Restored Church of God
Godfrey Denhere Exit Letter
October 10, 2023
Dear Mr. Louis Grey,
I trust this email finds you well.
First of all, l want to take this opportunity to thank you for your guidance since you took over the reins after the demise of Mr. Lomas. You resuscitated the church from spiritual lethargy, and l was personally inspired by your approach to guiding God's flock. It was a breath of fresh air and inspiring to witness the growth and fruit that came with the blessings as everything was restored in place.
However, over the years since the advent of the prophecy series, things have taken a dramatic shift, and the simplicity of Christ is no more. The teachings from David Pack are nothing short of blasphemous. The man has taken all the titles that belong to Christ, and here is a short list of the ones that come to mind:
Joshua the High Priest
Elijah the Prophet
The Branch
Messenger of the Covenant
Many times this year, l have beseeched God to show me the simplicity in Christ, and God has been faithful to show me even more than l asked. Time and space do not allow me to delve into the many details, but l have shared with you one aspect relating to Christ's ministry, which l proved in various ways that it began in 30 AD. Many other details about prophecy are now clear, but it is pointless to share them with you because you will not believe them.
I will mention one prophecy that God opened my mind to clearly understand. It is unmistakable that David Pack is fulfilling the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4. I have shared this information with you in the past, but you probably didn't read it. I talked to almost all brethren at the Feast, and no one understands the “present truth” of the prophecy series. They are all confused except for a few blue-eyed followers who can't even explain the “present truth” from the Bible. They must first read their notes, which they don't even understand. I have much to say, but it is pointless.
The time has come for me to flee from the jaws of the man of sin. I will not sit by and be spiritually tortured by lies and deception as the ministry justifies and protects this great fraud. Deuteronomy 18:20-22 is instructive to “....not be afraid of him.” Check the meaning of “afraid” in the Strong’s Concordance.
Luke 21:8 is even more specific. In the temple, Christ gave a warning meant for the last era: "Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying I am [Christ]; and the time draws near, go ye not therefore after them.”
Who has come in this present age in the Churches of God saying, “I am Elijah the Prophet / The Branch / Messenger of Covenant” (and more)? Who has predicted many times that the time draws near? Mr. Grey, I leave you to fill in the gaps…
God has a sense of irony that is unparalleled. Below are the words of David C. Pack from his book, “The Government of God—Understanding Offices and Duties.”
The Government of God—Understanding Offices and Duties
David C. Pack
Chapter 13 – False Apostles
pp. 241-242
False leaders are always known by the FALSE TEACHINGS they bring, which they invariably seem to bring “privately,” until their victims have been conditioned to believe something they had not recognized as new. By then it is often too late to recover. The key for the brethren is to stay alert and to act before it is too late.
But the warning applies to the ministry as well. In Acts 20, Paul was speaking to the assembled Ephesian elders for the final time before his life was to end in Rome. He told them to “Take heed…unto yourselves, and to all the flock…For I know this, that after my departing [his death] shall grievous wolves enter in among you [there it is, again], not sparing the flock” (vs. 28-29). Many believe this only occurred in the first century, or in the WCG. They could not be more wrong. In fact, the widespread blindness of the Laodicean age ensures the problem will be more subtle, with more kinds of less obvious heresies brought in “privately,” and probably more than at any other time in Church history.
Paul’s warning continued to the elders: “Also of your own selves shall men arise…” (vs. 30). The ministry is warned here—and this must have been a very sobering statement when heard!—that some right there in the group would turn doctrinally corrupt. Therefore, the danger for the ministers was the same as the brethren. It would be their associates within the ministry standing up “speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them” (same verse).
Of course, it would generally be the TOP LEADERS who were in a position to “draw away after them(selves)” more than could any pastor or elder within a larger organization. The ministry is to be watching among themselves for such “top” wolves.
Paul’s warning in Acts 20 to the assembled Ephesian elders carries this very warning, when speaking of “grievous wolves.” The Greek word translated “grievous” is most correctly translated “heavy” or “weighty” (but also “grave” or “burdensome”). We might then best describe what God had in mind through Paul as HEAVYWEIGHT WOLVES. Pause to consider until the meaning intended sinks in!’’
