Showing posts with label Grumbling Ministers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grumbling Ministers. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Congregant Bill of Rights




Congregant Bill of Rights

The following are basic human, religious and spiritual rights any person has as a member of any and all
religious organizations or church congregations.

You have the right to expect the church to keep your personal contributions private and should be able to expect that any who deal with such things for accounting purposes will do the same.

You have the right
to expect that your membership in any church or congregation is not contingent on how much you give or do not give. You should also expect that jobs, positions, opportunities or offices are not given based on the amount anyone gives to the church.

You have the right
to say I can only give this even if it is not a tithe of your income gross or net.

You have the right
to not to be spiritually judged or have your loyalty or sincerity questioned based on what you are able or unable to give financially to the church.

You have the right
to ask a Pastor if he checks tithes and offereings for any of the above reasons before giving to a church.

You have the right
to say "I'm tired and won't be there, " to any and all activities, plays, fundraisers, studies, seminars, prayer groups, rehearsals, practices and sermons.

You have the right
to say "I don't care about that."

You have the right
to question the advice, counsel or sermon of any minister, elder, deacon or any other person in authority.

You have the right
to question authority and to still expect to be allowed to attend your church.

You have the right
to question a minister who declares himself one or both of the Two Witnesses of Revelation, a Prophet, the Supreme Watcher of Mankind for God, The Only True Apostle in this Age and any other title or position he can come up with to impress you as to why you need to support him.

You have the right
to suggest a pastor get spiritual or psychological help should the need arise.

You have the right
to tell him that the congregation is noticing a trend here.

You have the right
to ask why the church believes what it does when the Bible might say otherwise, or why the Bible says something that the church practices that seems scary, weird, inappropriate for this time, out of date or controlling.

You have the right
to notice that ministers often quote scriptures out of context or fail to enforce or address the rest of the story that does not agree with the point they are trying to make.

You have the right
to ask all the "how can that be," "how could that happen," "why does it say this here and that there," questions you can come up and expect an intelligent answer. If you are told that you are using human reasoning, ask the pastor what kind of reasoning he uses. If he says "God's," find another church.

You have the right
to not want elders, deacons or your friends accompanying the minister on visits to your home to talk to you.

You have the right
to discuss or not discuss your life with the minister as you see fit.

You have the right
to expect absolute confidentiality and for your story not to show up in the sermon next week, even though "I won't say the name."

You have a right
to be called ahead of time when the pastor wants to ask about stopping over.

You have the right
, when he calls to say, "I'm tired," "I'm busy," "No, but I appreciate the call," without repercussions.

You have the right
to keep a dirty home, grass not mowed perfectly, an older car, red in color and kids that don't say "yes sir, nice to see you sir," in just the right way.

You have the right
to watch and read what you wish even if the pastor just got done bashing that particular program, movie or book from the pulpit in his sermon on "Demons in Your Home--Six Ways to Assure Your Eternal Death."

You have the right
to ask the pastor not to call on you at work, even if you own the business.

You have the right
to say, "I can't afford to take you to lunch." "I can't afford to give you free wood or brick." "I can't afford to fix your house up free," "I can't fix all your teeth," to your pastor should he expect professional courtesies, even if he offers to do your funeral free.

You have a right
to expect free use of your church for weddings and funerals.

You have the right
to expect these usages are not dependent on you, your parents or children living a sinless life six months prior to the date of the event.

You have the right
   to not to answer questions your pastor may ask you or your children about your sexual practices. If he insists, then insist that you all share together.

You have the right
to not let the pastor inform you as to who you can and cannot date or marry.

You have the right
to enjoy your sexuality free of church or pastoral approval. Something that is wrong for the pastor is not necessarily wrong for you in how you express yourself to your partner. There is no Bible prohibition against....well you know. And if there were, you'd have the right to disagree with that too.

You have the right
to not share which or if you are taking medications of any sort with the pastor.

You have the right
to take such medication and not be judged as having a lack of faith or trust in God to heal you.

