.

And, it's just not Bob, it's the entire Armstrongist splinter industry.

Gerald Flurry and the Philadelphia Church of God do it with even more authoritarian flair. Flurry claims his group is the true continuation of Herbert Armstrong’s Philadelphia era. PCG literature and The Key of David program hammer the idea that only they are faithfully keeping the truth while the rest of Christianity (and most other COGs) have gone astray.

Disfellowshipping and shunning are common tools to keep the “little flock” pure. The message to members: stay inside this tiny, tightly controlled group or you’re risking your eternal future.

David C. Pack and the Restored Church of God take the arrogance to cartoonish levels. Pack has declared himself the final Elijah, “Joshua the High Priest,” and various other end-time titles while setting (and failing) dozens of dates for Christ’s return to Wadsworth, Ohio. His group remains minuscule, yet he speaks as though God’s entire plan hinges on his tiny work. The “little flock” language fits perfectly into his narcissistic framework: only the truly faithful (i.e., those still following Pack after every failed prediction) are part of the real remnant. Everyone else — including former members and other COGs — is dismissed as Laodicean or worse.

United Church of God presents a more polished, “reasonable” face, but the underlying theology is the same. They teach that the true Church of God is the remnant that understands and keeps the Sabbath, Holy Days, and other distinctive doctrines. Other Christians are viewed as part of false or incomplete Christianity. While UCG is larger than some splinters, they still lean on the “faithful remnant in a deceived world” narrative to justify separation and a sense of special calling.

Living Church of God plays the same game. After Roderick Meredith’s death, the group continued the pattern of positioning itself as the faithful continuation of the Philadelphia work. Ironically, Bob Thiel left LCG precisely because he believed they had lost the mantle — proving that the “we are the true little flock” claim is infinitely splinterable. Each new group simply declares the previous one compromised while anointing itself as the real remnant.

The pattern is identical across the board: take a verse about Jesus comforting scared disciples, turn it into proof of organizational exclusivity, and use it to devalue every other believer on the planet.

This should be a giant warning flag.

When any religious leader or group repeatedly tells you:

“We are the little flock / faithful remnant”
“God is only really working through us”
“Everyone else is deceived or second-class”
“Leaving us puts your spiritual life in danger”

…that is not biblical humility. That is a control tactic dressed up in sheep’s clothing.

It creates fear. It discourages critical thinking. It justifies authoritarian leadership, financial demands, and the shunning of anyone who questions the narrative. And it directly contradicts the New Testament picture of the Church as the diverse, worldwide body of Christ — not one tiny, self-appointed “remnant” corporation.

Jesus never said the true followers would always be a small, obscure group led by whichever man currently claims the “mantle.” He said His sheep would hear His voice and follow Him.

As New Covenant Christians, you do not need any of this nonsense.

Under the New Covenant, your standing with God does not depend on which Armstrongist splinter you managed to find or whether you recognize Bob Thiel, Gerald Flurry, or David Pack as the current leader of the “true work.”

Salvation and a relationship with God come through faith in Jesus Christ alone. The Good Shepherd knows His sheep personally. He does not require you to read cogwriter.com, watch The Key of David, or stay loyal to whichever group currently claims to be the Philadelphia remnant.

The Father’s good pleasure to give the Kingdom belongs to everyone who belongs to the Son — a much larger and more diverse flock than any of these leaders want to admit.

So let them keep fighting over who gets to be the “little flock” this month. You can follow the actual Good Shepherd without their permission slip, without their fear, and without their arrogance.

The real flock is far bigger — and far more gracious — than their tiny pens.

No Smooth Talking From Me! I Speak Boldly Therefore I MUST Be A Prophet


I Speak Boldly Because Isaiah Said People Hate Hard Truths – Therefore, I Am the Prophet
Look at him. Hands raised. Eyes locked on the camera. Mouth moving with that special brand of urgent conviction. This is Bob Thiel in full “bold speaker” mode — the living embodiment of someone who has read Isaiah 30:8-14 and decided it was written specifically about him and his ministry.

Here’s how the logic works in Bob’s world, and it is a thing of twisted beauty.

God told Isaiah to write down that the people were rebellious because they said to the prophets, “Do not prophesy to us right things; speak to us smooth things, prophesy deceits.” 

Bob reads that ancient complaint and concludes: “The people who reject my warnings must be the same rebellious crowd. Therefore, I am the one speaking the ‘right things.’ Therefore, I am the true end-time leader God has chosen.”

It’s the theological equivalent of declaring yourself the winner of an argument by writing both sides of the script. Disagree with Bob’s latest prediction about world events or find his constant drumbeat of impending catastrophe a little manipulative? Congratulations — you’ve just proven Isaiah 30 was talking about you. You wanted smooth things. Bob, by contrast, bravely refuses to coddle you. He speaks the hard, non-smooth truth.