The bolded emphasis is mine. Pages 243-244 continue another warning from Paul to the Corinthians.
Paul warned the Corinthians: “For such are FALSE APOSTLES, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore, it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works” (II Cor. 11:13-15).
Let me repeat: False apostles—deceitful workers—in the world are no threat to God’s people. It is in the Church where these men present danger to the flock. Therefore, Paul’s reference to Satan and “his ministers” means ministers he controls “among” God’s flock.
Do not miss this!
Grasp this most stunning reality. The archenemy, Satan the devil, has ministers whom he directly controls within the Church of God. Some claim high office. This is the message of II Corinthians 11:13-15. We are specifically told—warned!—that these men among God’s people are hard to discern—they appear as angels of light—and can even look like APOSTLES!’’
Finally, Mr. Grey, here is a warning from Mr. Hebert W. Armstrong.
“Did Christ Reorganize the Church?”
Herbert W. Armstrong
The Good News
February 1939
It is US Satan is seeking to deceive. He will deceive even the very elect IF POSSIBLE. And it is possible if we are careless, and assume things without careful study of all sides, and ample PROOF from the Scripture. We must be continually ON OUR GUARD never trusting any man, or even a board or group of men, but God alone, through His holy word!
The scriptures speak of FALSE apostles, and of “them which SAY they are apostles, and are not, but hast found them LIARS.” (II Cor. 11:13; Rev. 2:2). Let us beware being deceived. It is the COMMANDMENT KEEPERS whom the Devil seeks, in these latter days, to deceive!
For some time, it has become a burden for me to sacrifice to support a work led by the man of sin, and I withdraw from being a member of RCG. I will not sit and wait for the miracles to start happening. God will lead me to the next step of my calling.
Thank you once again for everything while I was a member.
I do not wish to be contacted to discuss anything.
Kind regards,
Godfrey Denhere
(Courtesy of Marc Cebrian)
18 comments:
3 more steps toward the door
The tone of this is preemptively spiritual instead of angry or
bitter. Hopefully, leaving is a trend.
Anyone know the stats on this? Are most of those who leave remaining in Armstrongism, or making a clean beak?
If remaining, what splinter is the most popular destination, or are they going independent and unaligned?
..... "Christ's ministry, which l proved in various ways that it began in 30 AD"....
*****
Very interesting. And Jesus died in 33 AD. Not 31 AD when Nisan 14 was Monday.
For those who are wondering what the "pulse" is like to the abused brethren of the RCG is, this quote from Denhee's letter says it all...
"I talked to almost all brethren at the Feast, and no one understands the “present truth” of the prophecy series. They are all confused except for a few blue-eyed followers who can't even explain the “present truth” from the Bible. They must first read their notes, which they don't even understand. I have much to say, but it is pointless. "
"The time has come for me to flee from the jaws of the man of sin. I will not sit by and be spiritually tortured by lies and deception as the ministry justifies and protects this great fraud."
Ouch!
my guess is most who leave a whack-pot COG will then seek sanctuary in UCG since it is the most "popular" & has many of our former WCG friends settling there.
Originally I thought CCOG was even more Philadelphian than UCG, but the leader doesn't seem entirely realistic, and shows signs of favoritism & allows discrepancies. Many used to think stodgy, bland, stuffed shirt LCG was the refuge if one leaves Dave P. or Gerry F.
whichever leader is best at watching where the "abomination that causes desolation" will take place, would be a noteworthy person. Above King David's Tomb is a place called The Cenacle, & someone said the Vatican is also eyeing that real estate
watch Zillow for Wadsworth OH properties being listed for sale more & more
We need to pray this person heeds the warning from Jesus to continue to find out where his beliefs really come from. The fruit from the bad tree isn’t partly good. It’s all bad.
Waking up is hard to do.
Anonymous 11:05 said
"whichever leader is best at watching where the 'abomination that causes desolation' will take place, would be a noteworthy person."
