Bob Thiel is back today running off at the mouth about the Swedish train drivers who are "protesting" against a ban on train drivers wearing shorts during the hot summers. The dress code was changed to allow only pants and skirts. In order to keep cool in their enclosed cabs that they say are really hot, they opted to wear skirts partially out of functionality and also to thumb their nose at a stupid rule.
Apparently Bob Thiel cant understand that. He is throwing scripture bombs at these train drivers calling them transvestites and that God hates them for doing it.
The false prophet writes:
Ignoring the biblical teachings against transvestism, various train operators in Sweden are wearing skirts to protest a dress-code they do not care for:
June 9, 2013Not only is this form of protest distressing, the report that the responses from customers has been positive shows how far the people in Sweden have moved away from biblical standards of dress.
STOCKHOLM – Commuters on a train line in northern Stockholm were met with an unusual sight this week: male train drivers and conductors wearing skirts to work.
Train driver Martin Akersten says he and more than a dozen others at the Roslagsbanan line have started wearing skirts in the summer as a protest against the train company’s uniform policy, which doesn’t allow shorts.
The 30-year-old Akersten said Sunday the response from customers has been only positive. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/06/09/swedish-male-train-drivers-wear-skirts-as-protest/#ixzz2Vj7HhTZ0
The Swedes get their protest and are encouraging them on. Thiel thinks this is appalling and that they are encouraging these disgusting sinners.
Thiel continues with his first scripture bomb:
“Cross-dressing” is condemned as an abomination in the Bible:
5 A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God. (Deuteronomy 22:5)
He then throws the second scripture bomb:
The Bible clearly condemns cross-dressing. The Bible also condemns males acting effeminate:
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Corinthians 6:9-10, KJV)
Yeah right Bob, tell these MEN that they are effeminate!
The above Scripture is used by Theil as a weapon against these men. However, that scripture pretty much sums up the state of affairs in many of the COG's today. Perhaps he needs to start looking inwardly at these grievous sins he and his group posses.
Thiel then lets it be know HIS opinion on the subject:
Cross-dressing and wearing skirts is not something the males in Sweden should be doing. They should not violate the biblical ‘dress-code’ because they do not like an employer’s dress-code.Then Thiel throws his third Scripture bomb and says that they are deserving of death! The ultra-right Armstrongites are strong advocates of killing sinners. Some of them even look with glee at being able to do this in their millennium.
These train drivers deserve death and those that encourage them deserve to die too!
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them. (Romans 1:18-32)
This just in: Scottish men did this when they heard about Bob"s dumbass comments:
14 comments:
It must be a slow news day in Thielville! Someone much older and wiser than I once remarked that it is human nature to attack most ferociously the things which we are fighting ourselves.
BB
I always wondered how WCG women wore pants when that verse got slung around...
They are train-vestites
DD
Skirts , kilts etc are ok on men as LONG AS they do not wear high heels or fishnet stockings with them.
Joe Moeller
Cody, WY
PS- LOL on Dennis D. comment above!
Quick! Post some pictures of Jesus wearing a tunic.
Bob's head will explode.
A tunic?
Bob probably thinks Jesus wore Brooks Brothers suits for everyday and Armani for Shabbos and Feast Days.
The disciples wore fishnet stockings.
In Matthew 4:21 it says that James and John were busy mending them when Jesus solicited them. That's when James piped up and said, "No, YOU'RE the Jesus, HE'S the john. Buh-dum-PISHHHH.
It is not only Scottish males who will not make it to the Kingdom of Thiel. As far as I know, the Burmese male traditional clothing with their 135 ethnic groups longyi skirts. Here in the Philippines, Moslem males in the south also wear malong skirts which we also use conveniently when we come out of shower room. Woe to more half of male population of the world for having skirts as a male traditional attire. They will not enter the Kingdom of Thiel.
IMHO The Train-vestites need to be throttled for misconducting.
I am sure they would claim they were being railroaded but above 95 degrees and in these perilous times they need to skirt all railroad crossdressings.
groan.
Jesus wore a tuna-ic and fishnet stockings (with fish in them and bread up his sleeves), in case he came upon some hungry people.
No wonder he smelled like fish, but how else would he have attracted Satan to debate with him!?
So if the wife listens to Thiel's broadcast and ends up converting all of her pants into skirts, what do you call them? Ex-Slax?
BB
I read Mr Thiel's cogwriter blog but this one floored me. This is not something they are wearing every day - it is to make a point! (Now if they decide not to give up the skirts, that's a different thing :) )
Liked the comment about the train-vestites :)
Thank god for thiel. He makes armstrongism look like a Saturday Night Live skit!
Maybe it is!
Deut 22:5 is the most misunderstood verse of all. Did Jesus understand its meaning? In Luke 7 Jesus said the centurion had the greatest faith; how can "greatest faith" and "abomination" exist in the same person? Those soldiers wore skirts and they certainly weren't Scottish kilts. Modern Greek men wear frillier skirts than the Scots, except for
the vivid colors---so do Egyptian Dervishes. Deut 22:5 cannot be accorded greater emphasis than its context---mixed fabric garments are also banned. I feel safe interpreting it as forbidding opposite sex impersonation. But pants are not "male"---they are "equestrian." It took 1,000s of years to get men out of skirts/robes into pants, because the horse was essential for transportation and land warfare. It took four (4) years to get women into pants---World War 2 factory work ALONE is what women in pants today may be attributed to. Deut 22:5 is a sanitary law---exchanging garments could transmit illness because garments were seldom washed as today. A man's robe might be soiled by diarrhea, and if worn by a woman who got a scratch, illness could be transmitted---likewise with female menstruation. The garments were essentially the same---the prohibition was only against exchanging them! God gave men facial hair to be differentiated from women! Social forces (the horse) put men into pants, while much later, wartime factory work finally put women into pants. I caution readers to not hold any drivel notion that a Scottish kilt is the "only skirt men can wear." Your verse to back it up is---where? You are accustomed to that exact style, does not equate to other types are "wrong." Rome ran men in pants out of Rome in AD393 by order of Theodosius I as political subversives because 15 years earlier, Rome suffered a major defeat at the hands of trousered cavalrymen at Adrianople. Greek men today wear a skirt very different from a kilt and God never ordained "men can wear a skirt only if it's a kilt." If Deut 22:5 was banning pants on women, this is so important! There would be a prophecy in Revelation that in the last times, most women would be damned due to wearing "that which pertaineth unto a man." No such verse. And men are being denied choices for no reason. Christian parents in America---who were bitterly opposed to any pants on women---raised male children in dresses and skirts till age 6, until World War I when the smallest males also became trouserized. Believing "God is a pair of pants" or "God is a suit and tie" is idolatry.
Post a Comment