Sunday, August 16, 2026

Fred Coulter’s “Full Accountability”: Trust Us, the Brethren Have No Need to Verify



For decades Fred Coulter has positioned the Christian Biblical Church of God as one of the rare Church of God groups that actually practices financial transparency. Every year the membership receives an income-and-expense report. Fred has repeatedly insisted that those who receive support from the brethren “are accountable to both God and to the brethren as to how these tithes and offerings are used.” He has quoted 1 Timothy 3 about overseers not being greedy for gain. He has mocked Worldwide for treating members as walking ATMs. He has told the brethren to “prove all things” and has even invoked Ronald Reagan’s “trust but verify.”

Then a member named John Van Atta actually tried to verify.

What followed was a six-month masterclass in stonewalling, feigned ignorance, belittling questions as “stupid,” and finally an unsolicited refund of the man’s contributions so the inconvenient conversation could be declared over.

Opening Salvo – March 2026

Van Atta’s March 20 letter was polite, detailed, and entirely reasonable. He noted that the published financials listed only one bank with two accounts, yet members knew other accounts existed. He asked why donations made payable to CBCG were being endorsed by other entities. He asked about the tangled corporate history of Christian Biblical Church of God versus Christian Scriptural Church of God (the only entity that actually holds the IRS determination letter for tax-deductible contributions). He asked why there is never a balance sheet. He asked who currently holds signatory authority on the accounts holding God’s money.

Fred’s March 25 response was the classic COG non-answer: everything funnels into the main account, the accountant (an enrolled agent, not a CPA) consolidates it, there are “no assets except three used copiers and no liabilities,” therefore no balance sheet is possible or necessary, and York Publishing is somehow both separate and not separate. Problem solved. Move along.

Van Atta did not move along. His April 13 reply laid out the corporate history in uncomfortable detail, noted the recent tax lien, questioned the revolving door of DBA registrations, and pointed out that brethren were never informed that donations to the name they actually write on their checks (CBCG) are not the ones the IRS recognizes. Fred’s next reply essentially said “I’ve already answered everything” and closed the matter.

The “Stupid” Questions and the Cashier’s Check

By late April Van Atta was still asking for specific, documented answers rather than high-level generalities. Fred’s May 1 letter is a classic of the genre:

“Your stupid request could only be answered if you sat in my lap while I was writing and issuing checks, which will never happen… We are not a gang of thieves and robbers, as you insinuate… Enclosed is cashier’s check #2242505553. This is a return of any contributions that you sent… The return of these donations demonstrates that this is the end of the matter.”

Nothing says “we welcome accountability” quite like refunding a member’s tithes and offerings so he will stop asking questions.

Matthew 18 – Because Scripture Only Applies When Convenient

In August, Van Atta (now joined by Nathan Mitchell as a second witness) formally invoked Matthew 18. The letter quoted Fred’s own past statements about accountability back to him and suggested a livestream explanation of the complete financial operations, live questions, and posting of documents by August 29.

Fred’s reply the next day was two sentences long:

“We do everything according to God and publish it in our reports, as we have done for 30 years, completely within all Scriptural requirements. I don’t understand the purpose of your email.”

Van Atta’s final note was blunt: you have refused to hear the complaint one-on-one or with a witness. The church will now hear it. If you continue to ignore it, Matthew 18:17 applies.
What the Numbers Actually Show

A side-by-side comparison of the published reports from 2021–2025 raises the very questions Fred refuses to answer:

Hundreds of thousands in “Writing & Editing” and “Current Book” expenses – who is being paid?
“Housing Allowance – For Elders” jumping to $71,000 in 2025 – which elders?
Auto maintenance, fuel, and insurance every year while the official position is that the church owns essentially no assets.
Office rent nearly doubling in one year.
“Africa Work” money appearing and disappearing after reported disagreements with Kenyan contacts.
Large “Assistance” line items with no breakdown of who received help.
Significant “Ministerial Expense,” “Travel Meeting Expense,” and “Payroll Expense” with zero transparency about recipients.