And just to make sure no one misses how bold he is, Bob reaches for the New Testament. 

Jesus said, “Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves… beware of men.” 

Paul asked for prayer “that utterance may be given to me, that I may open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the gospel.”

Bob takes these verses — verses about courage in the face of real persecution for preaching Christ — and uses them as divine endorsement for his particular style of end-time fear delivery. “See?” he says, in effect. “The Bible commands boldness. I am bold. Therefore everything I say about the collapse of society, the King of the North, or whatever the current crisis is this month, carries the weight of scripture.”

The manipulation is almost elegant in its simplicity.

He positions himself as the courageous truth-teller who refuses to “speak smooth things.” In reality, he has perfected a very specific kind of smooth talking: the smooth talk of perpetual alarm. It’s the verbal equivalent of a fire alarm that never stops ringing. It keeps people anxious, dependent, and tuned in for the next update on why everything is about to get much worse unless they stay closely aligned with his particular interpretation of events.

This is not the boldness of the apostles, who were bold about the gospel even when it cost them everything. This is the boldness of someone who has discovered that scaring people is an effective way to maintain influence — and then baptizes that tactic in selective Old Testament quotes so it feels prophetic rather than controlling.

Under the New Covenant, boldness looks different. It looks like speaking truth in love. It looks like pointing people to Christ as the answer rather than to an endless cycle of “the end is nearer than you think, and only my warnings can prepare you.” It looks like comfort and edification alongside any necessary warnings — not using warnings as the main product.

Bob’s version flips the script. He uses Isaiah’s ancient rebuke of people who rejected hard truth as a shield against anyone who questions whether his version of “hard truth” is actually helpful, accurate, or even particularly biblical in its application. He uses Jesus’ and Paul’s calls to courage not to embolden people with hope, but to justify a ministry style built on keeping followers in a state of low-grade dread.
And when the predictions shift, when dates come and go, when the “imminent” events keep getting rescheduled, the same Isaiah 30 shield comes out again: “See? The rebellious people always reject the true warnings.”

It’s a closed loop. Fear is the product. Scripture is the marketing. Boldness is the branding.

The raised hands in the photo aren’t the hands of a man fearlessly proclaiming good news in the face of opposition. They’re the hands of someone working very hard to keep the spotlight on his own dramatic delivery — while hoping no one notices that the actual content is mostly recycled alarm dressed up as prophecy.

In the end, Bob Thiel hasn’t escaped “smooth things.” He’s simply discovered a smoother way to sell fear: wrap it in selective Bible quotes, call it boldness, and dare anyone to disagree without proving they’re the rebellious ones Isaiah warned about.

That, apparently, is what passes for non-smooth leadership these days.

——————————————- 

The prophet Isaiah was inspired to write the following:

1 Cry aloud, spare not;
Lift up your voice like a trumpet;
Tell My people their transgression,
And the house of Jacob their sins. (Isaiah 58:1)

That is something we in the CCOG do.

The Bible teaches:

8 Now go, write it before them on a tablet, And note it on a scroll, That it may be for time to come, Forever and ever: 9 That this is a rebellious people, Lying children, Children who will not hear the law of the Lord; 10 Who say to the seers, “Do not see,” And to the prophets, “Do not prophesy to us right things; Speak to us smooth things, prophesy deceits. 11 Get out of the way, Turn aside from the path, Cause the Holy One of Israel To cease from before us.”

12 Therefore thus says the Holy One of Israel:
“Because you despise this word, And trust in oppression and perversity, And rely on them, 13 Therefore this iniquity shall be to you Like a breach ready to fall, A bulge in a high wall, Whose breaking comes suddenly, in an instant. 14 And He shall break it like the breaking of the potter’s vessel, Which is broken in pieces; He shall not spare. So there shall not be found among its fragments A shard to take fire from the hearth, Or to take water from the cistern.” (Isaiah 30:8-14)

Since we do not despite (sic) the word of God nor trust in oppression and perversity, we do not restrict our teachings to “smooth things.”