Maybe that's true from the point of view of prophetic events. But I'd rather focus entirely elsewhere, and look for leaders who are doing likewise. Historically, I haven't seen the COG's prophetic fascination and speculation bear fruits of righteousness, but rather of pride and argumentation. Personally I'm not confident I have much insight at all into prophetic fulfilment.
I see a personal need to focus on repentance, faith in Jesus, and core moral purity. As Jesus said, "justice, mercy and faith" (Matthew 23:23). As is said in Micah, "do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God" (Micah 6:8).
Anonymous @ Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:54:00 AM PDT
"Very interesting. And Jesus died in 33 AD. Not 31 AD when Nisan 14 was Monday."
No. If Christ began His ministry in the Fall of 30 AD (when he was 30 years old - Luke 3:23) and was crucified exactly 3.5 years later, then the day of crucifixion would have been on Wednesday 21 April 34 AD (cut off in the midst of the week - Daniel 9:26-27). Passover was on a Wednesday in 34 AD and this meets the criteria of the 70-week prophecy of Daniel 9.
Anonymous @ Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:54:00 AM PDT
..... "Christ's ministry, which l proved in various ways that it began in 30 AD"....
*****
"Very interesting. And Jesus died in 33 AD. Not 31 AD when Nisan 14 was Monday."
No. If Christ began His ministry in the Fall of 30 AD (Luke 3:23...when he was 30 years old) then crucifixion occurred 3.5 years later in the Spring of 34 AD on Passover which was on Wednesday, 21 April 34 AD. Christ was cut off in the midst of the week to fulfill the 70-week prophecy of Daniel 9:26-27.
Mark Wolfe, Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 11:00:00 AM PDT, said:
"..."The time has come for me to flee from the jaws of the man of sin. I will not sit by and be spiritually tortured by lies and deception as the ministry justifies and protects this great fraud."
Ouch!..."
Mark you also wrote: "...Many times this year, l have beseeched God to show me the simplicity in Christ, and God has been faithful to show me even more than l asked......I will mention one prophecy that God opened my mind to clearly understand. It is unmistakable that David Pack is fulfilling the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4. I have shared this information with you in the past, but you probably didn't read it..."
******
David Pack just isn't as "great" as you may think because, among other things, he is not the man of sin. You may believe it is unmistakable, but what if it is?
Now, David, driven by another spirit to preach another Jesus and another gospel, may be among those that the Apostle Paul had in mind in 2 Corinthians:
2 Cor 11:13 "For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
:15 Therefore [it is] no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works."
Jesus knew how to address the evil satanic principalities that were driving the religious leaders of His day: kind of like in code: it was like woe to scribes, Pharisees, hypocrites, blind guides, fools, serpents, and even generation of vipers, just before accusing them of a couple of murders (John 8:44) they did:
Matthew 23:35 "That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation."
David Pack may just be another modern-day Pharisee who is driven by an "angel of light."
Is David anything like the Most High? Oh, David may be full of pride, vanity and self-righteousness, and there may be some "falling away" regarding him, but how would that be associated with the temple of God: God's Church? Where is the temple of God, today? Could it be that David isn't even part of the temple of God, perhaps just part of those who may have been spewed out from someplace: the former WCG?
2 Thess 3:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
How old is David? I ask because it appears that the apostle Paul told about a man of sin existing in his day, but it had not been revealed, exposed, to most (all?) in his day.
Paul told us the man of sin opposedth and exalteth himSELF above all that is called God. It sounds like someone with Satan's attitude (Isaiah 14:14), someone or something wanting to be Number 2. No, make that Number 1.
:5 "Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?"
Was Paul just being careful how he wrote things?
Could Dave Pack really be one among many brethren of God's Church/temple awaiting a coming of Jesus Christ, or is he just another individual shaken in mind, and troubled by another spirit, and think that he is some great one?
Time will tell...
John
Or, the 70th week of Daniel is a long time, a sevened period with number of units of time divisible by 7 or have 7 parts, from Christ's resurrection to His second coming in which week He confirms, mediates a new covenant - Dan 9:27; Heb 8:6, and did cause, in the half (another definition of "middle" in 9:27 or within the first half of the "week") the sacrifice and oblation to cease when the abomination of desolation stood in the holy place in 70 AD.