These are not “stupid” questions. They are the exact questions any competent steward would expect when handling other people’s money claimed to belong to God.
The Pattern Never Changes

Fred Coulter spent years correctly criticizing Worldwide for secrecy, uncontrolled spending, and treating the brethren as a cash machine. He built a reputation on being different. Yet when a member took his own rhetoric seriously and asked for verification, the response was evasion, insults, a refund check, and a claim not to understand why anyone would even ask.

The reports are published. That is true. What is not published is anything approaching the level of transparency Fred once demanded of others. Multiple legal entities, revolving DBAs, bank accounts that appear and disappear from the reports, no balance sheet, no independent CPA audit, and a leadership that treats detailed questions as personal attacks.

Van Atta followed the process Fred himself claims to follow. He was dismissed. That, more than any spreadsheet line item, is the real financial report of the Christian Biblical Church of God in 2026.

The brethren who continue to send their money under the name CBCG while the tax-deductible entity is actually CSCG, who never see a balance sheet, and who are told that asking for verification is “stupid,” might want to remember Fred’s own favorite phrase:

Trust, but verify.

Some of us are still waiting for the second half.


John Van Atta writes: 
I am a past member of WCG that left in the mid-nineties which was not soon enough. For the last ~30 years, my wife and I had nothing to do with any of the splinter groups. Back a few years ago I began to listen to Coulter a little. I knew better as we had some contact with him in the 90's. He hasn't changed a bit - he's even worse now. 

After a career investigating and prosecuting financial crimes for the federal government, I began to find some questionable financial facts about Fred's operation. Obviously, not having access to the investigative tools that I previously had before retirement, I cannot state whether Fred is involved in any illegal activities. However, from my experience I can say there is smoke and where there is smoke there may be a fire. 

With that stated, I have attempted to correspond with Fred regarding his financial activities. I have at least five different letter/emails to him with his responses. There is a nice stack of letters dating back to May, 2026 to the present time. Much to my surprise, the real name of his organization is the Christian Scriptural Church of God even though everyone believes it is Christian Biblical Church of God (CBCG) and they give money to CBCG (or think they do).  

Would you be interested in posting some or all of the letters and Fred's responses on your website? I believe strongly that anyone who is considering funding his business should read these before they do so. Then, at least, they could make an informed decision about throwing their money away.  

John Van Atta

Double-click to enlarge

 


Fred's response:



Fred's letter to members regarding church financials:





























10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow! This is one COG member whom I sincerely hope indulges in some splinter surfing. I'd like to see him impose his career skills on some other groups as well! He seems to be familiar with the entire Armstrong financial Kam Sutra as well as with the Bible.

Isn't Fred Coulter the minister who was not satisfied with any of the versions of the Bible upon which Christianity has been based, so actually went and wrote his own?

Anonymous said...

Some today still debate whether Fred was forced out of the WCG, or not, but once upon a time Fred was a hireling of the former Pasadena WCG, whether it was really part of God's Sheepfold/Church, and within God's pasture (John 10:9), or not. Time is telling.

Would a Fred Coulter, like some thief/robber, be included within the following words of Jesus?

John 10:1 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber."

:8 "All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them."

:12 "But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep."
:13 "The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep."

How much is Fred caring for sheep? John Van Atta has exposed a number of unpleasant observations and, but time is telling.

How about considering the Apostle Paul's following words?

2 Cor 11:13 "For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.”
:14 “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”
:15 “Therefore [it is] no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness;…”

Has Fred been transformed as a minister of righteousness? Time is telling.

Has Fred been doing the best he could with what he has to accomplish what "seemed right in his own eyes," or what was "right in God's eyes?"

Of course, even if Jesus and Paul's words were applicable to Fred Coulter, we know he would not be alone.

What about all of the other hirelings who fled from the former WCG to go off and do their own thing (one of the ways that seems so right), having $mammon$ flow into their coffers, taking care of their employment and their retirement for SELF, etc. ... and all of them wanting to be accepted as God's one true Church with sheep being guided/led by God's Spirit within God's pasture filled with well-fed and cared for sheep?