That said, Jesus said:

16 Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. 17 But beware of men, for they will deliver you up to councils and scourge you in their synagogues. (Matthew 10:16-17)

And the Apostle Paul added:

18 praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints — 19 and for me, that utterance may be given to me, that I may open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the gospel, 20 for which I am an ambassador in chains; that in it I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak. (Ephesians 6:18-20)

Yes, pray that we will have the wisdom and proper discretion to boldly speak as God wants us to.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

From Fear of Men to Fear of God: Leaving the Living Church of God for Christ Alone


On June 25, 2026, a former member of the Living Church of God (LCG) wrote a short but powerful letter to The Exit and Support Network explaining why he walked away. He did not leave in anger or rebellion. He left because he saw the same spirit of control he had once rejected in mainstream Christianity now operating under a different label.
“I do not fear the doctrines of men,” he began. For years, he had believed that joining an Armstrongist group meant escaping “Babylon.” Instead, he found “heavy-handed lordship, failed prophetic fear-mongering, and a corporate machine making merchandise of the brethren.” Most damning of all, he concluded that LCG teaches members that leaving its specific roster means losing salvation. The fear of God had been replaced by the fear of men.
This is not an isolated complaint. It is the predictable result of the system Herbert W. Armstrong built and that his spiritual descendants — including the Living Church of God — continue to operate.The Armstrongist Control SystemArmstrongism rests on a few interlocking doctrines that together create a high-control environment:
  1. One True Church / One True Work
    Only the organization descended from Armstrong is “God’s Church” in the end time. All other groups — Catholic, Protestant, or other Sabbath-keeping fellowships — are considered part of “Babylon” or at best incomplete. Loyalty to the corporate structure is therefore equated with loyalty to God.
  2. Hierarchical Government “From the Top Down”
    Ministers are not simply servants; they represent God’s government on earth. Questioning decisions, doctrines, or leadership is often framed as rebellion against God Himself. Disfellowshipment is presented as the biblical equivalent of handing someone over to Satan (1 Corinthians 5), with the clear implication that the person’s spiritual life is now in danger.
  3. Fear-Based Prophetic Speculation
    For decades, members have been told that world events prove the end is near and that only those inside the “right” organization will be protected in a “place of safety.” When predictions fail (and they routinely have), the response is usually not repentance for false prophecy but intensified calls for greater loyalty and more sacrificial giving. The letter-writer called this “failed prophetic fear-mongering.” It functions as a powerful retention tool: leave and you risk being unprotected during the coming Tribulation.
  4. Salvation Tied to the Organization
    While most Armstrongist groups are careful not to say in print “leave us and you lose salvation,” the practical teaching is unmistakable. Baptism into “God’s Church,” the laying on of hands by its ministry, regular attendance, tithing, and submission to its government are presented as the channel through which the Holy Spirit and truth flow. To walk away is therefore portrayed as cutting oneself off from God’s protection and truth.
  5. Financial and Social Pressure
    The system requires significant financial sacrifice (first tithe, second tithe, holy day offerings, building funds, etc.). Social life, friendships, and often family relationships revolve around the congregation. Leaving means losing community, identity, and, in many cases, the only support network the person has known. This is what the letter-writer meant by “a corporate machine making merchandise of the brethren.”
These tactics are not accidental. They are the logical outworking of a theology that places an earthly hierarchy between the believer and Christ.The New Covenant: Freedom, Not Another HierarchyThe New Testament presents a radically different picture.
Under the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8–10), God writes His law on hearts rather than stone tablets. Every believer has direct access to God through Jesus Christ, who is the one Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5). There is no longer a separate priestly class or physical temple that must be maintained by human organization. The veil has been torn.
Jesus Himself said:
No one will snatch them out of my hand 
(John 10:28). 
 
He did not add, 
unless they leave the right organization.

Paul was equally clear:
Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall (Romans 14:4).

The command to “come out of her, my people” (Revelation 18:4) is not a call to trade one human religious corporation for another. It is a call to come out of any system — religious or otherwise — that replaces the headship of Christ with the headship of men.
The writer of Hebrews urged believers to go to Jesus “outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore” (Hebrews 13:13). That “outside the camp” language is precisely what the former LCG member embraced when he wrote: 
I am stepping completely outside the camp to follow Christ alone.

This is not lawlessness. It is the liberty Christ purchased:
It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery (Galatians 5:1).
The New Covenant does not require a 501(c)(3) corporation, a top-down hierarchy, or the threat of losing salvation to keep people in line. It produces sons and daughters who serve God because they love Him, not because they fear what men will do to them if they leave.The Real ChoiceThe former LCG member’s letter is ultimately not an attack on Sabbath-keeping or holy days. It is a protest against spiritual abuse dressed in biblical language. He rejected trading one form of Babylon for another.
Many who have walked the same path have discovered something liberating: the same Jesus who promised that no one can snatch His sheep from His hand is perfectly capable of leading individuals without the constant supervision of a religious corporation. The New Covenant does not need a middleman organization to validate a person’s relationship with God.
Christ alone is enough.
Outside the camp is where many are finally finding Him.