You have the right
to seek professional help without informing your Pastor of the nature of the help and you have the right to not be helped solely by the pastor under threat of repercussions.

You have the right
to insist the pastor get professional help should the need arise and the man is causing more harm than good. You have the right to remind him that God does not directly speak to him nor express His will only through the mind of the pastor and that makes you uncomfortable if he thinks that is so.

You have the right
to be wrong about a many things.

You have the right
to believe you are correct about many things without repercussions.

You have the right
not to care about everything that others think you must care about to be a good Christian.

You have the right
to tell the pastor he is wrong, mistaken or exaggerating.

You have the right
to dress as you wish, wear the jewelry you wish and make up you wish or not wish without being labeled a whore or a goody goody.

You have the right
to feel that dressing as if it was still 1957 and only watching Disney Movies or How the West Was Won as proof of your pureness is baloney.

You have the right
to not be told that the best times for entertainment, movies and TV was when the Pastor was a boy.

You have the right
to like the food he does not like and to not like the foods he does.

You have the right
to like the schools he doesn't and not like the ones he does.

You have the right
  to not to bear your soul to the ministers wife.

You have the right
to like or not like, agree or not agree with the ministers wife.

You have the right
to not view the world through the pastor's eyes morally or politically.

You have the right
to hate the war while he believes the war in Iraq is God's will and thinks it's all in the Bible.

You have the right
to expect him to speak clearly where he thinks the Bible speaks for us today and to walk slowly and drink cool water where it doesn't.

You have the right
to tell the pastor that that is his opinion and not necessarily the only true opinion on earth.

You have the right
for you, your children, your partner and your friends to be themselves.

These are but a few of the rights any member of any Church, congregation or religious organization has.

 

In short, you have the right to not be required to check your brains, your insights, your perspectives and your free will at the door to be welcome and a member of any church.


Friday, December 3, 2010

Melvin Rhodes Strikes Back At Grumbling Ministers


Dear fellow ministers,

Some of you have no doubt received a document titled “Petition for Resolution to GCE” addressed to the General Conference of Elders (GCE), and apparently authored by and being circulated by four non-salaried elders. You personally may not have received this petition if it was considered by the sponsors that you would be unlikely to support its aim—which is to put the majority of the current Council of Elders on trial.

The resolution associated with the petition seeks to create a “GCE Review Committee” to, in effect, conduct an open investigation to identify and determine if any actions by the Council of Elders or the Administration against anyone in the United Church of God since January 1, 2010, have “in fact” been done “contrary to the published requirements and procedures” of UCGIA or “contrary to Scriptural guidelines.”
No specific improper actions or “aggrieved parties” are identified.

The resolution contains no way of giving those who may be accused access to any sort of due process and there is no mechanism for protecting the privacy of anyone involved. In fact, on completion of the “investigation” (very little time is allowed) the Committee’s “findings” or “recommendations” are to be made public—no doubt spread far and wide via the Internet.

The proposed makeup of the Review Committee is obviously designed to be composed primarily of men who are known to be critical of the present Council and Administration. One could easily envision the proposed Review Committee’s investigation becoming more like an inquisition.

The Council stated, by resolution on November 30, that this petition is legally flawed and has decided, with the backing of the opinion of UCG’s general legal counsel, that the associated resolution is clearly contrary to, conflicts with, and is inconsistent with our governing documents and existing grievance procedures. Such procedures are already in place under the authority of the governing documents. Legal counsel advises that it would require an amendment to the Constitution and/or Bylaws before the proposed committee could be created and become operational.

The proposed resolution is fatally flawed and members of the GCE should not support it.

Consequently, in a separate communication, the Council has advised the sponsors that their petition should be withdrawn since it would be improper to allow the associated resolution to be balloted upon by the GCE.

It remains the case that Council members can be removed through the balloting process at the annual general meeting of the GCE if elders are dissatisfied with their service.     

Sincerely,
Melvin Rhodes—Chairman, Council of Elders