Which of their groups, organizations, associations, etc. is within that pasture of John 10:9?

“I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.”

It appears that the former WCG hirelings have well taken care of themSELVES, but the state of "their sheep?"

Time will tell…

John

Anonymous said...

It seems clear that there are problems on both sides. Notice this complaint by Van Atta against Coulter:

Back in 2007, the elders were somewhat shaken when you informed them of David's planned role in the finances of the church. Apparently, you have now placed Jonathan in that role despite you adamantly stating he lacked those abilities 19 years ago.

Now, maybe Jonathan is qualified, or maybe he isn't. But even if Van Atta is reporting Coulter's 19-year-old statement accurately and in proper context, it is just bogus for him to assume that the guy could not in 19 years gain the training and experience to become qualified. From the above, and quite a few of his other accusations throughout the correspondence, it is clear that Van Atta isn't genuinely seeking to understand. Rather, he has already come to his conclusions and is merely looking for the "kill shot" that would defeat Coulter.

Let's not forget that in many of these Church of God disputations, BOTH sides can be ill-motivated and grievously wrong, and that the stated topic of disagreement may be a proxy for other objections that aren't being overtly stated. Sheldon Monson's failings don't absolve Gerald Weston, and vice versa. Same here with Coulter and Van Atta.

Anonymous said...

I love it when COG leaders get all frothy at the mouth and pissy, Like Fred did here. The only good thing he did was to return the tithe money. Now if only every other COG did that! Imagine if Pack, Flurry and even the mini-runt Thiel did that!

Anonymous said...

Agreed. I'll take this one step further. CBCG is a small operation, there isn't a lot of support staff, and a lot of responsibilities fall onto a small number of people -- much like any small business. Those people are not Harvard MBAs, they probably wouldn't know what FP&A or GAAP meant if someone wearing it on a necklace were to walk up and smack them in the face.

It is ludicrous to think a small outfit with a budget of barely $1M is going to do everything perfectly down to the smallest detail. Van Atta, if he is telling the truth about his background, surely knows this. I am no fan of Fred Coulter, or anyone promoting Armstrongism, but I'm not seeing any evidence of malfeasance here. What I do see is a willingness to be transparent with the organization's income statement, and a willingness to spend a lot of time attempting to answer Van Atta's questions without being sucked into the knife fight that Van Atta clearly was seeking to provoke.

Could there be some hanky-panky going on in CBCG? Of course it is possible. But I don't see any evidence of it in the income statement Coulter published. I simply see the same kind of one-dimensional income statement I might see in any small business without much of an administrative staff.

Signed,
an MBA FP&A GAAP finance geek

Anonymous said...

Admittedly Coulter didn't handle this as diplomatically as he should have. But as you pointed out, the fact he returned Van Atta's tithe money is pretty remarkable amongst COG leaders.

Anonymous said...

Where's the commandment to tithe to "the order of Melchizedek?

Anonymous said...

There isn't. But, if there were, can you imagine the impact of sending the tithes back to someone who believed that there is? There would certainly be an ""Oh shit!!!" moment. The guy would be thinking, "What do I do with this now? I'm commanded by God to pay them and the person I thought I was commanded to pay them to has sent them back to me! How do I obey God now???"

Anonymous said...

I can appreciate the fact that he left WCG before HWA died. I listened to some of his earlier messages and understand why he did it. Other than that I don't really agree with much of what he does and never listen to him.

Avoura said...

Yes, Coulter wrote his own Bible. As soon as someone does that, that marks them out as a false teacher. I have watched experts (sort of) on YouTube who have pointed out the erroneous ways of relying on a translation made by one man. Those made by groups of people are more likely to be accurate and reliable.
Never trust a Bible made by one man. Never trust a man who only preaches from his own special translation.
In crypto they say, "Verify, don't trust" -- so why does Coulter take the opposite view?
Always verify. Prove all things, as the Bible says. Do not trust in man.