Fred Coulter's website, cbcg.org, appears to have the correct calendar from about 3700 BC to over 2000 AD. In 34 AD Nisan 14 (Nisan 14 the day Jesus died) was on Monday.
Anonymous @ Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 11:30:00 AM PDT
"Fred Coulter's website, cbcg.org, appears to have the correct calendar from about 3700 BC to over 2000 AD. In 34 AD Nisan 14 (Nisan 14 the day Jesus died) was on Monday."
Did you check the calendar? 14th of Nisan 34 AD was on Wednesday 21 April 34 AD even on the calendar of the website that you mentioned...
I don't think the Most High would issue this date & then that date (& then some) of when His Son was on the way back here again, like Davy-wavy blatantly does📆⏰⌛đź“…
Yes, calendar checked: Nisan 14 was Monday March 22, 34 AD.
Nisan 14 was on Thursday April 22, AD34 by the ‘observational' calendar; not by the modern ‘mathematical' Hebrew calendar, which did not exit at that time:
"The Mishnaic tractate Rosh Hashanah describes the way in which the calendar was determined IN THE DAYS BEFORE THERE WAS THE SET, CALCULATED CALENDAR WHICH WE HAVE TODAY" ([Rabbi] Arnold A. Lasker and Daniel J. Lasker, Behold, A Moon Is Born! rabbinicalassembly.org).
Da 9:26b ... And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.
Da 9:26c and the end thereof shall be with a flood,
Da 9:26d and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
The army of the Antichrist will attack Jerusalem, beginning the NT tribulation, just as the army of Antiochus attacked Jerusalem and began the OT tribulation.
Da 9:26b ... And the people of the prince
Da 9:27a And HE shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:
"The determination of the antecedent of HE in verse 27 is the key to the interpretation of the passage. If the normal rule be followed that the antecedent is the nearest possibility, it would go back to the prince that shall come of verse 26. This is the normal premillennial interpretation which postulates that the reference is to a future prince who may be identified with the Antichrist who will appear at the end of the interadvent age just before the second coming of Christ... [and so the prince] is not to be identified with Titus but rather with a future enemy of the people of Israel who will bring them into the great tribulation anticipated as still future in the book of Revelation..." (John F. Walvoord, Daniel - The Key to Prophetic Revelation, pp.233-34).
"Since the Antichrist has been presented in Daniel's two earlier occasions of revelation (7:8, 23; 8:23-25) and will be again in the last (11:36-45), one might expect that he would be brought into this third location as well... the descriptions in the remainder of this verse fit all that is revealed elsewhere regarding the Antichrist" (Leon Wood, A Commentary on Daniel, p.258).
Da 9:27b and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease
"The thought is that three and one-half years after the Antichrist makes covenant with Israel, he will cause sacrifice and offering to cease. This means that Temple sacrifices will have to be started sometime before this; and since at this time the Antichrist will insist they cease, it may be part of the treaty of three and one-half years earlier will have concerned permission to have them. At least a forcing of them to cease is out of keeping with an idea of a covenant still continuing, which means that the covenant, intended to last seven years, will be broken when only half its time has elapsed. That sacrifices will be made to cease by the person involved provides further evidence for his identification with the Antichrist. The observation was made in chapter eight that Antiochus Epiphanes was typical of the Antichrist, and it was there stated that he also took away Jewish sacrifices in his time. This thought suggests a further rationale for the mention of the Jerusalem destruction in verse twenty-six, for, in the same pattern, Jewish sacrifices and offerings were made to cease at that time" (Leon J. Wood, A Commentary on Daniel, p.261).
Da 9:27c and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, EVEN UNTIL THE CONSUMMATION, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
"As for the "desolator" himself, it is simplest to take him to be the world dictator of the last days, who will resort to violence to carry through his ruthless policy of despotism... The dictator will hold sway till the wrath of God is poured out in fury on the God-defying world of the Beast (little horn or ruler)" (Gleason L. Archer Jr., Daniel, EBC, Vol.7, p.118).
Post a Comment